Just International

Gaza: Israel Bombs Two Schools Sheltering Displaced People, Killing at Least 15

By Quds News Network

Gaza (Quds News Network)- At least 15 Palestinians were killed and 30 others injured in Israeli attacks on two schools sheltering hundreds of displaced families in Gaza City on Thursday.

[https://twitter.com/QudsNen/status/1869764922651078849]

Local sources and medics reported that most of the victims were women and children. The attack hit the Dar al-Arqam and Shaaban al-Rayes schools in the Tuffah neighbourhood.

Witnesses added that the Israeli attack caused huge destruction to the schools and nearby residential buildings.

[https://twitter.com/QudsNen/status/1869773461251608662]

The Israeli military claimed, without providing evidence, that the deadly attacks carried out on the two school shelters were a “precise strike” that targeted “terrorists who were operating in command and control centres” in the buildings.

Since the start of the ongoing genocide, the Israeli military has repeatedly targeted schools-turned-shelters across Gaza. These attacks have included shelling, direct shootings, and the killing of forcibly displaced people and their families or making them leave the schools under fire and/or with orders to flee.

20 December 2024

Source: countercurrents.org

Extermination and Acts of Genocide: Israel Deliberately Depriving Palestinians in Gaza of Water – Human Rights Watch

By Human Rights Watch

  • Israeli authorities have deliberately inflicted conditions of life calculated to bring about the destruction of part of the population in Gaza by intentionally depriving Palestinian civilians there of adequate access to water, most likely resulting in thousands of deaths.
  • In doing so, Israeli authorities are responsible for the crime against humanity of extermination and for acts of genocide. The pattern of conduct, coupled with statements suggesting that some Israeli officials wished to destroy Palestinians in Gaza, may amount to the crime of genocide.
  • Governments and international organizations should take all measures to prevent genocide in Gaza, including discontinuing military assistance, reviewing bilateral agreements and diplomatic relations, and supporting the International Criminal Court and other accountability efforts.

(Jerusalem) – Israeli authorities have intentionally deprived Palestinian civilians in Gaza of adequate access to water since October 2023, most likely resulting in thousands of deaths and thus committing the crime against humanity of extermination and acts of genocide, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today.

In the 179-page report, “Extermination and Acts of Genocide: Israel Deliberately Depriving Palestinians in Gaza of Water,” Human Rights Watch found that Israeli authorities have intentionally deprived Palestinians in Gaza of access to safe water for drinking and sanitation needed for basic human survival. Israeli authorities and forces cut off and later restricted piped water to Gaza; rendered most of Gaza’s water and sanitation infrastructure useless by cutting electricity and restricting fuel; deliberately destroyed and damaged water and sanitation infrastructure and water repair materials; and blocked the entry of critical water supplies.

“Water is essential for human life, yet for over a year the Israeli government has deliberately denied Palestinians in Gaza the bare minimum they need to survive,” said Tirana Hassan, executive director at Human Rights Watch. “This isn’t just negligence; it is a calculated policy of deprivation that has led to the deaths of thousands from dehydration and disease that is nothing short of the crime against humanity of extermination, and an act of genocide.”

Human Rights Watch interviewed 66 Palestinians from Gaza, 4 employees of Gaza’s Coastal Municipalities Water Utility (CMWU), 31 healthcare professionals, and 15 people working with United Nations agencies and international aid organizations in Gaza. Human Rights Watch also analyzed satellite imagery, photographs, and videos captured between the beginning of the hostilities in October 2023 and September 2024, as well as data collected and estimates produced by doctors, epidemiologists, humanitarian aid organizations, and water and sanitation experts.

Human Rights Watch concluded that Israeli authorities have intentionally created conditions of life calculated to bring about the physical destruction of Palestinians in Gaza in whole or in part. This policy, inflicted as part of a mass killing of Palestinian civilians in Gaza, means Israeli authorities have committed the crime against humanity of extermination, which is ongoing. This policy also amounts to one of the five “acts of genocide” under the Genocide Convention of 1948. Genocidal intent may also be inferred from this policy, coupled with statements suggesting some Israeli officials wished to destroy Palestinians in Gaza, and therefore the policy may amount to the crime of genocide.

Immediately after the attacks in southern Israel by Hamas-led Palestinian armed groups in Gaza on October 7, 2023, which Human Rights Watch has found amounted to war crimes and crimes against humanity, Israeli authorities cut all electricity and fuel to the Gaza Strip. On October 9, then-Defense Minister Yoav Gallant announced a “complete siege” of Gaza, stating: “There will be no electricity, no food, no water, no fuel, everything is closed.”

That same day, and for weeks thereafter, Israeli authorities cut off all water and blocked fuel, food, and humanitarian aid from entering the strip. Israeli authorities continue to restrict the entry of water, fuel, food, and aid into Gaza and to cut Gaza’s electricity, which is required to operate life-sustaining infrastructure. This continued even after the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued provisional measures in JanuaryMarch, and May 2024 ordering Israeli authorities to protect Palestinians in Gaza from genocide and, in so doing, provide humanitarian aid, specifying in March that this includes water, food, electricity, and fuel.

Israeli authorities have also barred nearly all water-related aid from entering Gaza, including water filtration systems, water tanks, and materials needed to repair water infrastructure.

Between October 2023 and August 2024, the Gaza Coastal Municipalities Water Utility, the UN, and other sources reported that people in Gaza did not have access to the minimum amount of water needed for survival in long-term emergency situations. In northern Gaza, the UN reported that people did not have access to potable water for over five months, between November 2023 and April 2024. While a study of water access in August showed that people’s access to water had increased, most people still did not have adequate water needed for drinking and cooking.

Human Rights Watch found that Israeli forces have deliberately attacked and damaged or destroyed several major water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) facilities. In several cases, Human Rights Watch found evidence that Israeli ground forces were in control of the areas at the time, indicating that the destruction was deliberate.

The decimation of Gaza’s healthcare system, including healthcare tracking, has meant that confirmed cases of disease, illnesses, and deaths possibly linked to water-borne disease, dehydration, and starvation are not being systematically tracked or reported. However, based on interviews with healthcare professionals and epidemiologists, it is likely that thousands of people have died as a result of the Israeli authorities’ actions. The deaths are in addition to the more than 44,000 people directly killed in the hostilities, as recorded by Gaza’s Health Ministry.

Hundreds of thousands of people have also contracted diseases and health conditions to which the lack of access to safe and sufficient water has likely caused or contributed, including diarrhea, hepatitis A, skin diseases, and upper respiratory infections. Water deprivation is particularly harmful to infants, pregnant and breastfeeding women, and people with disabilities.

The crime of genocide requires committing acts of genocide with genocidal intent. The ICJ has said that to infer such intent from a pattern of conduct by the state, it needs to be “the only reasonable inference to be drawn” from the acts in question. Human Rights Watch’s findings, and statements from Israeli officials suggesting that they wished to destroy the Palestinians in Gaza, may indicate such intent.

Human Rights Watch also found that some statements from senior Israeli officials calling for cutting water, fuel, and aid, in tandem with their actions, have amounted to direct and public incitement to genocide.

The Israeli government’s continuing blockade of Gaza, as well as its more than 17-year closure of the strip, also amounts to collective punishment of the civilian population, a war crime. The closure also constitutes part of the continuing crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution that Israeli authorities have been committing against Palestinians.

Several governments have undermined accountability efforts and continue to provide the Israeli government with arms despite the clear risk of complicity in serious violations of international humanitarian law.

“Governments should not contribute to the grave crimes that Israeli officials are committing in Gaza, including crimes against humanity and genocidal acts, and should take all steps possible to prevent further harm,” Hassan said. “Governments arming Israel should end their risk of complicity in atrocity crimes in Gaza and take immediate action to protect civilians with an arms embargo, targeted sanctions, and support for justice.”

19 December 2024

Source: countercurrents.org

Christ is Still in the Rubble: A Sermon by the Rev. Dr. Munther Isaac

By Rev. Dr. Munther Isaac

It has been 440 days. 440 days of constant bombing. Nonstop. 440 days of starvation. On top of 17 years of siege and imprisonment. Tens of thousands killed. Injured. Forever disabled. Imprisoned. Starved. More than 17,000 children killed. It feels like we have watched them being killed one by one. 440 days of the people of Gaza sharing live images of their executions; burned alive. And we cannot stop it.

Trump said, if the hostages are not released in January there will be hell to pay! IT IS ALREADY HELL! What is he talking about? It has been hell for 16 years before October 7. And of course, no one is talking about the Palestinian hostages.

It is hard to believe that another Christmas has come upon us and the genocide has not stopped. It has expanded. We are out of words. We feel powerless to stop it. Decision makers are content to let this continue. To them, Palestinians are dispensable. And they know it. They are watching. It is not as if the horrors of this genocide will be discovered after all is said and done. No, it is well documented. We are all watching it. Even Those committing it, the ruthless soldiers and their masters are sharing images of their blatant crimes against humanity and boasting about it. They are taking pleasure in our erasure and our annihilation. Israeli news reported about soldiers competing to arbitrarily kill the most civilians. And that’s not just soldiers “following orders.” It has become some sort of a recreational activity — you can actually go on top of hills and watch our executions live – they have created a tourist spot for this. Or a boat tour for the whole family! A casual afternoon spent watching the bombs fall on Gaza. Celebrating this. It has become entertainment to them. They don’t see us as human. Because in the logic of settler colonialism, despite knowing there were always people here, the land was “empty” of who they deemed human.

