Archives: Articles

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich’s Blog

11 December 12

@ readersupportednews.org

Washington has a way of focusing the nation’s attention on tactical games over partisan maneuvers that are symptoms of a few really big problems. But we almost never get to debate or even discuss the big problems because the tactical games overwhelm everything else.

The debate over the fiscal cliff, for example, is really about tactical maneuvers preceding a negotiation about how best to reduce the federal budget deficit. This, in turn, is a fragment of a bigger debate over whether we should be embracing austerity economics and reducing the budget deficit in the next few years or, alternatively, using public spending and investing to grow the economy and increase the number of jobs.

Even this larger debate is just one part of what should be the central debate of our time – why median wages continue to drop and poverty to increase at the same time income and wealth are becoming ever more concentrated at the top, and what should be done to counter the trend.

With a shrinking share of total income and wealth, the middle class and poor simply don’t have the purchasing power to get the economy back on solid footing. (The wealthy don’t spend enough of their income or assets to make up for this shortfall, and they invest their savings wherever around the world they can get the highest return).

As a result, consumer spending – fully 70 percent of economic activity – isn’t up to the task of keeping the economy going. This puts greater pressure on government to be purchaser of last resort.

The dilemma isn’t just economic. It’s also political. As money concentrates at the top, so does power. That concentrated power generates even more entrenched wealth at the top, and less for the middle class and the poor.

A case in point is what’s now happening in Michigan. In the state where the American labor movement was born – and where, because of labor unions, the American middle class once had the bargaining power to gain a significant portion of the nation’s total income – Republicans and big money are striking back.

Legislators in the Michigan state House, followed almost immediately by Republicans who dominate the state Senate, voted Thursday afternoon to eliminate basic union organizing and workplace protections for both public and private-sector workers. Michigan Republican Governor Rick Snyder says he’ll sign the measure.

This anti-labor blitzkreig was launched and coordinated by “Americans for Prosperity” – a group developed and funded by the right-wing industrialists and billionaire campaign donors Charles and David Koch, to “pave the way for right to work in states across our nation.”

The Koch brothers are the same ones, not incidentally, who several years ago backed a group called “Citizen’s United,” on its way to the Supreme Court for an opinion by the Court’s Republican majority that opened the floodgates to big money corrupting our federal and state governments. (The brothers Koch have also entertained Justices Scalia and Thomas at strategy meetings they’ve organized of Republican donors.)

Connect the dots: As unions have withered, the middle class’s share of total income and wealth has dropped. The decline of the median wage in America over the last three decades correlates exactly with the declining percentage of American workers who are unionized.

And as the super-rich have grown even wealthier, they’ve been able to extend their power through the Supreme Court and the Republican Party – advancing a war on the middle class.

These moneyed interests may lose a skirmish or two, particularly at the federal level when the public’s attention is focused there (Michigan voters went overwhelmingly for President Obama and Democratic Senator Debbie Stabenow on November 6). But the moneyed interests are patient and relentless and, as is evident in Michigan, able to strike suddenly with extraordinary organization and precision.

They’ve taken on our tax system, successfully raising taxes on the middle class and the poor (Social Security payroll taxes, sales taxes, and user fees) while reducing their own top marginal tax rates. They’ve taken on public spending – cutting government workers and programs the poor and middle class depend on (teachers and school budgets, social workers and family support services, job training and unemployment insurance, to name only a few.)

And they’ve taken on the unions that once negotiated good wages on behalf of the middle class and of those who aspired to join it.

The result has been a degree of inequality this nation hasn’t witnessed since the days of the robber barons of the late nineteenth century – an inequality that’s harming our economy as much as it’s undermining our democracy.

As Washington fiddles over the fiscal cliff, a larger battle over inequality is being waged all over America.

By Hassan N. Gardezi

10 December, 2012

@ Countercurrents.org

Introduction

There is a war raging in our times between a coalition of states led by the United States of America and al-Qaeda which has entered its second decade. One of the parties in this war, the United States, needs no introduction. After the collapse of the Soviet Union it became the sole superpower and is known in all corners of the world as the most powerful nation on all accounts, political, military, economic and socio-cultural. However, al-Qaeda as a global force is not understood so well and needs some introduction and defining.

Al-Qaeda came out of the 1980s jihad (Islamic holy war) against the Soviet backed government of Peoples Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA) in Kabul. This jihad was mobilized by the United States, [1] in collaboration with the Saudi royalty and Pakistan’s military dictator Gen. Zia. The Saudis lavishly financed the jihad with their oil wealth, but what turned out to be their more fateful contribution was Osama bin Laden whose arrival in Afghanistan was arranged through the chief of the Saudi Secret Service, Prince Faisal al Turki, and the CIA. After the former Soviet Union withdrew its troops from Afghanistan in 1989 Osama, the accomplished holly warrior and some of his Arab comrades founded the organisation named al-Qaeda with a view to continue their jihad against the American “infidel,” who they thought was defiling the holy land of Islam by deploying its troops in Saudi Arabia in the wake of the first Gulf War.

Since its inception, however, the organisation has undergone changes in its composition, following, and geographical sphere of activity.  Today’s al-Qaeda, both as a political construct originating with the US establishment and as an existential reality stands for a loosely affiliated plurality of groups and individuals operating on a trans-national level with a shared mission and common tactics used to attain that mission. The plurality of groups linked to al-Qaeda range from the Afghan and Pakistani Taliban to Ansar al Sharia of Libya and Al Nusra Front of Syria.

The al-Qaeda Mission and the War on Terror

The overriding mission of al-Qaeda is to dominate the world, the Muslim world in particular, by imposing its own brand of socio-political order based on the Sunni-Salafi sharia laws of Saudi Arabia. This places al-Qaeda in conflict with the United States which also wants to dominate the world, but for different reasons that have to do with imperialist possession and control. While al-Qaeda has no interest in the imperial phenomena, it is convinced that it cannot achieve its goal of dominating the world without overpowering the “enemies of Islam,” defined primarily as infidels (unbelievers). The United States of America being the leading global power is at the top of al-Qaeda’s of infidel enemies. It was in retaliation to al-Qaeda’s alleged targeting of this “enemy of Islam” that led to the formal declaration of war on terror by President George W. Bush in 2001.

The “war on terror” despite the ambiguity of the phrase, is essentially a war of domination like the previous two world wars, albeit with some uniquely anomalous features. The first and foremost anomaly of this war lies in the fact that one of the combatants is a non-state, trans-national entity called al-Qaeda. As President Obama likes to reiterate, the goal of the war on terror is to “disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda.” Although under his “AfPak” policy Obama has extended the theatre of the war to include Pakistan with Afghanistan, the operations of al-Qaeda are not confined to these two countries. No continent or country seems to be free from actual or potential deadly attacks by the floating holy warriors of al-Qaeda. The problem is further complicated enormously when the United States itself finds it necessary to collude with the so called  al-Qaeda enemy when it suits its purpose, as being witnessed in the case of Libya and Syria.

The Libyan Nightmare

On 15 February 2011 a peaceful anti-government demonstration was staged in Libya’s eastern city of Benghazi, long associated with opposition to the Gaddafi regime. As the regime moved to quell the demonstration, the Security Council of the United Nations went into action with amazing haste and on February 26 and passed first of its resolutions calling for a freeze of the assets of Gaddafi and a number of his regime’s designated officials and a ban on their travel abroad, charging that the government had used excessive force against the demonstrators of Benghazi.. This was soon followed by a second resolution passed on March 17 declaring a No Fly Zone over Libya which gave the US-led NATO powers the pretext to intervene with air attacks on the country.  The global news channels including the Qatar based Al Jazeera, once the emerging face of an alternative to imperialist propaganda, kept telling the listeners that all this was being done out of “humanitarian concern”  for the safety of Libyan people.

On March 28 President Obama addressed the nation to say, in part, that:

“Confronted by brutal repression and looming crisis I have ordered warships into the Mediterranean. European allies declared their willingness to commit recourses to stop killing. The Libyan opposition and Arab League appealed the world to save lives in Libya. At my direction America led the effort with our allies at the United Nations Security Council to pass the historic resolution that authorized the no fly zone to stop the regime’s attacks from the air and further authorized all the necessary measures to protect the Libyan people.” [2]

This is a remarkably revealing quote from the address of the president of United States. It makes quite clear that it was the United States that had the Security Council meetings convened, and resolutions passed to intervene militarily in Libya soon after the first peaceful demonstration took place in Benghazi. Furthermore Obama’s story of Gaddafi’s “killing” of his people and the “necessary measures to protect Libyan people” sounds more like a replay of Bush’s story of Iraq’s “weapons of mass destruction.” And, while Obama could very well be correct regarding the messages he says he was getting from the European allies and the Arab League, his reference to “Libyan opposition” does need some scrutiny.

From the beginning of armed confrontations Libya’s state media continued to insist that the Gaddafi opposition was being led by ruthless al-Qaeda operatives. The US and NATO sources, however, either denied these claims or simply remained silent. Their warplanes continued the air attacks to cripple the Libyan defence forces and pin Gaddafi down to his hideouts as heavily armed opposition militias marched on to Tripoli, leaving blood and destruction in their trail. Finally on October 20, 2011 grisly images of a bloodied Muammar Gaddafi being lynched to death amidst shouts of allah-o-akbar (God is great) were flashed on the global television networks. Reportedly he was trying to escape to safety from his hometown of Sirte when his convoy was attacked by NATO war planes providing the ground militias the opportunity to grab and kill him.

The reaction of the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, caught on a widely circulated video, perhaps correctly reflected the mood of the entire US establishment at the news of Gaddafi’s murder. The good lady was about to sit down for an American TV interview in Kabul when she was told about the killing. After a moment’s pause she burst into a cackle of laughter uttering the words, “We came, we saw, he is dead,” waving her arms in the air.

Gaddafi’s horrible death may have served as a warning to dictators, especially those prone to get on the wrong side of the only superpower on earth, but it has certainly not brought Libya any closer to peace and democracy. After the fall of the regime some renegade ministers of Gaddafi’s erstwhile cabinets who had earlier joined together to form the National Transition Council (NTC) in Benghazi took over the rule of Libya, but not for long. On August 9, 2012 the governance of Libya, now fragmented into many tribal and regional factions and overrun by killing and torturing militias, was transferred to yet another interim  body, the 200 member General National Congress (GNC). This Congress chose the pro-Muslim Brotherhood politician Mohammed Magarief as its president who had been a long time opponent of the Gaddafi regime and had been living in the United States for many years. Magarief is the current titular president of Libya rendered lawless.

The al-Qaeda connection

It is no longer a secret that the main militia on the ground in Libya leading the opposition to bring about a violent regime change was the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, LIFG. This group has been well-known to the US establishment since its formation by the Libyan mujahideen, holy warriors, who had gone to Afghanistan in order to fight in the CIA sponsored jihad of the 1980s. Having returned from that holy war they decided to overthrow the secular regime of Muammar Gaddafi and replace it with an Islamic state. At the same time LIFG alienated its US facilitators by linking up with al-Qaeda. In 2004 the United States formally designated LIFG a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO), and after 9/11 had it banned by the Security Council of the United Nations. The CIA also began to keep a closer watch on the activists of the group. Those detained for suspected links to al-Qaeda’s terrorist activities were handed over to Libya under the notorious “rendition” policy.

