Just International

Syrian News on June 4th, 2012

President al-Assad: the Political Process is Moving Forward, National Security is a Red Line

DAMASCUS, (SANA)- President Bashar al-Assad on Sunday paid tribute to the souls of the innocent martyrs of the civilians and the military who have lost their lives since the early days of the events, stressing that their blood will not go in vain.

President al-Assad, addressing the People’s Assembly on the occasion of its first legislative term, eferring to the martyrs of the parliamentary candidates who were supposed to be part of “this big national workshop” on “this historic day”.

“To their souls and the souls of all innocent civilian and military martyrs who fell since the early days of the events, we stand in honor and high regard and send their families greetings and love and say to them ‘Their blood won’t go in vain’, and this is not be out of spite but out of the right as right is never lost unless it is abandoned by its holder.”

“Our only solace is that our homeland recovers and its sons live in security, peace, calm and stability,” the President added.

He expressed deep appreciation of the newly-elected members’ determination to run the elections under these delicate circumstances “which require us to have more courage, steadfastness and high sense of responsibility.”

The President said that the People’s Assembly is for all people, including peasants, farmers, employees, soldiers, doctors, engineers, lawyers, journalists, intellectuals and women, who aspire for a better, safer and more stable and prosperous future.

He stressed that “the legislative and monitoring tasks of the People’s Assembly’s members can’t be optimally done without possessing a clear developmental vision” which needs two factors to be fully developed.

“This fist one,” President al-Assad continued, “is the constructive dialogue under this Assembly and among its members,” adding that the second factor is the communication with the citizens to get acquainted with the challenges and difficulties facing them and to listen to their solutions and proposals that enrich those of the Assembly’s members so as for their plans and programs to be closer to reality and meeting the citizens’ concerns.

The President reiterated that the success of any official at the legislative or executive power is directly and closely related to his relationship with the citizen and ability to draw ideas and plans from the citizens’ aspirations and need for a better life.

“If the citizen is the target for, then he/she should be the starting point,” he added.

President al-Assad said the concentration on the scrutiny role of the Assembly should not overlook its role of participation with the executive authority in suggesting solutions, adding that “this requires that the Assembly turn into a beehive of work and dialogue to be the dynamo of energy and the engine of the entire development process in Syria.”

The President said “the relationship between the legislative authority and the executive authority is not one of compliment or competition, but one of integration,” adding that the relationship of integration should be methodical in that it needs mechanisms, “which is the most important thing for any institution to start its work with.”

The President spoke of the Assembly’s scrutiny role of over the executive authority, stressing that scrutiny does not start when there is negligence on the part of the executive official but rather starts with planning and gets completed when there is negligence or faults.

He added the process of planning by the executive authority requires direct dialogue with the legislative authority, which is to discuss the plan and vision of each minister for the sector he/she is responsible, and then to practice the role of monitoring and observations.

“When there is negligence, the Assembly’s role then will be that of accountability, and it is at this point when the Assembly assumes the responsibility of discussion before the voters and citizens,” the President added.

President al-Assad addressed the People’s Assembly’s members saying that their legislative term, coming “at this decisive stage whose gravity exceeds that of what Syria has faced since the evacuation of the French colonialists”, requires an exceptional role to deal with two opposite forces; “one pushing backward in terms of the attempts to weaken Syria and contravene its sovereignty through killing, sabotage, underdevelopment and submission to the outside, and the other pushing forward in terms of determination on reform.”

“If standing in the face of the regional and universal attack on our country has not been that easy mission, similarly, adapting to the reforms and consolidating them is not an easy process too,” said President al-Assad.

“With these reforms we keep off a large part of the attack and build an invincible dam in the face of the regional and international ambitions, and our success in this depends on us realizing the requirements of reform on the official and popular level,” the President added, pointing out that “the people who have been able to absorb the scope and dimensions of the scheme drawn for Syria and the region and face it with big national determination and awareness are the same people who are able to absorb the requirements of reform.”

“It’s our duty towards these people…to upgrade our performance to the level of their awareness and steadfastness so as for us to have the right to take pride in representing them and the honor to work for them,” said President al-Assad.

He stressed that the government has announced since the first days of the crisis clear political steps to boost the development process, which were carried out within their stated schedules contrary to what the enemies expected.

“Despite denying what has been achieved in the political field by the external and internal forces which bet on the crisis, and despite the continuous attempts to foil the political process, we didn’t halt doing what we announced and started,” said the President, citing the issuance of a number of laws, the conducting of local administration elections and the constitution referendum, which came in response to those attempts.

President al-Assad said conducting the People’s Assembly Elections at their time when the killings, threats and terrorism were continuing was the decisive response by the people to the criminal killers and their leaders and sponsors.

“This constitutional and democratic step dealt a blow to those who wanted Syria to isolate itself and drown in the blood of its sons and go decades back,” added the President.

President al-Assad said the international role in what is taking place has been laid bare after a year and a half of the crisis as it has exposed itself by moving from failure to failure to be later forced to reveal the reality of its stance and intentions in the words of its officials themselves.

President al-Assad said for trying to find a solution to the crisis, “we need to learn from the people we belong to, being able to decipher the conspiracy, based on an unerring popular sense, patriotic collective memory and a moral accumulation which constituted a fort that has protected our society from distortion and our identity and traditions from extinction.”

“What we have learnt from our people is an old and simple yet profound principle: if we are to solve our problems, we have to face them, not to escape them…confronting a problem is more likely painful, yet it is effective,” President al-Assad pointed out.

 

He spoke of the relationship between the political solution and terrorism, which has increased since the beginning of the crisis, saying that terrorism hit all sides with no exclusion, and it was not part of the political discord and did not support a side against another, wondering if dialogue and the political solution could prevent the terrorists from doing what they have done till today.

The President continued that the political process is moving ahead, but terrorism is also escalating nonstop, as it was not effected with the new laws issued since the beginning of the crisis.

“The terrorist is not interested in reform or dialogue, being an assassin tasked with a particular mission; neither does he care for condemnation and the tears of widows and orphans. He won’t stop until his mission is accomplished regardless of anything, and unless we stop him” President al-Assad added.

He stressed that not separating between terrorism from the political process is a big mistake committed by some people, as it gives legitimacy to terrorism which is sought by the terrorists and their masters since the first day of the events, noting that it is essential to separate between terrorism and the political process to ‘know how to move towards improving the conditions we are living in.”

“We should realize that we do not face a political problem, because having a political problem, means that there should be a party that presents a political or economic program and then we face this party through its project, so we know from the very first day that the problem is not political.”

President al-Assad continued to say “What we are facing is a scheme of sedition and fragmenting the homeland, and the tool of that is terrorism…yet we have not saved any political way from the beginning.”

President al-Assad added, ”We don’t have a magic wand, and we’ve tried all political ways, including laws, changing the constitution and pardoning those involved in events…Even national dialogue, we don’t have a problem with it in principle, but such dialogue needs that well-known parties agree and then we can reach national dialogue.”

”When we say that we are facing terrorism, this means that it is a real war waged from abroad, not an internal political issue…and dealing with a war is totally different from dealing with an internal disagreement or with Syrian parties. This must be clear.”

On dialogue, President al-Assad said that there must be well-defined plans and visions on dialogue and the parties involved in it and their relation to the current events, and whether these parties are really influential. ”We have to know if they are parties who are riding the wave to score personal gains…and whether these parties should be publically represented so as to get engaged in dialogue or not. If the answer is ”It does not matter”, what is the benefit from a dialogue that does not concern people? If yes, how can we define that these parties represent a section of the population?”

”These powers have escaped from participation in the elections under the pretext of boycotting elections…When they boycotted elections, they were not boycotting the government, the state or the ruling party, but boycotting people, because elections are the people’s right…that’ s why no one can claim to be representing people while boycotting people at the same time…this is a glaring contradiction,” the President added.

”Any political process has to be based on the public state…Otherwise, it is factually null…the people expressed themselves when they turned out in their millions to voice rejection of foreign interference and tampering with the territorial integrity and unity of the homeland…they also expressed themselves through participation in the elections under such tough circumstances and the local administration elections earlier and their wide participation in the constitution referendum, despite threats and terrorism.”

President al-Assad went on to say ”Any political action has to be built on the bases set by the people. National dialogue is no exception…the forthcoming national dialogue has to be based on these bases so as not to remain pro forma dialogue that won’t yield results.”

President al-Assad continued ”I differentiated between a political process and a political solution…When you say a political solution, this means that what we’re doing now will improve the conditions, and we said that terrorism has nothing to do with the political action…that’s why I say a political course.”

President al-Assad indicated that this course started with the laws issued, the parties formed and the political pluralism that the constitution guaranteed, adding that the forthcoming elections have to be publically endorsed, either through the People’s Assembly which represents the people or through direct public referendum as was the case with the constitution referendum.

”We are ready for dialogue and there are different opposition powers, some of which voiced readiness and willingness to get engaged in dialogue while others haven’t…part of the national opposition participated in the elections and are here with us now, and they came to the People’s Assembly through the public base they represent.”

”But part of the opposition is, frankly speaking, waiting for certain balances abroad to happen, some are even waiting for dictates from abroad. We say, nonetheless, we are always ready to start dialogue without conditions, except with those who are linked to outside powers, or the powers who got involved in supporting terrorism or called for foreign interference.”

President al-Assad said ”There will be a new government soon that takes into consideration the new political powers , especially the new balance at the People’s Assembly. There is no backtracking on openness and reforms.”

President al-Assad said that terrorism targets the homeland which makes it a separate case that needs to be addressed for the homeland to recover, ”There is tolerating terrorism or anyone who backs it.”

”I would like to affirm again that the state doesn’t resort to vengeance. I affirm that the state won’t take revenge now or after the crisis ends…We tolerated non-Syrian people who harmed Syria…How could we not tolerate our fellow Syrians?”

President al-Assad stressed that national security is a red line…”The price may be high…Syria has so far paid a high price, but we’ll be ready to pay it to protect the fabric of the Syrian society.”

President al-Assad said that the political course does not solve the current crisis or reduce terrorism, ”The political solution is far broader than laws or constitution…It is linked to all the reasons that led into the crisis which allowed foreigners-assuming that those who claim to be Arabs are foreigners- to interfere in the Syrian internal affairs…This crisis has created problems that are likely to cause troubles for us in the future, that’s why we need a political solution, and the legislations we’ve enacted help up to a point…The political solution starts with dealing with the concepts that have surfaced during this crisis.”

”Political solution starts when we differentiate between the difference in viewpoints which means richness and the disagreement over the homeland which means destruction…Pluralism is an intellectual state before being a political one…The solution starts when we recognize that nations soar above differences in times of crises, that’s why the issue becomes whether you are with or against the homeland.”

”Some tend to confuse between being against the policy of the state or the performance of officials and being against the homeland…There are people who drew the line between the two, and there are people who joined the rallies in force who are opposed to the performance of a lot of officials, but they succeeded in differentiating between the two cases,” said the President.

President al-Assad continued ”There are people who were abused by an official or member of a certain institution, but this is not a pretext to take revenge upon the state institutions or the homeland…I personally met families of martyrs who were killed by mistake, and they told me that the homeland is above personal issues…Most of the Syrian people are of this kind.” The President said that the battle was imposed on the Syrians who are now in a position of defending their homeland, calling on them to build their ideas for solving the crisis on reality and not on emotions.

He reiterated the necessity of learning from the people how to build and defend the homeland based on knowledge and the right vision, referring to the millions of Syrians who took up the streets to support the reform process, not because they were against freedom or because they supported corruption, but because they were able to envision the future and realize that it was not a case of reform or democracy but one of undermining Syria’s resistant role and its support to resistance and commitment to its rights and divide the homeland.

The President warned that chaos is the natural environment to embrace terrorism, noting that those who first made fuss for a new era of freedom and democracy were promoting chaos without realizing what they were talking about, adding that the result was chaos which embraced terrorism.

He said that the price Syria has paid during the crisis was expensive on the security level, expecting the price to be paid after overcoming the crisis to be more expensive on the moral level in terms of the new concepts which penetrated a large part of the young generation in Syria including those of terrorism, violence, robbery and mercenary, considering this a very big challenge ahead to face.

The President said ‘standing in the middle’ in terms of patriotism is no longer accepted and cannot be taken for ‘standing in the middle’ on the political level.

Responding to those who say that the president should be for all the people, President al-Assad said “a president is for all those standing under the umbrella of the homeland, the constitution and the law…therefore standing in the middle on the patriotic level is contrary to the constitution…and a betrayal of the patriotic trust.”

The President applauded the faith, great sacrifices, steadfastness and rare courage which the Armed Forces have showed in confronting the killing and terrorism facing the homeland’s sons, stressing the Syrian people’s embracement of the Armed Forces which reflected national unity in their steadfastness and adherence and therefore have become the target of the enemies for distorting the history of these forces.

The President added that it became clear for all the acts of counterfeit to attribute a lot of the heinous terrorist acts to the national Army establishment, and exploiting the mistakes by some individuals to show them as a method adopted by the State.

“Our armed forces’ establishment is a glorious edifice which built the homeland, defended it and protected its independence.. and it is not permissible to target a symbol that expresses our unity and dignity… so, we send our respect and appreciation to our honest soldiers who vowed themselves for the homeland,” President al-Assad said.

The President added that in the last week and following al-Houla massacre, they accused the armed forces and said that the massacres took place because of a shelling and tanks, but then they retreated after they felt the popular embracement, so they moved to accuse pro-state militias as they call them.

“We have described what has happened in al-Houla, al-Kazzaz, al-Midan, Deir Ezzor and Aleppo as heinous, brutal massacres… in fact, even the monsters can’t perpetrate what we have seen, particularly al-Houla… and I think that the Arabic Language is not able to describe what we have seen,” President al-Assad said.

The President added that this is the natural human feeling for anyone, wondering “do we want to use these feelings to prevent more bloodshed and protect more children .”

“This reminds us of  what has happened in the eighties of the last century when two sheikhs from two sects were killed in one city and it was nearly a sedition to break out, but the awareness of the families prevented that from happening … they have tried to repeat it now,” President al-Assad said.

He added “an oblivious question that we could ask in this case; who is the beneficiary… did the state or the pro-state persons perpetrate that act before the visit of Annan to make it a failure… we know who want to make it a failure.”

“The case is simple and obvious.. they started with stages during this crisis… they started with the case of popular revolution through which they expected to break out during several weeks, but they failed even in Ramadan.. after Ramadan they began with the armed act to confront the army and police, but they also failed … later they shifted into assassinations, explosions and terrifying the people, but they have failed due to the people’s steadfastness,”   the President said.

President al-Assad added, “Today, we should all stand together for the homeland. Everyone should feel that they are responsible for fulfilling their duties to save the homeland as a policeman, a soldier or an officer should…. depending solely on the government is not enough as the crisis is not internal, rather it is an external war with internal tools. Every citizen is responsible for defending their homeland.”

He went on saying, “We have to work every day to find renewable resources, reorder the priorities and repair what has been destroyed in the infrastructure”, stressing that the youths are the pillar of the homeland as the government started to activate their role in several social, economic and legislative junctures.

President al-Assad addressed the members of the People’s Assembly saying, “the citizens who voted for you want you to be close to them to feel their pains and to achieve their aspirations.”