But it has also been 440 days of resilience and even beauty. I think of our heroes of Gaza: the doctors, the medics, the rescuers, the volunteers—those who sacrifice and give everything for their fellow human beings. I think of those who created schools in tents. The ones who play music to the displaced children, to bring a smile in the midst of pain and destruction. The chefs who are cooking meals en masse. And the smallest of children, tending to their siblings. The loss is enormous. But we have not lost our faith, or our collective humanity. This is the beauty I am talking about.

We especially remember our steadfast churches in Gaza, which, despite the brutality of the scene, have embraced, supported, and suffered for their sons and daughters. In the midst of genocide, they continue to pray and serve.

Today we ask: What happened to humanity? I really fear for our collective humanity when a genocide of such scale is normalized, even celebrated. I fear for our souls, because we have gotten used to the images of children, lifeless, pulled from under the rubble, of plastic and cloth tents bombed, and people starved. How have we become numb? How do we watch this? We must fight this within us. We cannot be content. We have to fight against the growing apathy. We must not rest or grow weary. To do so, is to abandon not only the people of Gaza, but our very own humanity. This is why We must continue talking about Gaza, and all places of systematic oppression and killing, until this is stopped.

Last year I said silence is complicity. We are past that. Numbness is a betrayal to humanity. Yours and those in Gaza.

Equally, we must insist that all who committed war crimes must be held accountable. We cannot normalize impunity. What kind of a world and future we are leaving our children – if we accept a reality where war criminals go unpunished, even emboldened – where they openly boast of their crimes, and rather than met with justice they are met with applause in the halls of congress and defended by European parliaments. And they still dare to lecture us on human rights and international law.

Never again is only a slogan. Empty words. Never again should mean never again to all peoples. Never again has become yet again! Yet again to supremacy. Yet again to racism. Yet again for genocide.

And sadly, never again has become yet again for the weaponization of the Bible, and the silence and complicity of the western church. Yet again for the church siding with power; with the Empire.

Today, and after all this of total destruction and annihilation – Gaza is erased – millions have become refugees and homeless, tens of thousands killed, why is anyone still debating whether this is a genocide or not? Yet when a church leader simply calls for investigating whether this is a genocide, he is called out, and it becomes breaking news.

The evidence is clear. Truth stands plain for all to see. The question is not whether this is a genocide – this is not the debate. The real question is: why isn’t the world and the church calling it a genocide? It says a lot when you deny and ignore and refrain from using the language of genocide. It reveals hypocrisy – for you lectured us for years on international law and human rights. It says a lot on how you look at us Palestinians. And says a lot about your moral and ethical standards.  It says everything about who you are when you turn away from the truth, when you refuse to name oppression for what it is.

Or could it be that if reality was acknowledged for what it is, that this is a genocide, that it would be an acknowledgment of your guilt? For this was a war that so many defended as “just” and as “self-defense”?

The genocide will end one day. Soon we pray and plead. But history will remember where people stood. What they said. They cannot claim they did not know. This is why we insist that this is more than Gaza or Palestine. In Palestine, we find the intersection of colonialism, supremacy, the logic of might is right, militarism, racism and religious fundamentalism all coming together.

Palestine is a human and moral cause. For the church, it is also a theological crisis, as a friend of mine recently suggested. It is about the credibility of our witness. It is here that we come face to face with the tragic consequence of bad theology. Actually, this is way beyond “bad theology” or ideology. Zionism and Christian Zionism are ideologies of supremacy. It is racism. They turned God into a racist tribal deity of their image. They must be named for what they are.

Today also, we acknowledge all those who stood on the side of justice and truth; all those who said no to dehumanization; many of whom paid a heavy price. We salute you. Solidarity, by definition, is costly. Over the last 440 days, we have heard you, in churches, mosques and synagogues, in the streets, in universities, in governmental buildings, in front of arms factories, protesting, organizing, lobbying… we heard you.

Dear friends, it is indeed painful that we live in a time when a genocide is committed before the eyes of the world, and we feel powerless to stop it. Today, as we gather around “Christ in the Rubble”, we remember the children of Gaza, the children of Bethlehem before them, and many others around the world who have fallen victim to the tyranny of Herod and his modern-day counterparts. The Massacre of innocents.

A voice was heard in Ramah, the prophet cried thousands of years ago, weeping and great mourning. Rachel weeps for her sons and daughters and refuses to be comforted, because they are no more. A voice was heard in Bethlehem, and today we hear the same voice in Gaza: weeping and great mourning.

We weep, we are crushed, we suffer. And we cry out: How long, O Lord? Why, O Lord? Why do You allow this, and why do You remain silent? Humanity has chosen Herod’s path. Humanity glorified power and cruelty. It glorified domination, greed, weapons, and even the annihilation of others. Herod is neither the first nor the last. This is the logic of the Empire. And we have fashioned God in this image, turning Him into a god of war!

This is also the result of an exclusionary mentality. Even God, we have made tribal, exclusionary, and selective—a God of one people at the expense of another, one religion over another, one nation over another. In our human racism, we have made God a racist!

But the question remains: Why is God silent? How long will Rachel weep for her children? How long will Gaza weep? We have continued to ask this question until we saw this God, in His incarnation, sharing our same fate. He survived in His childhood, but not in His youth. As a child, He fled, becoming a displaced refugee in Egypt, but in His youth, He did not survive. He was crucified, killed by the logic of Empire, the worship of power and extremism. He shared our fate, our suffering, and cried the same cry we cry today: “My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?”

This is why we said last year, “Christ is in the rubble,” and this year, we say, “Christ is still in the rubble.” This is His manager. Jesus finds His place with the marginalized, the tormented, the oppressed, and the displaced. We look at the Holy Family and see them in every displaced and homeless family, living in despair. In the Christmas story, God walks with them and calls them His own.

Today, let us reflect on the Child Jesus—the Child of Bethlehem. At the heart of the Incarnation, there is a child. In His weakness, He is our hope, our consolation, and our strength. This child shook Herod’s throne. While there are some who talk about their “Roman Empire,” or glorify Herod as “great,” we Christians are the ones who sing of a child born to refugees escaping a massacre. And you cannot worship both.  I pray that the image of the Child in the Rubble will be deeply rooted in our hearts and minds. He was born among us and entered our world under the most difficult and harsh circumstances. His family suffered greatly to protect His life. The children of Bethlehem were massacred, but not all of them. Jesus survived this genocide, becoming a refugee with His family in Egypt, then returning to His land and people, serving, building, working, and bringing salvation and redemption. In this resilient child and His family, we find hope. This child, whom we see today among the ruins, once stood before Pilate and Herod, faced death itself, and triumphed, granting eternal redemption.

With this hope and faith, we endure. We refuse to surrender to despair, because ours is a faith of resurrection. From the midst of the rubble, a plant of life will arise, giving the promise of a new dawn. The assurance of a harvest where justice and restoration will flourish, and the vine will bear fruit that nourishes generations to come. As the poet Mahmoud Darwish said: “The grains of a dying ear of grain, fill the valley with ears of grain.”

We embrace our calling in this wounded world and land. We insist on seeing the image of Jesus in every victim of oppression, marginalization, and violent ideologies of supremacy and Empire. We will continue to declare the goodness and justice of God.

It has been 440 days of Palestinian resilience – sumud. Indeed, 76 years of sumud. But we have not and will not lose hope. Yes, it is 76 years of the ongoing Nakba, but it is also 76 years of Palestinian steadfastness, sumud, clinging to our right and the justice of our cause. 76 years of praying and singing for peace – We are stubborn people. We will continue echoing the words of the Angels: Glory to God in the Highest, Peace on Earth!

And today we say: Our faith in the God of truth and justice is our hope. Today we continue to cry out to Him because we believe that He hears us, and because we believe in His justice and goodness. And because we believe in His solidarity with the oppressed! “I know that the Lord maintains justice for the poor, and righteousness for the needy.” (Psalm 140:12)

In our steadfastness – sumud, let us have eyes of faith to perceive and believe that every Herod will pass, every Caesar will fade, for Empires have an expiry date, and let us remember that it is the meek, not the powerful, who will inherit the earth. In our pain and oppression, we might feel that death has the final word, that Herod is sovereign. But through the eyes of faith, we see that God has the final word: and it is a word of life and light, not death and darkness. In Christmas, God has spoken, and the Word is Christ. Christ is born! Hallelujah! Peace on Earth, Hallelujah! May it be so today – Amen!

Rev. Dr. Munther Isaac is a Palestinian Christian pastor and theologian. He pastors the Evangelical Lutheran Christmas Church in Bethlehem and the Lutheran Church in Beit Sahour. He is also the Academic Dean at Bethlehem Bible College, ad is the director of the Christ at the Checkpoint conferences. Munther is passionate about issues related to Palestinian theology.

20 December 2024

Source: redletterchristians.org

STATEMENT OF THE BUREAU OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY’S COMMITTEE ON THE EXERCISE OF THE INALIENABLE RIGHTS OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE

Committee Bureau Welcomes Historic Resolution Requesting an Advisory Opinion from the International Court of Justice, Rejects Actions that Obstruct Aid

The Bureau of the UN Palestinian Rights Committee warmly welcomes the General Assembly’s adoption of a timely and important resolution to urgently request an Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the obligations of Israel in relation to the presence and activities of the United Nations, other international organizations and third States. The path to peace begins with justice—no more, no less. This groundbreaking initiative spearheaded by Norway stands as a testament to the international community’s unwavering commitment to uphold human rights, international humanitarian law, and the urgent pursuit of justice for the Palestinian people.

By an overwhelming majority vote of 137 to 12, with 22 abstaining, the UN Member States requested the World Court to act urgently, giving the matter top priority. This step follows closely the adoption of resolution ES-10/25, which deplored the measures taken by Israel, the occupying Power, that impede assistance to the Palestinian people, including the illegitimate legislation adopted by the Knesset against UNRWA and reaffirmed full support for the mandate of the Agency and demanded an end to the obstruction of UNRWA’s vital operations and full respect for Israel’s international legal obligations.