One of them arrested in Malaysia and rendered to Libya, after being kept in a CIA secret prison for some time, was Abdel Hakim Belhaj. He too had fought in the 1980s CIA sponsored Afghanistan Jihad and later joined al-Qaeda. After his rendition Libya kept him jailed, but released him under some kind of a reconciliation deal in late 2010. He resumed his political activities when the February15 anti-Gaddafi demonstration took place in Benghazi followed by the US-led NATO intervention. Commanding a heavily armed LIFG militia band Belhadj marched on to Tripoli under cover of NATO air attacks and occupied the city on 23 August, 2011. That for all practical purposes was the end Gaddafi’s long rule over Libya. Belhadj installed himself the military commander of Tripoli. With the regime change completed over the next two months by the murder of Gaddafi, Belhadj was off to Syria planning the overthrow of Bashar al Assad government with the Free Syrian Army.

But al-Qaeda’s business in Libya was not over yet. On the 2012 anniversary of 9/11 another al-Qaeda linked militia calling itself Ansar al Sharia along with some prominent LIFG members attacked the Benghazi consulate of the United States and killed US ambassador, Chris Stevens along with three of his staff present there. The Obama administration first tried to portray the killing of the ambassador as the spontaneous act of a Muslim mob enraged over the recent showing of an anti-Islam film made in the United States, but under the election year scrutiny, had to admit at least this much that the killing of the ambassador was a planed act of a terrorist group.

The Syrian Nightmare

Rallies in opposition to the Syrian regime of Bashar al Asaad began to appear in mid-March 2011. Several reasons can be cited to account for these protests, including the contagion effect of the so-called Arab Spring and the long rule of the Bath Party led by the Assad family belonging to the minority Alawi sect. But an important factor that cannot be ignored is that of neo-liberal economic reforms that created much hardship for the lower income working class population. In this context it must be remembered that before the reforms were undertaken in the mid 1990s and pursued at an accelerated pace by Bashar al Assad when he took over in 2000, the Syrian state had a sizable public sector and supported a significant range of basic social programmes. The neo-liberal reforms led to rapid privatisation of the state sector enterprises and the dismantling of social programmes such as food and fuel subsidies, creating serious economic difficulties for the people.

While economic problems were clearly a major underlying factor in precipitating the protests, external powers and vested interests moved in quickly to transform the public unrest into a deadly melee for geopolitical domination. The same combinations of NATO Europeans and Arab league petro-monarchies led by the United States that were at work to bring down the Gaddafi regime began to sabotage the Bashar rule Syria. They heavily financed and armed al-Qaeda inspired Syrian and external Islamists to kill and destroy presumably to save the country for democracy or Islamic caliphate depending on who was interpreting the bloodshed in progress.

The Obama administration once again “led the effort,” this time behind the scenes, to summon the United Nations Security Council meetings to get a suitable resolution passed against the Bashar al Assad regime so that the Libyan ambush could be repeated in Syria. Starting in June 2011 a string of resolutions were moved in the Security Council meetings to condemn the Syrian regime or subject the country to international sanctions but all failed, not only because Russia and China cast their vetoes, but also because important states with long records of democratic rule such as India, Brazil and South Africa were also invariably opposed the moves. Those opposed to anti- regime resolutions were all very concerned about something the US and Western mainstream media have tried to push under the rug – the manipulation of the Security Council’s No Fly Zone Resolution by the United States and its allies to bring about violent regime change in Libya leading to Gaddafi murder. As one member of a UN mission said, “The ghost of Libya is haunting the debates on Syria.” [3]

However, the repeated rebuffs by the Security Council have not deterred the United States and its allies from clinging on to the objective of removing Bashar al Assad from power, no matter how much more the people of Syria have to suffer. Through its Arab allies, the Saudi Arabia and Qatar in particular, the United States has managed to supply enough petro-dollars and heavy arms, including shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles to the Syrian militias to keep the proxy war going and people dying. [4]

As a matter of fact the centre of the anti-Syrian activity led by the United States has been shifted out of the chambers of United Nations in New York to Doha in the oil-rich sheikhdom of Qatar. Here in the comfort of Luxury hotels a conference was held in early November 2012 to plan strategy to achieve a violent regime change and to cover up the al-Qaeda face of hard core Islamist militias in Syria. At the end of the conference, publicised extensively by the mainstream global media, the formation of a unified body to drive Assad out of power was announced under the rather pretentious name of “National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary Opposition Forces. In the meantime, ordinary Syrians keep dying and driven out of their homes by the explosions of suicide and car bombs of

Al-Nusra Front with al-Qaeda fingerprints.

Since the Doha conference global media has been awash with news of the success of militia fighters in having reached the suburbs of the Syrian capital, Damascus. BBC has also been reporting bomb explosions in the suburbs of Damascus with heavy loss of life, blamed invariably on Bashar for not quitting his job.  And in case none of these acts of war and terrorism work to bring about regime change in Syria, a new pretext is already being manufactures for US-NATAO intervention Libya style…  On December 3, 2012 giants of the corporate media, The New York Times, CNN and others broke the new of “intelligence” reports alleging that Bashar al Assad is planning to use chemical weapons to kill his opponents, complete with threats of retaliation issued by President Obama and his secretary of state, Hilary Clinton. The BBC News (America) in its December 3 television broadcast even spiced up its story by telling its audience that Hafiz al Assad had in fact used deadly chemicals on his opposition, only to apologize for telling a lie the next day.

Analysis

The United States is the leading power engaged in a very costly and prolonged war with al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. In the context of this ongoing war it does appear inconsistent for it to be in collusion with al-Qaeda in Libya and Syria. However, Afghanistan war has to be seen in the perspective of the overall foreign policy of United States, especially as it has been evolving since mid 1940s. At the end of the Second World War the United States emerged as a superpower that found it expedient to launch a more ambitious imperial project of dominating the world politically and economically, a policy which immediately brought it into intense rivalry with the other superpower, the Soviet Union. That rivalry produced the Cold War and its far-reaching global repercussions that are well known today. What is perhaps not so well known is that in the interstices of the Gold War had also emerged another regional, but nonetheless a major, obstacle to the forces of imperialism. This was the movement, known as pan-Arab nationalism or simply Arab nationalism that flourished in 1950s and 60s.

The movement was politically dominated by the personality of Jamal Adel Nasser and was aimed at unifying the vast region of Arabic speaking Middle East and North Africa stretching from the Arabian Sea to Atlantic Ocean on the basis of common language, history and ancestry, rather than religion. Ideologically this movement was secular and anti-imperialist, emphasising modernity, progress, socialist equality and ownership of the Arab natural assets for the benefit of the Arab people. Other than Nasser of Egypt the heads of state that more or less identified with the movement and its ideology included Ben Bella of Algeria, Houari Boumediene of Tunisia, Gaafar Nimeiry of Sudan, Hafiz al-Assad and Basher al-Assad of Syria Saddam Hussein of Iraq, and Muammar Gaddafi of Libya.

For all practical purposes the Arab Nationalist movement of the 1950s and 60s collapsed under the relentless opposition of Islamist groups of the time such as the Muslim Brotherhood, and the devastating impact of the 1967 Israel-Arab War. But the vestigial memories of the movement and fears of its resurrection in one form or the other through the initiative and leadership of a younger more educated and cosmopolitan Arab generation continue to haunt both the Islamists under the umbrella of al-Qaeda and the United States’ establishment. That is precisely the reason why the US and al-Qaeda while at war in Afghanistan have found it expedient to gang up in a last ditch battle to eliminate their common enemies in Libya and Syria.

[1] Zbigniew Brzezinski, Interview in Le Noviel Observateur, January, 15-21,1998

[2] Quoted in The Atlantic, September 28, 2012

[3] The Huffington Post, February 2, 2012.

[4] The New York Times, October 14, 2012.

 

By Francis A. Boyle

10 December, 2012

@ Countercurrents.org

Speech delivered at Puerto Rican Summit Conference on Human Rights , University of the Sacred Heart San Juan, Puerto Rico December 7-10, 2012

Historically this latest eruption of American militarism at the start of the 21st Century is akin to that of America opening the 20th Century by means of the U.S.-instigated Spanish-American War in 1898. Then the Republican administration of President William McKinley stole their colonial empire from Spain in Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines; inflicted a near genocidal war against the Filipino people; while at the same time illegally annexing the Kingdom of Hawaii and subjecting the Native Hawaiian people (who call themselves the Kanaka Maoli) to near genocidal conditions. Additionally, McKinley’s military and colonial expansion into the Pacific was also designed to secure America’s economic exploitation of China pursuant to the euphemistic rubric of the “open door” policy. But over the next four decades America’s aggressive presence, policies, and practices in the so-called “Pacific” Ocean would ineluctably pave the way for Japan’s attack at Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 194l, and thus America’s precipitation into the ongoing Second World War. Today a century later the serial imperial aggressions launched and menaced by the neoconservative Republican Bush Junior administration and the neoliberal Democratic Obama administration are now threatening to set off World War III.

By shamelessly exploiting the terrible tragedy of 11 September 2001, the Bush Junior administration set forth to steal a hydrocarbon empire from the Muslim states and peoples living in Central Asia and the Middle East and Africa under the bogus pretexts of (1) fighting a war against “international terrorism” or “Islamic fundamentalism”; and/or (2) eliminating weapons of mass destruction; and/or (3) the promotion of democracy; and/or (4) self-styled humanitarian intervention/responsibility to protect (R2P). Only this time the geopolitical stakes are infinitely greater than they were a century ago: control and domination of the world’s hydrocarbon resources and thus the very fundaments and energizers of the global economic system – oil and gas. The Bush Junior/ Obama administrations have already targeted the remaining hydrocarbon reserves of Africa, Latin America (e.g., the Pentagon’s reactivization of the U.S. Fourth Fleet in 2008), and Southeast Asia for further conquest or domination, together with the strategic choke-points at sea and on land required for their transportation. Today the U.S. Fourth Fleet threatens Cuba, Venezuela, and Ecuador for sure.

Toward accomplishing that first objective, in 2007 the neoconservative Bush Junior administration announced the establishment of the U.S. Pentagon’s Africa Command (AFRICOM) in order to better control, dominate, steal, and exploit both the natural resources and the variegated peoples of the continent of Africa, the very cradle of our human species. In 2011 Libya then proved to be the first victim of AFRICOM under the neoliberal Obama administration, thus demonstrating the truly bi-partisan and non-partisan nature of U.S. imperial foreign policy decision-making. Let us put aside as beyond the scope of this paper the American conquest, extermination, and ethnic cleansing of the Indians from off the face of the continent of North America. Since America’s instigation of the Spanish-American War in 1898, U.S. foreign policy decision-making has been alternatively conducted by reactionary imperialists, conservative imperialists, and liberal imperialists for the past 115 years and counting.

This world-girdling burst of U.S. imperialism at the start of humankind’s new millennium is what my teacher, mentor, and friend the late, great Professor Hans Morgenthau denominated “unlimited imperialism” in his seminal book Politics Among Nations 52-53 (4th ed. 1968):

The outstanding historic examples of unlimited imperialism are the expansionist policies of Alexander the Great, Rome, the Arabs in the seventh and eighth centuries, Napoleon I, and Hitler. They all have in common an urge toward expansion which knows no rational limits, feeds on its own successes and, if not stopped by a superior force, will go on to the confines of the political world. This urge will not be satisfied so long as there remains anywhere a possible object of domination–a politically organized group of men which by its very independence challenges the conqueror’s lust for power. It is, as we shall see, exactly the lack of moderation, the aspiration to conquer all that lends itself to conquest, characteristic of unlimited imperialism, which in the past has been the undoing of the imperialistic policies of this kind….

