Printer-Friendly Page
Printer Friendly Version
Where Liberals Go To Feel Good
By Chris Hedges
24 January, 2011
TruthDig.com
Barack Obama is another stock character in the cyclical political theater
embraced by the liberal class. Act I is the burst of enthusiasm for a Democratic
candidate who, through clever branding and public relations, appears finally to
stand up for the interests of citizens rather than corporations. Act II is the
flurry of euphoria and excitement. Act III begins with befuddled confusion and
gnawing disappointment, humiliating appeals to the elected official to correct
“mistakes,” and pleading with the officeholder to return to his or her true
self. Act IV is the thunder and lightning scene. Liberals strut across the stage
in faux moral outrage, delivering empty threats of vengeance. And then there is
Act V. This act is the most pathetic. It is as much farce as tragedy.
Liberals-frightened back into submission by the lunatic fringe of the Republican
Party or the call to be practical-begin the drama all over again.
We are now in Act IV, the one where the liberal class postures like the cowardly
policemen in “The Pirates of Penzance.” Liberals promise battle. They talk of
glory and honor. They vow not to abandon their core liberal values. They rouse
themselves, like the terrified policemen who have no intention of fighting the
pirates, with the bugle call of “Tarantara!” This scene is the most painful to
watch. It is a window into how hollow, vacuous and powerless liberals and
liberal institutions including labor, the liberal church, the press, the arts,
universities and the Democratic Party have become. They fight for nothing. They
stand for nothing. And at a moment when we desperately need citizens and
institutions willing to stand up against corporate forces for the core liberal
values, values that make a democracy possible, we get the ridiculous chatter and
noise of the liberal class.
The moral outrage of the liberal class, a specialty of MSNBC, groups such as
Progressives for Obama and MoveOn.org, is built around the absurd language of
personal narrative-as if Barack Obama ever wanted to or could defy the interests
of Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase or General Electric. The liberal class refuses
to directly confront the dead hand of corporate power that is rapidly
transforming America into a brutal feudal state. To name this power, to admit
that it has a death grip on our political process, our systems of information,
our artistic and religious expression, our education, and has successfully
emasculated popular movements, including labor, is to admit that the only
weapons we have left are acts of civil disobedience. And civil disobedience is
difficult, uncomfortable and lonely. It requires us to step outside the formal
systems of power and trust in acts that are marginal, often unrecognized and
have no hope of immediate success.
The liberal class’ solution to the bleak political landscape is the conference.
This, along with letters and cries of outrage circulated on the Internet, is its
preferred form of expression. Conferences, whether organized by Left Forum,
Rabbi Michael Lerner’s Tikkun or figures such as Ted Glick-who is touting a plan
to lure progressives, including members of the Democratic Party, into something
he calls a “third force”-are where liberals go to feel good about themselves
again. These conferences are not fundamentally about change. They are designed
to elevate self-appointed liberal apologists who seek to become advisers and
courtiers within the Democratic Party. The conferences produce resolutions no
one reads. They build networks no one uses. But with each conference liberals
get to do what they do best-applaud their own moral probity. They make
passionate appeals to work within systems, such as electoral politics, that have
been gamed by the corporate state. And the result is to spur well-meaning people
toward useless and ultimately self-defeating activity.
“What we need is an alliance which consciously incorporates elected Democrats as
well as elected Greens and independents, as well as groups, or individual
leaders and members of groups, like Progressive Democrats of America and the
Green Party,” Glick proposes. “More than that, this alliance eventually needs to
support and work to elect candidates running both as Democrats and progressive
independents, and maybe even an occasional Republican.”
The Tikkun Conference held in Washington last June was another pathetic display
of liberal apologists begging Obama to be Obama. The organizers called on those
participating to “Support Obama to BE the Obama We Voted For-Not the
Inside-the-Beltway Pragmatist/Realist whose compromises have led to a decrease
in his popularity and opened the door for a revival of the
just-recently-discredited Right wing.”
Good luck.
The organizers of the Left Forum conference scheduled for this March at Pace
University in New York City also communicate in the amorphous, high-blown moral
rhetoric that is unmoored from the actual and real. The upcoming Left Forum
conference, which has the vacuous title “Towards a Politics of Solidarity,”
promises to “focus on the age-old theme of solidarity: the moral act of
imagination underpinning working-class victories everywhere. It will undertake
to examine the new forms of far-reaching solidarity that are both necessary and
possible in an increasingly global world.” The organizers posit that “the
potential for transformative struggles in the 21st century depends on new chains
of solidarity-between workers in the rich world and workers in the global south,
indigenous peasants and more affluent consumers, students and pensioners,
villagers in the Niger Delta and environmental campaigners in the Gulf of
Mexico, marchers and rioters in Greece and Spain, and unionists in the United
States and China.” The conference “will contribute to the intellectual
underpinnings of new and tighter forms of world-wide solidarity upon which all
successful emancipatory struggles of the future will depend.”
