Just International

Pope Leo’s ‘Magnifica Humanitas’: “Be Human! Stay Human!”

By Fr. Cedric Prakash

On 25 May 2026, released his first Encyclical ‘Magnifica Humanitas’ (Magnificient Humanity): On Safeguarding the Human Person in the time of Artificial Intelligence’. In it, he makes a passionate plea for safeguarding humanity, promoting truth and freedom, the dignity of work, and advocating that the fundamentals of the universal destination of goods, subsidiarity, solidarity, human rights, social justice and peace should be paramount. His message to the world was loud and clear: “be human, stay human!”

Pope Leo XIV signed his document ten days earlier, on 15 May which was the 135th anniversary of the promulgation of Pope Leo XIII’s powerful 1891 encyclical ‘Rerum Novarum (Of New Things): On the Condition of Labour’. Pope Leo then, addressed the severe social and economic upheavals brought about by the Industrial Revolution. It is widely considered as the foundational blueprint for modern social doctrine of the Catholic Church, as it marked the first time the Vatican systematically and purposefully intervened in contemporary socio-economic debates to defend the dignity and the rights of workers!

‘Magnifica Humanitas’ should come as no surprise to those who are aghast at what is happening in the world today and sincerely want to do something about it! No papal encyclical makes easy reading. This masterpiece of 245 paragraphs, has five chapters, with an ‘Introduction’ and a ‘Conclusion’, all beautifully interwoven into a rich tapestry of a vision, mission and responsibility to address the realities of today’s world. Pope Leo sets the tone and direction of his encyclical in his opening words, “Humanity, created by God in all its grandeur, is today facing a pivotal choice: either to construct a new Tower of Babel or to build the city in which God and humanity dwell together. Each generation inherits the task of shaping its own era, of guiding history to become a place where the dignity of every person is safeguarded, justice is promoted and fraternity is made possible. Yet every era also runs the risk of creating an inhumane and more unjust world.”

The encyclical has a basic premise when it states, “While Leo XIII spoke in his time of “new things” (Rerum Novarum), today we cannot limit ourselves simply to repeating his insightful teachings. Instead, we must ask God for the wisdom to interpret the great trends of our time, particularly technological advances. In recent years, it has become increasingly evident how rapidly and profoundly digitalization, artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics are transforming our world. Technology should not be considered, in itself, as a force antagonistic to humanity. On the contrary, it has formed part of our history since the beginning as “a profoundly human reality, linked to the autonomy and freedom of man.”. Pope Leo then asserts that, “technology is never neutral, because it takes on the characteristics of those who devise, finance, regulate, and use it”. He appeals for people to build for the common good and to remain human, following a courageous mentality of shared responsibility and communion, so that the world “will come to recognize the human heart as the place where God desires to dwell”

Thedocument is comprehensive. The ‘Introduction’ provides the ‘raison d’être’ and the immediacy of the content. The first chapter, ‘A Dynamic Approach Faithful to the Gospel’, traces the Social Doctrine of the Church in recent magisterium and the Second Vatican Council, highlighting its dynamic character. In the second chapter, Pope Leo XIV explores the ‘Foundations and Principles of the Social Doctrine of the Church’. The third chapter, ‘Technology and Dominance: The Grandeur of Humanity in Light of the Promises of AI’, stresses the need to approach artificial intelligence with vigilance. In the fourth chapter, ‘Safeguarding Humanity at a Time of Transformation. Truth, Work, Freedom’, the Pope calls for an ecology of communication based on truth. In the fifth chapter, ‘The Culture of Power and the Civilization of Love’, Pope Leo XIV turns his gaze to war, saying “the digital revolution is changing the nature of conflict.” The Pope calls for an ethical approach, without which decisions about the life and death of persons will become increasingly impersonal due to a use of force regarded as an “immediate and viable option”. The ‘Conclusion’ points to the ‘road ahead’ giving one a spirituality for our time.

The Vatican ‘Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development’, has prepared an excellent five-page summary of the encyclical besides some useful resource materials. No summary will do justice to the wealth encapsulated in this treatise: spiritual, theological, socio-political, cultural, technological, putting into focus the many serious realities which grip the world today; above all, there is an unmistakable positivity throughout- Pope Leo is unequivocal in stating that ‘another world is possible’, that there is hope provided we get our act together –individually and collectively, to be human! To stay human!

Pope Leo XIV recalls the writings of his predecessors: from Pope Leo XIII to Pope Francis. identifies five principles of the Social Doctrine of the Church: common good, the universal destination of goods, subsidiarity, solidarity, social justice. Christians, says Pope Leo, are called to respond to the culture of power by building “the civilization of love” and by choosing whether to feed the logic of force or safeguard peace. He recalls the memory of the saints, “righteous people and the oft-forgotten peacemakers, show us that grace does not magically eliminate conflict, but instead it inspires active resistance to evil and an astonishing creativity in doing good”

Today AI permeates every sphere of life. The way the fundamental values of humanity are being eroded. The violation of human rights: the right to life, the rights of women and minorities. Pope Leo XIV identifies migrants, refugees, displaced persons as a “litmus test” for social justice. The way society treats migrants, he says, “reveals whether its sense of justice is driven by fear or by the spirit of fraternity.” He therefore appeals for societies to protect “the rightful hopes” of those forced to leave, by ensuring them safe and legal routes, dignified welcome, and genuine paths to integration, while promoting “the right to remain” in one’s homeland in peace and security, by addressing “the root causes” of migration. Compassion for the ‘other’ is what matters. He is also expresses concern about what is happening to the environment- and why one should care for our common home!

Pope Leo says that too much AI power is concentrated in too few hands. He warned that a small group of firms now control vast amounts of data, computing power and digital infrastructure. He writes, “When such power is concentrated in the hands of a few it tends to become opaque and evade public oversight, increasing the risk of distorted forms of development that give rise to new dependencies, exclusions, manipulations and inequalities.” He warned that powerful groups could use AI to shape public opinion, influence democratic systems and steer economies for their own interests. He also criticised the global race for “ever more powerful algorithms and larger datasets”, arguing that technology should serve humanity rather than corporate or geopolitical dominance. Another major concern in the document is employment. While he acknowledged that AI can improve productivity and make some work safer, he argued that workers must not become disposable in the process. He warns about AI weapons Pope Leo criticised the development of autonomous weapons and said it should never be acceptable for machines to make irreversible life-and-death decisions without human responsibility. He stated that, “Artificial Intelligence now demands to be disarmed, freed from logics that turn it into an instrument of domination, exclusion and death,”.