The factual circumstances surrounding the outbreaks of both the First World War and the Second World War currently hover like the Sword of Damocles over the heads of all humanity.

Since September 11, 2001, it is the Unlimited Imperialists à la Alexander, Napoleon, and Hitler who have been in charge of conducting American foreign policy decision-making. After September 11, 2001 the people of the world have witnessed successive governments in the United States that have demonstrated little respect for fundamental considerations of international law, human rights, or the United States Constitution. Instead, the world has watched a comprehensive and malicious assault upon the integrity of the international and domestic legal orders by groups of men and women who are thoroughly Hobbist and Machiavellian in their perception of international relations and in their conduct of both foreign affairs and American domestic policy. Even more seriously, in many instances specific components of the U.S. government’s foreign policies constitute ongoing criminal activity under well recognized principles of both international law and United States domestic law, and in particular the Nuremberg Charter, the Nuremberg Judgment, and the Nuremberg Principles, as well as the Pentagon’s own U.S. Army Field Manual 27-10 on The Law of Land Warfare, which applies to the President himself as Commander-in-Chief of United States Armed Forces under Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution.

Depending on the substantive issues involved, these international and domestic crimes typically include but are not limited to the Nuremberg offences of “crimes against peace”—e.g., Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Yemen, Pakistan, Syria, and perhaps their longstanding threatened war of aggression against Iran. Their criminal responsibility also concerns “crimes against humanity” and war crimes as well as grave breaches of the Four Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the 1907 Hague Regulations on land warfare: torture, enforced disappearances, assassinations, murders, kidnappings, extraordinary renditions, “shock and awe,” depleted uranium, white phosphorous, cluster bombs, drone strikes, etc. Furthermore, various officials of the United States government have committed numerous inchoate crimes incidental to these substantive offences that under the Nuremberg Charter, Judgment, and Principles as well as U.S. Army Field Manual 27-10 (1956) are international crimes in their own right: planning, and preparation, solicitation, incitement, conspiracy, complicity, attempt, aiding and abetting. Of course the terrible irony of today’s situation is that over six decades ago at Nuremberg the U.S. government participated in the prosecution, punishment, and execution of Nazi government officials for committing some of the same types of heinous international crimes that these officials of the United States government currently inflict upon people all over the world. To be sure, I personally oppose the imposition of capital punishment upon any human being for any reason no matter how monstrous their crimes, whether they be Saddam Hussein, Bush Junior, Tony Blair, or Barack Obama.

According to basic principles of international criminal law set forth in paragraph 501 of U.S. Army Field Manual 27-10, all high level civilian officials and military officers in the U.S. government who either knew or should have known that soldiers or civilians under their control (such as the C.I.A. or mercenary contractors), committed or were about to commit international crimes and failed to take the measures necessary to stop them, or to punish them, or both, are likewise personally responsible for the commission of international crimes. This category of officialdom who actually knew or should have known of the commission of these international crimes under their jurisdiction and failed to do anything about them include at the very top of America’s criminal chain-of-command the President, the Vice-President, the U.S. Secretary of Defense, Secretary of State, Director of National Intelligence, the C.I.A. Director, National Security Advisor and the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs of Staff along with the appropriate Regional Commanders-in-Chiefs, especially for U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM).

These U.S. government officials and their immediate subordinates are responsible for the commission of crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, and war crimes as specified by the Nuremberg Charter, Judgment, and Principles as well as by U.S. Army Field Manual 27-10 of 1956. Today in international legal terms, the United States government itself should now be viewed as constituting an ongoing criminal conspiracy under international criminal law in violation of the Nuremberg Charter, the Nuremberg Judgment, and the Nuremberg Principles, because of its formulation and undertaking of serial wars of aggression, crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, and war crimes that are legally akin to those perpetrated by the former Nazi regime in Germany. As a consequence, American citizens possess the basic right under international law and the United States domestic law, including the U.S. Constitution, to engage in acts of civil resistance designed to prevent, impede, thwart, or terminate ongoing criminal activities perpetrated by U.S. government officials in their conduct of foreign affairs policies and military operations purported to relate to defense and counter-terrorism.

For that very reason, large numbers of American citizens have decided to act on their own cognizance by means of civil resistance in order to demand that the U.S. government adhere to basic principles of international law, of U.S. domestic law, and of the U.S. Constitution in its conduct of foreign affairs and military operations. Mistakenly, however, such actions have been defined to constitute classic instances of “civil disobedience” as historically practiced in the United States. And the conventional status quo admonition by the U.S. power elite and its sycophantic news media for those who knowingly engage in “civil disobedience” has always been that they must meekly accept their punishment for having performed a prima facie breach of the positive laws as a demonstration of their good faith and moral commitment. Nothing could be further from the truth! Today’s civil resisters are the sheriffs! The U.S. government officials are the outlaws!

Here I would like to suggest a different way of thinking about civil resistance activities that are specifically designed to thwart, prevent, or impede ongoing criminal activity by officials of the U.S. government under well‑recognized principles of international and U.S. domestic law. Such civil resistance activities represent the last constitutional avenue open to the American people to preserve their democratic form of government with its historical commitment to the rule of law and human rights. Civil resistance is the last hope America has to prevent the U.S. government from moving even farther down the path of lawless violence in Africa, the Middle East, Southwest Asia, military interventionism into Latin America, and nuclear confrontation with Iran, Pakistan, North Korea, Russia, and China.

Such measures of “civil resistance” must not be confused with, and indeed must be carefully distinguished from, acts of “civil disobedience” as traditionally defined. In today’s civil resistance cases, what we witness are American citizens attempting to prevent the ongoing commission of international and domestic crimes under well-recognized principles of international law and U.S. domestic law. This is a phenomenon essentially different from the classic civil disobedience cases of the 1950s and 1960s where incredibly courageous African Americans and their supporters were conscientiously violating domestic laws for the express purpose of changing them. By contrast, today’s civil resisters are acting for the express purpose of upholding the rule of law, the U.S. Constitution, human rights, and international law. Applying the term “civil disobedience” to such civil resistors mistakenly presumes their guilt and thus perversely exonerates the U.S. government criminals.

Civil resistors disobeyed nothing, but to the contrary obeyed international law and the United States Constitution. By contrast, U.S. government officials disobeyed fundamental principles of international law as well as U.S. criminal law and thus committed international crimes and U.S. domestic crimes as well as impeachable violations of the United States Constitution. The civil resistors are the sheriffs enforcing international law, U.S. criminal law and the U.S. Constitution against the criminals working for the U.S. government!

Today the American people must reaffirm their commitment to the Nuremberg Charter, Judgment, and Principles by holding their government officials fully accountable under international law and U.S. domestic law for the commission of such grievous international and domestic crimes. They must not permit any aspect of their foreign affairs and defense policies to be conducted by acknowledged “war criminals” according to the U.S. government’s own official definition of that term as set forth in U.S. Army Field Manual 27-10 (1956), the U.S. War Crimes Act, and the Geneva Conventions. The American people must insist upon the impeachment, dismissal, resignation, indictment, conviction, and long-term incarceration of all U.S. government officials guilty of such heinous international and domestic crimes. That is precisely what American civil resisters are doing today!

This same right of civil resistance extends pari passu to all citizens of the world community of states. Everyone around the world has both the right and the duty under international law to resist ongoing criminal activities perpetrated by the U.S. government and its nefarious foreign accomplices in allied governments such as Britain, the other NATO states, Australia, Japan, South Korea, Georgia, Puerto Rico, etc. If not so restrained, the U.S. government could very well precipitate a Third World War. Here in Puerto Rico we saw the stunning example of the most courageous civil resistors against Yankee Imperialism on Vieques.

The future of American foreign policy and the peace of the world lie in the hands of American citizens and the peoples of the world—not the bureaucrats, legislators, judges, lobbyist, think-tanks, professors, and self-styled experts who inhibit Washington, D.C., New York City, and Cambridge, Massachusetts. Civil resistance is the way to go! This is our Nuremberg Moment now!

Thank you.

Professor Francis A. Boyle is an international law expert and served as Legal Advisor to the Palestine Liberation Organization and Yasser Arafat on the 1988 Palestinian Declaration of Independence, as well as to the Palestinian Delegation to the Middle East Peace Negotiations from 1991 to 1993, where he drafted the Palestinian counter-offer to the now defunct Oslo Agreement. His books include “ Palestine, Palestinians and International Law” (2003), and “ The Palestinian Right of Return under International Law” (2010).

 

 

The Armed Forces Continue Targeting Terrorists and Their Hideouts

Dec 10, 2012

PROVINCES, (SANA)- A unit of the Armed Forces on Sunday carried out a qualitative operation against terrorists near the Feed Foundation in Aliramon in Aleppo city, killing 20 terrorists.

A unit of the Internal Security Forces charged with the protection of the Greek Hospital in Aleppo on Saturday clashed with an armed terrorist group attempting to attack the hospital.

An Interior Ministry source said that the clash resulted in the killing of one of the terrorists and the injury of two others.

The source added that a 7mm pistol, night vision surveillance camera and HYT wireless device were seized in the clash.

Meanwhile, a unit of the Armed Forces killed 29 terrorists in an operation in which they targeted a gathering for Jabhat al-Nusra members near Chicken Restaurant in Bustan al-Basha in Aleppo city.

The Armed Forces also targeted terrorists’ gatherings in Darat Izza, Qibtan al-Jabal, Handrat and al-Mislmyeh, killing and injuring scores of terrorists and destroying their weapons and ammunition.

Another army unit destroyed a terrorists’ hideout and destroyed weapons and ammunition inside it in Khanaser.

In Aleppo city, the army targeted terrorists’ gatherings near the mosques of Suhaib and al-Na’na’i, destroying a vehicle equipped with heavy machinegun.

Terrorists’ gatherings in Bustan al-Basha and Bani Zaid were targeted, heavy losses were inflicted upon terrorists in these areas.

SANA reporter said that two terrorist groups clashed with each others as there were disputes over money in Deir Hafer, adding that scores of terrorists were killed or injured in the clash.

Al-Bakkarah Area Cleared from Terrorist Groups

The Armed Forces completely cleared al-Bakkarh area in Aleppo countryside from the armed terrorist groups.

70 Members of so-called ‘Military Council’ of Jabhat al-Nusra Killed in Damascus Countryside

A unit of the Armed Forces killed an armed terrorist group from Jabhat al-Nusra in al-Hejjeira town in Damascus Countryside.

SANA reporter quoted an official source in the province as saying that a number of terrorists were killed, among them terrorists Wael Masri, Izzat Ibrahim, Ahmad Fuad and Imad Zarzour were identified.

The source added that another army unit killed and injured 70 terrorists in an operation in which it targeted a hideout for the so-called ‘Military Council’ of Jabhat al-Nusra in al-Dhyiabiyeh town.

SANA reporter said amounts of weapons and ammunition were destroyed in the operation.

In the meantime, the Armed Forces continued operations against Jabhat al-Nusra terrorists in the city of Daraya.

An official source told SANA reporter that the army units inflicted heavy losses upon the terrorists in an operation it carried out in the area.

A warehouse including large amounts of weapons and ammunition used by the terrorists was destroyed in the operation.