BREAKING: UN requestes World Court’s opinion on Israel’s obligations to allow aid delivery to Gaza

Israel’s relentless and brutal war on the Gaza Strip has resulted in over 45,000 Palestinians killed, the majority children and women, more than 107,000 injured, over 70,000 homes destroyed or damaged, in addition to other vital civilian infrastructure, and approximately 1.9 million forcibly displaced and suffering a humanitarian catastrophe, including starvation, cold and the spread of diseases. Now is the time for decisive action—no more impunity, no more obstruction, no more weaponization of vital humanitarian aid.

Israel must implement, without delay, all of its legal obligations under international law, including the binding provisional measures as set out by the International Court of Justice in the case brought by South Africa under the Genocide Convention to prevent further harm to the Palestinian civilian population.

The Committee Bureau reiterates its longstanding call for an immediate ceasefire, unobstructed and immediate provision of humanitarian aid, and a just and peaceful resolution to the question of Palestine that ends the Israeli unlawful occupation, enables the Palestinian people to achieve their inalienable rights, including self-determination and achieve the two-State solution on the pre-1967 borders with East Jerusalem as the capital of the State of Palestine in accordance with international law and the relevant UN resolutions.

END

20 December 2024

Source: un.org

The Israeli Regime Will not Rescind its Illegal Measures and Laws Against UNRWA Without Sanctions

By BADIL

On 11 December 2024, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution titled “Supporting the Mandate of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East [UNRWA]” in response to the newly passed laws by the Israeli Knesset that will ban the Agency in Mandatory Palestine by the end of January 2025. While the resolution expresses “concern” for the ongoing dismantlement campaign against UNRWA, and urges states to increase their “voluntary contributions,” it fails to call on states to implement specific and actionable measures to prevent “Israel” from enforcing its laws against UNRWA, stop its  dismantlement campaign or hold it accountable.  The resolution has not only failed to effectively apply pressure on the Israeli regime to comply with its international obligations and responsibilities, but has paved the way for third states – like the Swedish government’s decision to stop funding to UNRWA in 2025 – to avoid their responsibilities.

The Israeli Knesset laws, set to take effect on 28 January 2025, will eliminate UNRWA’s work in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, and exacerbate the Israeli genocide in Gaza, severing crucial aid and services to the displaced, besieged, starved, and injured Palestinian population. Sweden’s decision to halt funding to the Agency, only days after the UNGA resolution, demonstrates support for the Israeli regime’s goal to dismantle UNRWA, contributes to the ongoing genocide in Gaza, and Sweden’s disrespect of the multilateral framework.

As a UN-mandated Agency, the protection of UNRWA and its installations, staff  and services is the obligation of all UN member states. It is also the obligation of states, by virtue of their membership, to assist in the implementation of resolutions adopted by the UNGA, including Resolution 194. Amidst the ongoing genocide and the Israeli regime’s escalating efforts to eliminate UNRWA, the resolution uses weak language, and avoids making direct, actionable demands on states and places additional burdens on UNRWA

UNRWA’s importance surpasses the provision of aid and services to Palestinian refugees. Since it is mandated to operate until the application of UNGA Resolution 194 — i.e. until the implementation of Palestinians’ right to reparations (including the rights to return, property restitution and compensation) — the Agency has a crucial role in the protection of the Palestine refugee question. The laws passed by the Knesset are not an isolated attack on the Agency, but part of a decades-long campaign aimed at eliminating UNRWA and with it the rights of Palestinian refugees.

Rather than specifying actionable articles for states, the resolution calls on UNRWA to implement the questionable recommendations of the “Independent Review of Mechanisms and Procedures to Ensure Adherence by UNRWA to the Humanitarian Principle of Neutrality” (Colonna Report), as UNRWA is facing Israeli measures aiming to end its very existence. In doing so, the resolution ignored states’ obligations to protect the lives of Palestinian refugees and IDPs, as well as UNRWA and its operations in Palestine.

Expecting the violator (the Israeli regime) to stop its actions based solely on verbal appeals, without any real pressure or tangible consequences, is unrealistic and ineffective. Such empty calls reiterate the ongoing failure of the UN to ensure the international protection that Palestinian refugees are entitled to.

The UNGA must call on states to take decisive actions not only to halt the Israeli dismantlement campaign against the Agency, but to enforce a ceasefire and hold the Israeli regime accountable for its genocide and international crimes. This includes implementing political, economic, and military sanctions, and making a firm commitment to oppose any efforts to eliminate or replace UNRWA. Beyond that, the UNGA should call on international organizations and the private sector to take actions to support UNRWA and isolate the Israeli regime by revoking its membership and privileges, halting any financial assistance and cooperation, and urging member states to impose sanctions. This is the only way to protect UNRWA and Palestine refugees’ rights.

20 December 2024

Source:https://badil.org/

Can Trump Trump China (or Vice Versa)?

By Michael T. Klare

Gaza, Haiti, Iran, Israel, Lebanon, Russia, Syria, Ukraine, and Venezuela: President-elect Donald Trump will face no shortage of foreign-policy challenges when he assumes office in January. None, however, comes close to China in scope, scale, or complexity. No other country has the capacity to resist his predictable antagonism with the same degree of strength and tenacity, and none arouses more hostility and outrage among MAGA Republicans. In short, China is guaranteed to put President Trump in a difficult bind the second time around: he can either choose to cut deals with Beijing and risk being branded an appeaser by the China hawks in his party, or he can punish and further encircle Beijing, risking a potentially violent clash and possibly even nuclear escalation. How he chooses to resolve this quandary will surely prove the most important foreign test of his second term in office.

Make no mistake: China truly is considered The Big One by those in Trump’s entourage responsible for devising foreign policy. While they imagine many international challenges to their “America First” strategy, only China, they believe, poses a true threat to the continued global dominance of this country.

“I feel strongly that the Chinese Communist Party has entered into a Cold War with the United States and is explicit in its aim to replace the liberal, Western-led world order that has been in place since World War II,” Representative Michael Waltz, Trump’s choice as national security adviser, declared at a 2023 event hosted by the Atlantic Council. “We’re in a global arms race with an adversary that, unlike any in American history, has the economic and the military capability to truly supplant and replace us.”

As Waltz and others around Trump see it, China poses a multi-dimensional threat to this country’s global supremacy. In the military domain, by building up its air force and navy, installing military bases on reclaimed islands in the South China Sea, and challenging Taiwan through increasingly aggressive air and naval maneuvers, it is challenging continued American dominance of the Western Pacific. Diplomatically, it’s now bolstering or repairing ties with key U.S. allies, including India, Indonesia, Japan, and the members of NATO. Meanwhile, it’s already close to replicating this country’s most advanced technologies, especially its ability to produce advanced microchips. And despite Washington’s efforts to diminish a U.S. reliance on vital Chinese goods, including critical minerals and pharmaceuticals, it remains a primary supplier of just such products to this country.

Fight or Strike Bargains?

For many in the Trumpian inner circle, the only correct, patriotic response to the China challenge is to fight back hard. Both Representative Waltz, Trump’s pick as national security adviser, and Senator Marco Rubio, his choice as secretary of state, have sponsored or supported legislation to curb what they view as “malign” Chinese endeavors in the United States and abroad.

Waltz, for example, introduced the American Critical Mineral Exploration and Innovation Act of 2020, which was intended, as he explained, “to reduce America’s dependence on foreign sources of critical minerals and bring the U.S. supply chain from China back to America.” Senator Rubio has been equally combative in the legislative arena. In 2021, he authored the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, which banned goods produced in forced labor encampments in Xinjiang Province from entering the United States. He also sponsored several pieces of legislation aimed at curbing Chinese access to U.S. technology. Although these, as well as similar measures introduced by Waltz, haven’t always obtained the necessary congressional approval, they have sometimes been successfully bundled into other legislation.

In short, Trump will enter office in January with a toolkit of punitive measures for fighting China ready to roll along with strong support among his appointees for making them the law of the land. But of course, we’re talking about Donald Trump, so nothing is a given. Some analysts believe that his penchant for deal-making and his professed admiration for Chinese strongman President Xi Jinping may lead him to pursue a far more transactional approach, increasing economic and military pressure on Beijing to produce concessions on, for example, curbing the export of fentanyl precursors to Mexico, but when he gets what he wants letting them lapse. Howard Lutnick, the billionaire investor from Cantor Fitzgerald whom he chose as Commerce secretary, claims that Trump actually “wants to make a deal with China,” and will use the imposition of tariffs selectively as a bargaining tool to do so.

What such a deal might look like is anyone’s guess, but it’s hard to see how Trump could win significant concessions from Beijing without abandoning some of the punitive measures advocated by the China hawks in his entourage. Count on one thing: this complicated and confusing dynamic will play out in each of the major problem areas in U.S.-China relations, forcing Trump to make critical choices between his transactional instincts and the harsh ideological bent of his advisers.

Trump, China, and Taiwan

Of all the China-related issues in his second term in office, none is likely to prove more challenging or consequential than the future status of the island of Taiwan. At issue are Taiwan’s gradual moves toward full independence and the risk that China will invade the island to prevent such an outcome, possibly triggering U.S. military intervention as well. Of all the potential crises facing Trump, this is the one that could most easily lead to a great-power conflict with nuclear undertones.

