Presented at llth Nobel Peace Summit, in
‘CRIMALITY AND DELEGITIMAZATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS’.
Mina Sama,
We remember that 65 years ago,
No American Government, has ever apologized to the Japanese people for these
War crimes. It is said if people do not admit to the wrong they have done, and say ‘sorry’ they are in danger of doing it again.
Tragically, I believe, the World is in danger of using Nuclear weapons again, if we do not take seriously the message of the survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and move to abolish Nuclear Weapons, War, militarism, and force, as ways of solving our problems in International relations. We can, and must, move from the threat and use of violence, from the myth of military security, to human and environmental security, based on Nonkilling, Nonviolence, Human Rights and International Laws.
No Government has dropped Nuclear weapons after Hiroshima and Nagasaki,but
the threat to use them has been used often. Many Goverments have built their
National Security Policies on threats of violence and militarism, and since 1945 millions of people have been slaughtered in many countries, by both State and Nonstate actors, in the name of progress and democracy. Increasingly Governments are using force against unarmed civilians. We think of
At the same time, the United States Government is threatening to attack Iran (or allowing Israel to do so) on the pretext that they have a nuclear weapons programme and if indeed they do attack Iran, this would set the whole region on fire. When President Obama says he wants to see a World without nuclear weapons and then says, in respect of Iran, and their alleged nuclear Weapon ambitions, that ‘all options are on the table’this is clearly a threat to use nuclear weapons,clearly a criminal threat under the World Court Advisory Opinion, against Iran.
The Nuremberg Charter of August 8th, l945 says the threat or use of nuclear weapons is criminal, so officials in all nine nuclear weapons states who maintain and use Nuclear Deterrence as a threat, are breaking the Law.
In his book ‘The Criminality of Nuclear Deterrence – Could the
War on terrorism go Nuclear?’ (l) International Lawyer, Prof. Boyle,
says ‘In the Advisory Opinion by the International Court of Justice on nuclear weapons, the
If any of us threatened to kill another person we would be prosecuted and yet the leaders of nuclear weapons States are holding the threat of nuclear extermination over us all. Some Governments feel it is prestigious being in the Nuclear Weapons Club as if it were a badge of ‘honour’, when in reality it should be a badge of ‘shame’ and ‘dishonour’ for any country to have such weapons, breaking not only the Nuremburg principals, but wasting their peoples precious resources so necessary for their basic needs of food, education, health care.
We must delegitimize nuclear weapons, change our militarized mindsets of fear and violence, abolish force in International relations, replacing this with the alternative of human and environmental security based on peace, sustainable development, Human Rights and International Laws. Making arms and the use of force illegal, and criminal, dismantling not only nuclear weapons but the entire war machine will give hope to the Human Family.
Soyoonara,
Mairead Maguire (Nobel Peace Laureate)
(l) ‘The Criminality of Nuclear Deterrence. Could the US War on Terrorism go Nuclear?’ published by Clarity Press, Inc. Prof. Francis Boyle.