A unit of the Armed Forces clashed with a terrorist group that attacked an army and law enforcement forces checkpoint on Daraa highway.

An official source told SANA reporter that the clashes resulted in leaving the group’s members dead and injured.

In the farms in Sheba’a area, an Armed Forces unit eliminated a number of terrorist group leaders, including Ahmad Mohammad Rajab.

An Armed Forces unit carried out an operation which resulted in the destruction of a number of terrorist hideouts along with the weapons and munitions inside them and elimination of a number of terrorists, including an Iraqi nicknamed Abu Omar al-Fallujah, in addition to Ala’a Zaher al-Khalaf, Adnan al-Awad, and Saleh al-Manzouri.

In al-Ziyabiye, another unit carried out an operation, destroying terrorist gatherings and hideouts along with the weapons, munitions and terrorists inside them, some of which were Tunisians and Jordanians.

The terrorists who were killed in the operation include Tunisian Ayman al-Hamadi and Jordanian Iyad al-Ala’ai, in addition to Fadi al-Hamdan, Farouk al-Sheikh, Mohammad al-Nader, Nasim al-Hamad, and a leader of a terrorist group known as Abu Ghadab.

Jabhat al-Nusra Terrorists Killed, their Hideouts Destroyed in Homs

A unit of the Armed Forces killed a number of al-Qaeda- affiliated Jabhat al-Nusra terrorists in al-Haidariyeh town in the countryside of al-Quseir in Homs.

A source in the province told SANA reporter that a mortar used by the terrorists in attacking citizens and their properties was destroyed in the operation.

It added that another army unit destroyed a number of terrorists’ hideouts in al-Sultaniyeh farms and killed all terrorists inside.

The Armed Forces destroyed a terrorists’ hideout and a weapons’ warehouse in al-Rawsheh neighborhood in Homs.

An official source told SANA that 6 terrorists were killed and 4 were injured in Bab Hood neighborhood.

In al-Qseir countryside, an army unit killed and injured scores of terrorists and destroyed a vehicle equipped with rocket platform in the areas of al-Haidariyeh.

Terrorist Arrested, Weapons and Ammunition Seized in Salamyieh, Hama

Meanwhile, authorities on Sunday stormed a terrorist group’s hideout in Daher al-Mugher al-Gharbi neighborhood in Salamyieh in Hama and arrested one of the most wanted terrorists.

An official source in the province told SANA reporter that the authorities seized the terrorist weapons and ammunition.

The source added that citizen Ismael Mohammad al-Ziyab, who was kidnapped by an armed terrorist group, released in the operation.

Terrorists’ Hideouts and Vehicles Destroyed, 3 Explosive Devices Dismantled in Idleb

Units of the Armed Forces continued pursuing Jabhat al-Nusra terrorists in the countryside of Idleb, killing and injuring many of them.

A unit of the Armed Forces destroyed a vehicle equipped with a heavy machinegun which the terrorists used in attacking the residents in Bsanqoul town in Ariha, killing scores of mercenary terrorists and injuring others.

The source added that the army also destroyed a number of terrorist groups’ hideouts and vehicles in Saraqeb and killed all the terrorists inside.

On the other hand, an army unit foiled terrorists’ attempt to detonate three explosive devices planted on al-Mastoumeh – Ariha road, weighed between 25 – 30 kg.

Armed Forces Destroy Pick-up with terrorists onboard in Jisr al-Shughour in Idleb

A unit of the Armed Forces targeted a pick-up loaded with munitions, weapons and military suits to terrorists in Jisr al-Shghour area in Idleb province.

A source in the province told SANA reporter that the Armed Forces eliminated several terrorists who were using the car.

Foreign and Expatriates Ministry: Syria Won’t Use Chemical Weapons, If It Possesses Any, Whatever the Circumstances

Dec 10, 2012

DAMASCUS, (SANA)- Syria on Saturday reaffirmed that it will not use chemical weapons, if it possesses any, whatever the circumstances as it is defending its people against terrorism supported by known countries, citing the USA on top.

Syria’s reaffirmation came in two identical letters addressed by the Foreign and Expatriates Ministry to the Chairman of the UN Security Council and the UN Secretary General.

“The U.S. administration has consistently worked over the past year to launch a campaign of allegations on the possibility that Syria could use chemical weapons during the current crisis,” said the Ministry.

It reiterated Syria’s openly repeated stress through the diplomatic frameworks that it “will not use chemical weapons, if it possessesany, whatever the circumstances because it is defending its people against terrorism supported by known countries, above all is the USA.”

“What raises concerns regarding this news circulated by the media is our serious fear that some of countries backing terrorism and terrorists might provide the armed terrorist groups with chemical weapons and claim that it was the Syrian government which did use the weapons,” said the Ministry in its letters.

It referred in this context to information revealed by the Turkish Yurt newspaper which said that members from al-Qaeda are manufacturing chemical weapons at a laboratory near the Turkish city of Gaziantep, and that they have threatened to use them against the Syrian civilians.

The letters also made reference to the Turkish newspaper indicating footages posted on the internet in which terrorists appear making poisonous gas from chemical materials which al-Qaeda got from a Turkish company and which were tested on living creatures.

“Those countries launching the campaign against Syria had better follow up on that act and hold those terrorists and the parties which helped them get the chemical materials to account,” the Foreign and Expatriates Ministry said.

It pointed out that the Syrian government, out of its care for its people’s lives, had asked the UN Supervision Mission to visit, inspect and calculate the stocks of a private sector chlorine processing plant, located to the east of Aleppo city, after information that the terrorist groups were then planning to take hold of it.

The Supervision Mission however could not do this because the terrorists opened fire on its members as they were trying to visit the plant, the Ministry added.

“The terrorist groups recently took hold of the plant which includes tons of the poisonous chlorine following the latest U.S.-Western campaign, with all the risks this issue implies,” it said.

The Ministry expressed Syria’s warning that the terrorist groups might resort to using chemical weapons against the Syrian people, and its denunciation of the international community’s inaction to deal with the developments after the terrorist groups recently took hold of a Chlorine processing plant to the east of Aleppo city.

“Syria also denounces not holding the supporters of the terrorist groups to account according to the relevant UN Security Council resolutions,” the letters added.

They slammed the hostile campaign against Syria as being characterized by the absence of the moral dimension, saying that “countries which used these or other similar weapons like the US, are not worthy to launch such a campaign, especially that [the US] used the pretext of Iraq possessing weapons of mass destruction (WMD) to justify its invasion and occupation of this Arab country in 2003.

The Foreign and Expatriates Ministry highlighted that Syria has scores of times made it clear that it will not use chemical weapons, if they exist, against its people under any circumstance, and stressed its commitment to its legal obligations according to the agreements and protocols it signed.

“Moreover, the Ministry added, “Syria submitted by the end of 2003 a draft resolution to the UN Security Council on Middle East Zone Free of Nuclear, Biological and Chemical (NBC)Weapons.”

However, the Ministry said, the US and the countries following it hindered the draft resolution and prevented the Security Council from adopting it.

It went on saying that Syria was not surprised by the U.S. move a few days ago to foil the UN efforts to hold a conference to establish a zone free of weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East, which was due to be held by the end of 2012.

“All of that was in defense of Israel, the only party in the region which has not signed the WMD agreements,” it added.

The Ministry concluded its letters by saying that “such campaign doesn’t work with Syria which has always adhered to is independence and sovereignty,” stressing that these media campaigns cannot mislead the Syrian people or the international public opinion, which has started to realize the reality of the conspiracies hatched against Syria and the real reasons behind continuing the shedding of the Syrian blood for which the terrorist groups and those supporting them are responsible in front of history and the nations.

Saudi Arabia Sends Most Wanted Criminals to Syria, Yemeni Websites Reveal

Dec 10, 2012

SANAA, (SANA) – Yemeni independent news websites published on Sunday a Saudi secret official document confirming that the regime of al-Saud ordered the release of a group of hundreds of most wanted criminals who are sentenced to death on crimes related to drug smuggling, killing and rape to send them to Syria and join the armed terrorist groups.

The document showed that an agreement was reached between the Saudi authorities and a number of criminals from several Arab and non-Arab nationalities who were exempted from the death penalty and given monthly salaries for their families in Saudi Arabia and releasing them to go to Syria.

According to the document, the criminals are 105 Yemenis, 212 Saudis, 96 Sudanese, 254 Syrians, 82 Jordanians, 68 Somalis, 32 Afghans, 194 Egyptians, 203 Pakistanis, 23 Iraqis, 21 Palestinians and 44 Kuwaitis.

The document said that those criminals will be trained to be sent to ‘Jihad’ in Syria.

Four Citizens Martyred in Terrorist Missile Attack in Homs, Car Bomb Explodes in al-Fahhameh in Damascus

Dec 10, 2012

DAMASCUS, (SANA)- An armed terrorist group on Sunday fired missile shells on the southern al-Arman neighborhood in the city of Homs, martyring a number of citizens, injuring others and causing considerable material damages.

An official source told SANA that an armed Terrorist group affiliated with Al Qaeda fired missile shells on the neighborhood, martyring four citizens and injuring others, in addition of causing grave material damages to shops, infrastructure, and water and electricity networks in the area.

Car Bomb Explodes in al-Fahhameh in Damascus, Injuring the Driver

Earlier on the day, terrorists detonated an explosive device attached to a private car in al-Fahhameh area in Damascus, causing severe injury of the driver.

SANA reporter said that the terrorist explosion resulted in complete destruction of the car in addition to material damage in a shop.

Brahimi: Efforts to find Political Solution to Crisis in Syria Possible

Dec 10, 2012

GENEVA, (SANA)-The UN Envoy to Syria Lakhdar Brahimi, following talks he held with US and Russian officials, announced they agreed that efforts to seek political solution to the crisis in Syria are still possible

“The meeting was constructive and it was held within an atmosphere of cooperation.. we discussed means to go ahead in a peaceful process and mobilizing a greater international movement in order to find a political solution to the crisis in Syria,” Reuters quoted Brahimi as saying in a statement issued after a day-long talks in Geneva.

UN: Brahimi’s Talks with Russian and US Officials on Syria Constructive

The UN said in a statement the talks that the UN envoy to Syria, Lakhdar Brahimi held with Russian and U.S. officials in Geneva were constructive.

Participants in the talks said that a political process to end the crisis in Syria is necessary and still possible.

AFP reported the international organization as saying that the meeting was constructive and it was held in an atmosphere of cooperation, adding that the participants called for more international work for a political solution to the crisis in Syria.

Egyptians Continue Their Stage-In Before Presidential Palace

Dec 10, 2012

CAIRO, (SANA) – Egyptians demonstrators participated in a stage-in in front of the Presidential Palace (Kasr al-Ittihadia) in Cairo for the third consecutive day in condemnation of the decisions of the Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi.

Thousands of demonstrators went to support the stage-in, while mass marches went off in several areas in the capital as to assemble before the palace.

Participants carried placards demanding the downfall of the rule of the Muslim Brotherhood, and subjecting the sides responsible for killing peaceful demonstrators last Wednesday to trials.

Political powers stressed the need to cancel the referendum call and resort to dialogue to overcome the current crisis.

Political sides said that the National Salvation Front will meet later to adopt unified stance on the Constitutional Declaration, adding that the Supplementary Declaration is a kind of prevarication policy.

The Front dismissed the calls to make a referendum on the new constitution draft, calling for mass marches on Tuesday in all Egyptian provinces.