When Washington granted diplomatic recognition to China in 1979, it “acknowledged” that Taiwan and the mainland were both part of “one China” and that the two parts could eventually choose to reunite. The U.S. also agreed to cease diplomatic relations with Taiwan and terminate its military presence there. However, under the Taiwan Relations Act of 1979, Washington was also empowered to cooperate with a quasi-governmental Taiwanese diplomatic agency, the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States, and provide Taiwan with the weapons needed for its defense. Moreover, in what came to be known as “strategic ambiguity,” U.S. officials insisted that any effort by China to alter Taiwan’s status by force would constitute “a threat to the peace and security of the Western Pacific area” and would be viewed as a matter “of grave concern to the United States,” although not necessarily one requiring a military response.

For decades, one president after another reaffirmed the “one China” policy while also providing Taiwan with increasingly powerful weaponry. For their part, Chinese officials repeatedly declared that Taiwan was a renegade province that should be reunited with the mainland, preferably by peaceful means. The Taiwanese, however, have never expressed a desire for reunification and instead have moved steadily towards a declaration of independence, which Beijing has insisted would justify armed intervention.

As such threats became more frequent and menacing, leaders in Washington continued to debate the validity of “strategic ambiguity,” with some insisting it should be replaced by a policy of “strategic clarity” involving an ironclad commitment to assist Taiwan should it be invaded by China. President Biden seemed to embrace this view, repeatedly affirming that the U.S. was obligated to defend Taiwan under such circumstances. However, each time he said so, his aides walked back his words, insisting the U.S. was under no legal obligation to do so.

The Biden administration also boosted its military support for the island while increasing American air and naval patrols in the area, which only heightened the possibility of a future U.S. intervention should China invade. Some of these moves, including expedited arms transfers to Taiwan, were adopted in response to prodding from China hawks in Congress. All, however, fit with an overarching administration strategy of encircling China with a constellation of American military installations and U.S.-armed allies and partners.

From Beijing’s perspective, then, Washington is already putting extreme military and geopolitical pressure on China. The question is: Will the Trump administration increase or decrease those pressures, especially when it comes to Taiwan?

That Trump will approve increased arms sales to and military cooperation with Taiwan essentially goes without saying (as much, at least, as anything involving him does). The Chinese have experienced upticks in U.S. aid to Taiwan before and can probably live through another round of the same. But that leaves far more volatile issues up for grabs: Will he embrace “strategic clarity,” guaranteeing Washington’s automatic intervention should China invade Taiwan, and will he approve a substantial expansion of the American military presence in the region? Both moves have been advocated by some of the China hawks in Trump’s entourage, and both are certain to provoke fierce, hard-to-predict responses from Beijing.

Many of Trump’s closest advisers have, in fact, insisted on “strategic clarity” and increased military cooperation with Taiwan. Michael Waltz, for example, has asserted that the U.S. must “be clear we’ll defend Taiwan as a deterrent measure.” He has also called for an increased military presence in the Western Pacific. Similarly, last June, Robert C. O’Brien, Trump’s national security adviser from 2019 to 2021, wrote that the U.S. “should make clear” its “commitment” to “help defend” Taiwan, while expanding military cooperation with the island.

Trump himself has made no such commitments, suggesting instead a more ambivalent stance. In his typical fashion, in fact, he’s called on Taiwan to spend more on its own defense and expressed anger at the concentration of advanced chip-making on the island, claiming that the Taiwanese “did take about 100% of our chip business.” But he’s also warned of harsh economic measures were China to impose a blockade of the island, telling the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal, “I would say [to President Xi]: if you go into Taiwan, I’m sorry to do this, I’m going to tax you at 150% to 200%.” He wouldn’t need to threaten the use of force to prevent a blockade, he added, because President Xi “respects me and he knows I’m [expletive] crazy.”

Such comments reveal the bind Trump will inevitably find himself in when it comes to Taiwan this time around. He could, of course, try to persuade Beijing to throttle back its military pressure on the island in return for a reduction in U.S. tariffs — a move that would reduce the risk of war in the Pacific but leave China in a stronger economic position and disappoint many of his top advisers. If, however, he chooses to act “crazy” by embracing “strategic clarity” and stepping up military pressure on China, he would likely receive accolades from many of his supporters, while provoking a (potentially nuclear) war with China.

Trade War or Economic Coexistence?

The question of tariffs represents another way in which Trump will face a crucial choice between punitive action and transactional options in his second term — or, to be more precise, in deciding how severe to make those tariffs and other economic hardships he will try to impose on China.

In January 2018, the first Trump administration imposed tariffs of 30% on imported solar panels and 20%-50% on imported washing machines, many sourced from China. Two months later, the administration added tariffs on imported steel (25%) and aluminum (10%), again aimed above all at China. And despite his many criticisms of Trump’s foreign and economic policies, President Biden chose to retain those tariffs, even adding new ones, notably on electric cars and other high-tech products. The Biden administration has also banned the export of advanced computer chips and chip-making technology to China in a bid to slow that country’s technological progress.

Accordingly, when Trump reassumes office on January 20th, China will already be under stringent economic pressures from Washington. But he and his associates insist that those won’t be faintly enough to constrain China’s rise. The president-elect has said that, on day one of his new term, he will impose a 10% tariff on all Chinese imports and follow that with other harsh measures. Among such moves, the Trump team has announced plans to raise tariffs on Chinese imports to 60%, revoke China’s Permanent Normal Trade Relations (also known as “most favored nation”) status, and ban the transshipment of Chinese imports through third countries.

Most of Trump’s advisers have espoused such measures strongly. “Trump Is Right: We Should Raise Tariffs on China,” Marco Rubio wrote last May. “China’s anticompetitive tactics,” he argued, “give Chinese companies an unfair cost advantage over American companies… Tariffs that respond to these tactics prevent or reverse offshoring, preserving America’s economic might and promoting domestic investment.”

But Trump will also face possible pushback from other advisers who are warning of severe economic perturbations if such measures were to be enacted. China, they suggest, has tools of its own to use in any trade war with the U.S., including tariffs on American imports and restrictions on American firms doing business in China, including Elon Musk’s Tesla, which produces half of its cars there. For these and other reasons, the U.S.-China Business Council has warned that additional tariffs and other trade restrictions could prove disastrous, inviting “retaliatory measures from China, causing additional U.S. jobs and output losses.”

As in the case of Taiwan, Trump will face some genuinely daunting decisions when it comes to economic relations with China. If, in fact, he follows the advice of the ideologues in his circle and pursues a strategy of maximum pressure on Beijing, specifically designed to hobble China’s growth and curb its geopolitical ambitions, he could precipitate nothing short of a global economic meltdown that would negatively affect the lives of so many of his supporters, while significantly diminishing America’s own geopolitical clout. He might therefore follow the inclinations of certain of his key economic advisers like transition leader Howard Lutnick, who favor a more pragmatic, businesslike relationship with China. How Trump chooses to address this issue will likely determine whether the future involves increasing economic tumult and uncertainty or relative stability. And it’s always important to remember that a decision to play hardball with China on the economic front could also increase the risk of a military confrontation leading to full-scale war, even to World War III.

And while Taiwan and trade are undoubtedly the most obvious and challenging issues Trump will face in managing (mismanaging?) U.S.-China relations in the years ahead, they are by no means the only ones. He will also have to decide how to deal with increasing Chinese assertiveness in the South China Sea, continued Chinese economic and military-technological support for Russia in its war against Ukraine, and growing Chinese investments in Africa, Latin America, and elsewhere.

In these, and other aspects of the U.S.-China rivalry, Trump will be pulled toward both increased militancy and combativeness and a more pragmatic, transactional approach. During the campaign, he backed each approach, sometimes in the very same verbal outburst. Once in power, however, he will have to choose between them — and his decisions will have a profound impact on this country, China, and everyone living on this planet.

Michael T. Klare, a TomDispatch regular, is the five-college professor emeritus of peace and world security studies at Hampshire College and a senior visiting fellow at the Arms Control Association.

18 December 2024

Source: countercurrents.org

Women Dissenters Against Genocide

By Linda Ford

“There is only one solution!  Intifada!  Revolution!”

–Pro-Palestinian Street March Chant, 2023-24

On November 2nd, there was a “No Votes for Genocide” protest in New York City.  To those pro-Palestinian activists, candidate Kamala Harris was fully supporting a genocide in Gaza and candidate Donld Trump promised complete devotion to the Israeli war criminal state committing it.  Palestinian-American Layan Fuleihan was out in front of the march leading the chants in Arabic and English: “Free free Palestine!  From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free!”  And “Imperialism will fall!  Every fascist state will fall!  Hands off Gaza now!  Hands off Lebanon now!  We demand liberation!  End the Zionist occupation!”

Claudia de la Cruz, presidential candidate for the People’s Party for Socialism and Liberation, also exhorted the crowd.  “Our so-called ‘democracy’ has no backbone to stand against genocide.  Trump and Harris both support millionaire military contractors!”  For Fuleihan and de la Cruz, as with the thousands of women marching there and all over America, there is no other choice but to dissent against the egregious US/Israeli partnership to commit war crimes against the Palestinian people.

Anti-genocide women activists see this holocaust as a feminist issue.  They see it as a matter of “human rights and justice,” as the Palestinian Feminist Collective puts it, and as a war crime directly impacting huge numbers of defenseless and innocent women and children.  The seven women featured here, although from diverse backgrounds, and employing different strategies, strongly agree with those sentiments.  They are young socialist feminists Layan Fuleihan and Calla Walsh; veteran Palestinian activists Hazami Barmada and Huweida Arraf, and very long-time anti-war activist Medea Benjamin; and two women in politics, one, Michigan Congresswoman and Palestinian, Rashida Tlaib; and socialist, anti-imperialist PSL candidate, Claudia de la Cruz.