22 Army, Law-enforcement Martyrs Laid to Rest

DAMASCUS, ALEPPO, (SANA) – On the music of the ‘Martyr’ and the ‘Farewell’, the bodies of 22 martyrs from the army and law enforcement forces on Sunday were escorted from Tishreen Military Hospital in Damascus and the Military Hospital of Aleppo to their final resting place.

Solemn funeral processions were held for the martyrs who were targeted by armed terrorist groups while they were in the line of duty in Damascus and its countryside, Daraa, al-Quneitera, al-Hasaka and Aleppo.

The martyrs are:

­           Brigadier General Nedal Ali Bashmani, from Lattakia.

­           First Lieutenant Talal Muti’ Allaw, from Aleppo.

­           Retired Chief Warrant Officer Nizar Ismael Shahin, from Hama.

­           Chief Warrant Officer Alaa Saleh Khadour, from Homs.

­           Chief Warrant Officer Basem Ali Khadou, from Homs.

­           Chief Warrant Officer Hassan Adnan Helweh, from Hama.

­           Warrant Officer Hassan Ali al-Ghazali, from Daraa.

­           Sergeant Major Mohammad Hassan Khaddour, from Lattakia.

­           Sergeant Major Youssef Bassam Ibrahim, from Hama.

­           Sergeant Major al-Muzaffar Ibrahim Zazou’, from Hama.

­           Sergeant Amer Ghazi Harfoush, from al-Quneitera.

­           Sergeant Jamal Ahmad al-Ali, from Hama.

­           Sergeant Bakri Ahmad al-Ali, from Lattakia.

­           Sergeant Manhal Ali Bakour, from Hama.

­           Sergeant Ghazwan Hassan al-Hassan, from Lattakia.

­           Sergeant Mohammad Jaber Hussein, from Tartous.

­           Conscript Khaled Ismael al-Khalil, from Daraa.

­           Conscript Ahmad Khaled al-Ahmad, from Hama.

­           Conscript Mahmoud Bouzan al-Sheikh Saleh, from Aleppo.

­           Conscript Lafi Omar Abdul-Razzaq, from al-Quneitera.

­           Conscript Mahmoud Khaled Babouri, from Damascus.

­           Policeman Mustafa Khaled Steili, from Idleb.

The martyrs’ families and relatives stressed the need for work with more awareness and sense of responsibility to overcome the crisis facing Syria and foil the conspiracy targeting the Syrians.

They applauded the Syrian Army members for their role in defending the homeland and the citizens and their principles of resisting the hegemony policies, calling for firmly confronting the armed terrorist groups who have put themselves at the disposal of the homeland’s enemies to undermine its principles and points of strength and steadfastness.

Lavrov: There is no Alternative to Annan’s Plan

MOSCOW, (SANA)_Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that the unfolding situation in Syria proves that there is no alternative to the plan of the UN envoy to Syria, Kofi Annan, for a diplomatic and political settlement of the crisis there.

In a telephone talk with the UN envoy, Kofi Annan, on Sunday, Lavrov said that the main task at this stage is to unify the efforts of key players to ensure the implementation of Annan’s plan.

Lavrov added that Russia is contacting the Syrian government and the opposition’s representatives to encourage them to jumpstart a political dialogue.

”Moscow is ready to study plans to coordinate the international efforts on the Syrian track,” added Lavrov.

According to the statement, Annan informed Lavrov on the outcome of his visit to Syria and his assessment of the developments there.

Russian Foreign Ministry: Russia, China, Cuba Voted against UNHRC Decision for being ”Imbalanced, Biased”

The Russian Foreign Ministry said that Russia, China and Cuba voted against a U.N. Human Rights Council decision which condemns the Syrian governments for the tragic events in al-Houla town because it was ”imbalanced and biased.”

The Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement on Sunday that Russia, China and Cuba voted against the decision because its text was imbalanced and biased as it leveled groundless accusations against the Syrian government for all the crimes committed in Syria and holds it fully responsible for human rights violations, without condemning the acts of gunmen, criminals and terrorists who perpetrated bombings in Damascus and Aleppo , vandalized facilities and assassinated public, academic and religious figures.”

The statement stressed that Russia vehemently condemns the collective killing of civilians in al-Houla on May 25.

”The UNHRC decision goes beyond the Council’s mandate and contradicts the UN Security Council press statement on May 27,” the Russian Foreign Ministry statement added.

”It is a matter of great concern that some countries pinpoint culprits without waiting for the findings of the observer mission investigation into al-Houla tragedy, in order to exert pressure on the U.N. Security Council to exploit this tragedy for their own interests and thwart the implementation of Annan’s plan,” added the statement.

”We are as convinced as ever that the Syrian crisis can never be settled except through political and diplomatic means and on the basis of all parties’ commitment to Annan’s peace plan and the relevant UN resolutions,” the Russian Foreign Ministry said.

 

”Our country opposes using the UNHRC to launch a scenario of using force against Syria…It is important not to anticipate the finding of the observer mission probe into al-Houla crime.”

”The sole exit from the Syrian crisis is in ending violence and supporting Annan’s plan…Russia will stick to this position and calls upon other countries to follow suit,” the statement said.

Ahmad: Arab League No Longer a Part of International Effort Represented by Annan’s Plan

DAMASCUS, (SANA) – Syria’s Permanent Representative to the Arab League Yousef Ahmad said that the Arab League is seeking to summon military intervention in the Syrian crisis and hinders any solution to it, with the League’s mechanisms and decisions being seized by sides from the Arab Gulf who continue to violate its charter and principles to benefit western and regional sides.

In a response to the decisions made by the meeting of the Arab League Ministerial Council in Doha on Saturday, Ahmad said that the League is no longer a part of the international effort represented by the plan of UN Envoy Kofi Annan, and that Syria reiterates its firm rejection of the League having any role or representation in the international plan.

He said that everything issued by the League since the decision to suspend Syria’s participation does not concern Syria, stressing the need for a true Arab effort to correct the course of the League and restore its intended role.

“Targeting the Syrian media under the umbrella of the AL decisions proves that the Arab and international parties which practice their political and media instigation against Syria, do not believe in the freedom of opinion and accepting the other as they seek to conceal the reality of what Syria is witnessing of systematic terrorism and foreign incitement to prevent a national solution for the crisis in the country,”  Ahmad added.

Ahmad said that the suggestions made by Nabil al-Arabi regarding changing the nature and the jurisdiction of the international observer mission in Syria strongly affirms the fact that the League’s General Secretariat has overstepped its charter and internal regulations, and that it now seeks to plan a role drawn up under cover from Arab Gulf, regional and international sides.

He concluded by affirming Syria’s commitment to positive cooperation with Annan’s plan in spite of some sides’ efforts to thwart the plan and escalate the situation in the region.

Information Ministry: Arab League’s Decision a Violation of Journalism Ethics and Expression Freedom

DAMASCUS, (SANA) – The Ministry of Information on Saturday said that the decision of the Arab League Council on asking Arabsat and Nilesat to suspend the broadcast of the Syrian TV channels constitutes a media terrorism within the plot against Syria.

In a statement, the Ministry added that the decision aims at blocking reality from the local and international opinion, all for the benefit of the fabrication campaign carried out against Syria and its people.

The statement stipulated that this unprecedented decision is a violation of the freedom of journalism and expression and contrary to all rules and professional custom, as it represents a flagrant violation of the media ethics and of the concepts of the freedom of expression.

The Ministry added that some Gulf oil countries, which seized control of the Arab League, protect the incitement channels despite the threats they pose on the stability and amity among the Arab people.

“Some Gulf countries, which are arming and funding the gunmen to shed the Syrian blood, are trying to block the reality from the Arab people to achieve the U.S. and western goals in fragmenting the region,” the statement said.

The Ministry stressed that it will deal responsibly with this aggressive decision to ensure the continuation of the Syrian channels’ broadcast and face the media war targeting Syria.

The Ministry called on Nilesat and Arabsat not to respond to this decision which violates media ethics and the principles of media work.

“This decision will not dissuade us from continuing our message of serving the interests of our people and moving forward with the national reform program. We are more resolved to face this hysteric media war against Syria and the Syrians,” the Ministry said.

The Ministry added that this decision will not deter it from unmasking the terrorism which is supported by Arab, regional and western countries, especially USA and Israel, and the acts of the armed terrorist groups against the Syrian people.

The Ministry concluded its statement by urging all organizations dedicated to defending freedom of speech and expression in the world to make a stand against this aggressive decision.

Ushakov: President Putin’s Talks with Merkel and Hollande Underlined Impermissibility of Foreign Interference in Syria

MOSCOW, (SANA) – The Russian President’s Deputy Chief of Staff for Foreign Policy and International Economic Issues Yuri Ushakov said that President Vladimir Putin underlined during his European tour the impermissibility of foreign interference in the Syrian crisis and that undermining the plan of UN Envoy Kofi Annan and that repeating the Iraqi and Libyan scenarios in Syria would risk destabilizing the entire region and would have catastrophic and unpredictable consequences.

In a statement issued on Saturday, Ushakov said that the situation in Syria was one of the primary issues discussed by President Putin with French President Francois Hollande and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, noting that the talks stressed that changing figures in the Syrian government is unlikely to improve the situation and might even lead to a civil war.

He said that Russia defended the need to take a careful stance regarding the situation in Syria by carrying out internal dialogue, with Russia voicing readiness to work more actively with the Syrian authorities and the opposition to settle the conflict, calling on its European partners to do likewise.

Ushakov affirmed that Putin’s visit to Paris was prompted by Hollande’s statements regarding the possibility of military intervention in Syria, adding that Hollande seemed more balanced during Putin’s visit, both in public and in private, despite his extreme stance regarding Syria prior to the visit.

He explained that the meeting between Putin and Hollande took around 90 minutes rather than the scheduled 20 or 25 minutes, with the two presidents building a rapport which is important for future interaction, developing relations, and preserving the unique nature of the Russian-French partnership.

Arab League Decision to Request That Arabsat and Nilesat Halt Broadcast of Syrian Channels Condemned

DAMASCUS, (SANA) – The National Media Council (NMC) on Saturday condemned the Arab Foreign Ministers Council’s unjust decision on asking Arabsat and Nilesat to stop the broadcast of Syrian satellite TV channels.

The Council described the decision as a “flagrant interference in the Syrian internal affairs and unprecedented violation of the media freedom in the Arab nation,”

The NMC stressed that the decision is a media terrorism against the Syrian people, calling on the Nilesat and Arabsat to commit themselves to the contracts with the Syrian channels and refuse to be a political tool in the hands of some Arab governments.

Journalists Union Denounces Arab Foreign Ministers’ Decision

The Syrian Journalists Union denounced the unjust decision of the Arab Foreign Ministers Council on stopping the broadcast of Syrian satellite channels, saying that this is an unprecedented and unjustifiable step that contradicts all norms and rights.

In a statement, the Union said that this decision was mad because Syrian channels managed to uncover the fake nature and falsity of the legations made by sedition promoters on certain channels which the proponents of toppling the Syrian states through military intervention have been relying on.

The statement said that this decision is an assault on freedom of expression and speech and a threat against human culture and Arab people’s rights, strongly condemning this attempt to silence the Syrian voice and preventing it from reaching Arab and international public opinion.

The Union said that Syria’s creative journalists and technicians are capable of overcoming such a reprehensible step, and that the Arab League’s decision is a clear indicator of the mentality of its makers who seek to eliminate the differing opinion and shows how corrupt they are and how deeply they’re involved in the plot targeting Syria.

The statement said that this suspect decision is an act of terrorism and pressure on Arabs and Syrian, and that it was made in collusion between the Ministerial Council, Istanbul Council and known Zionist Bernard Levy who always calls for a military invasion of Syria, which was evident in the calls of using Chapter 7 of the UN charter against Syria.

It also affirmed that the attempts to isolate Syria will fail, as Syria’s enemies have tried every method to undermine its steadfastness, including vandalism, murder, bombings, economic, diplomatic and media warfare, attacking the Syrian media, and finally the calls for foreign military intervention.

On a relevant note, the Union sent a letter to the Arab Journalists Union denouncing the decision, demanding that a clear stance be made and that the Arab League Secretary General stop making such decisions.

Arab Writers Union Denounces Arab Foreign Ministers Council’s Decision

Similarly, the Arab Writers Union denounced the decision of the Arab Foreign Ministers Council on stopping the broadcast of Syrian satellite channel, describing it as unethical and contradictory to the journalism code of honor.

In a statement, the Union affirmed commitment to the truth and freedom of speech and expression, voicing its adherence to confronting all those who seek to stifle it, lauding the role of the Syrian media.

The statement said that this decision shows certain Arab countries’ dismay with the Syrian media that showed Arab citizens the scale of media misdirection used by these countries’ channels, and that the decision shows that most Arab regimes are subservient to those who pay or influence them, with the Arab League becoming a willing tool in the hands of Qatar and Saudi Arabia who are carrying out a clear Zionist agenda.

The statement called upon Arab writers to assume their role in defending the freedom of speech and expression, affirming that the truth spoken by Syria’s writers, people and media must reach all Arabs who seek the truth and uncover the conspiracies of those who serve the United States and Israel.

Syrian Observatory for the Victims of Violence and Terrorism Condemns Arab League’s Demand of UNSC to Use UN 7th Chapter against Syria

For its part, the Syrian Observatory for the Victims of Violence and Terrorism condemned the decision of the Arab Foreign Ministers Council on asking the UN Security Council to adopt resolution under Chapter VII against Syria.

” This request reveals the dangerous role played by Saudi Arabia and Qatar and their involvement in shedding the Syrian blood,” the Observatory said in a statement.

The statement said that KSA and Qatar were annoyed by the reality of the events which the Syrian channels were broadcasting, especially the violations committed by the so-called Istanbul Council and the terrorist Wahabi gangs.

The statement added that the decision is against the human rights and freedom of expression and media.

Mass Gathering in Tartous In Condemnation of AL Decisions

Crowds of citizens gathered in Tartous Corniche to express condemnation of the decision of the Arab League Council on asking Arabsat and Nilesat to stop the broadcast of Syrian satellite TV channels.

The participants stressed their support to the reform program led by President Bashar al-Assad and appreciation for the sacrifices made by the Syrian army in defense of the homeland and its security.

They also stressed that the AL decision aims at blocking the reality of the events in Syria, adding that this decision is within the plot which targets Syria and its people.

Brazil Stresses Rejection of Military intervention in Syria, Voices Support to Annan’s Plan

BRAZILIA, (SANA) – Brazilian Foreign Minister Antonio Patriota reiterated his country’s rejection of any foreign intervention in Syria, stressing firm support to the mission of the UN Special Envoy to Syria, Kofi Annan.

Speaking at a press conference with his Venezuelan counterpart Nicolas Maduro , said that Brazil’s support to Annan’s plan may be higher than that of the US.

He called for taking seriously the recent statement of the head of the U.N. Investigation Commission on Syria, Brazilian Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, about a state of catastrophic militarization in Syria.

In a statement to the Brazilian Folha de S.Paulo newspaper, Pinheiro said that Syria witnesses a state of armed conflict and the Syrian government has legal grounds to confront armed groups, indicating that what is taking place in Syria is not a civil war.