Earlier, tens of demonstrators gathered in front of Morsi’s house in Sharkia province after the statement issued by the Egyptian Presidency. Police forces used tear gas grenades to disperse the demonstrators.

Follow-up Committee of Tehran National Dialogue Conference Calls for Finding Peaceful Solution to Crisis in Syria

Dec 10, 2012

DAMASCUS, (SANA) – The follow-up committee on national dialogue emerged from Tehran Conference held its first meeting in Damascus on Sunday.

The Follow-up committee agreed on forming central committees and subcommittees to achieve the goals concerning launching the national comprehensive dialogue and specifying the inside and outside Syrian parties to encourage them and persuade them to the attend dialogue, pointing out that the most important goals of the newly formed committees will be working to hold a new national dialogue conference in Damascus.

The committee also agreed that its new name is “the Follow-up Committee on Comprehensive National Dialogue” and it is tasked with launching dialogue to get out of the crisis in Syria.

It called for broadcasting two TV programs on a daily basis on the work of the committee and the Syrian opposition.

Representatives of political and popular parties participated in the meeting which focused on means of expanding the committee’s work and role in launching the comprehensive national dialogue and finding a peaceful solution to the crisis in Syria.

The participants also discussed establishing communication bridges among all political forces inside and outside Syria, preparing a national dialogue table based on firm principles, following up on the stages achieved by the National Dialogue Conference in Tehran and launching a Syrian national initiative for reconciliation away from foreign intervention.

They also called for holding an extended national dialogue conference in Syria and laying the foundation for ending all acts of violence.

Member of People’s Assembly, Faisal Azouz, expressed hope that this meeting will complete what was started at Tehran Conference “based on the participation of all parties and not excluding any political force that rejects violence.”

He called for making this conference the starting point to launch an expanded dialogue that includes all the Syrians to rescue Syria.

In turn, Chairman of the National Initiative for Syrian Kurds, Omar Ossi, called for forming a political office and a secretary for the follow-up committee representing all the participating popular and political spectrums to help permanently follow up the committee’s work.

Member of People’s Assembly, Khaled al-Abboud, said that this meeting constitutes a platform for an open dialogue among all political forces inside Syria and abroad.

He added that the follow up committee is open to all those who want to participate in it and contribute to reproducing the Syrian political scene to help solve the crisis in Syria.

For his part, Head of the National Youth for Justice and Development Party, Barwin Ibrahim, called for real work to combat corruption and find solution to the crisis, indicating that the Syrian media should be transparent in dealing with the events and give chance to all parties to express their viewpoints.

Representative of the opposition Third Movement, Mazen Mughrabiyeh, called for holding a serious national dialogue conference in Syria, considering that the problem currently facing Syria is a political one that should be solved.

Participants in Tehran Conference held on November 20 and 21 agreed on the formation of a follow-up committee to set the necessary preparations to follow up on the comprehensive national dialogue.

For his part, Fatih Jamous, leader of the Peaceful Change Path Movement, stressed that the impotence of finding a solution to the crisis in Syria is due to the absence of decisive parties from the negotiation table, highlighting the importance of these parties to be present at the table to launch dialogue and find specific axes to work for emerging from the crisis in Syria.

Founder of the Syrian Family Forum, Ahed Sharifeh, emphasized that the homeland is the compass for this joint work, calling for encouraging all sides to sit at the dialogue table to serve the interests of the Syrian people.

Chairman of the Secular Social Democratic Movement, Nabil Fayad, pointed out to the necessity of addressing decision-making centers abroad and the public opinion to clarify what is going on in Syria and the crimes committed by the armed groups.

He added that documented reports have been submitted to some U.S. Congress members on the violations committed by the armed groups against the Syrian people.

Secretary of the Popular Will Party Council, Alaa Arafat, highlighted the importance of finding a Syrian initiative to solve the crisis, adding that this initiative should be the task of the Follow-up Committee on National Dialogue.

Secretary-General of the Syrian National Youth Party, Maher Mirhej, pointed out to the efforts exerted by the party to communicate with armed opposition groups, adding that the armed groups which amounted to 175 groups expressed readiness to reject the Doha Coalition.

Lavrov: We Don’t Discuss the Destiny of Syrian Leadership with Any Party

Dec 09, 2012

MOSCOW, (SANA)- Russian Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov, announced that the upcoming meeting on Syria which is to be held on the level of the deputy foreign ministers of Russia and the US, with the participation of the UN envoy to Syria, Lakhdar Brahimi, will take place on Sunday and Monday. Speaking on the sidelines of the round table held under the title ‘Russia and the Changing World’, Lavrov pointed out that he met the U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, and Brahimi in Dublin and that they agreed on holding a special meeting for experts on the level of deputy foreign ministers to hold intensive talks.

He stressed that Russia is ready for such meetings if the Geneva Declaration is the basis for the talks without ultimatums or preconditions.

Lavrov revealed that there are unclean attempts by some countries known for distorting facts to portray Russia’s stance towards the situation in Syria contrary to the reality.

He stressed the need to force all sides to lay down arms and sit to dialogue table instead of the unavailing and endless talk about the departure of the Syrian leadership.

“My country doesn’t hold talks with any party on the destiny of the Syrian leadership and it is not clinging to anybody,” said the Russian Foreign Minister, considering that all attempts to portray the situation differently are unclean “even for the diplomacy of those countries that are known for attempts at distorting the facts.”

The Russian Foreign Minister said, “There are attempts to create an image that the Syrian Government is planning to use chemical weapons. We are dealing seriously with any rumors in this regard, and we are making sure of the truth through contacting the Syrian Government”.

He added, “According to our information which we present to the Americans in response to their demand and to the European colleagues, the Syrian Government does not have any intention to use chemical weapons”.

He went on saying that the greatest danger of chemical weapons is that they could go to gunmen, pointing out that currently there are organizations linked to al-Qaeda becoming active in Syria.

Body of Patriarch IV Hazim Arrives to Mariamite Cathedral in Damascus

Dec 09, 2012

DAMASCUS, (SANA) – The body of Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Antioch and All the East Ignatius IV Hazim was laid out in the Mariamite Cathedral in Damascus on Sunday, where prayers were held presided upon by Archbishop Saba Esper, Archbishop of Houran and Jabal a-Arab.

Representatives of churches in Syria and citizens attended the prayers to pay their respects to the late Patriarch.

The body of Patriarch Hazim arrived at 3 PM on Sunday to the Syrian-Lebanese border crossing point, accompanied by Lebanese figures including former minister Yakoub al-Sarrab representing former Lebanese President Emil Lahhoud and former foreign minister Eli Salem.

In Damascus, the Patriarch’s convoy followed in footsteps of St. Paul the Apostle, crossing the Road Called Straight and arriving at the Mariamite Cathedral at 4:30 PM where the Syrian national anthem was played upon its arrival.

The funeral of Patriarch Hazim will be held at 2 PM on Monday at the Cathedral and he wil be laid to rest in the Patriarchs’ burial ground.

Salehi: Syria’s Enemies Started to Reconsider their Stances Realizing their Wrong Path

Dec 09, 2012

TEHRAN, (SANA) – Iran’s Foreign Minister, Ali Akbar Salehi, said that targeting Syria is the targeting of the resistance in the region, stressing support to Syria’s government and people against the western-U.S. scheme which aims at undermining its key role in the region and its support to the resistance.

During a meeting with Syria’s Ambassador to Iran, Adnan Mahmoud, in which Salehi received his credentials, the Iranian Foreign Minister underlined the need for joint efforts to face the economic war against Syrian and Iran, pointing out to the strategic relations between the two countries.

He added that Syria’s enemies have started to realize that they were going in the wrong path and that the situation in Syria will not end up in a way that serves their interests so they have begun to reconsider their stances towards Syria.

Salehi reiterated his country’s stance towards the crisis in Syria based on the belief that the solution to the crisis should be through dialogue between the government and the national opposition which believes in dialogue and rejects foreign intervention and the armed groups’ terrorist acts.

He stressed the need for pushing the bilateral relations forward and overcoming all obstacles hindering trade and economic cooperation between the two countries.

The Iranian Foreign Minister wished Ambassador Mahmoud success in his mission in a way that contributes to boosting bilateral cooperation in all fields.

In turn, Ambassador Mahmoud stressed the importance of making a qualitative leap in bilateral relations and preserving direct communication to overcome obstacles facing the implementation of signed agreements between both sides.

Terrorist Group Attacks ‘Qaboun 2’ Electricity Plant, Causing Outages in Several Areas

Dec 09, 2012

DAMASCUS, (SANA)- An armed terrorist group attacked on Saturday night the Electric Power Transmission Plant ‘Qaboun 2’ in al-Qaboun neighborhood in Damascus, causing it to go out of service.

Minister of Electricity, Eng. Imad Khamis, told SANA reporter that the power transformers inside the plant were burned as a result of the attack, which caused power outages in the areas fed by the plant.

The Minister stressed that the repair workshops headed immediately to the targeted plant to fix the damage and restore service.

Khamis noted that the areas affected by the attack, including al-Mazra’eh, al-Qusour, al-Thawra Street, al-Qaboun and Barzeh, will be gradually fed by other sources until repair works are finished, which the Minister said will take a week.

Syria’s Ambassador in Algeria Refutes Media Claims of His Resignation

Dec 09, 2012

DAMASCUS, (SANA) – Syria’s Ambassador in Algeria Dr. Numair al-Ghanem affirmed on Sunday that the claims by some media outlets which are complicit in the shedding in Syria blood on him resigning his post are baseless.

In a phone call with SANA, Ghanem said that these allegations are part of the psychological warfare that seeks to undermine Syrians’ confidence, affirming that such fabrications and rumors are proof the of the utter stupidity and failure of Syria’s enemies.

He said that this attempt will fail, and that he and his colleagues in the diplomatic corps will continue to work in Syria and abroad to follow the directives of President Bashar al-Assad, concluding by stressing that Syria will not break thanks to the Syrian Arab Army which is confronting the west’s mercenaries and minions in the region.

Stands in Solidarity with Homeland Held in South Africa, Slovakia, Russia, Czech and Spain

Dec 09, 2012

CAPITALS, (SANA)- Members of the Syrian and Lebanese community in South Africa reiterated their rejection of the aggression targeting Syria because of its national stances, stressing their support to Syria’s national and pan-Arab project led by President Bashar al-Assad.

During a stand of solidarity with Syria held on Saturday in front of the Syrian Embassy in Pretoria, the participants emphasized that Syria’s territorial integrity and the unity of its people are red lines.

They highlighted that the Syrian Arab Army is the only party responsible for protecting the homeland and getting it out of its crisis.

They affirmed that Syria’s security is the security of Lebanon and that the targeting of Syria is the targeting of the resistance project in the face of the imperialist schemes which the West is trying to bring life to.

Syrians in Slovakia Reiterates Adherence to Homeland

In the same context, Syrian students and community in Slovakia reiterated solidarity with their motherland in confronting terrorism and the global conspiracy hatched against it, expressing support to Syria and its leadership and people.

The National Union of Syrian Students, Slovakia Branch, organized a march in solidarity with Syria, in cooperation with the Syrian community in Slovakia with participation of Arab and Slovakian youth activists.

The participants in the march raised the Syrian flag and toured the streets of the Slovakian capital, Bratislava, including the Presidential Palace, the Parliament and the old City.