The conference agenda, which sounds like a parody of a course catalogue
description, includes the requisite academic jargon of “moral act of
imagination” and “chains of solidarity.” This language gives to the enterprise a
lofty but undefined purpose. And this is a specialty of the liberal class-to
grandly say nothing. The last thing the liberal class intends to do is fight
back. Left Forum brings in a few titans, including Noam Chomsky, who is always
worth hearing, but it contributes as well to the lethargy and turpitude that
have made the liberal class impotent.
The only gatherings worth attending from now on are acts that organize civil
disobedience, which is why I will be at Lafayette Park in Washington, D.C., at
noon March 19 to protest the eighth anniversary of the invasion and occupation
of Iraq. Veterans groups on March 19 will also carry out street protests in San
Francisco, Los Angeles and Chicago. You can link to the protests here. Save your
bus fare and your energy for events like this one.
Either we begin to militantly stand against the coal, oil and natural gas
industry or we do not. Either we defy pre-emptive war and occupation or we do
not. Either we demand that the criminal class on Wall Street be held accountable
for the theft of billions of dollars from small shareholders whose savings for
retirement or college were wiped out or we do not. Either we defend basic civil
liberties, including habeas corpus and the prosecution of torturers or we do
not. Either we turn on liberal institutions, including the Democratic Party,
which collaborate with these corporations or we do not. Either we accept that
the age of political compromise is dead, that the corporate systems of power are
instruments of death that can be fought only by physical acts of resistance or
we do not. If the liberal class remains gullible and weak, if it continues to
speak to itself and others in meaningless platitudes, it will remain as
responsible for our enslavement as those it pompously denounces.
Chris Hedges writes a regular column for Truthdig.com. Hedges graduated from
Harvard Divinity School and was for nearly two decades a foreign correspondent
for The New York Times. He is the author of many books, including: War Is A
Force That Gives Us Meaning, What Every Person Should Know About War, and
American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America. His most recent
book is Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle.
© 2011 TruthDig.com
Share3
Comments are not moderated. Please be responsible and civil in your postings and
stay within the topic discussed in the article too. If you find inappropriate
comments, just Flag (Report) them and they will move into moderation que.
Barack Obama is another stock character in the cyclical political theater embraced by the liberal class. Act I is the burst of enthusiasm for a Democratic candidate who, through clever branding and public relations, appears finally to stand up for the interests of citizens rather than corporations. Act II is the flurry of euphoria and excitement. Act III begins with befuddled confusion and gnawing disappointment, humiliating appeals to the elected official to correct “mistakes,” and pleading with the officeholder to return to his or her true self. Act IV is the thunder and lightning scene. Liberals strut across the stage in faux moral outrage, delivering empty threats of vengeance. And then there is Act V. This act is the most pathetic. It is as much farce as tragedy. Liberals-frightened back into submission by the lunatic fringe of the Republican Party or the call to be practical-begin the drama all over again. We are now in Act IV, the one where the liberal class postures like the cowardly policemen in “The Pirates of Penzance.” Liberals promise battle. They talk of glory and honor. They vow not to abandon their core liberal values. They rouse themselves, like the terrified policemen who have no intention of fighting the pirates, with the bugle call of “Tarantara!” This scene is the most painful to watch. It is a window into how hollow, vacuous and powerless liberals and liberal institutions including labor, the liberal church, the press, the arts, universities and the Democratic Party have become. They fight for nothing. They stand for nothing. And at a moment when we desperately need citizens and institutions willing to stand up against corporate forces for the core liberal values, values that make a democracy possible, we get the ridiculous chatter and noise of the liberal class. The moral outrage of the liberal class, a specialty of MSNBC, groups such as Progressives for Obama and MoveOn.org, is built around the absurd language of personal narrative-as if Barack Obama ever wanted to or could defy the interests of Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase or General Electric. The liberal class refuses to directly confront the dead hand of corporate power that is rapidly transforming America into a brutal feudal state. To name this power, to admit that it has a death grip on our political process, our systems of information, our artistic and religious expression, our education, and has successfully emasculated popular movements, including labor, is to admit that the only weapons we have left are acts of civil disobedience. And civil disobedience is difficult, uncomfortable and lonely. It requires us to step outside the formal systems of power and trust in acts that are marginal, often unrecognized and have no hope of immediate success.The liberal class’ solution to the bleak political landscape is