Brigadier General Assassinated by Terrorists in Damascus Countryside

DAMASCUS COUNTRYSIDE, (SANA) – Brigadier General Nidal Bashmani was martyred on Saturday morning at the hands of an armed terrorist group.

An official source told SANA’s correspondent that the terrorists opened fire at Bashmani’s car while he was on his way to work in Deir al-Asafir in the eastern Ghouta area, killing him and his driver.

74 Persons Turn Themselves in in Damascus Countryside

DAMASCUS, (SANA)- 74 persons who got involved in the recent events in the country but whose hands are clear of the Syrian blood turned themselves in to the authorities in Damascus Countryside on Saturday.

The authorities released the persons after having pledged not to take up arms again or commit sabotage or any other acts that might affect Syria’s security in the future.

Syrian News on June 1st, 2012

Al-Jaafari: Implementing Annan’s Plan Requires Political Will from All Those who Instigate Violence, Smuggle Weapons and Harbor Terrorists

NEW YORK, (SANA) – Syria’s Permanent Representative to the UN Bashar al-Jaafari affirmed that implementing the plan of UN Envoy to Syria Kofi Annan requires political will on the part of all those who instigate violence and provide weapons to terrorists, finance and harbor them outside Syria, and not just on the part of the Syrian government.

In a press conference held on Wednesday after a UN Security Council session for discussing the situation in Syria, al-Jaafari said that the first point in Annan’s plan discussing ending violence by all sides, which dictates that some sides respect this point, noting that Syria informed the UNSC and the UN Secretary General of the identities of those who are smuggling weapons into Syria.

He stressed that the Syrian government is very serious about implementing Annan’s plan, while those who impose second, third or fourth options are the same ones who don’t respect the plan and who questioned it from the beginning.

Al-Jaafari said that Annan held positive talks with Syrian officials and reviewed with President Bashar al-Assad the progress made by the government in implementing his plan, with President al-Assad reminding Annan of the need for everyone to commit to the plan and cease weapon smuggling into Syria.

He said that most of the interpositions during the session were balanced and used more accurate terms in discussing the situation in Syria, specifically regarding what happened in al-Houla.

He pointed out that the Syrian government and the Syrian people are in a state of shock because of the horrible crime that took place in al-Houla, stressing that none could be more upset over what happened than the Syrians because the victims – the children, civilians and military personnel –  are our own people, noting that 26 soldiers and officers were martyred in this incident.

Al-Jaafari said that this crime is heinous, horrifying and unjustifiable, and that those who committed will be brought to justice in Syria, adding that a committee is in charge of the investigation and is due to finish its work by Thursday or Friday, at which point everyone will know the results of the investigation and the identities of the perpetrators.

“We want the international community to specify those who are working against Annan’s plan and those who finance and harbor armed terrorist groups,” he added.

He noted that this crime isn’t the beginning of the crisis in Syria which dates back to almost a year, saying that some of the representatives at the UNSC showed a high sense of responsibility by acknowledging the existence of a “third element” which is the armed groups, something that Syria had been trying to explain for a year and was met by doubt by these same representatives.

Al-Jaafari went on to explain that the Syrian people are facing terrorist groups that are trained, protected and funded by some Arab and regional countries and other countries from elsewhere in the world, pointing out that Syria referred more than 100 to the UN Secretary General, UNSC members and UN agencies containing the names and identities of terrorists along with details on the dates, types and amount of weapons smuggled into Syria, in addition to a list of over 4,000 violations of Annan’s plan by the armed groups that caused hundreds of deaths among Syrian civilians and military personnel.

He also drew attention to the weapon which was carrying weapons from Libya to the terrorists and Syria and was captured by the Lebanese authorities, in addition to the arrest of 26 Libyan and Tunisian terrorists in Syria whose confessions were relayed to the UNSC, while other foreign terrorists were killed and their identities were likewise sent to the UNSC.

Al-Jaafari noted that a Syrian Salafi opposition figure spoke live on a Lebanese channel from Jeddah two days ago, assuming responsibility for the abduction of Lebanese citizens in Syria who had come from Turkey, concluding that there’s no need for presenting one piece of evidence after the other since everyone now knows that Syria is facing dangerous armed terrorist groups.

He also wondered how the German ambassador was talking about his government’s concern over Syrian children in al-Houla while the UNIFIL naval forces allowed permitted the ship carrying weapons from Libya to cross the Lebanese waters.

On ending the missions of Syria’s ambassadors and diplomats in some countries, al-Jaafari said that diplomacy is based on dialogue and its task is finding settlements and middle grounds and bridging gaps, and that diplomacy isn’t based on sanctions, attacking countries or expelling diplomats.

He said that these irresponsible actions show the true intentions of the capitals in question regarding the Syrian crisis, adding that if they actually wanted to help the Syrian people, then they wouldn’t have imposed sanction on them nor facilitated weapon smuggling, adding that the political solution must come from within Syria itself, and that those betting on second, third or fourth options will fall silent.

On some sides accusations that the Syrian government is responsible for the crime in al-Houla, al-Jaafari said that UN Under-Secretary-General Herve Ladsous didn’t accuse the government; rather he voiced suspicions, adding that all such talks is premature as the Syrian committee charged with investigating the incident will report its findings on Thursday or Friday.

He also pointed out that the massacres also affected Teldo and al-Shomariya areas, and that their perpetrators were intentionally trying to start a civil wars since there are three different sects living in these villages, which shows that the perpetrators are professional criminals.

Regarding the recent UNSC statement and calls for withdrawing the army, al-Jaafari said that this has already been done, pointing out the paradox as there are those who criticize the Syrian government when it deploys the army and law-enforcement forces to protect people while others criticize it when the government doesn’t do that which allows terrorists to murder people, stressing that there are situations when the government needs to deploy law-enforcement forces to protect civilians.

Al-Jaafari called on Arab Gulf countries and other countries who are interested in sparking a civil war in Syria to not bet on the failure of Annan’s plan, stressing that Syria acknowledges the presence of a legitimate political opposition which the government invited to dialogue which is part of Annan’s plan, yet certain hostile countries or governments repeatedly encouraged armed groups and the opposition outside Syria to not engage in dialogue.

He went on to say that the opposition isn’t unified and that there are those who are working around the clock to unify it to extort the Syrian government which is diligently working to end violence, stressing the need the pressure the terrorist groups to cease violence and the need for some Arab and regional countries to stop providing these groups with funds, weapons, political support and media coverage.

Regarding some ambassadors’ acknowledgment of the presence of terrorist groups, al-Jaafari said that while some have began to share Syria’s approach in this regard, others are acting irresponsibly regarding their peacekeeping tasks, adding that regardless of the claims made by an ambassador, they must – as members of the UNSC – refrain from using the term “regime” and instead say “government” if they wish to be responsible and noble-minded.

He stressed that the ambassadors who speak of “options” are after escalation and that they violate Annan’s plan, adding that their abandonment of the plans shows that they had been betting on its failure since the beginning.

Al-Jaafari affirmed that the success of Annan’s plan requires equal commitment from all sides, ceasing to traffic in Syrian blood, and sending a clear message from the international community on the need to resolve the crisis through the plan and achieve appeasement, not escalation.

He stressed that the diplomats in the UNSC are there to bridge gaps and find acceptable solutions and settlements, not legalize more sanctions and adopt anti-diplomatic measures.

“If they really want to help Syrians, then the messages Syria needs is stopping escalation and speaking wisely about how to help the government to sit with the opposition and engage in comprehensive national dialogue and find a settlement led by Syria,” al-Jaafari said, adding that these aren’t his own terms, but rather the language of Annan who spoke of a political process led by the Syrian government.

On the appointment of Jeffrey Feltman in a prestigious position in the UN, al-Jaafari said that he hasn’t received official word on this, noting that if it were true, then it’s a sign of escalation, stressing that the task of the UN is to carry out the international agenda, not force an agenda on the international community, which is why honest and neutral experts are needed for high-ranking posts.

Regarding dialogue and the possibility of holding it outside Damascus, al-Jaafari said that the government accepted China’s suggestion to host talks in Beijing, but the opposition, prompted by external instigation, rejected, and that this was repeated when Russia offered to host talks in Moscow, concluding that “the ball isn’t in our court; it’s in the others’ court.”

Churkin: Armed Groups Use Every Opportunity to Violate Annan’s Plan

In a similar press conference after the UNSC session, Russia’s Permanent Representative to the UN Vitaly Churkin affirmed that armed groups in Syria continue to use every opportunity to violate Annan’s plan by targeting civilians and state officials.

Churkin said that there’s no tangible progress in implementing Annan’s plan save for the government’s withdrawal of heavy artillery from the perimeters of cities, noting that the Syrian opposition strongly rejects dialogue and that some of its members continue to call for foreign interference and continuing armament in Syria in a manner violating Annan’s plan and discouraging political dialogue.

He affirmed that the illegal flow of weapons to armed groups in Syria is continuing, and that these groups are receiving better weapons which is a worrying sign that requires some sides to take serious actions.

Churkin said that UNSC was untied on two decisions on sending the observer mission, and that everyone must commit to these decisions and pressure all sides to implement Annan’s plan, including the sides that don’t respect the plan and continue to militarize the conflict and encourage and arm groups to continue fighting.

He added that Russia isn’t satisfied over the current situation, and that it’s taking every possible step to improve the situation and advance Annan’s plan.

Churkin also said that ending the missions of Syrian ambassadors and diplomats in some countries might be misconstrued by those who wish to see foreign military intervention and more fighting in Syria, which should cause some countries to consider the repercussions.

He said that discussing sanctions is negative, as there are harsh unilateral sanctions imposed on Syria that had severe ramifications on citizens and caused shortages in fuel and other materials.

Churkin affirmed that Russia supports political settlement in Syria and that it doesn’t pick sides, saying that speaking about other options would be a disastrous scenario that would have grave consequences on the entire region.

He called on all countries to think carefully before taking any step or making any gestures or insinuations outside Annan’s plan and the UNSC, in addition to calling on those who arm the opposition to reconsider their options and study the repercussions of their actions.

Churkin added that the results of the UN investigation regarding the crime that took place in al-Houla will appear within a few days.

In response to a question on whether Russia will defend Syria no matter what others do, Churkin said that “Russia will do the right thing for Syria, the Syrian people, the Russian Federation and the international community.”

Initial Report of Judicial Investigation Committee on al-Houla Massacre: Victims belonged to Peaceful Families who Refused to Stand up against State

DAMASCUS, (SANA)_The initial report of the judicial committee investigating al-Houla massacre affirmed that all the victims belonged to peaceful families who wouldn’t stand up to the state and had never joined protests or held up arms, who also had opposed the armed terrorist groups.

The initial findings indicated that the victims were killed by fire at close distance and sharp tools, not by shellfire.

The initial report added that the armed terrorist groups who gathered in al-Houla liquidated the victims in the process of an attack on the law-enforcement members who hadn’t entered the area where the massacre occurred, adding that most of the bodies are of terrorists who were killed in the clash with the law-enforcement members.

Brigadier General Qassem Jamal Suleiman, head of the investigation committee, said in a press conference at the Foreign Ministry on Thursday that the investigation is in its initial stages and is still underway.

He added that the investigation committee depended on testimonies of eyewitnesses who saw the massacre happen that can be directly verified, adding that some of them will appear on TVs, indicating that the initial report was based on evidences and facts in relation to the armed attack that targeted the law-enforcement members in the town.

Gen. Suleiman said that law-enforcement members were positioned at five points in al-Houla, adding that the armed attack was aimed at turning the place into an area outside the state’s control.

Suleiman said that the armed men gathered inside the village after Friday prayers and started an onslaught simultaneously with other gunmen numbered between 600-800 who came from neighboring areas, namely al-Rastan, al-Sa’an, Burjka’I, al-Sam’alin and others, where mortars, machineguns and anti-tank missiles were used, targeting two law-enforcement points as the main target of the attack, one near Taldao and the second near al-Sa’a Roundabout.

Suleiman said that the terrorist groups came from outside the town and simultaneously liquidated peaceful families during the attack on the law-enforcement members.

He indicated that the place where the massacre happened is in an area where there are armed terrorist groups, and no law-enforcement members entered the area neither before nor after the massacre, indicating that the area is located far from the law-enforcement members’ posts.

He added that the law-enforcement members hadn’t left their positions but defended themselves against the terrorist groups, which can be verified through the victims’ images aired by satellite channels, showing that the massacre happened due to close fire and sharp tools, not shellfire as the images showed no signs of mashing, burns or traces of shelling buildings, which means that what happened was direct liquidation.

Suleiman added that killing children does not serve the law-enforcement members or the state, but serves the armed terrorist groups who seek to incite sedition.

Gen. Suleiman said that all the victims belonged to peaceful families who wouldn’t stand up to the state and had never joined protests or held up arms, who also had opposed the armed terrorist groups, indicating that the terrorist groups aimed to invite foreign and humanitarian intervention.

Suleiman said that the massacre targeted the relatives of the People’s Assembly member Abdul-Moa’ti Mashlab whom they wanted to take revenge of before the events ran contrary to the plan and the massacre extended to slaughter other families.

He affirmed that the massacre perpetrated by armed terrorist groups is part of the scheme that seeks to give the impression that a civil war is close at hand in Syria as it coincided with the visit of the UN envoy Kofi Annan.

For his part, Spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates Ministry, Dr. Jihad Makdissi, said “The report which came after three days is initial and the investigation is still underway as the massacre has political and criminal dimensions. The investigation faces difficulties due to the presence of gunmen in the area.”

”There are further details that were kept unannounced out of fear for the lives of the eyewitnesses. When the investigation ends, we will put the full conclusions to the international community, the UN Security Council and the UN observer mission,” added Makdissi.

Answering a question on whether the international community and the humanitarian and international bodies would be convinced on the findings of the initial investigation, Makdissi said ”It is a complicated matter to identify the international community, as part of the international community is hostile to Syria and has an agenda against it. What we care for is public opinion and the citizens who back the state because the state doesn’t commit such crimes and is in a state of self-defense as terrorists are being funded and armed.”

”It is a heinous crime that was condemned by the Syrian government for which we deny responsibility and stress that the Syrian army can never commit such a crime…The perpetrators sought to take revenge of a family of one of the People’s Assembly members, but events got out of hand and a larger massacre was perpetrated.”

Makdissi said that neither statements have not accused the Syrian army but hinted at other elements, adding that the Syrian army protects citizens.

In reply to a question on not engaging the observer mission in the investigation, Makdissi said ”It was the Syrian side who contacted the head of the mission, Robert Mood, who was sent by the Syrian Foreign Ministry…There were gunmen killed in the clash and moved to the village’s mosque and filmed for the massacre to appear larger. When the observers arrived, there was a flood of lies aired by media.”

Makdissi added that the Syrian government was acquitted of other massacres in Karm al-Zaitoun and Deir Baalbeh, adding that clues pertaining to the massacre are revealed.

”There is diligent work to incite sedition in Syria…There are 18 sects that have lived in harmony for years and the massacres are aimed at shattering this coexistence, but the Syrian fabric is impervious to sedition attempts,” added Makdissi.

