Just International

When Is a Ceasefire Not a Ceasefire?

By Philip M. Giraldi

We are possibly witnessing another stealthy move by Washington and Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel to enhance the Israeli position in a Middle East at war while pretending to do something else. President Joe Biden and his cast of know-nothings have been bleating for months about their desire to arrange a “humanitarian” ceasefire in Gaza and Lebanon while also alternatively whining about the Jewish state’s “right to defend itself,” but somehow the arrangements proposed have never quite satisfied Netanyahu.

Bibi has repeatedly declared that he will not accept any halt to the fighting, presumably until all the Palestinians are dead, but would accept some kind of suspension of the conflicts as long as he has the option to return to unleashing the mass murder whenever it suits him. He deceptively labels that “making sure that the bad guy ‘terrorists’ abide by the agreement.” In that context of everyone lying to everyone else, Genocide Joe has managed to drag his sorry ass over the finish line with a “whereas laced” US endorsed temporary peace formula for Lebanon that suits Bibi just fine. In fact, it suited him so well that he could not resist renewing his attacking the Lebanese last Thursday even before the ink was dry on the ceasefire documents.

The ceasefire, arranged largely by Amos Hochstein, an Israeli who served in the Israeli army and is now Biden’s roving negotiator, was agreed to on November 27th. Its written provisions include 60 days for Hezbollah to withdraw to the Litani River, 18 miles north of the border, while Israel withdraws from all of south Lebanon that it has occupied. The Lebanese army will occupy the area vacated by Hezbollah and will work with the UNIFIL soldiers to monitor the process and maintain the peace in what will be designated as a weapons free zone. Complicating the agreement, there is a side letter from the United States to Israel confirming American support for Israel to “act in self-defense,” a term that Israel can exploit to reintervene in Lebanon. In the letter, the US also commits itself to share with Israel intelligence on Iran providing any support for Hezbollah. Israel is to be permitted to act “in self-defense” if Hezbollah violates the ceasefire in the area south of the Litani and it is also allowed to conduct reconnaissance flights over Lebanon to monitor developments. As usual, Prime Minister Netanyahu claimed a “win,” stating that he had reached an understanding with the US that Israel would “maintain full military freedom of action” in southern Lebanon. “If Hezbollah violates the agreement and tries to arm itself, we will attack. If it tries to renew terrorist infrastructure near the border, we will attack. If it launches a rocket, if it digs a tunnel, if it brings in a truck with missiles, we will attack.” As 35,000 Hezbollah militants actually live in the disarmed zone and presumably will try to return home, Israel will always have an excuse to resume its offensive.

To be sure, Lebanon was happy to accept any reprieve from the destruction wrought by Israeli bombs and artillery rounds, even if Israeli ground forces had been less than successful. Lebanon’s war losses have been calculated to be upwards of $8.5 billion dollars, together with thousands of civilians killed and injured. That includes Israel’s destruction of 100,000 homes and substantial impacts on health, education, and agriculture, according to the World Bank. But there is nevertheless, of course, a lot of speculation as to why any agreement was reached at all given Netanyahu’s unrelenting demand that he have a free hand to punish his neighbors and Biden’s usual cowardice whenever he is confronted by the Israeli gauleiter. The most interesting theory regarding why Israel has agreed to the US drafted ceasefire with Lebanon is that the Israeli government has finally figured out that it is not exactly winning its two little wars even though it has killed tens of thousands, or possibly even hundreds of thousands, Arabs.

Regarding Israel’s own casualties, one assumes that the US Defense Department knows roughly or even in detail the numbers of dead and wounded that the Israel Occupation Force (IOF) is sustaining in its unconventional warfare in both Gaza and south Lebanon. Some credible analysts even have concluded that the Israeli military is under considerable pressure due to a high casualty rate in ground fighting involving its best soldiers, overreliance on reservists, and shortages of equipment and weapons in spite of the Biden airlifts occurring on an almost daily basis. There are reports that even the Pentagon is now running out of certain types of weapons, including artillery shells and smart bombs. A respite in the fighting against the still formidable Hezbollah enemy would be welcome both to the Israeli government and to the military planners particularly as the ceasefire is drafted to favor Israel, which can intervene in Lebanon at will just by alleging a Lebanese failure to enforce the agreement. Netanyahu may also be looking forward to the Trump factor in seven weeks. Donald Trump has always been a consequence free supporter of Israel and his cabinet is composed of hardcore Zionists. So, there is every reason for Netanyahu to believe that with Trump in power he will be able to manipulate circumstances involving both Gazans and Lebanese to enable a US supported move towards the large-scale attack on Iran that Bibi has wanted for decades.