They thanked Russia and the friendly countries for supporting the Syrian people in confronting the conspiracy.

They also expressed complete rejection of all forms of foreign interference in Syria’s internal affairs, voicing confidence that Syria will overcome the crisis due to the wisdom of its leadership, awareness of its people and sacrifices of its army.

They reiterated support to President Bashar al-Assad in facing the challenges that aim at undermining Syria’s unity, stability and security, hailing the reforms launched by the Syrian leadership.

Solidarity Stand for Syria Held in Russia

The Syrian community, the National union of Syrian Students Union in Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States, in cooperation with a number of active Russian organizations on Saturday staged a solidarity stand at the Martyrs Square in Moscow to express their support to Syria against the armed terrorist groups.

Participants reiterated their support to Syria’s leadership, army and people in face of the conspiracies hatched against it, stressing their readiness to exert all they can to defend their homeland and protect it in its battle against terrorist and extremist groups which are backed by western countries and their regional allies in Turkey and kingdoms and sheikdoms of the Gulf.

They hailed the firm and principled stances of the Russian and Chinese leaderships which prevented foreign military intervention in Syria’s internal affairs, expressing gratitude and support to these stances.

Representative of the Anti-Globalization Movement in Russia told SANA correspondent in Moscow that the movement’s participation in this stand is an expression of solidarity with Syria and rejection of foreign interference in its affairs.

On deploying Patriot missiles along the Syrian-Turkish borders, the representative said this issue is a flagrant provocation as Turkey is offering its territories for terrorist activities against Syria.

Speeches delivered at the event stressed that the US and its agents want to escalate tension to double up their presence in the region and hinder the efforts of the Syrian people to preserve independence and sovereignty.

Syrian Students in Prague Srtress Rejection of Foreign Interference in Syria

In the same context, Syrian students at the Czech universities reiterated their rejection of regional and international pressure and conspiracies against Syria.

Organizing a stand in solidarity in the Czech capital of Prague, the students stressed support to their homeland and rejection of any foreign intervention in Syria’s internal affairs.

They condemned the instigative and misleading media campaign launched by some channels and international organizations against their country, voicing support to the current reforms in Syria.

The participants stressed that the Syrians only have the solution, hailing the sacrifices of the Syrian Arab Army against terrorism and the foreign-backed terrorists.

They expressed gratitude to the countries and peoples who stand by Syria at the international forums to thwart the conspiracy, especially Russia and China.

Arab students, Czech citizens and representative from the Czech National Socialist Party participated in the stand.

Syrian Students in Spain Hold Rally in Support of Homeland

Syrian students and members of the Syrian community in Spain rallied in front of the Spanish foreign ministry in Madrid to voice their support for their homeland.

Participants denounced the countries that support armed terrorist groups and those who tamper with Syria’s security and shed blood in the name of Jihad.

They also saluted the Syrian Arab Army which managed to confront mercenaries and foiled the conspiracies against Syria.

Prime Minister Stresses Importance of Work with National Parties to Boost Unity

Dec 09, 2012

DAMASCUS, (SANA)- Prime Minister, Wael al-Halqi, highlighted the importance of communication and coordination between the government and the representatives of the Syrian national parties to work as one team to boost steadfastness in the face of the conspiracies and consolidate national unity.

The Premier’s remarks came during his meeting with the Secretary General of the Syrian Communist Party (Unified), Hanin Nimir, and members of the Party’s politburo on Sunday.

Al-Halqi stressed the need for activating the role of the parties of the National Progressive Front and the popular, vocational and civil organizations in protecting the public and private properties and preserving the constructive diversity of the Syrian community.

For his part, Nimir said the battle which Syria is engaged in is a political, military, economic and social one, hailing the great efforts exerted by the government to strengthen the steadfastness of the national economy.

Nimir highly valued the role of the Armed Forces in confronting terrorism and restoring security and stability to Syria.

A Popular Walk in Honor of Martyrs in Sweida

Dec 09, 2012

SWEIDA, (SANA) – Youth and civil figures in Shahba city in Sweida organized a walk from al-Baath Arab Socialist Party headquarters in the city to the tombs of the martyrs who were targeted by the armed terrorist groups while carrying out their national duty.

Families of a number of martyrs participated in the event which aimed at honoring the martyrs who sacrificed their lives for the sake of defending their country.

USA Starts Arming Terrorist Groups in Syria

Dec 09, 2012

LONDON, WASHINGTON, (SANA) – After the failure of the tools of the US in the region and after Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia proved impotence in face of the Syrian people’s steadfastness, the US has started playing its last card which is arming the opposition which is under the control of al-Qaeda Takfiri minds, according to the New York Times Newspaper.

The Newspaper said that an armed group linked to al-Qaeda has become more effective in fights against the Syrian Arab army.

Meanwhile, the British Sunday Times Newspaper said that the US started an underground process to send weapons to the Syrian opposition, adding that the Syrian opposition has been acquiring weapons from Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey with the blessings of the US since last Spring.

The Newspaper pointed out that the US will send mortars, missile launchers and anti-tank missiles through its allies in the Middle East.

It added that US President, Barack Obama, authorized the US Central Intelligence (CIA) to carry out an underground process to support the opposition forces earlier this year.

The Sunday Times noted that the Americans bought part of the weapons of the former Libyan Leader, Moammar al-Qaddafi’s arsenals, including SA 7 missils, Strela 2 missiles which can be used  to down aircrafts.

It pointed out that the US Department of State is contacting field commanders of the Syrian armed opposition forces.

US diplomats and CIA officials have established a channel for direct contact with the Syrian opposition military formations.

Turkey a Large Border Crossing to Jihadists Coming to Syria

Dec 08, 2012

ANKARA, (SANA) – After the US enlisted the terrorist organization of Jabhat al-Nusra on the international terrorism list, several western media outlets affirmed that Turkey is the main entrance for this terrorism into Syria.

Western media interviewed terrorists who spoke about the places they are coming from and the manner in which they enter Syria through Turkey.

A terrorist told the AFP that the journey of the extremists begin in Turkey, adding that they spare no effort to avoid journalists although they are spread all across the border areas between Turkey and Syria.

The AFP said it interviewed terrorists of several nationalities in Turkey and Syria, including Egyptians, Saudis and Algerians.

International Crisis Group stressed that there are foreign extremists who are directly involved in the fighting along with the armed groups in Syria.

The Group added that majority of these extremists are within the Salafi organizations, adding that the ambiguity circling their movements and locations made it so difficult to know their numbers and influence.

 

 

By Robert J. Burrowes

10 December, 2012

@ Countercurrents.org

Amid the ongoing sequence of horrendous news articles reporting one environmental disaster after another, with dire consequences for the planet and all its species (see, for example, ‘Global Extinction within one Human Lifetime as a Result of a Spreading Atmospheric Arctic Methane Heat Wave and Surface Firestorm’ –

http://climatesoscanada.org/blog/2012/04/30/global-extinction-within-one-human-lifetime-as-a-result-of-a-spreading-atmospheric-arctic-methane-heat-wave-and-surface-firestorm/),

I can now read accounts of the recent and predicable catastrophe that took place in Doha, where the 18th UN Climate Summit was held (see, for example, ‘A Carbon Tsunami in Doha’ – http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/12/06-0). I can also read many articles by people who respond to the ongoing climate catastrophe by urging us to lobby governments, UN organisations or others to change their policies and practices in one way or another.

In my experience, organisations such as the United Nations and governments cannot respond meaningfully to any of the major crises we face as a species for the simple reason that they are controlled by elite interests, including those multinational corporations that profit from wars, the use of fossil and nuclear fuels, the destruction of ecosystems and the exploitation of indigenous peoples (see, for example, ‘The Global 1%: Exposing the Transnational Ruling Class’ – http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=32356). Consequently, lobbying these organisations is more than a waste of time; it is an act of disempowerment (because you have submitted to ‘participation’ in a process that they already control). Of course, these institutions are also the ones that tell us that lobbying is ‘your democratic right’ and thus they encourage us to lobby them as the most effective way of absorbing and dissipating our dissent. They also have many agents, including some that are called ‘activists’ and ‘activist groups’ that encourage us to lobby as well.

But if lobbying to change the behaviour of the elite and its agents is ineffective, what can I do instead? Well, I devote considerable time to changing myself and, in doing so, give others the opportunity to consider my example. In addition to this, I take principled and strategic nonviolent action to directly confront those elites who are harming constituencies, including nonhuman species, which I love. This means that I cop a lot of criticism, some prison time and other forms of violence.

But I am far more powerful and effective than I would be if I spent my time lobbying someone who is paid well to ignore me.

One way in which I take action is by participating in ‘The Flame Tree Project to Save Life on Earth’ – http://tinyurl.com/flametree. The Flame Tree Project outlines a fifteen year strategy during which participating individuals are encouraged to reduce their consumption in each of seven vital resource areas by 10% per year for each of 15 successive years while increasing their self-reliance in sixteen key areas by 10% per year for 15 successive years. By doing this, participants automatically noncooperate, in a strategic manner, with elite-controlled structures and processes while simultaneously creating alternative, local structures that allow them to self-reliantly meet their own needs, at a much lower level of consumption. This provides a basis for sharing the world’s resources equitably with the peoples of Africa, Asia and Central/South America while living in an ecologically sustainable manner. Moreover, individuals can participate as part of their household, street, neighbourhood or community but powerful individuals also have the option of setting an example when others they know are not yet ready to respond.

The Flame Tree Project also identifies action that can be taken by businesses, community groups, farmers, scientists and governments but it does not depend on the participation of any of these for the scheme to succeed. The scheme depends on powerful individuals. And because it depends on powerful individuals, participants are given the option of ignoring any aspect of the project with which they do not agree.

A second feature of The Flame Tree Project is that it offers the option for individuals and groups to participate in the planning and implementation of sophisticated campaigns of nonviolent resistance to prevent/end wars, end economic exploitation and save threatened ecosystems, as well as strategies of nonviolent defense to liberate Palestinians, Tibetans and other oppressed populations in those circumstances in which elite violence must be directly confronted (see Robert J. Burrowes ‘The Strategy of Nonviolent Defense: A Gandhian Approach’, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996 and Gene Sharp ‘The Politics of Nonviolent Action’, Boston: Porter Sargent, 1973). Not everyone will choose to participate in this way but, again, this is a choice for powerful individuals to make.

A third feature of The Flame Tree Project is that it challenges participants to ask searching questions about the nature of human society: for example, why are human beings violent? If we do not understand, and address, the fundamental cause of violence, then all of our efforts to survive by tackling the symptoms of our violence – including those that impact on our planetary environment – will ultimately fail. Understanding the cause of violence has profound implications for the nature of the institutions we must create if violence, including ecological violence, is to be eliminated. How do we raise our children? How is their education undertaken? How do we respond to dysfunctional (including violent) behaviours? Do police, legal and prison systems have any role to play in creating and developing cultures in which violence simply has no part? How do we defend ourselves without using military violence (which kills people, consumes vast quantities of natural resources and generates vast quantities of radioactive and other toxic wastes)? And what of structural violence? What organisations and institutions, of what size, are best able to meet the biologically inherent needs of humans?

Fundamentally, The Flame Tree Project is an invitation to ask the deep questions about how we go about creating a new and higher phase of life on Earth: a shift from violent civilization to nonviolent planetization. You are welcome to consider joining.