‘Magnifica Humanitas’ challenges certain dimensions of today’s human behaviour. Pope Leo devotes ample space to a critique of transhumanism andposthumanism, which interpret progress as the overcoming of human limits. Instead, limitations are not defects to be eliminated, but a constitutive dimension of the human person, because it is in fragility and finitude that relationship and openness to God and to others, mature. He says we must remember that “humanity flourishes not despite limitations, but often through them” Pursuing technological innovation at the expense of eliminating human limitations, he says, would cause an anthropological regression. “Humanity—in all its grandeur and woundedness—must never be replaced or surpassed,” The encyclical challenges all people of good will to stay actively engaged in the ethical development of AI, ensuring it bridges societal divides, rather than centralising power.

‘Beinghuman’ is a commitment to a better world, pregnant with hope and built on the civilization of love. Pope Leo calls for an “ecology of communication” based on truth. He urges transparency in how content is selected, protection of personal data, serious journalism founded on argumentation and verification, a new awareness in the “proper and critical” use of digital tools, and the integration of different forms of knowledge. The Church must also embody transparent and honest communication, especially in cases of injustice and abuse. The Pope also appeals for a renewed educational alliance, so that the “desire to ask questions” may not be extinguished in young people by perfect machines that make human thought seem useless. Pope Leo therefore calls for renewed attention to schools as places where people learn to “seek and love the truth”. He emphasizes the importance of protecting the dignity of work by designing systems centered on the person and not only on performance. For him, peace and development is to move beyond GDP as the measure of a country’s level of development, focusing instead on the dignity of work, shared prosperity, the reduction of inequalities, and environmental protection; “prosperity contributes to peace “only if it is widespread, inclusive, and sustainable”

Pope Leo’s call to the Church to do a serious examination of conscience will make many within the Church uncomfortable. He says that the five principles of the Social Doctrine of the Church, should be applied not only to society, but also to the Church herself, which must make “an examination of conscience.” The Pope says living out this justice calls for “purifying ecclesial relationships and structures from distortions that give rise to inequality, lack of transparency and abuse of power.” This means to listen to the “victims of spiritual, economic, institutional, sexual and power-based abuse, as well as abuses of conscience.” This examen, “is an integral part of a journey toward justice, which includes acknowledging the harm done, just reparation and taking steps to prevent it from happening again”.

Pope Leo upholds the importance of combating new forms of slavery as a “decisive test for ethical discernment” in the digital transformation. He stresses, “the Church renews her firm condemnation of every form of slavery, trafficking, and commodification of persons” and he underscores that to not react or to tolerate grave violations of human dignity means becoming accomplices to them. He asks pardon, “This (slavery)constitutes a wound in Christian memory, one from which we cannot consider ourselves detached. It is impossible not to feel deep sorrow when contemplating the immense suffering and humiliation endured by so many in stark contrast to their immeasurable dignity as persons infinitely loved by the Lord. For this, in the name of the Church, I sincerely ask for pardon.”

He indicates five paths of responsibility for the way ahead, they are: disarming words by speaking the truth; building peace in justice; adopting the perspective of victims by taking a stand, because there are conflicts in which “it is unjust to remain neutral”; cultivating “a healthy realism” that seeks practicable paths of peace through deeds, not only words!

He emphasizes the need to relaunch dialogue by moving from a culture of power to a culture of negotiation; of decisive importance is “interreligious dialogue”, being bearers of a message of peace. He says, “those who use the name of God to legitimize terrorism, violence or war betray his true nature, for to fight in the name of religion means attacking religion itself”. A strong message to today’s warmongers; to those who use the name of God to justify their wars! God is synonymous with compassion, not with hate, violence and war!

Towards the end he gives the world an antidote to ‘stay human’, “As we look to the future, I would like to recall the image of Nehemiah whom we chose as our companion and guide at the outset. Nehemiah heard the cry of a devastated city, brought that pain to prayer, discerned before God, asked for help, received permission to return, organized the work, confronted internal and external resistance and rebuilt the walls of Jerusalem with the assistance of the people, brick by brick. In this era of digital transformation, I see in him a striking parable of our own vocation, which is not to be passive spectators of social and cultural fractures, nor mere commentators on what is crumbling, but men and women prepared to enter the construction sites of history — research laboratories, technology companies, schools, the media, institutions and local communities — in order to rebuild what has collapsed and protect what is threatened. Like Nehemiah, we too are called to unite listening and courage, prayer and responsibility, so that, even when a technocratic mentality or partisan interests seem to prevail, the human city may become a more fitting place to live.

Today, our world in several aspects has either lost or is fast losing its humaneness; concluding with Mary’s ‘Magnificat’ Pope Leo
challenges us all to Be Human! Stay Human!

Fr. Cedric Prakash SJ is a renowned human rights, reconciliation and peace activist & writer.

1 Jun 2026

Source: countercurrents.org

The Rise of the Global South

By The Chris Hedges Report

The war on Iran has not only ended in a humiliating defeat for the United States, but resulted in a dramatic shift in the balance of power in the Middle East and the Global South.

28 May 2026 – The humiliating defeat of Israel and the United States in their war on Iran, along with the savagery of the ongoing genocide in Gaza, are ushering in a new world order. This order is one where voices of reason and stability emanate not from the West — which spent tens of billions of dollars sustaining Israel’s genocide — but from the Global South, including China. It is an order where alliances are being rapidly reconfigured to protect countries from a rogue American state that lashes out like a wounded beast, as it spirals toward terminal decline.

The end of the U.S. Empire, led by an impetuous and clueless Donald Trump, is irreversible. The U.S. has lost its sixth war in the Middle East in 25 years. Iran’s power has been enhanced not only because it — along with Oman — controls the Strait of Hormuz — where roughly 25 percent of the world’s seaborne oil and 20 percent of the world’s seaborne liquified natural gas pass through — but because it has delivered a stark message, with its drones and missiles, to U.S. allies and bases in the region, while sending the global economy into a tailspin.

Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — who reportedly lured Trump into the war with Alice-in-Wonderland visions of easy regime change in Iran following the decapitation strikes against the country on February 28, 2026, which included the assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and other political and military figures, along with 168 school children and their teachers — may strike Iran again. They are desperate. But a renewed bombing of Iran will not work. Iran’s mosaic defense strategy ensures all political and military commanders are easily replaced.

Iran can strangle the world economy by closing the Strait of Hormuz. It can accelerate the pain by getting its Yemeni allies — Ansar Allah — to close the Bab el-Mandeb Strait in the Red Sea, just as they did to Israel-bound ships when defending Palestinians after October 7. This could result in a complete blockade. Saudi Arabia, with the Bab el-Mandeb Strait open, is able to bypass the Strait of Hormuz and export five million barrels a day through its pipeline to tankers in the Red Sea port of Yanbu.