The seven women dissenters are fighting the Israeli/Jewish apartheid state which is carrying out the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, and the US/Western support of this genocide, as part of racist Western colonialism.  The Palestinian resistance group Hamas started their “Al Aqsa Flood” operation last October 7, essentially a slave rebellion to break out of 75 years of extreme apartheid/occupation.  It was met with an unbelievably violent response:  an Israeli holocaust which has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians.  The journal Lancet reported last July that the Gaza Ministry of Health’s count of 45,000 dead is far too low.  They estimate, after considering the victims buried under the rubble, and the people who succumb to disease and famine, the true tally is upward of 186,000.  UN Rapporteur Francesca Albanese has outlined in great detail how Israel’s intention is to kill “the totality of the Palestinian people.”   After over a year the US and Western countries continue to stand by and watch the genocide unfold, literally and in great detail, on social media.  Anyone with a shred of humanity has to oppose it; many women are choosing to resist it.  And many are paying the price for defying the Empire and its cosseted partner, Israel.

Professor As’ad Abu Khalil has said that the “movement against Israeli/American colonialism and genocide is being led by remarkably brave young Palestinian women.”  If you have seen the rallies, marches, university encampments, and attacks and arrests by police—you’ve seen many remarkably brave young women. Layan Fuleihan re-tweeted the comments of Hamas-allied Hezbollah Resistance leader Hassan Nasrullah, since murdered by the Israelis.  Nasrullah was surprised at the support American student protests gave to the Palestinians.  He called it “another front of the resistance.”  Fuleihan and her fellow young protesters take being another resistance front very seriously and are convinced they can show their power in their dissent.  There are hundreds of student/youth organizations involved in this effort, many of them Palestinian-led, and many women-led.  The very visible Students for Justice for Palestine (SJP) “supports and unifies” the over 200 campus Palestinian solidarity organizations “in occupied Turtle Island” (US-occupied Native-American lands).  Its aim is to “contribute to the fight for Palestinian liberation.”

Last May, the SJP and Within Our Lifetime, which seeks university divestment of Israel investment, organized a rally which included hundreds of protesters, to oppose Israel’s Gaza genocide.  That same month, encampments were set up at Columbia University and City College in NYC, and in Massachusetts, Iowa, Texas, Michigan, California, and all across the country.  And in every case, they were met by heavy-handed repression by university authorities and security and by the police.  At the May NYC student protests, over 300 were arrested.  Hunter College student Johanna von Maack joined an encampment praising the students’ “solidarity and support.”  But von Maack was appalled at the NYPD’s reaction.  They were in full riot gear, “pepper spraying students; they were injuring them.”  She wondered, “Why was it so brutal and violent?  They were just trying to get CUNY to divest away from genocide.” The counterforce was well under way to stop student protest.

Zionist/Jewish/Israeli pressure has influenced university presidents, legislators and law enforcement to bring the hammer down on the anti-genocide dissenters.  Many hundreds have been arrested—often in brutal and violent ways—from Emerson College in Boston to USC and UCLA. USC security and LAPD police shoved young women protesters wearing kaffiyehs to the ground and clubbed them, and then hauled them off as their fellow protesters chanted “free Palestine!”  The crackdown has only worsened this fall.  There are new stricter regulations for demonstrations, and at NYU, pro-Israel “Zionists” are now a protected class.  There is more repressive surveillance and a greater police presence.  Two women students, Samantha Escobar and Naomi Guttierrez, were among four arrested for the felony of putting up posters criticizing people who were for genocide at the University of Rochester.  The Jewish/Israeli lobby was at work to maintain the school administration’s continued support of Israeli/US genocide.  When student protester Reem Odeh of Chicago was out in the streets last summer, she said “The US role is to continue genocide and persecution. . .  The American ruling class spends money killing children in Gaza.” And “We want a weapons embargo now!”  At the same event, a young woman called Melach of the Palestinian Assembly for Liberation denounced the “settler colonial regime of Israel.”  “Revolution is here!”  Such is their commitment.

My two young activists—Layan Fuleihan and Calla Walsh—have different methods, but share leftist politics:  they want the revolution here and now.  A day after Hamas began the Al Aqsa Flood Operation, Layan Fuleihan said “the oppressed people of Palestine broke out of the open-air prison they have been subjected to.”  She was speaking at an “All Out for Palestine” rally organized by the People’s Forum.   Fuleihan is education director for the Forum, an organization which “makes no apologies for calling for the destruction of an apartheid and colonial state that is actively engaging in a genocide of the Palestinian people.”  Fuleihan is an impressive and insightful writer.  She “educates and organizes” for the Forum, sharing what she has learned as a “student of the struggles of the oppressed.”  She works to promote a “world free from the control of imperialism and capitalism.”  She has written that the end of the Gaza war will bring a way “for the Palestinian people to realize their goals for liberation, for dignity and for true independence.”  She dreams of returning to “a liberated Palestine.”

She’s continually at rallies—in New York on October 24, ’23, she spoke out against the US as a “capitalist imperialist government” which supports the Gaza genocide.  Fuleihan was at the huge march in DC last July protesting Netanyahu’s visit, which saw a lot of police violence against the marchers. Her message was that the US “provides a “fortress” for “war criminal” Bibi Netanyahu.  “We are the people of conscience—there is no place for genocide!”   “Hands off Gaza now!”  Her twitter posts reflect her politics:  she lauds the Palestinian resistance and condemns Israel.  When Israel bombed a hospital in Gaza she wrote: “Israeli occupation is genocidal and needs to go now.”  Last January at the “Shut it down for Palestine” march, she said “we will stay in the streets until there is a permanent ceasefire and Palestine is free!”  She was arrested and she continues to be.  “The genocide defenders sent their puppets, the NYPD, thinking they could shut us down.  They were wrong.  Arrest us, and the millions will keep marching.  We are the ones with the power.”  And the bravery.

Beyond rallies, marches and encampments, some female dissenters opt for direct action in their anti-genocide fight.  Activist Calla Walsh, now 20, is one of the “Merrimack 4,” arrested for her action against the Haifa (Israel)-based Elbit Systems plant.  Elbit is a major supplier of the drones, artillery and munitions Israel needs to do its genocide in Gaza.  Walsh began her political activism at 16 in Massachusetts, working to create online youth support for Senator Edward Markey, who quickly disillusioned her with his support for Israel.  Walsh changed political directions and became a socialist, often speaking out against US imperialism, especially as used against Cuba and China.  She argues that the US uses promises of “democracy” and aid as weapons to fight real (anti-US) democracy around the world.

Walsh, with Sophie Ross, 22, Paige Belanger, 32, and Bridget Shergolis, a 24-year-old former Disney actress, spray-painted walls, raised burning torches and smashed some windows at the Merrimack, NH branch of Elbit.  Walsh and Belanger had helped organize a US branch of the British Palestine Action which has been busy getting its people arrested for doing direct action against Israeli arms-related businesses.  Before Merrimack, Walsh and company had been involved in related actions in Virginia and Cambridge, MA (Ross and Walsh are still facing court action there).  The Merrimack arrests were followed by very harsh charges.

Brought into court in shackles and orange jumpsuits, the women were met with accusations of “riot, conspiracy to commit criminal mischief, burglary and falsifying evidence.”  Each charge, a felony, could mean a three and a half to seven- year prison sentence.  A conservative NH attorney general, backed by numerous politicians, such as Governor Chris Sununu, called the action “antisemitic” and “a vile act of hate.”  They joined the Jewish Anti-Defamation League in calling the women antisemitic for crimes targeting Jewish and Israeli-owned businesses.  The Canary Mission, an Israeli-run website which tracks and smears Palestinian advocates (including Fuleihan) through network informants, calls Walsh a “vicious antisemitic communist hooligan.”  This is partly because she supposedly worked on the “Mapping Project” of Boston [Jewish] organizations’ support for colonization of Palestine.  She denies that and says she only “supported it,” but didn’t work on it.

In September the felony charges were dropped.  Apparently, the prosecutors hoped to coerce some guilty pleas, but also to discourage others from such actions.  The sentences were reduced to 60 days, starting on November 14, for misdemeanors.  Walsh said the “hardest part was all the months of waiting, isolation and fear of a lifetime in prison.”  But she still believes direct action is better than parades and “liberal reformism.”  Palestine Action stated the women will be “imprisoned for trying to stop a genocide.”  The punishments for fighting a holocaust are harsh.

My older activists, Hazami Barmada, Medea Benjamin, and Arraf Huweida, have all faced numerous arrests and threats.  Palestinian Barmada was inspired to fight because of the Gaza genocide, but Jewish anti-war campaigner Benjamin and anti-occupation Palestinian Huweida have been in the struggle for years.  Barmada, probably my favorite dissenter, comes from an interesting background.  I first saw Hazami Barmada in a video with another dozen people, shouting at Secretary of State Antony Blinken as he drove away from his house.  “War criminal!  War criminal!”  Barmada and crew set up their camp across the road from his house in January, calling it “Kibbutz Blinken.”  The protesters ask people driving by to honk for Palestine, and they usually do.  At seven every morning, Barmada wakes Blinken: “Wakey, wakey war criminal!  How many kids did you kill while you were sleeping?”  The group follow that up by putting blood red paint on the road as Blinken leaves for the State Department.  Blinken asked Barmada not to make his kids “uncomfortable.”  But she told him Palestinian kids their age “are treated as dispensable.  They can’t escape the rain of bombs that drop on their heads.”