Makdissi said that there are sides working day and night to ignite sectarian sedition; even after al-Houla massacre, they tried to attack another village but they did not succeed.

Makdissi pointed out that the world media focused on some massacres because they belong to a certain sect in Syria, adding that in Syria all Syrians are equal regardless of their sects.

Concerning Syrian ambassador and diplomats whose mission was ended in some western capitals, Makdissi said, “Ambassadors everywhere work to serve their countries’ interests. Recalling or expelling ambassadors is a political decision. We are dissatisfied because we built our diplomatic relations with whom we thought are our partners.”

He added that diplomatic transactions are based on reciprocity; however, Syria will not resort to malicious policies. Syria belives in diplomacy and dialogue as means to solve problems among states.

Makdissi stressed that about 200 media outlets are working in Syria in addition to 100 accredited media outlets, adding that there are no restrictions on the work of the media.

Asked about the coordination between the Syrian Investigation Committee and the UN Supervision Mission in Syria (UNSMIS) team, Makdissi said the UNSMIS is not an investigation committee; it is tasked with observing and verifying.

He said, “We are telling the UNSMIS about the results of the investigation; we sent General Robert Mood to the massacre site, and we would like Annan to look at the reality of events in Syria through the eyes of the observers.”

Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates: Developing Countries are Most Affected by Using Mercenaries to Violate Human Rights

DAMASCUS, (SANA)_Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates sent a letter to the Human Rights Council on using mercenaries as a means for violating human rights and obstructing peoples’ right to self-determination.

In its letter, the ministry expressed concern over the bids of some countries who use mercenaries to abort the efforts of developing countries in combating this phenomenon, indicating that these countries have used modern designations such as the private security and military companies, convincing the world that these consist of guards working in protecting diplomatic schools or missions in countries ridden with unstable security situation to camouflage the true role of these companies.

The ministry said that these countries are exerting strenuous efforts to make the world forget the true nature of these firms as they work to provide a legal cover for their actions through exonerating them of legal accountability and engaging the world in a legal discussion on the law to be applied, with the aim of diverting attention from their violations of human rights.

The ministry said in its letter that massacres committed by the security companies come to the surface every now and then, revealing to the world their true nature.

The letter condemned the double standard policies of some countries in approaching human rights, giving orders to these companies to wage their wars against developing countries as they brag about human rights at the United Nations.

The ministry considered the events in Syria a clear example of this double standard policy, indicating to confirmed reports on US mercenary companies providing training for mercenaries to incite violence acts in Syria.

The letter added that such countries as Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey are supporting these companies and facilitating their work in killing Syrians, heedless of the international efforts to combat mercenaries and violating the resolutions of the UN General Assembly and the Human Rights Council.

21 Army, Law-enforcement and Civilian Martyrs Laid to Rest

PROVINCES, (SANA) – The bodies of 21 army, law-enforcement and civilian martyrs on Thursday were escorted from Tishreen Military Hospital in Damascus, Aleppo Military Hospital and Zahi Azraq Military Hospital in Lattakia to their final resting place.

Solemn funeral processions were held for the martyrs who were martyred in line of duty in Damascus and its Countryside, Idleb Daraa and Homs.

The Martyrs are:

­           First Lieutenant Hisham Nader Saftli, from Homs.

­           First Lieutenant Wissam Ali Sebh, from Lattakia.

­           First Lieutenant Adham Jawdat Ali, from Lattakia.

­           Chief Warrant Officer Mohammad Ahmad Isber, from Hama.

­           Sergeant Major Mohammad Mwafaq Tareq Naal, from Aleppo.

­           Sergeant Mohammad Hassan Suleiman, from Tartous.

­           Sergeant Adnan Nooh al-Helw, from Hasaka.

­           Sergeant Hassan Rajab al-Mohammad, from Deir Ezzor.

­           Corporal Jaafar Riyad Shahin, from Aleppo.

­           Corporal Abdallah Hussein al-Ahamad, from Aleppo.

­           Corporal Mohamad Abdel Hamid Ka’ako, from Aleppo.

­           Corporal Khaled Bassam Dakak, from Damascus Countryside.

­           Conscript Salim Mohammad Mohammad al-Haji, from Aleppo.

­           Conscript Yasser Jumaa al-Helw, from Raqqa.

­           Conscript Mohammad Salem al-Arjeh, from Damascus.

­           Conscript Amer Mahmoud al-Malla, from Raqqa.

­           Conscript Yaser Yaseen Haji, from Aleppo.

­           Conscript Khaled Shhadeh al-Selman, from Aleppo.

­           Civil worker Samer Said Salloum, from Lattakia.

­           Civilian Saher Ibrahim Dalla, from Tartous.

 

500 Persons Involved in Recent Events Released

DAMASCUS, (SANA)- 250 people who got involved in the recent events in the country but did not commit murders were released in Damascus on Thursday.

Earlier, the authorities released other 250 persons who got involved in the recent events in the country but did not commit murders.

On May 16th, the authorities set free 250 detainees whose hands are clear of the Syrian blood, in addition to 265 detainees who were released on May 5th.

On April 21st, 30 persons involved in the events were set free, preceded by 552 detainees who were released on January 5th.

Ahmadinejad: West and Certain Arab Countries Interfere in Syria, Send Weapons to Armed Groups

TEHRAN, (SANA)_ Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad reiterated that the West and certain Arab countries were interfering in Syria and were sending weapons to the armed terrorist groups.

The Iranian President condemned, in an interview with France 24 television yesterday, al- Houla massacre in Homs Governorate last week, saying those who had committed the crime should be punished.

President Ahmadinejad was quoted by IRNA News Agency as also saying in the interview that enriching uranium up to 20 percent is Iran’s legal right and it is not for production of nuclear weapons.

Ahmadinejad added that other countries would have to explain why Iran was not allowed to do this and what they would offer Iran in exchange if it stopped enriching uranium.

In response to a question of France 24 on the “threats made by Israel”, he said “How would the west have reacted if Iran had threatened Israel?” wondering if “the laws are subject to interpretations!”

President Ahmadinejad underscored that the “root causes for the world problems is this kind of approach”, and that His Country is a “country with seven thousand years of civilization” and that the “Iranian government is justice based, and not a forged one.”

CBS: U.S. Sanctions against SIIB in Line with Package of U.S. and Western Sanctions Aimed at Increasing Pressure on Syrian People

DAMASCUS, (SANA) – The Central Bank of Syria (CBS) stressed that the U.S. sanctions against Syria’s International Islamic Bank (SIIB) came in line with the package of U.S. and European sanctions on Syria which aimed at undermining and weakening the Syrian economy, in addition to increasing pressure on the Syrian people.

The CBS, in a statement on Thursday, said that the SIIB transactions are conducted under the supervision of the CBS as it is the case for all Syrian banks according to the international standards and principles.

The statement added that the SIIB foreign trade operations benefit clients who are not included in the sanctions whether they are individuals, private companies or public institutions.

It added that the bank’s imported materials are allowed, indicating that there are no U.S. or European sanctions that prevent importing them to Syria.

The statement added that the bank uses the international filtering system to incoming and outgoing transfers and prevent operations for names included in the sanctions list, indicating that the bank has documents that prove the legibility of its transactions.

Regarding the SIIB connection with Syria Commercial Bank, the statement made clear that there are no reason to end such cooperation as long as it is subject to the Syrian laws and regulations in force and doesn’t violate the international sanctions.

The CBS stated that all Syrian banks, including the SIIB, have stopped their dealings in the USD since the U.S. sanctions against Syria on August, 18th, 2011.

The CBS added that the sanctions didn’t affect the bank since it has no assets in the US and that the bank will continue its activity.

The statement concluded that the CBS will spare no effort to take measures that support the Syrian banks and guarantee their high quality services to preserve its pioneering role in boosting national economy.

The CBS announced that it will take all necessary procedures regarding the illogical and unjustifiable decision taken by the U.S. Treasury Department.

Yesterday, the U.S. Department of Treasury took a decision to impose sanctions on SIIB, including freezing its assets held in the US and forbidding U.S. individuals and companies from any business with it.

Appropriate Mechanisms to Provide Humanitarian Aid to Needed Families in Daraa Reviewed

DARAA, (SANA) – Governor of Daraa Mohammad Khaled al-Hanous reviewed with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) the appropriate mechanisms to provide humanitarian aid to the needed families in Daraa and the future cooperation between the ICRC and the branch of the Syrian Arab Red Crescent (SARC) in the governorate to carry out humanitarian activities.

The Governor briefed the delegation on the huge damage caused by terrorist acts and the authorities’ efforts to provide humanitarian and food aid and health care services to the people in the province.

He expressed readiness to do whatever it takes to facilitate conveying aid to the needed and affected people due to acts of killing and sabotage committed by the terrorist groups against citizens and properties.

Head of the ICRC delegation Yves Peterman hailed the coordination with the SARC in providing help to the families in need in all areas.

Blood Donation Campaign Organized to Appreciate Syrian Army and Law-enforcement Forces’ Sacrifices

DAMASCUS, (SANA) – Workers, students, deans of faculties and Head of Damascus University participated in the blood donation campaign organized at the university in appreciation of sacrifices of the Syrian army and law-enforcement forces to defend the homeland’s unity and stability against the armed terrorist groups.

Deputy Rector for Scientific Affairs, Hiyam Bashour, said that the campaign is a humble contribution to appreciate those who offered their souls to protect the homeland.

A worker at the faculty of Pharmacy, Wafaa Husaini, said that it is the duty of every Syrian citizen to express gratitude for those who sacrificed themselves to safeguard the country.

Another donator, Ammar Mhrez, stressed that the Syrian blood is united against conspiracies and schemes hatched against Syria.

UN Observers Countinue Tours in Homs, Damascus Countryside, Deir Ezzor and Aleppo

PROVINCES, (SANA)- A delegation of the international observers mandated to supervise the ceasefire in Syria, part of a six-point peace plan brokered by UN envoy Kofi Annan, on Thursday visited the Military Hospital and al-Zaeem Hospital and the city of al-Rastan in the countryside of Homs province.

Another observer team visited Douma city and met with inhabitants there.

The delegation of  international observers in Deir Ezzor visited al-Mayadeen city and the towns of Barqas and al-Zabari in the province countryside and met the locals.

In Aleppo province, the UN observer team visited Deir Hafer area, the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and the hospital of Aleppo University.

Syrian Human Rights Network Condemns Terrorists’ Burning Shops and Threatening Safe Civilians

DAMASCUS, (SANA) – The Syrian Human Rights Network strongly condemned the acts committed by the armed terrorist groups in some areas of Damascus Countryside and other cities and provinces, including the setting shops on fire, terrifying safe civilians and threatening owners of shops to close down.

In its statement issued on Thursday, the Network said that these terrorist acts don’t comply with the principles of human rights and cannot be considered the way to freedom.

The network wondered why do the human rights organizations and the Security Council turn blind eye to these crimes which constitute a flagrant violation of human rights and threaten the life and security of Syrian citizens.

The Network denounced the appalling silence regarding organized terrorism and killing committed by the armed terrorist groups which contain terrorists from Arab and foreign nationalities against safe citizens under the auspices of the US.

It called upon law organizations to be objective and honest in implementing the principle s of human rights and illustrating issues that serve terrorism and reveal the identity of those who committed it and its supporters who seek to stoke panic and threaten security in Syria.

 

Some Questions on the Houla Massacre…and Beyond

It is not known who perpetrated the Houla massacre. It is certain though that both sides (the Syrian regime army and the gangs operating under the banner of the Free Syrian Army) have a record of brutality and disregard for human lives to qualify them to do the job.

What is certain is that Houla was a propaganda blitz that dominated Western as well as Arab (Saudi-funded and Qatari-funded) media. The romanticizing of the so-called “Syrian Revolution” (the deeds of the Free Syrian Army and Syrian National Council and the Muslim Brotherhood deserve the label of revolution as much as George W. Bush deserves the Nobel Peace Prize and as much as Bashar Assad deserves to serve as president of Syria) clashes with the actual record of the armed groups operating under the umbrella of the FSA.

But it is time that we raise questions and we expose lies surrounding the Syrian uprising. Let us first remember that Western media basically surrender control of their editorial policies to their governments when they decide to go against a developing country. We remember that few raised questions about the wisdom of forming an army of militant Muslims in Afghanistan in the 1980s.

The cause of what later produced al-Qaeda was championed. I remember Dan Rather in Afghan clothes riding a horse and reporting on the “heroes” of the fight against communism. Lies and fabrications and exaggerations were the symptom of the coverage of Afghanistan at the time. And when the communist regime fell and was later replaced by the Taliban, there were no demands for accountability and no one asked Dan Rather if he ever met Bin Laden during his media stunt in Afghanistan.

When Western governments were preparing for the invasion of Libya (you were led to believe that only Qatari forces were on the grounds in Libya by the way, given their battle-tested experience), the West’s media yet again published unsubstantiated reports and claims about what was happening in Libya.

The same media that stood silent when all Western leaders groveled before Gaddafi suddenly woke up to the reality of dictatorship in Libya. All sorts of claims were made: the number of 100,000 dead was thrown about casually (of course, it later proved to be untrue), and reports of foreign mercenary armies were a staple of the coverage (that was also untrue and the reports themselves fueled a racist anti-black campaign by the Libyan fighters after “liberation”).

Whatever happened to that woman who made that claim about being raped by Gaddafi’s soldiers? Why was she deported from Qatar and what became of her? No one asked, and the media turned the page and started another campaign.

It should be mentioned that some decent journalists may feel pressured to toe the line not only by the conventional wisdom of the establishment around them but also because the regime (whether in Libya or in Syria) is an awful dictatorial regime that does not deserve to last one day longer.

But it should be stressed that the well-funded (mostly by Qatar, UAE, and Saudi Arabia) press offices of the exile Syrian opposition constantly and daily feed the Western media a large supply of lies, exaggerations, fabrications, and wild scenarios. These media offices (like the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights – and for everything else that propaganda requires) never have to account for their information or claims.

They provide names of people inside Syria and Western correspondents merely Skype with them. Those whose names are provided by the press offices of the Syrian exile opposition merely confirm or reiterate or repeat verbatim whatever is being said by the exile offices. There have been videos shown on Youtube (since Youtube is the favorite source for Western media on Syria) in which injuries are faked and children are coached to speak about their experiences. All that never makes it into Western media.

Even the obvious lies never get challenged. From very early on, there were many lies spread that have yet to be exposed. For months, Syrian opposition exile groups insisted that there were no armed opposition groups and they stressed that their movement is purely peaceful (and when pictures of armed men were displayed, they were dismissed as enemy propaganda).

Yet, suddenly and without explanation, the same groups started to brag about and praise the armed opposition groups who ostensibly were leading a purely peaceful revolution. The propaganda agenda was clearly exhibited with the various statements (especially by exile opposition figures in Western and Saudi media) to the effect that the Syrian regime is being assisted by fighters from the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, Hezbollah, and the Mahdi Army.

The sectarian motives were obvious, and no one asked the basic logical questions. Why would an army experienced in shooting at its own people resort to the assistance of Hezbollah fighters who are trained in fighting the Israeli army? What kind of assistance would Hezbollah fighters bring to the picture? And why would the large Syrian Army need additional men?