Robert J. Burrowes has a lifetime commitment to understanding and ending human violence. He has done extensive research since 1966 in an effort to understand why human beings are violent and has been a nonviolent activist since 1981. He is the author of ‘Why Violence?’ – http://tinyurl.com/whyviolence. His email address is flametree@riseup.net and his website is at http://robertjburrowes.wordpress.com

By George Monbiot, Monbiot.com

10 December 12

@ readersupportednews.org

Neoliberalism is not the root of the problem: it is the ideology used to justify a global grab of power, public assets and natural resources by an unrestrained elite.

Humankind’s greatest crisis coincides with the rise of an ideology that makes it impossible to address. By the late 1980s, when it became clear that manmade climate change endangered the living planet and its people, the world was in the grip of an extreme political doctrine, whose tenets forbid the kind of intervention required to arrest it.

Neoliberalism, also known as market fundamentalism or laissez-faire economics, purports to liberate the market from political interference. The state, it asserts, should do little but defend the realm, protect private property and remove barriers to business. In practice it looks nothing like this. What neoliberal theorists call shrinking the state looks more like shrinking democracy: reducing the means by which citizens can restrain the power of the elite. What they call “the market” looks more like the interests of corporations and the ultra-rich(1). Neoliberalism appears to be little more than a justification for plutocracy.

The doctrine was first applied in Chile in 1973, as former students of the University of Chicago, schooled in Milton Friedman’s extreme prescriptions and funded by the CIA, worked alongside General Pinochet to impose a programme that would have been impossible in a democratic state. The result was an economic catastrophe, but one in which the rich – who took over Chile’s privatised industries and unprotected natural resources – prospered exceedingly(2).

The creed was taken up by Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. It was forced upon the poor world by the IMF and the World Bank. By the time James Hansen presented the first detailed attempt to model future temperature rises to the US Senate in 1988( 3), the doctrine was being implanted everywhere.

As we saw in 2007 and 2008 (when neoliberal governments were forced to abandon their principles to bail out the banks), there could scarcely be a worse set of circumstances for addressing a crisis of any kind. Until it has no choice, the self-hating state will not intervene, however acute the crisis or grave the consequences. Neoliberalism protects the interests of the elite against all comers.

Preventing climate breakdown – the four, five or six degrees of warming now predicted for this century by green extremists like, er, the World Bank, the International Energy Agency and PriceWaterhouseCoopers( 4,5,6) – means confronting the oil, gas and coal industry. It means forcing that industry to abandon the four-fifths or more of fossil fuel reserves that we cannot afford to burn( 7). It means cancelling the prospecting and development of new reserves – what’s the point if we can’t use current stocks? – and reversing the expansion of any infrastructure (such as airports) that cannot be run without them.

But the self-hating state cannot act. Captured by interests that democracy is supposed to restrain, it can only sit on the road, ears pricked and whiskers twitching, as the truck thunders towards it. Confrontation is forbidden, action is a mortal sin. You may, perhaps, disperse some money for new energy; you may not legislate against the old.

So Barack Obama pursues what he calls an “all of the above” policy: promoting wind, solar, oil and gas( 8). Ed Davey, the British climate change secretary, launched an energy bill in the Commons last week whose purpose was to decarbonise the energy supply. In the same debate he promised that he would “maximise the potential” of oil and gas production in the North Sea and other offshore fields( 9).

Lord Stern described climate change as “the greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen”( 10). The useless Earth Summit in June; the feeble measures now being debated in Doha; the energy bill( 11) and electricity demand reduction paper( 12) launched in Britain last week (better than they might have been but unmatched to the scale of the problem) expose the greatest and widest ranging failure of market fundamentalism: its incapacity to address our existential crisis.

The 1000-year legacy of current carbon emissions is long enough to smash anything resembling human civilisation into splinters( 13). Complex societies have sometimes survived the rise and fall of empires, plagues, wars and famines. They won’t survive six degrees of climate change, sustained for a millennium(14). In return for 150 years of explosive consumption, much of which does nothing to advance human welfare, we are atomising the natural world and the human systems that depend on it.

The climate summit (or foothill) in Doha and the sound and fury of the British government’s new measures probe the current limits of political action. Go further and you break your covenant with power, a covenant both disguised and validated by the neoliberal creed.

Neoliberalism is not the root of the problem: it is the ideology used, often retrospectively, to justify a global grab of power, public assets and natural resources by an unrestrained elite. But the problem cannot be addressed until the doctrine is challenged by effective political alternatives.

In other words, the struggle against climate change – and all the crises which now beset both human beings and the natural world – cannot be won without a wider political fight: a democratic mobilisation against plutocracy. I believe this should start with an effort to reform campaign finance: the means by which corporations and the very rich buy policies and politicians. Some of us will be launching a petition in the UK in the next few weeks, and I hope you will sign it.

But this is scarcely a beginning. We must start to articulate a new politics: one that sees intervention as legitimate, that contains a higher purpose than corporate emancipation disguised as market freedom, that puts the survival of people and the living world above the survival of a few favoured industries. In other words, a politics that belongs to us, not just the super-rich.

References:

1. See Colin Crouch, 2011. The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Polity Press, Cambridge.

2. Naomi Klein, 2007. The Shock Doctrine: the rise of disaster capitalism. Allen Lane, London.

3. http://www.nytimes.com/1988/06/24/us/global-warming-has-begun-expert-tells-senate.html

4. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and Climate Analytics, November 2012. Turn Down the Heat: why a 4C warmer World Must be Avoided. Report for the World Bank.

5. http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2011/11/09/364895/iea-global-warming-delaying-action-is-a-false-economy/

6. PriceWaterhouseCoopers, November 2012. Too late for two degrees? Low carbon economy index 2012.

7. http://www.monbiot.com/2011/07/19/an-underground-national-park/

8. http://www.barackobama.com/energy-info/

9.http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmhansrd/cm121129/debtext/121129-0002.htm

10. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2012-2013/0100/130100.pdf

11. Nicholas Stern, 2006. The Economics of Climate Change.

12. http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/11/consultation/electricity-demand-reduction/7075-electricity-demand-reduction-consultation-on-optio.pdf

13. Susan Solomon, Gian-Kasper Plattner, Reto Knutti, and Pierre Friedlingstein, 10th February 2009. Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. PNAS, vol. 106, no. 6, pp1704-1709. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812721106.

14. I’m speaking loosely here, as Solomon et al propose that not 100% but around 40% of the CO2 produced this century will remain in the atmosphere until at least the year 3000. On the other hand, unrestrained emissions and global warming will not stop of their own accord in 2100: temperatures could rise well beyond 6C in the following century: without sharp mitigation now, we’re setting up 1,000 years of utter chaos.

09 December, 2012

Countercurrents.org

Dear Sisters,

We are writing again to you for the 6th time. We realize that all over our country and the world people are speaking for us. As you know the present phase of the struggle that started in August 2011 against the Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant has gone through so many special and intense moments. Some of which has reached the world, some have not. But for us living in Idinthakarai and Koodankulam villages, we have not respite till we hear that the KKNPP has been shelved. We would also like to see that transparency in decision making and also participation in development programs become part of the democratic process in India. This we have learnt by being here and listening to so many learned thinkers and leaders who have come with support to us. We know that the Nuclear Industry is one ridden with secrets and lies, swamped in corruption and fraud. For this, our own tryst with the implementation of Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant is enough testimony.

We write this to share with you a matter that has reached our ears recently and which is troubling us no end. Our three dear sisters who were taken away by Police on September 10, 2012 are in Trichy jail. Now we hear that the Madurai bench of the Madras High Court has denied them bail. They have been charged with unlawful assembling, shouting abuses and carrying deadly weapons. We cannot even think for a moment like this about our gentle sisters. We are sure that you remember Xavier Amma lamenting at the Police from the sandy beach drenched in sea water, Sundari shouting slogans in her cracked voice after days of traveling and talking to villagers, Selvi being pushed around. We rub our eyes and pinch ourselves to make sure that these are sights not seen in mindless sleep. No, these are real as the attached photos will not lie. These are images , live and real from a day taken by friends who shared our anguish by being with us. These are images, not worked on in photoshop software or manipulated to prove some vested interest. These are honest copies of our life that speak for themselves.

We are afraid that the trio will be kept indefinitely in captivity so that the morale of all of us here can be broken and trampled upon. While we want to say aloud that we are still strong and convinced, we would also like to convey that we are worried about the future of the 3 sisters. We see their families, pining for them, anxious and restless. We see the faded smiles on the faces of Sundari’s children, the weak but sensitive son of Selvi’s the pain in Xavierammal’s aged mother’s eyes. We all miss them too. If anyone thinks that by treating them like criminals or anti-national suspects, the determination of the women in the movement can be suppressed, they are mistaken.

We have gained strength and energy as we hear from people who have visited them in jail.We are proud that they are holding on conveying to all their companions in the prison the cause they are fighting for. We are inspired by their steadfast courage and will power. We feel that it is permeating through the concrete walls and iron bars of the prison and reaching us.

We wish that all of you would think of the 3 in your prayers. Please come together even as small groups and demand their release. Now it is Sundari, Selvi and Xavierammal. Tomorrow it could be you, me and us.

Do convey this message to the world

With love

Sisters from Idinthakarai

( Conveyed to Anitha.S on 9.11.2011)

 

 

By Richard Falk

9 December 2012

@ Palestine Update Edition 2 No 56

CAIRO (5 December 2012) – Concluding his week-long mission to the region, Mr. Richard Falk, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied by Israel since 1967, called on Israel to abide by and fully implement the cease fire agreement that ended the recent crisis with Gaza.

“The initial purpose of my visit was to assess the overall impact of Israel’s prolonged occupation and blockade against the Gaza Strip, which is an integral part of Palestine,” Mr. Falk explained, “however there arose an urgent need to investigate Israel’s seemingly deliberate attacks against seemingly civilian targets during recent hostilities. We visited the sites of attacks and spoke with surviving family members. It is clear that some attacks killed and harmed civilians in a grossly disproportionate manner and thus clearly appear to violate international law.”

The Special Rapporteur continued, “There is a widespread feeling among Palestinians that Israel is above the law, and that Israel is likely to continue to have the benefits of impunity even when it flagrantly violates international humanitarian law. Experience has shown that Israel fails to meet its international obligation to promptly and impartially investigate its own actions. Experience has also shown that Israel is not likely to carry out its obligations under the cease fire agreement; indeed during our visit we heard Israeli warplanes flying directly overhead and received reports of Israeli military incursions into the Gaza Strip.”

For the Special Rapporteur, “Sustained pressure from the international community, including both Governments and civil society, is essential to secure Israel’s the full implementation of the cease fire agreement, without which it is extremely unlikely to hold. Worldwide support for the recent General Assembly resolution that made Palestine a non-Member observer State should serve as a starting point for the more concerted international protection of Palestinian rights.”

The Special Rapporteur stressed that talks to clarify how certain aspects of the cease fire agreement will be implemented, in particular with regard to access to maritime and agricultural resources, must be swiftly concluded. “Every day Palestinian fishermen and farmers risk being shot at or detained by Israeli forces. Already since the agreement was reached, Israel has detained 13 fishermen, confiscated 4 fishing boats and sank another fishing boat. Such actions signal an Israeli intention to maintain the continuity of its coercive style of occupation rather than explore whether implementing the ceasefire, agreement might not lead toward a more relaxed atmosphere and a more hopeful future.”