Barmada is Syrian/Palestinian/American; she is CEO of Humanity Lab Foundation, and once headed the Arab Empowerment Institute.  She has an MA from Harvard in public policy and has been a consultant to the UN, Aspen and the government of Oman.  In 2023 she became an adjunct professor at George Washington University in DC.  In her earlier persona, she is pictured as an attractive buttoned-down CEO, but as an anti-genocide activist, her hair is carelessly pulled back in a kerchief and she’s in jeans.  Why the change?  She says the last few years have been hard:  her father had a paralyzing stroke, and she almost died twice during her last pregnancy.  She had never been a Palestinian activist, because they didn’t do that “in philanthropy work.”  But then she saw a photo of a Palestinian woman holding her daughter on her knees.  She looked at it as she was putting her son to sleep.  She started crying.  “What would I do if it was my kid?”  So she said she “went out and put my body on the ground in front of the Capitol.”  As a mother, she felt compelled to fight the Israeli/American genocide.

Barmada wanted, like Walsh, to do direct action and “political street theater” to “engage” and “educate” people more that marches do.  Her actions include “die-ins” at the Israeli Embassy and White House, making State Department workers walk through blood red paint to get to work, and interrupting pro-Israel politicians’ speeches.  For her actions, she has received many death threats and been assaulted by Israeli Embassy people.  Barmada and company lived at Kibbutz Blinken from January through July, experiencing a lot of support from locals (and especially from Arab and Palestinian restaurants).  Finally in late July, the state of Virginia decided it was illegal for them to “block the road” (although they weren’t).  Police with rifles cleared them out.  Barmada says she has lost friends because of her activism, but she has gained a new family.

Fellow dissenter Medea Benjamin seems to be constantly dogging the steps of government leaders—trying to make them listen.  It’s very much an uphill battle, and Benjamin has been fighting to change politicians’ minds for decades.  To me, her most dramatic and spectacular anti-genocide display was the one done very early in the Gaza “war,” on November 3, 2023.  Dozens of protesters, including Benjamin and her COlDEPINK colleagues, held up hands painted bloody red as a backdrop to secretaries of state and defense, Antony Blinken and Lloyd Austin as they presented their case to the Senate Appropriations Committee for giving more money to Israel to commit war crimes against the Palestinians in Gaza.  When her turn to interrupt came, Benjamin told them they had blood on their hands.  “How can you send more weapons to Israel?  They kill a child every 10 minutes. . .Who are you representing?  [Jewish/Israel lobby’s] AIPAC?  The arms industry?”  She was dragged away as the Senate audience looked annoyed or indifferent.

Medea Benjamin has been arrested hundreds of times because she refuses to stop her anti-government dissent.  Benjamin was born to a Jewish family on Long Island in 1952.  She went to Tufts where she embraced feminism and joined SDS.  She left school to hitchhike through Europe, and then returned to earn MAs at Columbia (public health) and the New School (education).  She spent 10 years as a nutritionist in Latin America and Africa.  Her activism efforts are really too numerous to mention, but they center in anti-war dissent: a watch center on US abuses in Baghdad, anti-Guantanamo Prison protests in Congress, anti-drone activism, pro-Venezuela action in Washington, and taking part in Gaza flotillas and freedom marches to break Israel’s siege.

Medea Benjamin, Jodie Evans and 100 others started CODEPINK in November ’02 to protest the Iraq War.  The CODEPINK name was to counter President Bush’s national security codes of Orange and Red and offer pink as a call “to wage peace.”  After four months in existence, 25 of their number including Benjamin, were arrested at the White House gates protesting the war.  From then until now, you can find CODEPINK people, often including Benjamin, at any significant government function regarding war and peace.  They were there in force at the Democratic National Convention last July—plaguing VP candidate Tim Walz when he spoke at the “Women’s Caucus” about the ERA.  But he did not mention Palestinian women’s rights, and so he was informed.  “Gaza is a feminist issue!”  The DNC was a clear example of US political depravity.  Onwar Omeish was one of the women reading out the names of dead Gazan children, to ridicule, and for the most part, to attendees “covering their ears.”

When Medea Benjamin was honored at the global Peace Unity Conference in London last October, she told them she has gone to Congress every day since October 7.  As an American she is disgusted.  And as a Jew, she says her “religion has been twisted.”  “Anti-Zionism is not antisemitism.”  She is fighting “Israeli apartheid.”  She does not (publicly) grapple with the huge support American Jews, in every local synagogue and federation, give to Israel and its genocide.  One egregious example was an LA synagogue selling Gaza land in anticipation of its Israeli takeover.  Israel is a Jewish supremacist apartheid state and needs to be condemned by—as Benjamin put it—”anyone with a sense of humanity.”  Benjamin was back opposing Austin last April at the House Appropriations Committee.  She told him US support for Gaza genocide is “illegal, immoral and disgraceful.”  She shouted, “The whole world is watching what we are doing in Gaza.  Secretary General you are supporting a genocide.  Free Palestine!”  Again, she was led away in handcuffs.  She spoke to the cameras: “We must all do what we can even if it means going to jail for justice.”  And she did.  And she will.

Veteran Palestinian-American activist Huwaida Arraf has also been doing what she can for Palestinian rights for decades, although as a Palestinian she comes at it from a different direction from Benjamin.  Like Benjamin, Arraf maintains mainstream connections while she criticizes political policy.  My impression is that she and Benjamin are both shaken by the US government/Democratic administration support for Israeli genocide.  Last March, Arraf joined the crowd of protesters rallying against President Biden as he prepared to give his State of the Union message.  She wielded a microphone to tell the crowd they “actually represent the ideals Biden claims to speak for.”  “We know the State of the Union, the State of the Union is genocide!”  His motorcade avoided the protesters, their huge Palestinian flag, and their chants: “From DC to Palestine, occupation is a crime!”  Arraf, 48, knows only too well about the crimes of occupation.  Huwaida Arraf grew up in Michigan after her Palestinian parents moved there when she was an infant.  She visited Palestine until she was 11, and later studied in Jerusalem.  She got her law degree with a focus on human rights.

Arraf worked with Seeds of Peace, a US organization promoting Jewish-Palestinian dialogue, and met her Jewish husband there.  But it wasn’t long before she left Seeds of Peace.  She has said it was a “feel-good project” and it “ignored Israeli hegemony.”  Instead she and her husband founded the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) in 2001 with the very different focus of resisting “the long-entrenched and systematic oppression and dispossession of the Palestinian population” with non-violent and direct actions methods.  She was off and running:  from Ramallah, West Bank, joining the PLO’s Arafat in solidarity, under Israeli fire in 2002; to serving as a “Palestinian freedom rider” defying Israeli anti-Palestinian law and thus getting dragged off a bus and arrested in 2011.  In 2008 she was aboard the first of the International Gaza Freedom Flotillas (which she helped organize).  The ship was the first to reach a Gaza port in 40 years.  Arraf was also onboard in 2010 when their ships were raided by Israeli commandoes.  The Israelis killed 10 and injured 50 of the activists.  When a Greek participant of the 2010 action recently died, she tweeted he’d be with her in spirit “when we return to a free Gaza and free Palestine!”  She was an organizer for the Flotilla attempt last April to call attention to the siege and genocide in Gaza, knowing “Israel might attack us.”  But there were Turkey/Israeli/American political machinations and delays which ended their attempt.

Maintaining her ties with the Michigan Democratic party, Arraf ran for Congress in 2022.  She said she hoped once there, she would be able to work on writing better human rights laws. Unsurprisingly, she had vicious Jewish/Israeli Lobby opposition with their charges of antisemitism, and lost the primary handily.  As noted, her disillusion with the Democrats is growing.  She tweeted on November 1st she would never vote for Kamala Harris, and on the 6th that she was not surprised Secretary Blinken ignored Israel’s blocking aid to Gaza and his refusal to change administration policy.  She spends her time defending Michigan students who face disciplinary action for their pro-Palestinian protests.  She’s at rallies and giving talks and seminars—my husband, a pro-Palestinian writer himself, says she doesn’t get enough credit for all she’s done.  According to Huweida Arraf, “The Palestinian struggle is for freedom–for basic human dignity and human rights.”  Obviously an Israeli/American genocide would, to her, have to be fought at all costs.

My two women in politics, Rashida Tlaib and Claudia de la Cruz, have differing political views but the same dedication to the anti-genocide struggle.  The only politician in Washington fighting against genocide, like her close friend Arraf, Palestinian Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, has been scorned and censured by her own party for her (understandably) strong pro-Palestinian stands.  She refused to endorse Democratic presidential candidate and pro-genocide, Kamala Harris, but won her own fourth term with 80% of the vote.  She won in spite of strong Jewish lobby pressure against her.  On November 14, she was on the floor of the House, demanding that Secretary Blinken resign for lying to Congress.  In an October letter he threatened Israel with withholding arms if they didn’t start sending aid to the population of Gaza.  He, of course, reneged on that promise, which, as noted, Arraf also condemned.  Tlaib tweeted that Blinken’s lies had led to the starvation of Gaza.  “I can’t believe our country won’t stop funding and enabling these war crimes.”

Rashida Tlaib, 48, is the first and only Palestinian-American to be in Congress.  She comes from a working-class Detroit family; attending college for a political science and then law degree.  She ran for and won state office in 2007 and then Congress in 2019.  Her opposition to Israeli apartheid has always been central for her, and she’s made no apologies for it.  She promotes a one-state solution and supports Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) against Israel.  Israel banned her from the country so she cannot visit relatives in the West Bank.  In Congress she has been investigated for allegedly violating campaign finance laws, and last October the House voted to censure her for criticizing Israel and “leading an insurrection” for participating in a Capitol protest.  That censure motion failed.  Tlaib called it “deeply Islamophobic.”  The next attempt in November succeeded.  This time 22 Democrats joined the GOP in denying their colleague free speech.  The Republican-led resolution accused her of “promoting false narratives” regarding the Hamas operation of October7 and of using the phrase “from the river to the sea” to advocate Palestinian self-determination as “a genocidal call” to “destroy Israel.”  Tlaib has actually been careful about her statements, dutifully criticizing Hamas and denying the Congressional “river to the sea” interpretation.  But her ceasefire calls and criticism for US support for genocide is too much for Congress.