Furthermore, the notion that the Syrian army would need the Mahdi Army (which is always appropriately described in the Western press as the “rag-tag” army) was not dismissed. The Western media promoted those accusations although the “evidence” that was often talked about on TV never materialized, despite the kidnapping of Iranian civilians in Syria. It is likely that Russian special forces assisted the Syrian Army in Baba Amr (according to one of my sources) but that is never mentioned in the press because Russia is not a Shia country.

Similarly, the Syrian exile opposition also duped the Western press (and Western audiences in workshops, conferences, and panels) to think that the Syrian uprising is led by liberal peaceful feminists (and they would often name a woman or two), and would insist that the Muslim Brotherhood has nothing to do with the uprising in Syria.

Of course, now we know better. Various leading figures in the Syrian National Council admitted belatedly that indeed the Muslim Brotherhood is running the show, and only after a year of the uprising did some in the Western press publish articles about the influence and clout of the Muslim Brotherhood.

The Houla story is still murky. No one knows what happened. We know that there are innocent civilians who were killed. We know that both sides are exchanging accusations and we know that both sides are habitual liars. But we can raise some questions:

-Why have the Western media ignored stories of kidnappings and killings of civilians by the gangs of Free Syrian Army (which is really merely a name used by a variety of gangs and bands largely with Islamist – and in some cases Bin Ladenite – ideology)?

-Why were there no attempts made at deconstructing the stories spread by the exile Syrian opposition. Initially, they claimed that the Syrian Army killed those civilians by shelling. It was only the other day when the UN stated that less than 20 were killed by the shelling (and the 20 are not a small number and they should be added to the disgraceful list of crimes committed by the regime that should be overthrown and brought to justice), and that most were killed at close range. There were claims of knife attacks but it seems that most were shot.

-Why was there an attempt to make it as though the Houla massacre was a sectarian crime (by Shia/Alawis against Sunnis) when it is emerging that maybe a third of the victims were Shia. Were there sectarian killings going on in the region in the days preceding the massacre? Why has there not been in the Western press any reference to the sectarian kidnappings (by Salafi armed groups in Daraa comprising even some Libyans according to Al-Akhbar correspondent who visited the scene) against Druze in the Sweida region (the Druze, in turn, kidnapped people from Daraa before the matter was resolved and hostages exchanged.

-Why did the media not notice that the Free Syrian Army, the Syrian National Council, and the Muslim Brotherhood all admitted that they were in touch with the sectarian group that kidnapped the Lebanese Shia pilgrims? In fact, famed liberal Syrian dissident, Haytham al-Malih, told a newspaper owned by a Saudi prince (Ash-Sharq Al-Awsat) that he supported the kidnapping and called on the kidnappers to not release the pilgrims.

Is it possible to believe the story that was told: that Shia and Alawis who reside in a predominantly Sunni area decided to suddenly turn against the majority and butcher them? And how did the surviving victims know the sectarian identity of their killers? Well, according to the Neil MacFarquhar, they bizarrely told them, “we are shabiha.” They all but left pictures of Bashar Assad behind them. Another story (wildly circulated on Twitter) has a more bizarre twist: apparently, the killers had “Shia slogans written on their foreheads [1]” (the story was written by a Western reporter and then circulated by Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi (who will soon direct a news station owned by the Prince Al-Walid bin Talal).

With this you know that Nazi style bigotry is dominating the coverage and that sectarian armed groups are purposefully fanning the flames of sectarian hatred. Civil war is no more a danger in Syria. It is a matter of a policy eagerly sought by Salafi groups and their sponsors in the Gulf countries.

This does not settle it. We still don’t know what happened in Houla. But a healthy dosage of skepticism is in order in the case of Syria especially as Western governments seems to pushing in the direction of military intervention.

There are many sides of the story but the Western media is only covering one side. (Neil MacFarquhar flat out lied when he claimed twice in the New York Times that Syrian TV does not mention the armed clashes in Syria). To be sure, both sides can’t be believed and their claims can’t be taken at face value, but it is high time that real investigation of the Syrian story be undertaken by people who are not beholden to governments – East or West.

By As’ad AbuKhalil

31 May 2012

@ Al Akhbar English

So, what did the Muslims do for the Jews?

Islam saved Jewry. This is an unpopular, discomforting claim in the modern world. But it is a historical truth. The argument for it is double. First, in 570 CE, when the Prophet Mohammad was born, the Jews and Judaism were on the way to oblivion. And second, the coming of Islam saved them, providing a new context in which they not only survived, but flourished, laying foundations for subsequent Jewish cultural prosperity – also in Christendom – through the medieval period into the modern world.

By the fourth century, Christianity had become the dominant religion in the Roman empire. One aspect of this success was opposition to rival faiths, including Judaism, along with massive conversion of members of such faiths, sometimes by force, to Christianity. Much of our testimony about Jewish existence in the Roman empire from this time on consists of accounts of conversions.

Great and permanent reductions in numbers through conversion, between the fourth and the seventh centuries, brought with them a gradual but relentless whittling away of the status, rights, social and economic existence, and religious and cultural life of Jews all over the Roman empire.

A long series of enactments deprived Jewish people of their rights as citizens, prevented them from fulfilling their religious obligations, and excluded them from the society of their fellows.

This went along with the centuries-long military and political struggle with Persia. As a tiny element in the Christian world, the Jews should not have been affected much by this broad, political issue. Yet it affected them critically, because the Persian empire at this time included Babylon – now Iraq – at the time home to the world’s greatest concentration of Jews.

Here also were the greatest centres of Jewish intellectual life. The most important single work of Jewish cultural creativity in over 3,000 years, apart from the Bible itself – the Talmud – came into being in Babylon. The struggle between Persia and Byzantium, in our period, led increasingly to a separation between Jews under Byzantine, Christian rule and Jews under Persian rule.

Beyond all this, the Jews who lived under Christian rule seemed to have lost the knowledge of their own culturally specific languages – Hebrew and Aramaic – and to have taken on the use of Latin or Greek or other non-Jewish, local, languages. This in turn must have meant that they also lost access to the central literary works of Jewish culture – the Torah, Mishnah, poetry, midrash, even liturgy.

The loss of the unifying force represented by language – and of the associated literature – was a major step towards assimilation and disappearance. In these circumstances, with contact with the one place where Jewish cultural life continued to prosper – Babylon – cut off by conflict with Persia, Jewish life in the Christian world of late antiquity was not simply a pale shadow of what it had been three or four centuries earlier. It was doomed.

Had Islam not come along, the conflict with Persia would have continued. The separation between western Judaism, that of Christendom, and Babylonian Judaism, that of Mesopotamia, would have intensified. Jewry in the west would have declined to disappearance in many areas. And Jewry in the east would have become just another oriental cult.

But this was all prevented by the rise of Islam. The Islamic conquests of the seventh century changed the world, and did so with dramatic, wide-ranging and permanent effect for the Jews.

Within a century of the death of Mohammad, in 632, Muslim armies had conquered almost the whole of the world where Jews lived, from Spain eastward across North Africa and the Middle East as far as the eastern frontier of Iran and beyond. Almost all the Jews in the world were now ruled by Islam. This new situation transformed Jewish existence. Their fortunes changed in legal, demographic, social, religious, political, geographical, economic, linguistic and cultural terms – all for the better.

First, things improved politically. Almost everywhere in Christendom where Jews had lived now formed part of the same political space as Babylon – Cordoba and Basra lay in the same political world. The old frontier between the vital centre in Babylonia and the Jews of the Mediterranean basin was swept away, forever.

Political change was partnered by change in the legal status of the Jewish population: although it is not always clear what happened during the Muslim conquests, one thing is certain. The result of the conquests was, by and large, to make the Jews second-class citizens.

This should not be misunderstood: to be a second-class citizen was a far better thing to be than not to be a citizen at all. For most of these Jews, second-class citizenship represented a major advance. In Visigothic Spain, for example, shortly before the Muslim conquest in 711, the Jews had seen their children removed from them and forcibly converted to Christianity and had themselves been enslaved.

In the developing Islamic societies of the classical and medieval periods, being a Jew meant belonging to a category defined under law, enjoying certain rights and protections, alongside various obligations. These rights and protections were not as extensive or as generous as those enjoyed by Muslims, and the obligations were greater but, for the first few centuries, the Muslims themselves were a minority, and the practical differences were not all that great.

Along with legal near-equality came social and economic equality. Jews were not confined to ghettos, either literally or in terms of economic activity. The societies of Islam were, in effect, open societies. In religious terms, too, Jews enjoyed virtually full freedom. They might not build many new synagogues – in theory – and they might not make too public their profession of their faith, but there was no really significant restriction on the practice of their religion. Along with internal legal autonomy, they also enjoyed formal representation, through leaders of their own, before the authorities of the state. Imperfect and often not quite as rosy as this might sound, it was at least the broad norm.

The political unity brought by the new Islamic world-empire did not last, but it created a vast Islamic world civilisation, similar to the older Christian civilisation that it replaced. Within this huge area, Jews lived and enjoyed broadly similar status and rights everywhere. They could move around, maintain contacts, and develop their identity as Jews. A great new expansion of trade from the ninth century onwards brought the Spanish Jews – like the Muslims – into touch with the Jews and the Muslims even of India.

A ll this was encouraged by a further, critical development. Huge numbers of people in the new world of Islam adopted the language of the Muslim Arabs. Arabic gradually became the principal language of this vast area, excluding almost all the rest: Greek and Syriac, Aramaic and Coptic and Latin all died out, replaced by Arabic. Persian, too, went into a long retreat, to reappear later heavily influenced by Arabic.

The Jews moved over to Arabic very rapidly. By the early 10th century, only 300 years after the conquests, Sa’adya Gaon was translating the Bible into Arabic. Bible translation is a massive task – it is not undertaken unless there is a need for it. By about the year 900, the Jews had largely abandoned other languages and taken on Arabic.

The change of language in its turn brought the Jews into direct contact with broader cultural developments. The result from the 10th century on was a striking pairing of two cultures. The Jews of the Islamic world developed an entirely new culture, which differed from their culture before Islam in terms of language, cultural forms, influences, and uses. Instead of being concerned primarily with religion, the new Jewish culture of the Islamic world, like that of its neighbours, mixed the religious and the secular to a high degree. The contrast, both with the past and with medieval Christian Europe, was enormous.

Like their neighbours, these Jews wrote in Arabic in part, and in a Jewish form of that language. The use of Arabic brought them close to the Arabs. But the use of a specific Jewish form of that language maintained the barriers between Jew and Muslim. The subjects that Jews wrote about, and the literary forms in which they wrote about them, were largely new ones, borrowed from the Muslims and developed in tandem with developments in Arabic Islam.

Also at this time, Hebrew was revived as a language of high literature, parallel to the use among the Muslims of a high form of Arabic for similar purposes. Along with its use for poetry and artistic prose, secular writing of all forms in Hebrew and in (Judeo-)Arabic came into being, some of it of high quality.

Much of the greatest poetry in Hebrew written since the Bible comes from this period. Sa’adya Gaon, Solomon Ibn Gabirol, Ibn Ezra (Moses and Abraham), Maimonides, Yehuda Halevi, Yehudah al-Harizi, Samuel ha-Nagid, and many more – all of these names, well known today, belong in the first rank of Jewish literary and cultural endeavour.

W here did these Jews produce all this? When did they and their neighbours achieve this symbiosis, this mode of living together? The Jews did it in a number of centres of excellence. The most outstanding of these was Islamic Spain, where there was a true Jewish Golden Age, alongside a wave of cultural achievement among the Muslim population. The Spanish case illustrates a more general pattern, too.

What happened in Islamic Spain – waves of Jewish cultural prosperity paralleling waves of cultural prosperity among the Muslims – exemplifies a larger pattern in Arab Islam. In Baghdad, between the ninth and the twelfth centuries; in Qayrawan (in north Africa), between the ninth and the 11th centuries; in Cairo, between the 10th and the 12th centuries, and elsewhere, the rise and fall of cultural centres of Islam tended to be reflected in the rise and fall of Jewish cultural activity in the same places.

This was not coincidence, and nor was it the product of particularly enlightened liberal patronage by Muslim rulers. It was the product of a number of deeper features of these societies, social and cultural, legal and economic, linguistic and political, which together enabled and indeed encouraged the Jews of the Islamic world to create a novel sub-culture within the high civilisation of the time.

This did not last for ever; the period of culturally successful symbiosis between Jew and Arab Muslim in the middle ages came to a close by about 1300. In reality, it had reached this point even earlier, with the overall relative decline in the importance and vitality of Arabic culture, both in relation to western European cultures and in relation to other cultural forms within Islam itself; Persian and Turkish.

Jewish cultural prosperity in the middle ages operated in large part as a function of Muslim, Arabic cultural (and to some degree political) prosperity: when Muslim Arabic culture thrived, so did that of the Jews; when Muslim Arabic culture declined, so did that of the Jews.

In the case of the Jews, however, the cultural capital thus created also served as the seed-bed of further growth elsewhere – in Christian Spain and in the Christian world more generally.

The Islamic world was not the only source of inspiration for the Jewish cultural revival that came later in Christian Europe, but it certainly was a major contributor to that development. Its significance cannot be overestimated.

By David J Wasserstein

24 May 2012

@ The JC.com

Source URL: http://www.thejc.com/comment-and-debate/comment/68082/so-what-did-muslims-do-jews

Shoes give clue to Houla assailants

“Read well this silly propaganda piece. It’s about Syria, but written by one great FT reporter in Abu dhabi and another in Beirut. They’re quoting as “analysts” some jokers based in the UK and US. And of course the inevitable Nadim Khoury of the US-funded “Human” rights watch in Beirut.

The story says pro-government communalist militiamen, dressed in army uniforms, went and killed over a hundred civilians, sunni muslims, in Houla near Homs, shooting at close range and knifing.

The regular military wouldn’t go around knifing and shooting at close range. Out of the 9 or so divisions in the Syrian army, all but one are of sunni muslim origin. And it’s tough to make believe that sunni regulars went and butchered other sunnis! That’s where “alawi shabiba” militia come in handy. So they government gave the “shabiba” military uniforms, and put them in white sports shoes to show they’re alawite killers!!! See, the syrian regime really wants the world to believe they themselves are killing their own people. Heard that one before?

Back to reality: most likely armed islamist and related thugs, funded by the Gulf emirates and endorsed by the US and allies, put on Syrian army uniforms, but tied on those “white shoes”  as proof  they’re not army but private sector. Remember the initial lie was that the Houla massacre was caused by artillery shelling by the regular army. But the UN Danish general came out saying the killing was at close range. so they had to take out the tanks and shells and supplant them with white sports shoes!! And when repeated by propaganda, white sports shoes stick in the mind!” By Salil Sarkar

Syrian opposition’s Shaam News Network shows UN observers at a hospital morgue before their burial in the central Syrian town of Houla on May 26, 2012. The head of a UN mission warned of “civil war” in Syria after his observers counted more than 92 bodies, 32 of them children, in Houla following reports of a massacre there©AFP

The men who stormed the Abdel Razzaks’ home while carrying out a massacre in the Houla district of Syria were dressed like soldiers except for one potentially crucial detail, said a ten-year-old family member: they wore white shoes.