If a ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran is not reached soon, the global economy will crash, perhaps within weeks. The U.S. and its allies, such as Japan, have released some of their extensive strategic oil reserves, however they will not be able to cushion markets indefinitely. Stockpiles in America’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve are near their lowest in more than 40 years. Once these reserves are depleted, the price of fuel will skyrocket. If a barrel of oil shoots up to $200, the price at the pump could climb as high as $10 per gallon. This, coupled with shortages of other petroleum-based products, along with nitrogen fertilizer, aluminum, and helium — an indispensable element in the production of MRI machines and semiconductors — are already shutting down vital industries and driving up prices on basic commodities.

The World Bank projects a 31 percent increase in the cost of nitrogen fertilizers alone — which are produced in the Persian Gulf and transit through the Strait of Hormuz — if the war continues. This will mean a steep rise in the price of food.

Trump is like a dog being pushed unwillingly into a crate. When it appears a deal with Iran is close, he snarls and barks, sabotaging the proposed 30-to-60-day ceasefire agreement. Netanyahu’s apoplectic fits about any agreement that would halt Israeli attacks against Lebanon, along with the potential release of some of Iran’s estimated $100 billion in frozen assets, spurs Trump’s momentary defiance.

But the clock is ticking. There is little time left. And the longer Trump waits, the worse it will get. Neither Trump, nor Netanyahu, are the masters of this game. Iran holds the cards.

Israel’s dream of formalizing its hegemony over the Middle East, codified in the Abraham Accords during Trump’s first term — which normalized relations between Israel and regional states — is dead. This war and the genocide in Gaza killed it.

Trump is attempting to revive them by inserting them into a deal to end the war on Iran. He has demanded states previously uninvolved with the Abraham Accords, such as Pakistan and eventually, Iran, sign up to normalize relations with Israel. Pakistan — the only state to publicly respond — rejected the invitation due to what it called a clash with the country’s “fundamental ideologies.” Every other state Trump appealed to reacted with bewildered silence.

Iran demands the removal of sanctions and an end to the naval blockade — which the Central Intelligence Agency concluded Iran can endure for months before it experiences severe economic hardship — in exchange for reopening the Strait of Hormuz. The proposed agreement makes no mention of Iran’s ballistic missile arsenal, which U.S. military and intelligence officials believe remains at 70 percent pre-war levels, according to The New York Times.

Iran, Pakistan, Turkey and Qatar — a lead negotiator with Hamas — are the new powerbrokers in the region.

Pakistan not only signed a mutual defense pact with Saudi Arabia in 2025, it deployed troops, jets and air defense systems to the Gulf dictatorship in April. It has also been hosting ceasefire talks between Trump’s Dumb and Dumber duo of lead negotiators — his feckless son-in-law Jared Kushner and fellow real estate developer and golfing partner, Steve Witkoff.

The war has enhanced the prestige and power of China, which compared to Washington is seen globally as embodying rational, prudent and stable leadership. Iran, in a sign of the new global order, permits Chinese and Pakistani tankers, along with other ships not allied with Israel and the U.S., to travel through the Strait.

Israel, unable to convince the U.S. to do its dirty work of bombing Iran into a failed state, will, I expect, strike out with renewed fury against Gaza, perhaps occupying the remaining 30 percent of what is left of the besieged territory. It will continue its Gaza-like policy of turning every structure south of Lebanon’s Litani River into rubble, which it bombs daily despite Iran stating that attacks on Lebanon violate the current ceasefire agreement.

Trump’s savagery and bluster – he threatened to “blow up” Oman if it fails to “behave” after reports of Oman jointly charging tolls with Iran for ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz – cannot mask the impotence of the U.S. The refusal by America’s allies to heed Trump’s call to help him reopen the Strait, along with the economic misery visited on nations struggling to cope with shortages and the rising costs of energy and fertilizer supplies, are stark evidence of Washington’s pariah status.

Empires, blinded by the myth of their own omnipotence and military superiority, blunder at the final stages into conflicts with little understanding of where they are headed. They alienate their allies. They stumble from one military fiasco to the next, as the U.S. has done for over two decades in the Middle East.

The British Empire in 1956, already in precipitous decline, was humiliated when it conspired with France and Israel to seize the Suez Canal, which Gamal Abdel Nasser had nationalized. The U.S. forced all three countries to halt the invasion. Britain’s pound sterling gave way to the petrodollar. It signaled the last chapter of the British Empire.

The war on Iran is Washington’s Suez Crisis.

This may not be the end of the American Empire, but it is the beginning of the end.

Chris Hedges is a Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist who was a foreign correspondent for fifteen years for The New York Times, where he served as the Middle East Bureau Chief and Balkan Bureau Chief.

1 Jun 2026

Source: transcend.org

Euro-Med Monitor under Attack for Its Exemplary Human Rights Effort to Document Wrongdoing in Occupied Palestine

By Richard Falk

27 May 2026 – My name is Richard Falk, a retired professor of international law at Princeton University. I speak here as the Chair of the Board of Trustees of Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, a civil society organization based in Geneva, that reports on human rights throughout the Middle East and North African region with a special focus on violations of the human rights of the Palestinian people. I am most proud to be associated with Euro-Med due to the fearless dedication it has displayed in its on the ground documenting and reporting upon human rights abuses since 2011 when it was founded by its current inspirational leader Ramy Abdu who has served throughout its existence as its Chair. Through my contacts with Ramy Abdu I came to appreciate his leadership, admiring how much was achieved by Euro-Med despite its modest budget. Ramy together with his small staff arranged the collection of evidence and documentation of huma rights allegations by the recruitment of unpaid volunteers from the region, mostly young persons committed to the promotion of human rights willing to accept the risks of this dangerous work.

What has impressed and moved me most about Euro-Med is the indispensable work done over the 15 years since 2011 in the most difficult of circumstances. I make this statement affirming the quality and integrity of Euro-Med’s work now in response to the intensification of defamatory attacks on the organization as biased and supposedly linked to Hamas. These charges have been made by the government of Israel and by pro-Israel media and Zionist zealots in Western countries, particularly the United States. These attacks that are intended to be discrediting have included vicious media diatribes leading to threats of violence against Euro-Med staff members that have forced the organization to divert attention from its crucial substantive priorities to use precious resources and valuable time to take prudential precautions to protect its staff.