One of the bravest acts of courage I’ve ever seen is when Tlaib sat alone in Congress on the occasion of the Congressional lovefest for Israeli war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu last July.  She was noticeably avoided and ignored by her colleagues.  No one joined her as she held up a sign which said “War Criminal” on one side and “Guilty of Genocide” on the other.  She explained: “It is important for myself as a Palestinian-American to make sure that our community is not erased, that the genocide in Gaza is not ignored.”  There was one presidential candidate who opposed the Democrats who joins Tlaib in her determination that it will not happen.

No one exemplifies the courage and backbone to fight genocide better than the indomitable Claudia de la Cruz, 44.  As noted, de la Cruz was marching with Fuleihan last January in a NY “Shut it Down for Palestine” rally, when she suffered one of her numerous arrests.  She pulls no punches as to whom to blame for the genocide.  Last July at a rally in NY protesting Netanyahu’s visit, one met with slobbering devotion by both political parties, Dominican-American de la Cruz, PSL candidate for president, had a decidedly different view.  “The US sponsors terrorism!  Congress/Trump/Biden/Blinken and Harris—no pass given for a black woman—all support it.”  “We are in the belly of the beast. . . We are committed to liberation.  Long live Palestine!”  De la Cruz is a complete socialist:  anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist.

She prides herself on her working- class background.  Born in the South Bronx, she has a degree from John Jay, an MA in social work from Columbia, and a divinity degree from Union Theological Seminary.  At an early age she was organizing—as in a 2003 march against the Iraq war—and began a movement to promote leadership for young Dominican and Puerto Rican women in honor of the nuns killed in 1960 who opposed Dominican dictator Trujillo.  As pastor in a Latin American church, she worked to use her faith to do community organizing.  Her link with Layan Fuleihan stems from her being co-founder of the People’s Forum.  Her PSL candidacy features socialist reforms like single payer healthcare, recognition of Native-American treaty rights, and eliminating billionaires; but her main goal has been ending Israeli/American genocide.

In a University of Rochester student interview, she said she’s been demonstrating for Palestine since she was 13. In her opinion, the worst thing to do “as we approach one year of this genocide is give them [the ruling power] space to demoralize us. . .  Genocide is the issue because it shows us that they have the capacity to annihilate, to exterminate, an entire population.  What do you think will happen to us?”  So de la Cruz keeps marching, organizing, speaking out and being arrested.  A few weeks ago she was in New York exhorting her listeners: “Hello comrades!  It’s a long march!  People in Syria, in Gaza—they all know the US is a terrorist entity too! . . .  Are you tired of marching?  [A resounding No!]  Hands off the Middle East!  From the Belly of the Beast!”  She said she’s a girl from the Bronx and she “fights to win!”  So “Buckle up, it’ll get bumpy!  We’ll build resistance to lift us to liberation!  Free Palestine!”  De la Cruz would be the president we badly need.

Not everyone believes the genocide should be fought at all costs.  In fact, incredibly, the job of mainstream western media is to normalize genocide, and again, an array of female dissenters are working hard to make sure people are constantly presented with the reality of how genocide is abnormal and the worst crime against humanity. One of the most infamous supporters and hawkers for Israel, is CNN’s Dana Bash.  Bash makes her arguments, like Antony Blinken, by unabashedly centering them in her being a Jew.  She constantly parrots the IDF and Israeli government line.  She insists Israel is a wonderful democracy where “every life matters.”  She calls US student protests against the genocide “rage against Jews” and “hate on college campuses.”  When addressing the need for a ceasefire, she says “On October 6, there was a ceasefire, but it ended on October 7 with the brutal massacre of Israelis done by Hamas.”  There is no context and no argument.

Bash has been confronted by protesters who charge her with “media malpractice” and “promoting genocide.”  When Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal told Bash 15,000 women and children had been killed by Israel, Bash said “at least Israeli soldiers don’t rape Palestinian women.”  That, of course, is a lie, with plentiful documentation of their soldiers’ raping women and men in their prisons and at their checkpoints.  But her favorite focus was the since disproved story of Hamas soldiers systematically raping and killing Israeli women on October 7.

The weaponization of rape as used by Empire narrative managers is not new.  In this case, beyond Dana Bash and CNN, it was used most notably in a film by Sheryl Sandberg called “Screams Before Silence.”  The film is supposedly a documentary of the rape and murder of Israeli women by Hamas, with women sexually abused, some mutilated and raped, and some killed.  But her witnesses and her evidence have been debunked.  In spite of that, Democratic Party “feminists” like Hillary Clinton and Senator Kristen Gillibrand lined up for an Israeli embassy event lauding the film.  Kamala Harris repeated the disproved narrative numerous times, insisting “Israeli women suffered unspeakable sexual violence.”  Truth has no place when engaging in heavy-handed Israeli genocide propaganda.

A whole host of alternative female podcasters, journalists and writers battle that narrative by presenting the truth and horror of genocide.  There are numerous Americans, including Anya Parampil, Sabby Sabs, Katie Halper, Amy Goodman, and Margaret Kimberley. The writing efforts of Australian Caitlin Johnstone tackle the horrors of genocide and imperialism with her wit and insight every day.  And there is brave former Gaza activist, Canadian Eva Bartlett bringing her first-hand knowledge to describe Israeli atrocities. Truthteller Vanessa Beeley, once detained by police at Heathrow, is still bringing the truth about the Empire’s new invasion in Syria.  And the stubbornly strong Sarah Wilkinson, because she provides Gaza news for many thousands, was arrested, injured, and her home ransacked—with the British SWAT team dumping out her mother’s ashes.  All these women bring their sanity and humanity, and their unswerving support for the women, the children, the innocents being killed in the Israeli/American genocide.

A couple of weeks ago, the door to my house was egged.  We live in a small town, but on a busy highway.  Someone objected, I believe, to the signs in our windows: “Stop Israeli Apartheid” and “Let My People Go” in English and Arabic.  As a child of the 60s, it is clear to me this is the time for building a movement against the Empire’s imperialism and global destruction, which now includes the brutal, violent takeover of Palestinian Resistance bulwark Syria.  Young Palestinian women like Layan Fuleihan are leading rallies and marches, which she says shows the strength of the movement—of “people who refuse to be complicit in genocide.”  Claudia de la Cruz has the same mission: “We’re fighting to build socialism here. . We’ll build resistance to lift us to liberation.” Barmada, Benjamin and Arraf demand that women in government stand for “true feminism and liberation” and not “weaponize women’s rights” as the Palestinian Feminist Collective puts it.

Female dissenters are willing to take the consequences for being part of this movement.  To quote Paige Belanger of the Merrimack Four: “I didn’t want to serve time in jail, but I have no regrets about being incarcerated for materially disrupting the flow of weapons to Palestine and I will forever be proud that I took a stand against genocide, especially because it meant putting my own freedom on the line.  Standing by and doing nothing simply wasn’t an option.”  And standing by silently was not an option for Hazami Barmada when she confronted Joe Biden’s campaign speech last January.  The topic was reproductive health.  She interrupted him to shout out that women’s reproductive health was under attack in Gaza.  He spoke over her, said she was a Trump MAGA, and called her “the woman hollering over there.”  Women are hollering and they won’t be silenced.  They won’t be stopped.

Linda Ford is a retired history professor living in Madison, NY. She is the author ofWomen Politicals: From Mother Jones to Lynne Stewart and Iron-Jawed Angels: The Suffrage Militancy of the National Woman’s Party.

18 December 2024

Source: countercurrents.org

Palestinian Authority proves loyalty to US, Israel by attacking Jenin

By Tamara Nassar

The Palestinian Authority is demonstrating its value and proving loyalty to its Israeli and American masters through a deadly military operation in the northern occupied West Bank city of Jenin.

“The operation is a make or break moment for the Palestinian Authority,” one unnamed Palestinian official told Barak Ravid, an Israeli media figure with close ties to US and Israeli intelligence.

The deadly PA military operation in Jenin and its refugee camp, which is nearing a second week, is targeted at armed Palestinian resistance in the area which emerged to counter Israeli encroachment and land grabs.

PA leader Mahmoud Abbas launched the operation “to send a message to the incoming [Donald] Trump administration that the Palestinian Authority is a reliable partner,” Ravid wrote for Axios.

The PA’s “actions seem to be driven by its desire to offer a ‘valuable gift’ to the incoming US administration and win the favor of President-elect Donald Trump, by suggesting that its military operation in Jenin is capable of ‘cutting off the head of the resistance,’” one analysis piece in the Lebanese newspaper Al-Akhbar read.

Whether the PA can be successful in actually making a dent in resistance capabilities or the will to carry on is a different story.

There is buzz in Israeli media about the fragility of the Palestinian Authority, with concerns that some members within its ranks may shift their loyalties. This is why the PA is attempting to demonstrate its capabilities in suppressing armed resistance in areas where Israel grants it nominal control.

Asked for more weapons

The PA is employing Israel-like tactics to achieve this.

Since the military operation began, PA forces have occupied the Jenin government hospital, cut off electricity and water to the camp, shot and killed two youths in addition to a member of the armed resistance, creating a state of fear and uncertainty in the camp.

Schools have been closed in the area, with students shifted to virtual learning. Jenin residents have observed a camp-wide strike for the fourth day in a row to protest the PA’s incursion.

UNRWA, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, has been forced to suspend its operations in the area.

“Children remain out of school and camp residents are unable to access primary healthcare and other critical services,” Philippe Lazzarini, commissioner-general of UNRWA, said on Tuesday.