Hidden in a nearby barn, the boy watched as the thugs left the house and shot dead his 13-year-old friend Shafiq, who was standing across the street.

Analysts say the white shoes are one of several indicators that the murder of more than 100 people in this central Syrian cluster of villages was more than just another killing spree by the army of Bashar al-Assad.

Nadim Houry, of Human Rights Watch, said the running shoes were one of the details cited by witnesses as evidence the people carrying out the attacks were not soldiers but members of the shadowy and much-feared grouping of pro-regime militiamen known as the shabbiha, who are playing an ever-growing role in the country’s deepening conflict.

From their roots as a Mafia-style crime gang in the home region of the Assad dynasty that has ruled Syria for more than four decades, the shabbiha have, say many observers, emerged as a increasingly deadly but deniable instrument in the regime’s efforts to crush a more than year long uprising against its rule.

“With the regime basically relinquishing control over some rural areas, it’s easier to send in the shabbiha than it is to send in the regular army,” said Emile Hokayem, an analyst at the International Institute of Strategic Studies. “They are a better tool for retribution – and you are going to see them operating in the country a lot more.”

While the world – including the Assad regime and its allies in Moscow – has deplored the Houla killings, there are sharp divisions over who is responsible. The Syrian government blames armed gangs for the murders, the vast majority apparently carried out at close range against victims that included 49 children.

However, the Syrian opposition, its international allies and rights groups say the atrocity was primarily the work of shabbiha, who they say poured into the town after the military shelled it.

Most observers agree the original shabbiha were allawite ganglords who ran drugs and hot money across the Lebanese border from the region of north-west Syria around the coastal town of Lattakia, the heartland of Mr Assad’s minority Allawite religious sect.

But much else about the group remains murky, even down to its etymology: while many say the name shabbiha has its roots in the Arabic word for ghost, others say “ghost” was actually the nickname not of the gang members, but of the stolen black Mercedes some used to drive.

In the 1990s, the group’s racketeering and extortion eventually caused sufficient anger that even Mr Assad – with the approval of his father Hafez, the then president – tried to curb its activities. But the popular uprising that began in March last year put the shabbiha – and, more significantly, the militia idea they represent – firmly back in favour with the regime.

Analysts say the term shabbiha has now become a catch-all term for irregular forces fighting on behalf of the government, ranging from hardcore loyalists bussed in to trouble spots, to poor farmers in central Syria given arms and told to defend themselves against the foreign-backed terrorists whom the government says are behind the revolt.

As the shabbiha’s ranks and violence have grown and widened, groups have sprung up to counter them. Analysts say shabbiha-style militias made up of the Sunni Muslims who represent the majority of the population have also started to emerge in regions like the province of Homs, where Houla is located and where Sunni and Allawite communities sit side by side, increasing the potential for sectarian violence.

Wissam Tarif, a researcher with the anti-Assad campaign group Avaaz, said there have been tit-for-tat cycles of kidnapping and violence between religious communities in Homs city because of the presence of local shabbiha. “That’s what made the sectarian cycle of violence in Homs higher,” Mr Tarif said.

Analysts say the Houla massacre is one of the most horrific and best-documented of many signs that Syria’s conflict, like other civil wars, is increasingly becoming the domain of militiamen operating under political licence but also with increasing autonomy.

Given rein to attack a civilian population and an opposition Free Syrian Army that is itself a loosely-linked confection of localised militarised groups, many observers see the likelihood of more and greater shabbiha atrocities such as the one in Houla.

“You are creating a monster here,” said Randa Slim, a researcher at the New America Foundation, a US-based thinktank. “We have a Frankenstein in the making.”

By Michael Peel in Abu Dhabi and Abigail Fielding-Smith in Beirut

30 May 2012

@ The Financial Times

Searching for Solutions in Syria

The worsening conflict in Syria and the prospect of foreign military intervention outside the mandate of the United Nations poses an immediate risk to civilian safety. The consequences of pursuing regime change in Damascus invite a broader sectarian conflict that would forever reshape the Middle East; this article analyzes the ongoing perpetuation of violence and attempts to offer non-abrasive solutions to the crisis in Syria.

For sixteen months, the people of Syria have undergone economic hardship, tremendous human suffering and the unparalleled horrors of war. As the Syrian opposition officially abandons the ceasefire and calls for foreign intervention and the imposition of a no-fly zone [1], US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has announced a new transition plan that would topple the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, signaling the increasing possibility of intervention outside the mandate of the United Nations [2].

Following clashes between militant rebel groups and government forces that claimed the lives of 80 Syrian troops [3], rebels in Aleppo have reportedly taken 11 hostages and vowed to release them only when a new state is established [4]. While Bashar al-Assad attributes the perpetuation of Syria’s crisis to outside forces [5], Iran has expressed its readiness to mount an armed resistance against foreign military forces in Syria [6]. Regardless of who perpetrated the recent killings in Qubayr and Houla, the profoundly disturbing images of lifeless children begs the question, has the Syrian crisis reached a point of incorrigibility?

Western media has largely relied on unconfirmed opposition accounts crediting the Shabiha, pro-government Alawite militias with carrying out massacres across Syria as a result of the Assad government “brainwashing the militia into believing the Sunni majority was their enemy,” as reported by The Telegraph [7]. Germany’s Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung has recently reported that anti-Assad Sunni militants carried out the massacre in Houla, targeting pro-government Alawi and Shia minorities, “Those killed were almost exclusively from families belonging to Houla’s Alawi and Shia minorities. Over 90% of Houla’s population is Sunni. Several dozen members of a family were slaughtered, which had converted from Sunni to Shia Islam. Members of the Shomaliya, an Alawi family, were also killed, as was the family of a Sunni member of the Syrian parliament who is regarded as a collaborator. Immediately following the massacre, the perpetrators are supposed to have filmed their victims and then presented them as Sunni victims in videos posted on the internet” [8].

Human Rights Watch has also released a report entitled “Syria: Armed Opposition Groups Committing Abuses,” documenting the outstanding cases of violence exercised by the Syrian opposition, which has been accused of kidnapping, detaining, torturing and executing of members of the Syrian military and civilian government supporters [9]. HRW reports that attacks by opposition groups are conducted largely on sectarian grounds, motivated by anti-Shia and anti-Alawite sentiments, citing abuses committed by militant Salafist groups and members of the opposition Free Syrian Army. Although UN observers admit they are unable to determine the perpetrators of the recent massacre in Qubayr with no firm evidence to inculpate the Syrian government, UN chief Ban Ki-moon has declared that the Assad government has lost its legitimacy [10], channeling calls by President Barak Obama, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and British Prime Minister David Cameron for Assad to step down [11].

Reports of massacres have been framed to fit a pre-determined conclusion, in line with the foreign policy objectives of Western capitals by implicating the Assad regime with orchestrating violence in order to build popular support for aggressively toppling the Syrian government. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has recently accused external forces of inciting violence by providing arms and material assistance to militant opposition forces, stating, “They want the international community to be filled with indignation and start a full-blown intervention in Syria” [12]. Following the killings in Qubayr, US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner called on the world to exert “maximum financial pressure” on Assad’s government through strong sanctions that “can help hasten the day the Assad regime relinquishes power,” while assuring that the US would support the use of force against Syria as authorized under Chapter 7 of the United Nations charter [13].

Although Hillary Clinton has openly acknowledged that members of Al-Qaeda and other groups on the State Department’s terror list are fighting alongside opposition rebels supported by the United States [14], countries belonging to both NATO and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) have provided extensive financial and material support to the militant opposition. Former FBI translator turned whistleblower Sibel Edmonds has reported that NATO/American-affiliated troops have conducted operations on Jordanian soil near Syrian border in the village of Albaej [15], as US troops reportedly train members of the Free Syrian Army along with Jordanian forces in order to prepare them for an international military drill in the country [16]. Syrian officials report the presence of intelligence operatives from Mossad and the CIA, as well as employees of private military contractors such as Blackwater in Syria; security forces have reportedly detained French, Turkish, Gulf, Iraqi, and Lebanese gunmen operating inside Syria [17].

The Washington Post reports in their article, “Syrian rebels get influx of arms with gulf neighbors’ money, U.S. coordination,” that Persian Gulf nations such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar with coordination from the United States have spent millions arming and funding militant opposition groups battling the Assad government [18]. The United States has admittedly spent $6 million training opposition journalists and activists between 2006 and 2010, while funneling approximately $6.3 million to the Movement for Justice and Development, a London-based dissident organization that broadcasts anti-government news into Syria [19]. As a further indication of foreign elements at work in Syria, members of the Syrian opposition have also adopted tactics seen by Al Qaeda in Iraq. Reuters reports in their article, “Outgunned Syria rebels make shift to bombs,” that rebels have adopted suicide bombing, booby-trapped car bombs and roadside explosions; Joseph Holliday of the US-based Institute for the Study of War adds “There’s no question that a lot of Syrians fought with al Qaeda elements in Iraq [against the United States] and it’s likely that many rebels today learned bombing skills fighting there” [20].

While the editorial policy of The New York Times permits the publication of pieces such as the ostentatiously titled “Assad, the Butcher,” which incongruously accuses the foreign ministries of Russia and China of living in a “fantasy world” before calling on those nations to receive “comprehensive punishments” for being complicit in “more than 12,000 Syrian deaths,” the Western and Gulf capitals’ strategy of arming militant opposition forces and extremist groups has worked to foment atrocities and further enflame regional sectarian tension, invalidating any attempt to abide by Kofi Annan’s Peace Plan [21]. Publications released by The Brookings Institution, a US think-tank noted for its influence on American foreign policy, provides further insight into the nature of Washington’s objectives in Syria. Brookings’ March 2012 Middle East Memo titled “Saving Syria: Assessing Options for Regime Change,” is a testament to the underlying politicization of the “Responsibility to Protect” in Syria, as atrocities are orchestrated as a pretext to protect civilians, to warrant toppling the Syrian government and furthering Washington’s geopolitical objectives in the region.

Brookings’ Memo meticulously theorizes ways to overthrow the Assad government, including the use of crippling economic sanctions to further incite unrest and the leveraging of human rights abuses to aggressively intervene in Syria, “Working with its Arab, regional, and Western partners, Washington can push for a more effective humanitarian response and pave the way for more aggressive intervention options to topple Asad” [22]. Due to budget restraints and a public wary of fighting wars overseas, Washington’s strategy is to lead from behind by prompting other countries to lead the charge militarily, “Israel could posture forces on or near the Golan Heights and, in so doing, might divert regime forces from suppressing the opposition. This posture may conjure fears in the Asad regime of a multi-front war, particularly if Turkey is willing to do the same on its border and if the Syrian opposition is being fed a steady diet of arms and training” [23].

While Hilary Clinton and others pay lip service to supporting the ceasefire proposed by the Annan Plan, Brookings’ advisers suggest Washington “pin down the Asad regime and bleed it, keeping a regional adversary weak, while avoiding the costs of direct intervention” [24]. The US continues pressuring neighboring countries like Jordan and Turkey to provide support for the militant Syrian opposition, “These allies would have to provide secure bases for the opposition on Syria’s borders, protected by their own armed forces. Their militaries could do much of the arming and training, in conjunction with the United States. Area intelligence services, perhaps including Israel’s, could also work behind the scenes to undermine Asad’s regime and bolster the opposition” [25]. Brookings’ Memo highlights Washington’s commitment to overthrowing the Syrian government using the most cost-effect means possible, “the hope is that the United States could fight a ‘clean’ war from 10,000 feet and leave the dirty work on the ground to the Free Syrian Army, perhaps even obviating a massive commitment to Iraq-style nation-building” [26].

The toppling of the Assad government would offer the United States and its allies in Tel Aviv and Riyadh substantial strategic advantages, as the underlying object of supporting insurgent activity against Damascus is to undermine Iranian influence in the Arab world. Syria under Bashar al-Assad is the fundamental channel that links Hezbollah with Iran, serving as a transit point for conducting training operations and distributing material assistance to the Palestinian resistance. Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak has theorized that the toppling of Assad would “be a major blow to the radical axis [Syria, Iran, Hezbollah] and a major blow to Iran. It’s the only kind of outpost of Iranian influence in the Arab world and it will weaken dramatically both Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza” [27]. Although Syria’s opposition in power after the downfall of Assad would be a compliant entity to the foreign powers supporting it, the SNC would likely be unable to conjure the political leverage needed to enforce order, and heinous violations of human rights would no doubt occur under it; if Salafist elements were able to usurp authority, Syria’s Alawite, Druze and Christian populations would likely be subject to sectarian violence and persecution.

Israel can potentially reap significant gains from regime change in Syria by working to reduce Iran’s influence in the region and by increasing its commercial exploits in Syria’s Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, which supplies one-third of Israel’s water supply [28] and holds an estimated $24 million in oil and gas reserves [29]. Over time, resistance movements in Lebanon and occupied Palestinian territories may be unable to defend their territory without outside support, allowing the Netanyahu government to more effectively pursue its aspirations to create a “Greater Israel”. Saudi Arabia is motivated by the prospect of becoming a dominant regional power and the ideological aspirations of quelling the expansion of Shia identity through neutralizing the governments of Tehran and Damascus, as adherents to Sunni Islam recognize Alawites as part of the Shia sect. Turkey is also determined to increase its influence in the region and possibly expand its territory by annexing northern regions of Syria under appropriate circumstances.

While foreign military intervention would inevitably continue to produce civilian casualities and collateral damage, it is important to recognize that the Syrian people have already experienced the spoils of war at this stage in the conflict. The unspeakable nature of the killings in Syria inevitably brings one to contemplate how diplomacy can be successfully utilized given the current state of affairs. The immediate cessation of violence in Syria through diplomatic and non-abrasive means should be the ultimate objective of those individuals charged with enforcing the Annan Plan, even if it means drastically increasing the presence and financial expenditure of a neutral United Nations peacekeeping mission. For all its shortcomings and adherence to aggressive policies of the United States, Israel, and others, the United Nations is the only institution currently established to undertake such a mission in Syria.

Certain steps can be taken by the international community to ease tensions at the administrative and grassroots levels, namely by encouraging direct talks with between Bashar al-Assad and representatives of all internal opposition organizations, including members of the Free Syrian Army, the Syrian National Council, the Muslim Brotherhood and the National Coordination Committee, a coalition of left-leaning political parties staunchly opposed to foreign intervention [30]. Although both the opposition and the Syrian government have exercised inappropriate and excessive force indiscriminately throughout the conflict, the government of Bashar al-Assad is the legitimate legal authority in Syria. The Assad government has issued reforms allowing for multi-party competition, the establishment of an independent judiciary, a two-term limit on the presidency and political pluralism through inaugurating a new constitution passed in a referendum held in February 2012. If a ceasefire can be upheld through a power-sharing agreement between representatives of various opposition groups and the current government in Syria, the international community should rightfully encourage such a transition.