This recent escalation of defamatory attacks on Euro-Med and its leadership has been prompted by the publication on May 11, 2026 in the New York Times of an opinion column written by Nicholas Kristof, a prize-winning regular contributor to the NYT. This carefully reasoned and sourced article explicitly relied on Euro-Med Reports to ground Kristof’s confirmation of severe forms of sexual violence engaged in by Israeli prison officials and IDF soldiers in dealing with Palestinian civilians, and particularly detainees, including women and children. It was not unusual for influential media, NGOs, and activists to rely on Euro- Met reports given its reputation for trustworthy information. In this instance, Kristof’s eminence as a journalist, and even more because the NYT enjoyed had a long record of being a pro-Israeli news source that self-censored itself with respect to the most incriminating abuses by Israel that defied its legal and moral responsibilities in relation to the Palestinian people. As a result when even the NYT took seriously such dramatic allegations it could not easily be refuted or brushed aside.Actually, Kristof’s reference to Euro-Med’s documentation of sexual violence against Palestinians should have enhanced the credibility and demonstrated the effectiveness of Euro-Med instead of serving as a launching pad for a smear campaign that is characteristic Israeli behavior whenever accused the state is accused in a persuasive manner. Israel employs the practice of shifting the conversation to the credibility of the messenger as a means of ignoring the message, especially when its veracity is beyond a reasonable doubt.

These charges of sexual violence, shocking as they were, came as no surprise to close observers of Israel’s behavior in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The surprise was that the NYT had finally broken its habitual silence about Israeli atrocities that it had maintained for so long. The. NYT had been silent in the past whenever evidence of systematically and flagrantly violations of human rights principles by Israel was irrefutable.

This pattern of Israel’s sexual abuse in the aftermath of the October 7 Gaza attack became more extreme and notorious. This development was a major theme of the detailed report in March 2025 by the Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory established by the UN Human Rights Council. Additional to the description of instances of human rights abuses was the extremely damning assessment that ‘sexual and gender-based violence’ had become for Israel a ‘method of war.’ It was acknowledged that there was lacking convincing evidence that this practice was explicitly adopted by the Israeli government. Yet the Commission believed this behavior was implicitly endorsed by Israeli officialdom that responded to even the most extreme abuses by granting governmental impunity to the wrongdoers however serious the international crimes.

It is of utmost importance to support the integrity of Euro-Med and other objective human rights organizations and not allow state propaganda and extremist support groups of Israel to shut down or defame courageous efforts to expose human rights abuses. This attack on Euro-Med should be understood as part of a wider campaign of punitive response to truth-tellers (in contrast to impunity for wrongdoers) who are risking not only their reputations but their lives by devoting their efforts to the dissemination of inconvenient truths. The United States sanctioning of UN Special Rapporteur of Israeli Violation of Human Rights in Occupied Palestine, Francesca Albanese, is a similar disgraceful attack on an exceptionally brave truth-teller that should be seen as at one with these vicious attacks on Ramy Abdo and Euro-Watch.

Voices of global conscience need to accept and act upon the ancient wisdom that when truth prevails, justice is served, human dignity and moral decency upheld. Likewise, when truth is suppressed and evidence of atrocities is filtered or ignored, evil flourishes.

Prof. Richard Falk is a member of the TRANSCEND Network, of the TRANSCEND Media Service Editorial Committee, Albert G. Milbank Professor Emeritus of International Law at Princeton University, Chair of Global Law, Faculty of Law, at Queen Mary University London, Research Associate the Orfalea Center of Global Studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and Fellow of the Tellus Institute.

1 Jun 2026

Source: transcend.org

How 51 Countries Armed Israel During Gaza Genocide

Israel imported military-related goods from six European countries despite arms restrictions.

23 May 2026 – On a cold day in early January 2024, protesters gathered outside the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague to denounce Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza, then nearly 100 days old.

More than 3,000km (1,864 miles) away, some Palestinians in Gaza followed the proceedings, livestreamed on YouTube, but most were trying to survive Israel’s relentless bombardment.

In nearly eight decades of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, only a handful of cases had ever reached the court. That day, South Africa was asking the world’s highest court to consider whether Israel’s assault on Gaza constituted a genocide – the destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group.

Inside the courtroom, Irish lawyer Blinne Ni Ghralaigh, who was representing South Africa, began to speak.

“The international community continues to fail the Palestinian people,” she told the judges, despite Israeli officials’ “dehumanising, genocidal rhetoric” matched by the military actions in Gaza.

“This is the first genocide in history, where its victims are broadcasting their own destruction in real time, in the desperate, so far vain, hope that the world might do something,” she said.

An average of 247 Palestinians were being killed every day, Ni Ghralaigh told the court; 48 mothers, two every hour; more than 117 children daily, five each hour.

She referred to the new acronym used among doctors and aid workers that had emerged from the devastation: WCNSF – wounded child, no surviving family. By that point, more than 7,000 Palestinians had been killed.

“These facts,” Ni Ghralaigh said, “could not present a clearer or more compelling case” for genocide.

On January 26, 2024, the ICJ ruled that there was a plausible risk of genocide in Gaza and ordered provisional measures. Crucially, it reminded all states party to the Genocide Convention, of which there are 153, of their obligations: to act to prevent genocide.

But over the next 22 months, the killing continued. By the time a ceasefire was reached in October 2025, more than 70,000 people had been killed, with some 171,000 injured.

Throughout that period, the weapons to Israel kept flowing.

Weapons exports

A months-long Al Jazeera investigation has found that military-related goods originating from at least 51 countries and self-governing territories continued entering Israel after the ICJ’s warning of a plausible risk of genocide in Gaza.

Based primarily on an analysis of Israeli Tax Authority (ITA) import data between 2022 and 2025, and supported by customs records and freedom of information requests, the investigation traced military supply chains linked to countries across Europe, Asia, North America and South America. All named countries are signatories to the Genocide Convention.

In some cases, the military-related goods originated from countries that had formally imposed arms embargoes on Israel or had partially suspended arms supplies to the country.

In fact, according to the ITA data, arms imports increased after the ICJ ruling, with the largest share falling under the category of munitions.

The five largest countries of origin for military-related goods entering Israel – the United States, India, Romania, Taiwan and the Czech Republic – all recorded increased shipments during the war.

While many countries included in this investigation do not share statistics on arms exports to Israel, the ITA data shows that 2,603 consignments of military-related goods – including imports labelled as goods related to ammunition, explosive munitions, weapons parts and armoured vehicle components – entered Israel between October 2023 and October 2025.

In total, the imports were valued at 3.22 billion shekels ($885.6m), with 91 percent of that value recorded after the ICJ’s ruling, according to the ITA data.

By comparison, in the 20 months before October 2023, military-related imports to Israel totalled 1.41 billion shekels ($388.1m). The data suggests Israel increased its dependence on foreign weapons supplies to help sustain its military offensive in Gaza.