the conference. This, along with letters and cries of outrage circulated on the Internet, is its preferred form of expression. Conferences, whether organized by Left Forum, Rabbi Michael Lerner’s Tikkun or figures such as Ted Glick-who is touting a plan to lure progressives, including members of the Democratic Party, into something he calls a “third force”-are where liberals go to feel good about themselves again. These conferences are not fundamentally about change. They are designed to elevate self-appointed liberal apologists who seek to become advisers and courtiers within the Democratic Party. The conferences produce resolutions no one reads. They build networks no one uses. But with each conference liberals get to do what they do best-applaud their own moral probity. They make passionate appeals to work within systems, such as electoral politics, that have been gamed by the corporate state. And the result is to spur well-meaning people toward useless and ultimately self-defeating activity.”What we need is an alliance which consciously incorporates elected Democrats as well as elected Greens and independents, as well as groups, or individual leaders and members of groups, like Progressive Democrats of America and the Green Party,” Glick proposes. “More than that, this alliance eventually needs to support and work to elect candidates running both as Democrats and progressive independents, and maybe even an occasional Republican.”The Tikkun Conference held in Washington last June was another pathetic display of liberal apologists begging Obama to be Obama. The organizers called on those participating to “Support Obama to BE the Obama We Voted For-Not the Inside-the-Beltway Pragmatist/Realist whose compromises have led to a decrease in his popularity and opened the door for a revival of the just-recently-discredited Right wing.” Good luck.The organizers of the Left Forum conference scheduled for this March at Pace University in New York City also communicate in the amorphous, high-blown moral rhetoric that is unmoored from the actual and real. The upcoming Left Forum conference, which has the vacuous title “Towards a Politics of Solidarity,” promises to “focus on the age-old theme of solidarity: the moral act of imagination underpinning working-class victories everywhere. It will undertake to examine the new forms of far-reaching solidarity that are both necessary and possible in an increasingly global world.” The organizers posit that “the potential for transformative struggles in the 21st century depends on new chains of solidarity-between workers in the rich world and workers in the global south, indigenous peasants and more affluent consumers, students and pensioners, villagers in the Niger Delta and environmental campaigners in the Gulf of Mexico, marchers and rioters in Greece and Spain, and unionists in the United States and China.” The conference “will contribute to the intellectual underpinnings of new and tighter forms of world-wide solidarity upon which all successful emancipatory struggles of the future will depend.” The conference agenda, which sounds like a parody of a course catalogue description, includes the requisite academic jargon of “moral act of imagination” and “chains of solidarity.” This language gives to the enterprise a lofty but undefined purpose. And this is a specialty of the liberal class-to grandly say nothing. The last thing the liberal class intends to do is fight back. Left Forum brings in a few titans, including Noam Chomsky, who is always worth hearing, but it contributes as well to the lethargy and turpitude that have made the liberal class impotent.The only gatherings worth attending from now on are acts that organize civil disobedience, which is why I will be at Lafayette Park in Washington, D.C., at noon March 19 to protest the eighth anniversary of the invasion and occupation of Iraq. Veterans groups on March 19 will also carry out street protests in San Francisco, Los Angeles and Chicago. You can link to the protests here. Save your bus fare and your energy for events like this one. Either we begin to militantly stand against the coal, oil and natural gas industry or we do not. Either we defy pre-emptive war and occupation or we do not. Either we demand that the criminal class on Wall Street be held accountable for the theft of billions of dollars from small shareholders whose savings for retirement or college were wiped out or we do not. Either we defend basic civil liberties, including habeas corpus and the prosecution of torturers or we do not. Either we turn on liberal institutions, including the Democratic Party, which collaborate with these corporations or we do not. Either we accept that the age of political compromise is dead, that the corporate systems of power are instruments of death that can be fought only by physical acts of resistance or we do not. If the liberal class remains gullible and weak, if it continues to speak to itself and others in meaningless platitudes, it will remain as responsible for our enslavement as those it pompously denounces. Chris Hedges writes a regular column for Truthdig.com. Hedges graduated from Harvard Divinity School and was for nearly two decades a foreign correspondent for The New York Times. He is the author of many books, including: War Is A Force That Gives Us Meaning, What Every Person Should Know About War, and American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America. His most recent book is Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle.
By Chris Hedges
24 January, 2011
TruthDig.com