Furthermore, representatives of the Syrian government and its allies should have a place at future “Friends of Syria” meetings and any international mediation conference to work towards a balanced solution to the crisis. The United Nations or any other legitimate neutral institution must investigate the nation states and institutions responsible for illegally exporting arms into Syria and issue substantial fines and sanctions to those responsible parties. Neutral institutions must secure Syria’s borders and thoroughly inspect all incoming and outgoing persons and cargo; in addition, an arms embargo must be established and respected by all sides with a focus on subduing illegal smuggling. Both sides must be encouraged to use the maximum amount of restraint, no matter how severe the provocation. In the case of successful dialogue between the Assad government and representatives of the opposition, the creation of UN-administered “arms-free zones” can be established in population centers if opposition leaders can be persuaded to call for the gradual disarmament of rebel forces.

Given the degree of brutality exerted by those responsible for the atrocities in Houla and elsewhere, it is to be expected that certain individuals would not respect such a ceasefire; the motivation for their brutal actions may be sectarian, ideological, or financial. Neutral external individuals and institutions could encourage inter-faith dialogues between regional spiritual leaders, and perhaps influential clerics can be persuaded to issue fatwas or the equivalent against the further perpetuation of violence in an attempt to cool sectarian tensions. If the Syrian government and members of the opposition can come to a conducive transitional agreement where all parties have a degree of influence, joint security coalitions can be formed comprised of UN personnel, Syrian soldiers and former rebels to ensure that the ceasefire is exercised. Those who act outside the ceasefire using illegally procured arms and explosives could be individually prosecuted or dealt with by force if they pose an immediate security threat.

Outside forces must be held accountable for engaging in activities that have brought the Syrian crisis to this dismal stage, namely by paying substantial penalties that can be used to temporarily resettle Syrian refugees and fund efforts to secure Syria’s borders. All efforts must be made to transition the Syrian people into a climate of normality, including the removal of economic sanctions. At this crucial stage, the Syrian government should exercise strict curfews to ensure the safety of civilians, making it more difficult for terrorist groups to operate. Even if an agreement can be reached between Bashar al-Assad and representatives of Syria’s various opposition groups, terrorists groups would likely continue to provoke violence for whatever their purpose. Until both the Syrian government and the opposition can unite under the common goal of providing security to the people of Syria, no viable political transitions can be agreed upon.

The government of Bashar al-Assad must continue to make tangible reforms that legitimize dissent and promote expression, and the Free Syrian Army must agree to gradually disarm and come to a political compromise. The implications of both foreign military intervention and the administrative usurpation of sectarian fanatics hold unacceptable consequences for the Syrian people and the entire region. Even if internal actors agree upon a solution, it will take years for the people of Syria to recover from this conflict and begin to forgive each other. If the majority of the Syrian people desire a change in leadership, the world must respect their aspirations, however such a decision can only be reached once the domestic security situation has transitioned to appropriate levels by both sides respecting the ceasefire. Those individuals who value stability founded on the pillars of peace, compromise and conflict aversion must make their voices heard and stand with the Syrian people to help steer them out of these dark times, and eventually, help them heal.

By Nile Bowie

10 June, 2012

@ Global Research

Nile Bowie is an independent writer and photojournalist based in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Twitter: @NileBowie

Notes

[1] Syrian rebels abandon ceasefire, call on UN for no-fly zone, Russia Today, June 4, 2012

[2] US post-Assad Syria plan: Intervention in the cards? Russia Today, June 7, 2012

[3] Syria rebels ‘kill 80 soldiers’ in weekend clashes, BBC, June 4, 2012

[4] Syria rebels say will free Lebanese hostages in new state, Chicago Tribune, June 9, 2012

[5] Assad says Syria faces “real war” waged from outside, Reuters, June 3, 2012

[6] Iran: Syrian intervention ‘will be defeated’, Russia Today, June 9, 2012

[7] The Shabiha: Inside Assad’s death squads, The Telegraph, June 2, 2012

[8] Abermals Massaker in Syrien, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, June 7, 2012

[9] Syria: Armed Opposition Groups Committing Abuses, Human Rights Watch, March 20, 2012

[10] UN mission ‘can’t say who to blame’ in Hama massacre, Russia Today, June 9, 2012

[11] UN debates Syria amid new demands Assad quits, Russia Today, August 19, 2011

[12] Annan plan ‘only chance for peace’ but stalled by intervention supporters – Lavrov, Russia Today, June 9, 2012

[13] Geithner warns Syria of UN action, as Clinton heads to Istanbul to talk strategy with allies, The Associated Press, June 6, 2012

[14] Clinton: Syria risking civil war, BBC, February 26, 2012

[15] US troops surround Syria on the eve of invasion? Russia Today, December 13, 2011

[16] Amman allows US to train Syrian rebels on Jordanian soil, PressTV, May 23, 2012

[17] Mossad, CIA and Blackwater operate in Syria – report, Russia Today, March 7, 2012

[18] Syrian rebels get influx of arms with gulf neighbors’ money, U.S. coordination, The Washington Post, May 16, 2012

[19] U.S. admits funding Syrian opposition, CBC News, April 18, 2011

[20] Outgunned Syria rebels make shift to bombs, Reuters, April 30, 2012

[21] Assad, the Butcher, The New York Times, June 9, 2012

[22] Saving Syria: Assessing Options for Regime Change, Page 4, The Brookings Institution, March 2012

[23] Ibid, Page 6, Brookings Institution, March 2012

[24] Ibid, Page 9, Brookings Institution, March 2012

[25] Ibid, Page 7, Brookings Institution, March 2012

[26] Ibid, Page 9, Brookings Institution, March 2012

[27] AMANPOUR. Latest full-length edition: Ehud Barak, CNN, April 20, 2012

[28] Shouting in the hills, Al-Ahram, June 2008

[29] Netanyahu Approves Oil Drilling In Golan Heights, AP, October 25, 1996

[30] Meet Syria’s Opposition, Foreign Policy, November 2, 2011

Nile Bowie is a frequent contributor to Global Research.  Global Research Articles by Nile Bowie

Root of Evil

As such a useful tool of exchange, money is not inherently evil. Money can be a springboard to such evil as bailout-begging banks too monstrous to fail gambling with taxpayer wealth—you know, private profits, public risk. Casino financialization with taxpayers as a backstop. The $700 billion TARP bailout actually being a $23.7 trillion bailout . But the root of all evil is the human brain.

New research has exposed, shall we say, the root of the problem. Pathocracy is its flower.

Definition: pathocracy (n). A system of government created by a small pathological minority that takes control over a society of normal people (from Political Ponerology : A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes, by Andrew Lobaczewski).

A small minority of people are born psychopaths; they inherit a genetic deviance linked to certain structural abnormalities of their social brain.

The physical dynamic that exposes psychopaths is a reduction of gray matter in the anterior rostral prefrontal cortex and temporal poles. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is able to image this deviation fundamental to psychopathy. Potential benefits to humanity are immense; imagine something like a TSA screening (without the bureaucracy, groping and humiliation) to keep psychopaths from boarding the flight to power.

Psychopaths enjoy a perverse advantage over normal people in ascending pyramids of power. Unfettered by conscience, empathy, morality…some might say, without the weight of a soul , psychopaths readily rise to the top in a society turned upside down by pathocracy. Lying, cheating, stealing, backstabbing—without remorse, psychopaths can claw for power in ways that make a person with a conscience recoil.

It’s not so much that power corrupts as that the corrupt seek power.

Politics and investment banking are prime waters for psychopaths to school. If people enjoying great power over others were screened for social-brain deviations with an MRI scan, and the psychopaths were weeded out, renaissance might occupy Capital Hill and Wall Street. Judging from our current state of politics and financialization, there certainly would be many vacancies to fill in such a furthering of the humane.

It truly is right in our hands, an opportunity we may never see again.

But…possessing the means of physically detecting psychopathy and correcting the blight of psychopathic “leadership” may be irrelevant in the face of pathocracy fully entrenched. Psychopaths in power would never volunteer to have their social-brain deviations revealed, would never allow legislation regarding a brain MRI as a prerequisite to holding any elective office.

Perhaps it’s true, “where there’s a will, there’s a way”. Technology offers us the way—the key to identifying the human brain’s physical roots of psychopathy. The question becomes whether or not the American public has the will to force holders of great power over others, and seekers of such power, to bare their soul…or lack thereof.

Legislation requiring some “ newfangled, junk-science ” brain scan for leaders could only be forced from below. But our influence down here in the 99.99% is withering toward nothing but voting for a red psychopath, or a blue one, in elections controlled by unlimited corporate cash, and fraud.

And there’s: “Either with us, or against us”. Criminalization of dissent is plodding toward any questioning of entrenched pathocracy becoming “domestic terrorism”.

A most insidious aspect of psychopathy: It’s in the genes. Not only can moneypower be passed on through progeny, so can genes for psychopathy. The elite are shameless in pronouncing their gigadeath plans (95% reduction of human population) with such as Agenda 21 , Georgia Guidestones , Denver airport …though they are elusive about how billions of humans will be eliminated….

When human population is reduced to 500,000,000, will the elite in absolute control be psychopaths across the board?

Perhaps an easy way to consider our potential for furthering the humane that a simple MRI scan may offer: Imagine…Dick Cheney was screened from ultimately becoming, for eight years, the de facto president of the greatest military power Earth has ever suffered.

By Rand Clifford

30 May, 2012

@ Countercurrents.org

Rand Clifford’s latest novel, Priest Lake Cathedral  has been released by StarChief Press

Towards Empowering Refugees

A workshop that was organized by the Malaysian Social and Research Institute (MSRI) took place on the 30th and 31st of May 2012. Representatives from the International Movement for a JUST World were invited therefore, we attended the event.  The workshop satisfied its goal of providing its audience with a head-to-toe 101 on all aspects of the refugee situation in Malaysia. In order to ensure that all participants were on the same page, the audience was first of all presented with the statistical figures that currently define the refugee situation in Malaysia. The audience comprised of a variety of individuals from various Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), Religious Communities, Law firms, the general public and finally, refugee communities themselves. The refugee communities discussed comprised individuals from Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Myanmar Pakistan, Palestine, Somalia, Sudan, and Sri Lanka. Despite the differences that existed between each of the community’s experiences, one similarity persisted and that was the theme of struggle.

The main speaker at the event was Mr. Brian Barbour, a well-mannered and experienced lawyer currently working for the Japanese Association for Refugees (JAR). In order to describe the events that took place in the workshop in a more concise manner, the first day served as an introduction to the refugee struggle in Malaysia which assisted in preparing each and every individual both empathically and emotionally for the events that were set to take place on the second day which focused more on the application of the acquired knowledge.

Voluntary Return, Local Integration and Resettlement are the only options for refugees in Malaysia. Many refugees can never return to their homelands and therefore for the majority of the individuals, the first option is not applicable. With regards to the second option, refugees in Malaysia are not provided with very many working or education of opportunities which prevents them from obtaining a sustainable lifestyle and therefore once again, the second option is impossible. One might assume that due to how limiting the first two options are that the third option would be the most ideal. However, based on the information received from the refugees who were present at the workshop, this option was the most nerve wrecking of all.

The only organization that has the power to resettle a refugee in Malaysia is the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR). As of today, a total of 98,000 registered refugees exist in Malaysia. What about those individuals who have failed to register? Brian Barbour explained the standardized registration procedure that each and every asylum seeker has to endure in order to be deemed professionally a refugee by the UNHCR.  The term ‘endure’ is not a typological error. It has been carefully selected in order to begin to describe the horrific process that each and every refugee seeking to be resettled must experience in order to be relocated.

Can one imagine what it must be like to have to flee your own country in order to avoid one form of persecution or another only to arrive at another country that you believed would serve to protect you and heal you from all of the atrocities that you had previously faced only to be confronted by a new trauma? In order to begin the resettlement process, the individual must first of all be deemed to be a refugee by UNHCR. The individual is expected to explain his or her experience over and over again, thereby causing the individual to become repeatedly exposed to the trauma. One must keep in mind that this process is very longwinded and therefore can take up to eight years. What happens if after all the waiting the UNHCR officer present on that day merely rejects the asylum seekers application? Due to the lack of recognition that the government gives to the refugees in Malaysia, it is very difficult to devise standards on how asylum seekers must be treated. Without these standards, can one imagine the amount of torture that a refugee may experience and not be able to do anything about it?

With the large number of refugees that are currently residing in Malaysia, the UNHCR can only do so much. Over recent years, many NGOs have been actively involved in improving the refugee situation; however, due to the lack of progress with regards to this issue, it is evident that this is not enough.

Despite the grim and tragic revelations made at the workshop, the event was truly eye-opening. The layperson views that we had prior to the workshop were completely demolished upon attending the event. The truth of the matter is refugees do not exist solely on the border of Malaysia; they live five minutes away from you. Refugees do not necessarily dress shabbily, they shop at the same store that you do. Refugees are everywhere and they need our help.

Jennifer Kate Tennant

Sarah Madhi

Towards Empowering Refugees

A workshop that was organized by the Malaysian Social and Research Institute (MSRI) took place on the 30th and 31st of May 2012. Representatives from the International Movement for a JUST World were invited therefore, we attended the event.  The workshop satisfied its goal of providing its audience with a head-to-toe 101 on all aspects of the refugee situation in Malaysia. In order to ensure that all participants were on the same page, the audience was first of all presented with the statistical figures that currently define the refugee situation in Malaysia. The audience comprised of a variety of individuals from various Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), Religious Communities, Law firms, the general public and finally, refugee communities themselves. The refugee communities discussed comprised individuals from Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Myanmar Pakistan, Palestine, Somalia, Sudan, and Sri Lanka. Despite the differences that existed between each of the community’s experiences, one similarity persisted and that was the theme of struggle.

The main speaker at the event was Mr. Brian Barbour, a well-mannered and experienced lawyer currently working for the Japanese Association for Refugees (JAR). In order to describe the events that took place in the workshop in a more concise manner, the first day served as an introduction to the refugee struggle in Malaysia which assisted in preparing each and every individual both empathically and emotionally for the events that were set to take place on the second day which focused more on the application of the acquired knowledge.

Voluntary Return, Local Integration and Resettlement are the only options for refugees in Malaysia. Many refugees can never return to their homelands and therefore for the majority of the individuals, the first option is not applicable. With regards to the second option, refugees in Malaysia are not provided with very many working or education of opportunities which prevents them from obtaining a sustainable lifestyle and therefore once again, the second option is impossible. One might assume that due to how limiting the first two options are that the third option would be the most ideal. However, based on the information received from the refugees who were present at the workshop, this option was the most nerve wrecking of all.

The only organization that has the power to resettle a refugee in Malaysia is the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR). As of today, a total of 98,000 registered refugees exist in Malaysia. What about those individuals who have failed to register? Brian Barbour explained the standardized registration procedure that each and every asylum seeker has to endure in order to be deemed professionally a refugee by the UNHCR.  The term ‘endure’ is not a typological error. It has been carefully selected in order to begin to describe the horrific process that each and every refugee seeking to be resettled must experience in order to be relocated.

Can one imagine what it must be like to have to flee your own country in order to avoid one form of persecution or another only to arrive at another country that you believed would serve to protect you and heal you from all of the atrocities that you had previously faced only to be confronted by a new trauma? In order to begin the resettlement process, the individual must first of all be deemed to be a refugee by UNHCR. The individual is expected to explain his or her experience over and over again, thereby causing the individual to become repeatedly exposed to the trauma. One must keep in mind that this process is very longwinded and therefore can take up to eight years. What happens if after all the waiting the UNHCR officer present on that day merely rejects the asylum seekers application? Due to the lack of recognition that the government gives to the refugees in Malaysia, it is very difficult to devise standards on how asylum seekers must be treated. Without these standards, can one imagine the amount of torture that a refugee may experience and not be able to do anything about it?