Even after the latest ceasefire took effect on October 10, 2025, the flow of weapons did not stop. In the final two months of 2025, Israel received an additional 324.9 million shekels ($89.4m) in military-related imports, according to the ITA data.

1 Jun 2026

Source: transcend.org

Euro-Med Monitor Under Attack for its Exemplary Human Rights Effort to Document Wrongdoing in Occupied Palestine: Richard Falk

By Richard Falk

My name is Richard Falk, a retired professor of international law at Princeton University. I speak here as the Chair of the Board of Trustees of Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, a civil society organization based in Geneva, that reports on human rights throughout the Middle East and North African region with a special focus on violations of the human rights of the Palestinian people. I am most proud to be associated with Euro-Med due to the fearless dedication it has displayed in its on the ground documenting and reporting upon human rights abuses since 2011 when it was founded by its current inspirational leader Ramy Abdu who has served throughout its existence as its Chair. Through my contacts with Ramy Abdu I came to appreciate his leadership, admiring how much was achieved by Euro-Med despite its modest budget. Ramy together with his small staff arranged the collection of evidence and documentation of huma rights allegations by the recruitment of unpaid volunteers from the region, mostly young persons committed to the promotion of human rights willing to accept the risks of this dangerous work.

What has impressed and moved me most about Euro-Med is the indispensable work done over the 15 years since 2011 in the most difficult of circumstances. I make this statement affirming the quality and integrity of Euro-Med’s work now in response to the intensification of defamatory attacks on the organization as biased and supposedly linked to Hamas. These charges have been made by the government of Israel and by pro-Israel media and Zionist zealots in Western countries, particularly the United States. These attacks that are intended to be discrediting have included vicious media diatribes leading to threats of violence against Euro-Med staff members that have forced the organization to divert attention from its crucial substantive priorities to use precious resources and valuable time to take prudential precautions to protect its staff.

This recent escalation of defamatory attacks on Euro-Med and its leadership has been prompted by the publication on May 11, 2026 in the New York Times of an opinion column written by Nicholas Kristof, a prize-winning regular contributor to the NYT. This carefully reasoned and sourced article explicitly relied on Euro-Med Reports to ground Kristof’s confirmation of severe forms of sexual violence engaged in by Israeli prison officials and IDF soldiers in dealing with Palestinian civilians, and particularly detainees, including women and children. It was not unusual for influential media, NGOs, and activists to rely on Euro- Met reports given its reputation for trustworthy information. In this instance, Kristof’s eminence as a journalist, and even more because the NYT enjoyed had a long record of being a pro-Israeli news source that self-censored itself with respect to the most incriminating abuses by Israel that defied its legal and moral responsibilities in relation to the Palestinian people. As a result when even the NYT took seriously such dramatic allegations it could not easily be refuted or brushed aside.Actually, Kristof’s reference to Euro-Med’s documentation of sexual violence against Palestinians should have enhanced the credibility and demonstrated the effectiveness of Euro-Med instead of serving as a launching pad for a smear campaign that is characteristic Israeli behavior whenever accused the state is accused in a persuasive manner. Israel employs the practice of shifting the conversation to the credibility of the messenger as a means of ignoring the message, especially when its veracity is beyond a reasonable doubt.

These charges of sexual violence, shocking as they were, came as no surprise to close observers of Israel’s behavior in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The surprise was that the NYT had finally broken its habitual silence about Israeli atrocities that it had maintained for so long. The. NYT had been silent in the past whenever evidence of systematically and flagrantly violations of human rights principles by Israel was irrefutable.

This pattern of Israel’s sexual abuse in the aftermath of the October 7 Gaza attack became more extreme and notorious. This development was a major theme of the detailed report in March 2025 by the Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory established by the UN Human Rights Council. Additional to the description of instances of human rights abuses was the extremely damning assessment that ‘sexual and gender-based violence’ had become for Israel a ‘method of war.’ It was acknowledged that there was lacking convincing evidence that this practice was explicitly adopted by the Israeli government. Yet the Commission believed this behavior was implicitly endorsed by Israeli officialdom that responded to even the most extreme abuses by granting governmental impunity to the wrongdoers however serious the international crimes.

It is of utmost importance to support the integrity of Euro-Med and other objective human rights organizations and not allow state propaganda and extremist support groups of Israel to shut down or defame courageous efforts to expose human rights abuses. This attack on Euro-Med should be understood as part of a wider campaign of punitive response to truth-tellers (in contrast to impunity for wrongdoers) who are risking not only their reputations but their lives by devoting their efforts to the dissemination of inconvenient truths. The United States sanctioning of UN Special Rapporteur of Israeli Violation of Human Rights in Occupied Palestine, Francesca Albanese, is a similar disgraceful attack on an exceptionally brave truth-teller that should be seen as at one with these vicious attacks on Ramy Abdo and Euro-Watch.

Voices of global conscience need to accept and act upon the ancient wisdom that when truth prevails, justice is served, human dignity and moral decency upheld. Likewise, when truth is suppressed and evidence of atrocities is filtered or ignored, evil flourishes.

Richard Falk is an international law and international relations scholar who taught at Princeton University for forty years. Since 2002 he has lived in Santa Barbara, California, and taught at the local campus of the University of California in Global and International Studies and since 2005 chaired the Board of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation.

28 May 2026

Source: countercurrents.org

Euro-Med Monitor announces exceptional measures in response to Israeli disinformation and threats, reaffirms continuation of its work

By Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor

Geneva — Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor has taken exceptional and involuntary measures in response to a systematic Israeli campaign of disinformation, defamation, incitement, and direct and indirect threats targeting the organisation, its chairman, and members of its team. The campaign escalated after false accusations linked the organisation to a New York Times investigation into systematic sexual violence against Palestinians inside Israeli prisons.

Following an intense wave of incitement and threats, a restructuring of field and institutional operations has become necessary. These measures include downsizing the team and reducing activities across the occupied Palestinian territory and the wider region, suspending operations at the central Geneva office, closing offices in the occupied Palestinian territory and Lebanon, and shifting toward virtual and essential field-based work as circumstances require.

Among the latest repressive measures documented is an agreement concluded by Israeli Minister of Diaspora Affairs Amichai Chikli with Israel’s Population and Immigration Authority to bar nearly 40 staff members and affiliates from entering Israel and the occupied Palestinian territory, including founder and chairman Ramy Abdu, senior officials, board members, and employees.

The ongoing campaign constitutes a systematic attempt to silence independent human rights voices and undermine efforts aimed at exposing the truth and ensuring accountability for grave crimes and violations committed against Palestinians.

