By Raïs Neza Boneza
24 Nov 2025 – In recent weeks, international headlines have warned of Mali’s imminent collapse: “Bamako is about to fall.” “Terrorists are at the gates.” Western embassies urge citizens to flee, and foreign analysts speak of an Afghan-style scenario in the Sahel. Yet behind this chorus of alarm lies a more strategic story — one that reveals as much about global competition for resources as it does about Mali’s security. The real struggle, many in the region suggest, is not about ideology or terrorism. It is about lithium — the white metal that powers the world’s future.
Fear as a Weapon
The notion that Mali’s capital could fall within weeks has circulated widely through Western media. But inside the country, such claims are viewed with deep skepticism. For many Malians, these reports amount to psychological warfare — part of a campaign to undermine confidence in the state and to justify a potential “stabilization” intervention.
The truth, according to Malian observers, is more complex. Armed groups remain a threat, but they are far from capable of taking Bamako. Their power has been reduced to sporadic road ambushes and local disruptions rather than the sweeping offensives seen years ago. Still, fear serves a purpose. It weakens institutions, deters investment, and prepares public opinion abroad for renewed foreign involvement.
The Real Battle: Lithium
Mali’s newfound prominence in global headlines coincides with a quiet but profound economic development: the opening of major lithium mines at Goulamina and Bougouni. Together, these sites could produce over half a million tonnes of lithium concentrate each year — placing Mali among the world’s top suppliers. Lithium is indispensable for electric cars, renewable energy storage, and virtually every rechargeable device on Earth. In short, it is the oil of the 21st century.
What distinguishes Mali’s lithium projects is who controls them: not Western conglomerates, but Chinese and Malian partnerships. The Goulamina mine, in particular, involves major Chinese investment. Western companies — and the governments behind them — have been notably absent.
This shift toward non-Western partners represents more than a commercial choice; it is an act of economic sovereignty. It threatens to overturn a centuries-old pattern in which African resources are extracted for foreign benefit, leaving little value behind.
The Geopolitics of Disruption
To understand the intensity of current media coverage, one must see the pattern. Whenever an African nation attempts to nationalize or control a key resource, it suddenly becomes the focus of humanitarian concern, security alerts, or political pressure.
The argument is that this is not coincidence but a long-term strategy — maintaining control through fragmentation. The logic is simple: weaken the state, question its legitimacy, isolate it economically, and eventually reintroduce foreign “assistance” to restore order — along with access to its resources.
History provides painful parallels. In Libya, the promise of African-led oil sovereignty ended in chaos and foreign reoccupation. The same fate, many fear, could await the Sahel if Mali’s attempt at self-determination is crushed.
Media Narratives and Economic Leverage
Recent corporate maneuvers underscore this connection. Shipping giants such as CMA-CGM temporarily halted transport to Mali, citing instability, only to resume operations days later. The sudden suspension — and equally sudden reversal — seemed more like a political signal than a logistical decision. Such gestures contribute to an atmosphere of uncertainty that discourages trade and investment, amplifying the perception of a nation on the brink.
Meanwhile, Western networks feature “experts” who echo the same alarmist narrative — many of whom, Malians say, have little knowledge of the terrain. This is not simply misinformation but information warfare, designed to delegitimize African autonomy.
A New Colonial Equation
Mali’s fate reverberates far beyond its borders. If it falls, the argument goes, the center of West Africa will unravel — destabilizing Burkina Faso, Niger, and the broader region. Such an outcome would invite new international interventions, each claiming to “restore peace” while reasserting geopolitical control.
The pattern is familiar: chaos, intervention, extraction. In each African region, one key state’s collapse can reshape the entire geopolitical map. The destruction of Libya transformed North Africa; the Congo crisis reshaped Central Africa. The collapse of Mali, many fear, could inaugurate Libya 2.0 in West Africa — another externally managed zone of endless “stabilization.”
Between Paranoia and Pattern
Skepticism is healthy. Conspiracy theories often flourish where transparency is lacking. Yet dismissing these warnings outright ignores a long history of foreign interference justified through the language of “security” and “development.” From the Congo in the 1960s to Iraq and Libya in the 21st century, resource-rich nations have repeatedly learned that sovereignty can be undone not only by coups or invasions, but by narratives that make domination seem like rescue.
Today, as Mali seeks to redefine its place in the global order, it stands at a crossroads between vulnerability and autonomy. Lithium is not just a mineral — it is the currency of tomorrow’s world. And whoever controls it will shape not only the global economy but also the very balance of power between continents.
Raïs Neza Boneza is the author of fiction as well as non-fiction, poetry books and articles.
1 December 2025
Source: transcend.org