With the large number of refugees that are currently residing in Malaysia, the UNHCR can only do so much. Over recent years, many NGOs have been actively involved in improving the refugee situation; however, due to the lack of progress with regards to this issue, it is evident that this is not enough.

Despite the grim and tragic revelations made at the workshop, the event was truly eye-opening. The layperson views that we had prior to the workshop were completely demolished upon attending the event. The truth of the matter is refugees do not exist solely on the border of Malaysia; they live five minutes away from you. Refugees do not necessarily dress shabbily, they shop at the same store that you do. Refugees are everywhere and they need our help.

 by Jennifer Kate Tennant and Sarah Madhi


 

Pakistan gets a cuddle and a hug

The back-to-back visits to Pakistan this week by China’s Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi and the Russian president’s special envoy for Afghanistan, Zamir Kabulov, are rich in political symbolism and strategic content.

The consultations came at a time when Pakistan is reeling under pressure from the United States, the future of Afghanistan remains complicated and regional security is in flux.

The timing of the consultations will draw attention – since they were sandwiched between the summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in Chicago on May 20-21 and the forthcoming summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) in Beijing on June 6-7. Afghanistan is a burning issue for both international groupings.

But there is a global context, too. China and Russia closely coordinate on regional and international issues. What stands out is that Beijing and Moscow have come forward to extend political support to Pakistan at a time when Washington is trying to isolate it and make Islamabad bend to its wishes.

Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari was invited to the NATO summit and then publicly humiliated. The alliance’s secretary general, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, and United States President Barack Obama refused to meet him. Obama further showed his displeasure by omitting Pakistan from the list of countries he thanked for supporting the military effort in Afghanistan and by pointedly asking Pakistan to cooperate. Through media leaks, US officials have since publicized that in a closed-door session, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton subjected Zardari to an hour-long harangue.

A dragon cuddle …

Yang summed up his mission when he said in Islamabad, “Pakistan deserves full support form the international community.” He said Islamabad has played an important role in fighting terrorism and he called upon the international community to recognize it.

Yang stressed, “China will continue to firmly support Pakistan in protecting its sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity and dignity.” He made it clear that he was in Islamabad to further strengthen and push forward China’s strategic partnership with Pakistan.

Yang said that in the evolving international situation the Sino-Pak relationship has added strategic significance for promoting world peace, stability and development. China appreciated the important and active role played by Pakistan in international and regional affairs, he said.

Yang underscored that China will unwaveringly pursue the policy of further strengthening its friendship with Pakistan and is willing to work together to deepen practical cooperation and strengthen the strategic coordination and elevate the partnership to new heights.

Xinhua news agency reported that China and Pakistan have agreed to “strengthen multilateral coordination and to safeguard the common interests of both sides.” The reference seems to be to Pakistan’s role in the SCO, whose forthcoming summit in Beijing will be attended by Zardari.

While Yang’s official visit had a broad-ranging agenda, Kabulov’s consultations were focused and purposive. He came to Islamabad primarily to discuss the situation in Afghanistan and the forthcoming visit to Pakistan by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Kabulov is Moscow’s ace diplomatic troubleshooter on Afghanistan. The Pakistani accounts quoted him as saying to Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani that “enormous commonalities” existed between Russia and Pakistan on regional issues and bilateral cooperation. Clearly, the reference is to the situation surrounding the Afghan problem, where both Russia and Pakistan have been seeking a bigger role while the US selectively engages them for specific roles.

Putin’s visit to Pakistan, which is expected “soon”, will be the first by a Russian head of state in the six-decade long history of relations between the two countries. It will consolidate the remarkable makeover in the two countries’ relations in the past two to three years.

The fact that Putin picked Pakistan to be one of his first visits abroad after taking over as president in the Kremlin itself testifies to the “mood swing” in the geopolitics of the region. Many trends need to be factored in here.

Russia is gearing up to play an effective role in world affairs. Its assertive stance on Syria and Iran can be expected to extend to Pakistan and Central Asia. Russia kept its participation over the NATO summit on a low-key and saw to it that none of the Central Asian leaders who were invited – from Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan – attended either. Meanwhile, Moscow also hosted a summit of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO). Putin is undertaking visits to Belarus, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan during the week ahead and is virtually launching his Eurasian project.

There are signs that Moscow expects the SCO to take common positions on regional and international issues. The Beijing summit may formalize a “mechanism” to this end. The Russian media have forecast that the summit will take a stance supportive of the Russian concerns on the issue of the US missile defense.

Meanwhile, the US-Russia reset remains in the doldrums and the probability is that it might well degenerate through the months ahead until a new administration takes over in White House early next year. The exchanges have become increasingly acrimonious at the diplomatic level. Obama’s Republican opponent, Mitt Romney, has declared Russia to be a “destabilizing force on the world stage” and the US’s “No 1 geopolitical foe” and has promised to “re-reset” Obama’s reset of US-Russia ties. Obama cannot afford to be seen “soft” on Russia. Obviously, Russia has been dragged into the vortex of the US presidential election campaign.

Disregarding Russian objections, NATO’s Chicago summit also decided to press ahead with the deployment of the US missile defense system. Moscow has already warned that it will take counter-measures. A new “fifth-generation” missile system was test-fired last week. Above all, Washington persists with an intrusive policy toward Russia’s domestic politics and is positioning itself to challenge Putin’s Eurasia project.

… and a bear hug

On the other hand, Russia and Pakistan have been closely consulting on the Afghan situation, and they recognize each other’s legitimate interests. Both put primacy on a regional approach to resolving the Afghan problem. Each side acknowledges that the other has an important role to play in the Afghan endgame. A good working relationship has developed through the past year or two. Russia works Pakistan within the bilateral framework as well as in the quadrilateral forum that includes Tajikistan and Afghanistan.

On its part, Pakistan regards Russian regional policies positively as favoring its vital interests. Most importantly, Pakistan and Russia share a deep skepticism about the US-led “transition” in Afghanistan and the Afghan security forces’ capacity to maintain security. Both assess that the NATO has lost the war but is preparing the ground for keeping a long-term military presence at affordable cost. In sum, they strongly sense the need for them to work together through the upcoming “transition” in Afghanistan and the post-2014 period.

The geopolitics of the Afghan war concerns Russia and Pakistan. Neither is willing to put faith in what the US claims to be the objectives of the war. Russia suspects the intentions of the US as much as Pakistan does. At the same time, both are conscious of the US/NATO’s vulnerability as regards the transit routes through Pakistan and the Northern Distribution Network. Pakistan isn’t alone in demanding a hike in the tariff for the transit routes.

To be sure, Pakistan eagerly seeks an ally in Russia to gain strategic space vis-a-vis the US, while Moscow sees a window of opportunity to regain its lost influence in South Asia following the defeat in Afghanistan in the 1980s. Thus, Pakistan is likely becoming a key element in the evolving Russian regional strategies. As Moscow would see it, the realization of the US objectives in Afghanistan and Central Asia is largely predicated on Pakistan’s cooperation as a willing partner.

Put differently, in order to effectively counter the US’s strategic thrust into Central Asia, Russia (and China) would do well to strengthen Pakistan’s strategic autonomy and its capacity to withstand US pressures. Pakistan, on its part, has shown remarkable grit in standing up to US pressures. The US’s so-called New Silk Road project to erode Russian and Chinese influence in Central Asia itself becomes a non-starter without Pakistan’s whole-hearted cooperation.

However, a Russian-Pakistani partnership cannot exist in a vacuum. The bilateral ties are next to nothing at present. In order for a strategic partnership to survive and gather strength over time, it needs substantive content. This is where Putin’s visit can be expected to set the ball rolling. Kabulov told Gilani that Putin looked forward to a “productive” visit that would be instrumental in enhancing multi-faceted cooperation between Russia and Pakistan.

Kabulov discussed the agenda of Putin’s visit. Gilani listed the upgrade of Pakistan Steel Mills in Karachi, defense cooperation and energy among potential areas of cooperation. (Interestingly, Kabulov’s meetings included a call on Pakistani army chief Ashfaq Kiani.) Significantly, Gilani welcomed Russian participation in the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline project and pointed out that “some specific proposals” have been discussed already.

In geopolitical terms, the warming of the Russian-Pakistani ties meshes with the growing coordination between Moscow and Beijing on regional and international issues. The fact that Yang and Kabulov visited Pakistan at the same time suggests a degree of Sino-Russian coordination in their regional policy toward Pakistan. Indeed, neither Yang nor Kabulov overtly nudged Pakistan toward a “strategic defiance” of the US. But then, they didn’t have to. Suffice to say, the new paradigm already presents Pakistan with an unprecedented opportunity to negotiate with the US from a position of strength.

The prospect of Putin’s visit to Pakistan will be highly disquieting for Washington at the present juncture. In normal circumstances, Washington could have viewed the rising curve of Russian-Pakistani relations with equanimity, since both Russia and China would only have a moderating influence on Pakistan. But these are extraordinary times, with the US at loggerheads with Moscow and Beijing.

The utter failure of the US strategy in Afghanistan stands exposed in terms of its exceptionalism and the stark absence of a regional consensus. Yang and Kabulov could and should have been the US’s best allies in urging Pakistan to work with the international community for an enduring peace in Afghanistan. The paradox is that even in the prevailing situation of high volatility in the US’s relations with Russia and China they might well have done that, but without Washington’s bidding.

By M K Bhadrakumar

6 June 2012

@ Asia Times Online

Ambassador M K Bhadrakumar was a career diplomat in the Indian Foreign Service. His assignments included the Soviet Union, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Kuwait and Turkey.

Optimism

Overall life is good and people are good. Some people do foolish things once in a while: oppress, kill, steal land, destroy trees etc. But life continues and people survive, adapt, and struggle to get to a better place. Here in Palestine, the apricots (Mishmish) are in season and they are as sweet as can be. Our village is known for Faqous (of the cucumber family) which is now also in season. While Israeli colonizers took most of the agricultural land around the area, we still have some Sahouri Faqous and we still struggle to reclaim our rights. And we are now beginning to get the first ripe figs (called Teen Dafour). The young olives and grapes are still green and growing. Like those grape vines that shed their leaves always come back with young leaves and then bear fruits. So I am thrilled that thousands of our students are graduating this month. The wedding season is on and my sister, a nurse at a maternity hospital in Bethlehem, relays how they are busier than ever. Community gatherings always have more children than adults (60% of us Palestinians are children). Nothing pleases my sight more than young children walking down ancient streets holding hands like their ancestors did thousands of years ago. 5 and 6 year old friends with their arms on each other’s shoulders whispering in each other’s ears through the narrow alleys of the refugee camp of Aida. Kids are sharing fruits and balloons in the nativity square. Young girls giggling as they go home from the “Shepherds’ field school”. They all look like little angels on earth even in the cantons/ghettos of Israeli apartheid.

Those of us who are adults may sometime lose the optimism and energy of childhood. We need to be reminded and retain our optimism. Adults sometimes try to remind us with a bit of philosophical reflections. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. once stated: “I do not pretend to understand the moral universe; the arc is a long one, my eye reaches but little ways; I cannot calculate the curve and complete the figure by the experience of sight; I can divine it by conscience. And from what I see I am sure it bends towards justice.”

Or our departed friend Howard Zinn who once wrote: “To be hopeful in bad times is not just foolishly romantic. It is based on the fact that human history is a history not only of cruelty, but also of compassion, sacrifice, courage, kindness. What we choose to emphasize in this complex history will determine our lives. If we see only the worst, it destroys our capacity to do something. If we remember those times and places – and there are so many – where people have behaved magnificently, this gives us the energy to act, and at least the possibility of sending this spinning top of a world in a different direction. And if we do act, in however small a way, we don’t have to wait for some grand utopian future. The future is an infinite succession of presents, and to live now as we think human beings should live, in defiance of all that is bad around us, is itself a marvelous victory.” (You Can’t Be Neutral on a Moving Train: A personal history of our times, p. 208. )

But we remain optimistic because we are human beings who believe in coexistence, equality, peace, and freedom. Pessimists are those who believe in tribalism, racism, conflict, and the need for military might. In the long run, we are more numerous than they are and we need to help them see the truth and join us. We remain optimistic because our children and grandchildren are optimistic and we should not try to dissuade them from optimism or from acting to improve their lives. As we free our minds of dark thoughts, we can see the light.

By Mazin Qumsiyeh

7 June, 2012

@ Popular Resistance

Where commemoration meets celebration (on optimism and pessimism) http://www.thisweekinpalestine.com/details.php?id=3524&ed=199&edid=199

Images of a tour in Palestine 100 years ago

http://ireland.anglican.org/about/144

Video in English and French: Arabs of Jerusalem

Les arabes de Jérusalem, d’Israël et de Cisjordanie

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pT2FPIRjK0s

US Embassy to American in trouble in Israel: ‘You’re not Jewish? Then we can’t do anything to help you’

http://mondoweiss.net/2012/06/us-embassy-to-american-in-trouble-in-israel-youre-not-jewish-then-we-cant-do-anything-to-help-you.html

Male Israeli soldiers who speak out

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vd5AaxPw8gM

How Zionized is the US?

US Secretary of “Homeland Security” Defends Controversial Grant Program

“A Forward report found that the program for DHS security grants for not-for-profit organizations was tailored to the Jewish community and that almost three-quarters of its funds went to Jewish institutions.

…On another topic, Napolitano said that the DHS has decided to allow Israeli citizens to enter the United States via a special fast-track program despite Israel’s decision not to grant Americans reciprocal consideration, as the United States usually requires. …Napolitano also pointedly declined to criticize New York City’s controversial program of surveillance of Muslim organizations and individuals with no known or suspected ties to terrorism. “

http://forward.com/articles/157280/jews-face-special-risks-napolitano-says/?p=all#ixzz1x1Kh1EmL

And on May 9, 2012 House passed H.R. 4133 Unites States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012, http://tinyurl.com/7nctgj4

Genocide and/or genocidal acts clearly characterize Israel’s attempts to obliterate in part or in whole a whole group of people (the Palestinians). Palestinians should bring Israel and Israeli leaders to justice.

Read More from International Law Expert Francis Boyle

http://www.mediamonitors.net/francis1.html

and this interesting debate between a Zionist tribalist and Prof. Martin Shaw

http://martinshaw.org/2010/11/26/debate-with-omer-bartov-on-palestine-and-genocide/

for more on genocide, visit http://martinshaw.org/my-academic-papers/

A new direction for the Palestinian People (still a concise and good article)

http://www.mediamonitors.net/francis3.html

The Zionist Story

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufLAitMq3zI

teaches and does research at Bethlehem and Birzeit Universities in occupied Palestine. He serves as chairman of the board of the Palestinian Center for Rapprochement Between People and coordinator of the Popular Committee Against the Wall and Settlements in Beit Sahour He is author of “Sharing the Land of Canaan: Human rights and the Israeli/Palestinian Struggle” and “Popular Resistance in Palestine: A history of Hope and Empowerment” http://qumsiyeh.org