The campaign has included the distortion and manipulation of public statements, the fabrication of false allegations regarding political or organisational affiliations, and widespread incitement campaigns accompanied by threats that have extended to calls for the physical assassination of the organisation’s president and several staff members.

This escalation would not have reached such a dangerous level without the continued international silence surrounding Israeli crimes and the persistent failure to take meaningful action to hold perpetrators accountable for grave violations committed against Palestinian civilians, including the targeting of journalists, human rights defenders, and humanitarian workers.

What Euro-Med Monitor is facing today forms part of a broader policy targeting anyone who documents crimes or approaches the truth. Palestinian and international human rights organisations, humanitarian institutions, and UN mechanisms have all faced restrictions, delegitimisation efforts, and incitement campaigns, while journalists in Gaza have been systematically targeted and killed.

These precautionary measures reflect the seriousness with which the threats are being treated. The risks posed by this campaign are being raised before the United Nations, states, and relevant international mechanisms, as confronting such attacks is essential to protecting independent human rights work, professional journalism, and the public’s right to truth and justice.

Despite these dangerous circumstances, human rights and humanitarian work will continue through every possible means. Documentation of violations, advocacy for victims, and efforts to ensure accountability and prevent impunity remain ongoing responsibilities grounded in the conviction that protecting truth and defending human dignity are not optional, but fundamental obligations and moral duties.

Our work and documentation efforts did not begin because conditions were safe or easy, and they will not end because Israel has decided to raise their cost. Retreating in the face of intimidation would mean leaving victims without a voice, crimes without a record, and perpetrators without accountability. At the same time, Euro-Med Monitor is aware that these efforts confront a power that exercises force without restraint while benefiting from impunity and international indifference.

Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor is a Geneva-based independent organization with regional offices across the MENA region and Europe

28 May 2026

Source: countercurrents.org

UN Adds Israel to Sexual Violence Blacklist Amid Reports of Abuse Against Palestinians

By Quds News Network

New York (QNN)- The United Nations has added Israel to its blacklist for sexual violence against Palestinians amid mounting reports of sexual abuse against Palestinian detainees in Israeli prisons, which have sharply increased since the start of Israel’s Gaza genocide.

Israel’s ambassador to the UN Danny Danon announced on Thursday the decision, describing it as “blood libel” and a “political decision.”

According to Israeli media, the Israeli Prison Service will be included on the 2026 list, along with other Israeli entities that have entered a monitoring framework for the possibility of future inclusion.

In August, UN Secretary General António Guterres put Israel on notice that it might be included on the list in the 2026 annual report if it doesn’t take a series of steps.

“I urge the Government of Israel to release Palestinians who were arbitrarily detained, ensure that Palestinian prisoners are released in a dignified way, investigate and prosecute all allegations of sexual violence against Palestinian detainees, ensure humane treatment for all those held and implement prevention measures, including granting unhindered humanitarian access to detention facilities.”

In January 2025, it was reported that Israel was preventing Pramila Patten, Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict, from carrying out a comprehensive examination of war crimes allegedly committed by Hamas on October 7, because it would have required Israel to also allow the UN to investigate sexuap violence against Palestinians being held in Israel.

As a condition to an examination of Hamas’ alleged crimes, Patten had demanded that her staff be given access to the Israeli detention facilities where Palestinians are being held so they could also look into reports that soldiers sexually assaulted them. Israel, however, refused.

The UN move comes after the New York Times published a column by Nicholas Kristof detailing sexual violence by Israeli forces and settlers against Palestinians.

The report said Israeli forces train combat dogs to rape Palestinian detianees on the command of their handlers; Kristof said that “other Palestinian prisoners and human rights monitors have cited reports of dogs sexually assaulting prisoners.”

The testimony in the article was based on a report published last month by Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, which is based in Geneva, as well as interviews conducted by Kristof himself.

The report adds to a growing body of evidence documenting systematic sexual abuse of Palestinian detainees by Israeli forces, particularly since the start of the genocide in Gaza. Rights groups and media outlets have documented these abuses amid a sharp rise in the deaths of Palestinians in Israeli custody, alongside widespread reports of torture, mistreatment, and medical negligence.

Kristof’s article cited a report by the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel, presented to the UN Human Rights Council last year that Israel’s security apparatus had become a system under which sexual violence is “standard operating procedures” and “a major element in the ill treatment of Palestinians”.

It also pointed to a Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) report that found nearly a third of Palestinian journalists detained by Israel had faced sexual violence.

In March, Francesca Albanese, the United Nations special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories, said in her report to the UN Human Rights Council that “the Israeli prison system has degenerated into a laboratory of calculated cruelty” with acts that include rape of Palestinians with bottles, metal rods and knives.

“For skeptics, why not agree on Red Cross and lawyer visits for the 9,000 Palestinian ‘security’ prisoners?” Kristof wrote about X. “If you think these abuse allegations are false, such monitoring visits would be protective. So why not?”

The Israeli occupation government has not allowed the Red Cross to inspect the conditions of Palestinian detainees in Israeli prisons for years.

Recently, the Israeli military authorized five soldiers who sexually assaulted and raped a Palestinian detainee at the notorious Sde Teiman detention facility to return to reserve service after the charges against them were dropped. In 2024, a video was leaked showing the gang rape of a Palestinian detainee from Gaza by Israeli guards at Sde Teiman. The footage shows the detainee being selected from a larger group of bound detainees lying on the floor.

[https://twitter.com/Housebots/status/1940460344222404805]

[https://twitter.com/IslamAndLyfe/status/1941098860849529231]

The victim is then escorted to a wall, where guards, using their shields to hide their identity from the camera, proceed to rape him. The video was aired by Israel’s Channel 11. The attack is believed to have been so brutal that, after he was transferred to hospital, Israeli media reported that the victim was unable to walk.

According to a recent released report by Physicians for Human Rights–Israel (PHRI), based on data obtained from the Israeli army and Israel Prison Service (IPS), 98 Palestinians have died in Israeli prisons and military detention centers since October 2023, in many cases seemingly as a direct result of torture, medical neglect, and food deprivation by soldiers and prison officers.

28 May 2026

Source: countercurrents.org

Israel Commits Massacre in Gaza on First Day of Eid, Killing 10 in Strike on Residential Building

By Quds News Network

Gaza (QNN)- Ten Palestinians, including women, children, and elderly people, were killed in an Israeli strike on a residential building in Gaza City on the first day of Eid, in one of the deadliest attacks on Gaza since the so-called US-backed ceasefire took effect.

Medical sources confirmed that ten Palestinians were killed after an Israeli strike targeted a residential building in a densely populated area of central Gaza City overnight.