“At the same time, Palestinians and the international community are confronted with huge challenges to address underlying problems that have been severely aggravated by Israel’s occupation and blockade.” The Special Rapporteur pointed to the urgent need for access to clean water and sanitation, productive agricultural land, and new infrastructure. “We received extensive briefs on what could be done if sufficient resources and political will are made available. One example is the construction of a desalinization plant to meet urgent water and agricultural needs, but in many such cases funding is not forthcoming as donors are reluctant to invest in infrastructure projects that Israel is likely to bomb in one of its periodic large-scale attacks against Gaza.”

According to Mr. Falk, “Unless these underlying problems are addressed soon, it appears that Gaza will be uninhabitable by 2020, as predicted by a recent United Nations report. Some of the experts with whom we spoke actually believe that 2016 is a more reasonable assessment. This indicates the gravity of the human rights crisis in the Gaza Strip.”

The Special Rapporteur noted that his visit to the region consisted of meetings in Cairo and the Gaza Strip, with Governmental, inter-governmental and civil society representatives, as well as victims and witnesses. He received helpful briefings from UNRWA and other United Nations agencies, which provided an in-depth picture of the magnitude of the challenges in Gaza and the difficulties of addressing such challenges in a situation of occupation and blockade. He expressed his special appreciation to the people of Gaza and those international civil servants with whom he spoke for their support and engagement.

Mr. Falk’s next report to the Human Rights Council, which he intends to present in June 2013, will fully address the many concerns that were raised during the mission.

By Ismail Salami

09 December, 2012

@Countercurrents.org

As part of the sinister plan for Syria at work, French military agents have recently held face-to-face meetings with the foreign-backed militants inside the country in a bid to “assess the situation on the ground.”

A report carried by French paper Le Figaro on Friday indicates that “Their main task was to know who controls the battlegrounds around Damascus.”

It seems that a West-orchestrated plan to invade the country is under way and that they are teaming up and gearing up for united military action against the country.

The report adds that the meetings were held last month with the full knowledge of the French government and that the French government wants to know the “operational capacity of each group” and their “political colors.”

To make matters worse, NATO has agreed to deploy Patriot missiles on the Syria-Turkey border under the pretense of defending Turkey as Britain has warned Syria of ‘serious consequences’ if the regime used chemical weapons. All the pieces of the puzzle are being meticulously put together by the ‘foes of Syria’ to lend a cloak of legitimacy to an imminent invasion of the country: that Syria mulls using chemical weapons against its own people and the militants, that the war may spill over into Turkey and that Turkey should be able to defend herself against any potential attacks.

While in Brussels for a NATO foreign ministers’ meeting, William Hague, British foreign secretary, said that Britain had delivered a stark message to President Bashar al-Assad, echoing the words of the Obama administration on Monday.

“We are worried about chemical weapons,” said Mr. Hague. “We have become more concerned about them in recent days for the same reasons the US has. We have already sent our own, clear, private message directly to the Syrians about the serious consequences that would follow from the use of those weapons.”

Syria has blasted NATO’S decision to deploy Patriot missiles as “psychological warfare,” saying the new deployment would not deter it from seeking victory over the militants it views as terrorists.

Despite some western countries claiming that NATO’s decision to deploy the missiles shows a low appetite on their part for military intervention, it is to be seen as a strong naked message that the West is indeed gearing up for military intervention.

Syria said the NATO deployment shall not make Assad change course, calling the talk of chemical weapons part of a conspiracy to justify future intervention.

“The Turkish step and NATO’s support for it are provocative moves that constitute psychological warfare,” Syria’s Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad said in an interview with Lebanon’s Al-Manar TV. “But if they think this will affect our determination and work for a decisive victory in this fight against terrorism, they are very wrong.”

He added, “In the event that [foreign powers] actually considered an aggression, they should consider the consequences. I believe the cost will be high…. They need to understand that they are putting the entire region and its environs to danger, if they tried to commit such a folly.”

That Assad will use chemical weapons against his own population or even the militants is a threadbare claim and a feeble excuse concocted by the West to embark on their initial militaristic voyeurism and eventual military expedition. In fact, it is very much reminiscent of Washington’s claim that Iraq was in possession of Weapons of Mass destruction before it launched a military invasion of the country and brought about a human loss of inconceivable degree. Sadly some realities are soon forgotten. An opinion conducted by Opinion Research Business (ORB) on August 12–19, 2007, indicated a human loss of 1,033,000 in Iraq War. Although the range varies between 946,000 to 1,120,000 deaths, the sheer idea of such colossally disastrous human loss is beyond imagination. According to ORB, “48% died from a gunshot wound, 20% from the impact of a car bomb, 9% from aerial bombardment, 6% as a result of an accident and 6% from another blast/ordnance.”

Russia’s new ambassador to NATO, Alexander Grushko, has de plano perceived some pernicious amount of threat in the move and said, “This is not a threat to us, but this is an indication that NATO is moving towards engagement and that’s it. We see a danger of further involvement of NATO into the situation in Syria as a result of provocation or some border incidents.”

It is cruel but highly likely that West may provide the militants with chemical weapons so they may use them against the Syrians and shift the blame on the Syria government so that they can carry on with their long-though-out plan of invading the country. This idea is further consolidated when we focus on the attention recently accorded to this issue by the US and some western countries. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Barack Obama have for their parts vowed to take action if Syria uses chemical weapons in the country. NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen warned on Tuesday that any use of chemical weapons by Syria against gunmen would prompt an immediate military response.

The sad truth is that they have already formed their coalition against Syria with even Israel being part of this coalition. According to Hebrew-language Maariv newspaper, Tel Aviv is preparing for such a scenario amid increasing speculation that the US military will intervene in Syria “within days” if chemical weapons are used.

The ‘chemical weapons’ scenario seems to be the best cue for Washington and their western allies in order to gorge the international community on a tacit consent to another military adventurism in the Middle East.

Dr. Ismail Salami is an Iranian writer, Middle East expert, Iranologist and lexicographer. He writes extensively on the US and Middle East issues and his articles have been translated into a number of languages.

By Raghavan Srinivasan

09 December, 2012

@ Countercurrents.org

Twenty years back, on the 6th of December, the historical monument called Babri Masjid was destroyed by an armed mob. Developments leading to the destruction were orchestrated by the BJP government of Kalyan Singh in Uttar Pradesh with tacit support from Narasimha Rao’s Congress government at the centre. The criminal act of demolition was followed by widespread and large scale communal violence. The demolition symbolised a turning point in the Indian polity, for the worse.

Historical Context

The demolition had a historical and political context. The Babri Masjid dispute was a Machiavellian creation of the British colonialists who erected a fence in 1859 around the monument, and ordered that Hindus are to enter from the East gate and Muslims from the North gate. For the following 90 years, the British colonial courts allowed petitions from so-called Hindu and Muslim leaders, keeping the dispute smouldering, to be re-ignited whenever required.

After the partition, in the dark night of 22nd December, 1949, an idol of Ram was installed surreptitiously inside the mosque. The interim Government of Nehru immediately proclaimed the premises as a disputed area and locked the gates. The gates remained locked for the next 40 years, until Nehru’s grandson, Rajiv Gandhi, ordered it to be reopened in 1989.

The next three years witnessed a shrill campaign to build a temple for Lord Ram at the site where the Babri Masjid stood. The BJP built up a frenzied atmosphere through Rath Yatras demanding that the Ram temple should be built exactly where the 400-year old monument stood. The Central Government acted as the mediator between self-styled leaders of Hindus and Muslims, purportedly to strike a negotiated deal, but really keeping the dispute alive.

The Political Turning Point

The reason why the gates of the Babri Masjid were reopened after a 40-year hiatus can only be understood in the specific political context of the time. The decade of the eighties was tumultuous. The deepening economic and political crisis stared at us in the face. The old Nehruvian model had run its course and the decade ended with an acute crisis of government finances and external balance of payments. It was a period of intense conflicts and rivalries among different parties and the sectional interests they represented. There was tremendous pressure to push the country onto a path of economic reforms that would launch India into the superpower orbit and acquire world class status for India’s business houses.

The Congress Party headed by Rajiv Gandhi had come to power in 1985 on a communal platform, after the sacrilege of the Golden Temple and the genocide of Sikhs in November 1984. The next five years witnessed two important movements which prepared the political climate for a minority government to push through far-reaching policy reforms while people were otherwise preoccupied. Competing sectarian campaigns provided the justification for the law and order machinery to resort to blatant terror in the name of restoring order. There were agitations for and against the implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations on caste-based reservation quotas for the “other backward classes” or OBCs. And in the midst of the ensuing chaos, the vehicle of Rath Yatras was used to launch a campaign for erecting a Ram Mandir at the site where the Babri Masjid stood.

It was a time when major and abrupt changes were taking place across the world, culminating with the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the end of the bipolar division of the world. In the new dispensation, with the US pushing for a unipolar world, certain prescriptions were laid down for all countries to follow. It was made clear that there was simply no alternative to liberalisation and privatisation and to multi-party representative democracy. Any country which did not follow these prescriptions would be liable to be branded as a rogue state.

These developments created a conducive atmosphere for a section of the powerful business houses in our country to seize the initiative and launch the liberalisation and privatisation program, aimed at getting India a seat at the high table of major imperialist powers of the world. This was accompanied by diversionary and divisive campaigns to neutralise the growing opposition to the aggressive drive of India Inc.

The BJP harped on the pseudo-secularism of the Congress Party and its “appeasement of Muslims” as being the main problem faced by the country. The Congress Party blamed the religious chauvinist outlook of BJP as being the main danger. The activities of these two parties, who were apparently at loggerheads with one another, tended to polarise public opinion into the Hindutva camp and the Secularist camp. While these camps seemed to have irreconcilable differences, they vied with each other to support the reforms platform.

Political Impact

The demolition of Babri Masjid typified the growing rot in the Indian polity. It meant that the two biggest parties in Parliament could get away with any sort of crime to expand their vote banks. The genocide against Sikhs in 1984, following the assassination of Indira Gandhi, had already confirmed the fact that the new economic offensive required a new method of governance as well. The communal violence of 1992-93 marked the institutionalisation of this criminal method of governance.

The Liberhan Commission, which was appointed by the Narasimha Rao government to investigate the destruction of the Babri Masjid in 1992, submitted its report after 17 years, in 2009! The report described how the Uttar Pradesh government of Kalyan Singh and top leaders of the BJP were directly involved in the destruction of the monument. But the equally shameful role of the Narasimha Rao government at the centre was downplayed by the Commission. In any case both the Congress and the BJP made sure, through a barrage of accusations and counter-accusations in Parliament at each other — after the Commission released (or rather leaked) its report — that the guilty at the highest levels went scot free.

The fall of the Babri Masjid symbolised not only the mindless destruction of a historical monument but a turning point in the Indian polity for worse. In the new system of governance ushered in by the economic reforms, political parties representing big moneyed interests increasingly resort to criminalisation and communalisation to capture or to retain power. They remain unaccountable to the voters who elected them. They fight proxy battles in Parliament for various business interests and are steeped in corruption.

For all men and women of conscience, the 20th anniversary of the demolition of Babri Masjid is an occasion to dedicate ourselves to see that justice is done; that the guilty of communal violence are punished; and that our polity is cleansed of communalism and communal violence, through radical political reforms to empower the people.

(The author is the President of Lok Raj Sangathan and a political commentator and writer, email: lokrajsangathan@yahoo.com)