“For far too long, residents of Jenin and Jenin camp have been subject to a cycle of violence and destruction, rendering the camp nearly uninhabitable,” Lazzarini added, failing to mention that it was the Israeli military that subjected Jenin to widespread destruction and accelerated violence since Israel launched its genocide of Palestinians in Gaza in October 2023.

In September this year, Israel reportedly destroyed the vast majority of Jenin’s streets during a lethal multi-day raid of the city and its camp.

The PA operation is being carried out with full coordination with Israel, Hebrew media has reported. PA security chiefs even met with Michael R. Fenzel, a US lieutenant general who oversees so-called security ties between Israel and the Palestinians, ahead of the operation to go over planning details.

The PA officials handed Fenzel a detailed list of weaponry needed to intensify their offensive against Palestinians, Axios reported.

The US is now asking Israel to authorize the transfer of weapons to the PA, ensuring it can continue carrying out Israel’s dirty work.

Officials from the Joe Biden administration, including the US ambassador to Israel Jack Lew, requested that Israel approve “the urgent delivery of ammunition, helmets, bulletproof vests, radios, night vision equipment, explosive disposal suits and armored cars.”

Incoherent propaganda

Palestinian and US officials told Barak Ravid the operation was also launched “to try to prevent what happened in Syria from happening in the West Bank.”

One Palestinian official said that this was the “Syria effect. Abbas and his team were concerned that what happened in Aleppo and Damascus will inspire Palestinian Islamist group[s].”

This is, of course, incoherent with the Palestinian Authority’s other propaganda, which portrays armed Palestinian groups in the camps as part of an “Iranian-funded takeover,” as the unnamed Palestinian official told Ravid.

“The gunmen in Jenin are not resistance fighters, but mercenaries serving the dubious agenda of an outside party,” Anwar Rajab, the spokesperson of the PA “security” forces, said.

Rajab likened activities by the groups to “ISIS-style efforts,” highlighting this incoherence.

In reality, the resistance in the West Bank has existed as long as Israel’s military occupation has, and is a direct reaction to it. It is not motivated by external support.

This is a reality the PA understands and is undermined by, which is why the collaborationist body is willing to do everything in its power to prove its worth to its Israeli masters.

Tamara Nassar is an assistant editor at The Electronic Intifada.

18 December 2024

Source: countercurrents.org

Israel still refusing to deliver aid to northern Gaza: UN

By Countercurrents Collective

The spokesman for UN chief Antonio Guterres told AlJazeera Israel is continuing to refuse the delivery of aid to the northern Gaza Strip, amid an ongoing Israeli siege and intense bombardment.

Stephane Dujarric said during a news conference that the majority of UN-led aid missions to northern Gaza trying to reach the besieged areas in Beit Lahiya, Beit Hanoon and parts of Jabalia had been rejected.

The UN attempted to reach these besieged areas 40 times, of which 38 attempts were denied and two were obstructed.

Dujarric urged Israel to meet the “essential needs” of civilians in the north and facilitate the delivery of humanitarian aid.

Last month, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant for war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza.

Staff at Kamal Adwan Hospital describe night of ‘horror’ amid Israel’s attack

Eid Sabbah, the director of nursing at Kamal Adwan Hospital, described a night “full of horror” at the facility in northern Gaza, as Israeli bulldozers advanced and quadcopter drones fired at the medical compound and surrounding buildings.

“They targeted the Battah family home in the vicinity of the hospital. Fifteen bodies arrived at the hospital including six people from the Battah family,” Sabbah told Al Jazeera.

“Many have been wounded and many are still under the rubble.”

Sabbah said the Israeli attack on the hospital’s ICU filled the rooms with black dust, as staff evacuated four patients on ventilators. Centralised oxygen remained unavailable and the few cylinders left were about to run out.

[https://twitter.com/QudsNen/status/1869334501689880833]

He added that 74 injured patients were present at the hospital and were being treated “in a very primitive way” due to the lack of resources.

International medical team denied deployment at Kamal Adwan Hospital: WHO

The World Health Organization (WHO) says an international medical team urgently needed at Kamal Adwan Hospital has not been allowed to deploy as Israel continues its siege in northern Gaza.

Hanan Balkhy, WHO regional director for the Eastern Mediterranean, also condemned the repeated attacks on the medical facility. “The fear endured by the hospital’s staff and patients in recent days is indescribable – and unacceptable,” she wrote on X.

[https://twitter.com/HananBalkhy/status/1869303338895847785]

The representative for the UN health agency said the hospital was without surgical or maternal care capacity.

WHO was instead able to deliver supplies to al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, Balkhy said.

18 December 2024

Source: countercurrents.org

Joe Biden Is an Accomplice to the Slaughter of Thousands of Palestinian Children

By Jay Janson

Joe Biden should be tried and convicted of illegally providing American bombs and planes for genocide, but not before being forced to watch videos of some of the thousands of Palestinian kids murdered or maimed by Biden’s bombs and warplanes. Let Biden see the blank look of horror of a temporarily surviving Palestinian child alongside the bloodied dead body of its mother, father, brother, sister, playmate, auntie, uncle, grandad, grandma, or as often enough all of them killed by the same blockbuster bomb.

Let the condemnable President of the United States of American brutality be seen on the cover of Time magazine as ‘Man of the Year.’ Let Americans become aware of the reality of their government’s horrific crime against humanity. Though there is currently an international arrest warrant for Biden’s partner in the crime of genocide, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, the International Criminal Court lets Biden off the hook.

Also let the rest of the world know the truth that the TV entertainment/news conglomerates under U.S.-CIA control, by their world wide audience via satellites,make every effort to obscure the mass murderous nature of the U.S. government.

Currently criminal Western media keeps focusing their tele-broadcasting time on the hostages held by Palestinian freedom fighters for a second exchange for some more of Israel’s thousands of Palestinians in Israeli prisons.

While the world watched and students protested as Israel committed genocide with American bombs turning the cities of Gaza into rubble, the Biden presidency vetoed ceasefires in Gaza commanded by the United Nations Security Council last year on October 18, October 25, November 8, November 20, and November 28.

On November 22 of this year, the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, accusing him of crimes that include “starvation as a method of warfare,” Just two days later the Biden administration again vetoed the latest UN Security Council resolution demanding a ceasefire in Gaza that even France and Britain voted in favour of.

China’s senior envoy, Fu Cong, asked: “Do Palestinian lives mean nothing?

For Biden and his cohorts, the Israeli users of the lethal American weapons provided, Palestinian lives must mean less than nothing.Some Israeli soldiers’ social media have shown soldierslaughing like hyenas in videos of themselves cheering the genocidal destruction on. More than 50 thousand Palestinians under illegal militarily occupation, mostly women and children have already been put to death, while another 11 thousand or more lie buried beneath the ruins of their homes, and hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza suffer the life endangering pangs of hunger that bring disease, dysentery, and fatal results of starvation and malnutrition.

The Face of Good ol’ Joe Biden

What does this caricature of a human being see when it looks in a mirror? This monster of pitiless death and destruction sees not the creature thrown up from Hell that seeks to help Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu annihilate all Palestinian life in Gaza and the West Bank, but rather the jovial face of a human being deceptively presenting himself as a likeable father figure.

Don’t be fooled! Joe Biden is a serial destroyer of human life on Earth, and Biden didn’t start in October of last year.

Previously Joe Biden as Senator Made War on Iraq Possible

We knew Joe Biden as a super ‘yes man’ of the war and weapons investors complex deep state already when as Senator and Chair of the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Biden vociferously called for the invasion of Iraq, even though it would be a war of the opposing party Republican President George Bush Junior. Senator Biden embraced an ultrahawkish position on Iraq, already in March 2000, Joe Biden said at a Senate hearing that if Iraq refused weapons inspections, he “would introduce a resolution calling for the use of force by the United States of America, if we have to do it alone, to go after Saddam Hussein.” (Congressional Quarterly,March 2000)

In October 2002, he voted in favor of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq, approving the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

In September 2004, then-United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan stated, “I have indicated that it is not in accordance with the UN charter. From our point of view and the UN Charter point of view, it [the war] was illegal.”

Fast forward

“Iraq conflict has killed a million”, says survey

By Reuters, January 30, 2008 (Updated 17 years ago)

LONDON, Jan 30 (Reuters) – More than one million Iraqis died as a result of the conflict in their country since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003, according to research conducted by one of Britain’s leading polling groups, (The survey was conducted by Opinion Research Business ORB), but Biden’s Gaza genocide, so widely and graphically tele-broadcasted all around the world makes him someone to be remembered for representing the intensive cruelty of the American government and the deadly indifference of the American public.

America’s most famous critic, 96-year-old Noam Chomsky, has said repeatedly that all the U.S. presidents after Franklin Roosevelt would have been hanged if tried under the same laws the Nazis were tried under. With his Palestinian Gaza genocide Joe Biden seems to have outdone all of them in extreme mortal cruelty, except possibly Harry Truman, who had atomic bombs dropped on two cities. But Biden has the distinction of having been able to watch his provisioned genocidal  daily and nightly horror go on for 14 months.

May Joe Biden Be Condemned To Watch Videos of the Thousands of Adorable Palestinian Children He Has Had Murdered.

May Americans be made aware of the genocide of their president.

May the Global South be empowered to stop it and learn from it.

On January 20, another president might continue to provide for the inhuman mass butchery of women and children. Trump has warned of consequences if the hostages are not released, but tellingly made no mention of the more than 50 thousand dead Palestinians.

Let’s hope and agitate for a termination of the Gaza genocide and the usurping of Palestinian land.

Jay Janson, spent eight years as Assistant Conductor of the Vietnam Symphony Orchestra in Hanoi and also toured, including with Dan Tai-son, who practiced in a Hanoi bomb shelter.

17 December 2024

Source: countercurrents.org