The attack occurred on the first day of Eid Al-Adha as many Palestinians gathered in the streets and in public spaces in an attempt to celebrate despite ongoing Israeli attacks and the blockade on the Gaza Strip.

[https://twitter.com/QudsNen/status/2059887877849248183]

The victims included women, elderly people, and children. The youngest was nine years old, while the oldest was 81. Among those killed were two 12-year-old girls and a 17-year-old girl. Among the killed were twelve-year-old Nour and 13-year-old Yamen who were siblings.

[https://twitter.com/QudsNen/status/2059896531604357311]

There has been a spike in Israeli attacks in the war-torn Strip despite the ceasefire.

Israel has violated the ceasefire which took effect in October more than 3,000 times, killing hundreds and blocking the entry of much-needed aid.

Israeli forces have killed more than 870 Palestinians since the ceasefire, including over 300 children, women, and the elderly.

Over 72,700 Palestinians have been killed in Israeli attacks since the war began on October 7, 2023.

United Nations human rights chief Volker Turk condemned Israel’s recent attacks in the Gaza Strip, saying that “the unrelenting pattern of killings” reflects Israel’s “sweeping impunity”.

“Palestinians are still being killed and injured in what is left of their homes, shelters and tents of displaced families, on the streets, in vehicles, at a medical facility and a classroom,” Turk said.

28 May 2026

Source: countercurrents.org

The Prisoner Down the Road: Palestine, Pakistan, and Prophetic Politics

By Prof. Junaid S. Ahmad

There is a strange and revealing theatre in the politics of the Muslim world: Gaza burns, capitals convene, communiqués appear, banquets proceed, Jerusalem is invoked, alliances are announced, and somehow the great machinery of “resistance” keeps moving without ever quite arriving where the oppressed need it most. It is not simple hypocrisy; that would be too easy, too crude, too morally lazy an explanation. It is something more intricate and more consequential: a polished choreography of grief and caution, sympathy and restraint, sacred language and strategic hesitation — a politics in which Palestine is loved sincerely by the people, honored ceremonially by the state, and too often left waiting at the gates of power.

Into this theatre came Dr. Sami Al-Arian, a man whose life is inseparable from sacrifice for Palestine. Few have paid more dearly in the belly of the American empire for refusing to treat Palestinian freedom as an unspeakable cause. He was persecuted, imprisoned, separated from his family, and ultimately deported because Palestine, in Washington’s catechism, is not a cause but a crime scene whose witnesses must be punished.[1]

For that reason, Dr. Sami deserves not casual criticism but serious, grateful, and respectful engagement. He is not a tourist of resistance, nor a professional flatterer passing through Islamabad for ceremonial applause. He is a Palestinian intellectual and activist who has endured the machinery he denounces. His moral capital is real. His sacrifices are real. His place in the history of Palestine solidarity is secure. Precisely because of that, his words in Pakistan matter.

When Dr. Sami addresses “Pakistan’s elite” and describes Pakistan as a source of strength for Palestine, one wants desperately to believe him.[2] Pakistan is nuclear-armed. Pakistan refuses formal recognition of Israel. Pakistan’s people carry Palestine not as a diplomatic slogan but as a wound. Its mosques, campuses, streets, homes, and hearts have carried Gaza with an intensity no foreign ministry could manufacture. Ordinary Pakistanis understand, with greater moral clarity than those who govern them, that Palestine is not a file in international relations. It is a test of the soul.

But here is the necessary distinction: Pakistan’s elite is not Pakistan. Pakistan’s rulers are not Pakistan’s conscience. Pakistan’s people may indeed be a source of strength for Palestine; its ruling establishment has yet to prove the same. That difference is not semantic. It is the whole matter.

The emerging dream of an “Islamic NATO” suffers from precisely this confusion. Its advocates speak as if Muslim regimes have suddenly discovered sovereignty because Israel has become too reckless even for its quiet partners and anxious neighbors. But Gaza already tested this proposition. Gaza did not happen in darkness. Its hospitals were destroyed in public. Its children were starved in public. Its universities, journalists, doctors, families, and neighborhoods were erased before the eyes of the world. If a meaningful Muslim security bloc existed in substance, Gaza would not have been left to plead with a world order engineered to ignore it.

The reality is more complicated, and more sobering. These states may now be organizing not primarily to protect the masses of the region from Zionism, empire, and domestic repression, but to protect themselves from the widening consequences of Zionist war. Gaza was a catastrophe. Qatar was a warning. Iran is a strategic panic. Saudi recalibration, Pakistan’s renewed military relevance, Turkiye’s possible inclusion, Qatar’s anxiety — all of this may be geopolitically significant. But significance is not the same as emancipation.

A Muslim bloc that defends palaces but not prisoners, borders but not bodies, regimes but not citizens, cannot yet be called a liberation project. At best, it is an unstable experiment in regional self-preservation. At worst, it is containment dressed in civilizational language.

That is why Dr. Sami’s Pakistan remarks are so delicate, and so painful. Not because he praised the Pakistani people; they deserve praise. Not because he imagined Pakistan could matter; it can, and perhaps must. But because he spoke to and through an elite whose domestic conduct sits uneasily beside the prophetic politics that Palestine demands.

Just down the road from where Pakistan’s powerful could be addressed as custodians of Palestine, former Prime Minister Imran Khan remains confined in conditions described by supporters and international advocates as punitive, isolating, and dangerous.[3] One need not be uncritical of Khan, or blind to his contradictions, to grasp the symbolism. One of the most popular political figures in one of the world’s most consequential Muslim countries is imprisoned while the same power structure receives praise for its supposed moral utility abroad.

This is not a side issue. It is the central contradiction.

The international appeal over Khan’s detention drew striking support from Palestinians and South Africans.[3] That is not an accident, nor is it evidence of some exotic “cult” of Khan. Palestinians and South Africans know something about the relationship between sovereignty and humiliation. They know that a people denied political agency are not merely misgoverned; they are disciplined. They recognize in Khan, whatever his limits, a figure through whom tens of millions of Pakistanis have articulated dignity, refusal, and the desire not to live as tenants in their own republic.

Here the contrast becomes unavoidable. The deepest moral pulse of Pakistan’s Palestine solidarity has not come from officialdom. It has come from figures like Senator Mushtaq Ahmad Khan, from the Pak-Palestine Forum, from the Pakistan Rights Movement, from the Haqooq-e-Khalq Party, from students, workers, religious activists, left organizers, and ordinary citizens who see no contradiction between opposing Zionism abroad and authoritarianism at home.[4] Many come from the Islamic movement, yet have rejected the collaborationist Islam of power for a liberation theology of the oppressed: Islam not as courtly perfume, not as protocol language, but as a vocabulary of justice.

If Dr. Sami is to strengthen Pakistan’s role for Palestine, these are the people who most deserve his attention. Not because officials must never be engaged. Politics is not a purity seminar, and Palestinians have often had to speak in difficult rooms with imperfect actors. But there is a difference between tactical engagement and moral endorsement. There is a difference between saying Pakistan could become a source of strength and implying that its present rulers have already behaved as one.

The danger of the current Islamic alliance discourse is that it can allow Muslim rulers to purchase anti-Zionist legitimacy on credit. They need not democratize. They need not release prisoners. They need not address grotesque inequality. They need only speak the language of Palestine with sufficient solemnity, and suddenly the moral ledger appears balanced.

Dr. Sami Al-Arian’s own life is a profound testimony to a better politics. He knows what empire does to those who refuse silence. That is why many who admire him hope his words in Pakistan become sharper, not harsher; more prophetic, not less respectful; more attuned to the people beneath the state. Respecting him means taking him seriously enough to offer a careful and principled challenge.

The Muslim world does not suffer from a shortage of alliances. It suffers from a shortage of justice. Until any “Islamic NATO” can defend not only states from Israel, but peoples from the states that rule them, it will remain what too much official Muslim politics already is: a procession of flags, summits, uniforms, slogans, and sacred vocabulary marching with great ceremony toward the nearest safe compromise.

Endnotes

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_vs._Al-Arian
[2] https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2026/05/20/pakistan-source-of-strength-for-palestine-says-palestinian-prof-dr-sami
[3] https://muslimviews.co.za/imran-khan-global-coalition-demands-medical-transparency/
[4] https://muslimviews.co.za/from-pakistan-to-gaza-why-senator-mushtaq-ahmad-khan-terrifies-power-and-zionism/

Prof. Junaid S. Ahmad teaches Law, Religion, and Global Politics and is the Director of the Center for the Study of Islam and Decolonization (CSID), Islamabad, Pakistan.

26 May 2026

Source: countercurrents.org

Venezuela Under Siege: Defending the Bolivarian Revolution Against US Imperialism

By Francisco Dominguez and Roger D Harris

In response to recent developments in Venezuela under imperialist siege, international solidarity activists should adopt a stance that does not inadvertently reinforce Washington’s drive for domination. Our central responsibility is not to adjudicate every tactical decision made under siege conditions, but to oppose the imperialist aggression that creates those conditions.

The overwhelming structure of US hybrid warfare against Venezuela remains intact, continuing to suffocate the country’s economic recovery and undermine its sovereignty. Washington continues to exert decisive pressure over the country’s principal source of national revenue, the oil sector. It uses sanctions, financial coercion, and domination of global banking systems, as it has against other targeted states such as Iraq and Syria.

At the same time, the threat of direct military escalation remains ever present, a danger underscored by continuing military deployments, aggressive rhetoric, and repeated threats.

What some may regard as unjustifiable compromises by the Venezuelan government pale in comparison to our obligations as international solidarity activists: defending Venezuela and Cuba against the policies of imperialism. The US continues to intensify blockades, sanctions, destabilization efforts, and military threats against these revolutionary processes while simultaneously waging disinformation campaigns against the Chavista leadership and the Cuban Revolution.

Both Fidel Castro and Hugo Chávez identified US imperialism as the principal enemy of humanity. Our primary political focus should therefore remain opposition to imperialist domination, rather than allowing secondary disagreements to obscure the central contradiction.

The responsibilities of internationalists

First and foremost, the main blow must be directed against US imperialism. Any discussion of shortcomings, compromises, or concessions should be understood within the context of relentless external aggression, destabilization efforts, and military threats.

That is why internationals vigorously campaign both for the safe return to Venezuela of President Nicolá s Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores and for the immediate and unconditional lifting of all sanctions.

The political choices made by the Venezuelan leadership must ultimately be resolved within Venezuela itself. The role of internationalists is to oppose imperialism at home, not to instruct Venezuelans on how to defend their revolution.

Support for Venezuela against US imperialism does not require agreement with every decision taken under conditions of coercion. Understanding political decisions made under such circumstances is to situate them within the realities imposed by imperialist military power. This includes the extradition of Alex Saab.

A longstanding objective of US policy has been to fracture the unity of the Chavista leadership, military, and popular base. Despite immense pressure, that unity has largely held. Attempts to counterpose solidarity with the popular base against solidarity with the leadership, however well intentioned, objectively strengthen imperialist aims.

The conditions facing Venezuela

We do not know the full extent of the pressures exerted on the Venezuelan government, nor the range of alternatives realistically available under present conditions. The Venezuelan leadership operates under severe geopolitical constraints. The US openly threatens Libya- or Iran-style retaliation. Another major military escalation remains entirely possible.

Unlike in earlier periods, Venezuela today lacks strong regional allies, while in the context of the ongoing Gaza genocide, so-called “international law” offers little meaningful restraint on US power.

Given the vast military asymmetry between the two countries, the consequences of direct military confrontation would be catastrophic for Venezuela, potentially including the destruction of vital infrastructure and long-term devastation of the oil industry upon which the country depends.

If the US succeeds in placing the extreme right-wing opposition in power, the likely result would be devastating political repression directed against Chavismo and the popular sectors.

Strategic realities and political continuity

While continuing to rely upon the Chavista base, the government also recognizes the necessity of building a broader patriotic bloc capable of resisting imperialist pressure more effectively.

Even amid forced compromises, the central achievements of the Bolivarian process remain significant: preservation of the revolutionary leadership, survival against destabilization efforts, and avoidance of a full-scale invasion.

Years of sanctions and economic warfare severely degraded Venezuela’s oil infrastructure. Restoring productive capacity, reestablishing trade, and attracting investment have therefore become vital imperatives.

The political transitions from Chávez to Maduro to Rodríguez largely reflect changes in the international geopolitical landscape. Yet there has remained substantial political continuity within Chavismo, evident in continued solidarity with Cuba, the vitality of the communal system, and the endurance of the revolutionary mass movement.

In conclusion, under conditions of economic warfare, military threat, diplomatic isolation, and perpetual destabilization efforts, Venezuela’s contradictions cannot be analyzed abstractly or outside the realities of imperialist power. The primary task of solidarity movements within the imperial centers remains what it has always been: opposing the aggression of our own ruling classes.

Roger D. Harris is a co-founder of the North American-based Venezuela Solidarity Network.

Francisco Dominguez is the national secretary of the UK-based Venezuela Solidarity Campaign.

26 May 2026

Source: countercurrents.org