“Victory” has also become elusive as fighting drags on well into its second year on all fronts and Israel’s “freeing of the hostages” has not only failed to materialize, it has resulted in the actual killing of some prisoners of Hamas by Israeli bombs and gunfire. Israel has failed to establish any of the “realities” it wanted to create by invading Lebanon: there is no buffer zone and instead a full IOF retreat, no Hezbollah disarmament, no Hezbollah withdrawal, and no Hezbollah removal from political power in Lebanon. Publicly, Israel got a decoupling between Gaza and Lebanon, but it also was punished with an international arrest warrant for multiple war crimes and genocide being issued against Israel’s Prime Minister and former Defense Minister. Even though the US has rallied around in defense of Israel, the demands for isolating Israel worldwide due to its clearly demonstrated ongoing genocide will intensify.

The disruption and sinking of the Israeli economy due to the evacuation of the northern tier of the country under Hezbollah pressure, an increasing number of international boycotts, and the closure of many businesses, has been widely observed, as has also been the actual departure of many more educated Jewish Israelis holding US and European passports. There is considerable talk among antiwar Israeli Jews in the diaspora and even in liberal newspapers like Haaretz that Israel is in a very real sense self-destructing.

This all derives from the growing belief that the Israeli leadership has begun to realize that it does not have an effective military solution either to end the war in its favor nor to extend it to include the US as an ally in attacking Iran. If Netanyahu and his generals thought they could continue the carnage for another ninety days until the arrival of Donald Trump in the White House, they almost certainly would have gone in that direction without any talk of ceasefire. Instead, leaked reports suggest that the generals themselves are complaining that the government of Netanyahu “has no plan” and have demanding a cutback due to heavy losses.

There are, to be sure, other theories to explain the surprise development of the so-called ceasefire, particularly as it so closely involves the United States and Israel, neither which can be trusted. The lull in the fighting certainly gives the IOF a break during which time it can regroup and re-equip with the help of Washington. And, as noted above, the concession to Israel that it can re-engage if it determines that Lebanon is not abiding by the ceasefire will be easy to manipulate as Israel is, if anything, a master of deception. So the agreement to down arms benefits Israel with Netanyahu, backed by the US, continuing to be able to call the shots on what comes next on the Hezbollah front.

So will the ceasefire hold or is it another gimmick by the US and Israel? In fact, as noted above, the uneasy truce between Israel and the militant group Hezbollah was violated by Israel on its second day in Lebanon on Thursday, by an airstrike that it inevitably claimed targeted militants violating terms of the cease-fire deal. The Israeli strike was the first of its kind since the US backed ceasefire went into effect before dawn on the day before. In spite of the clear violation, neither of the war’s combatants, Israel or Hezbollah, seemed keen to immediately return to full-scale fighting. The Israeli military said the incident, near the border in southern Lebanon, had targeted two militants entering a Hezbollah rocket facility that had been used to fire into Israel. Lebanon’s army, which is set to play a major role in enforcing the truce, also accused Israel of violating the ceasefire “several more times” on Thursday afternoon. The Israeli military claimed that its soldiers had in fact interdicted other militants attempting to enter into southern Lebanon. “With the same power we used to secure the agreement, we will now enforce it no less so,” Lieutenant General Herzi Halevi, the Israeli military’s chief of staff, said in a subsequent video. It is no doubt precisely how Israel will behave in the future and how little the US, as a guarantor of the agreement together with France, will be tempted to intervene to maintain the peace contrary to Netanyahu’s wishes. That partisanship by Washington is precisely the problem and it suggests that the both the integrity and viability of the ceasefire might reasonably be questioned.

*

Philip M. Giraldi, Ph.D., is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest, a 501(c)3 tax deductible educational foundation (Federal ID Number #52-1739023) that seeks a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.

2 December 2024

Source: globalresearch.ca

Video: Say No to Nuclear War! Peace on the Planet

By Drago Bosnic and Prof Michel Chossudovsky

Our thanks to Lux media for the production of this video

To contribute to Lux Media click here and then Click: Faire un don 

To Contribute to Global Research’s Fund Raising Click here, 

First published on November 28, 2024

Pour la Paix à l’échelle planétaire, Towards Peace at the Level of the entire Planet, На пути к миру на уровне всей планеты, На шляху до миру на рівні всієї планети, Por la paz a escala planetaria, من أجل السلام على نطاق عالمي, 世界規模での平和のために, Auf dem Weg zum Frieden auf der Ebene des gesamten Planeten, 为了全球规模的和平, สู่สันติภาพในระดับโลกทั้งใบ, 전체 비행기 수준의 평화를 향하여, Rumo à paz no nível de todo o planeta

Say No to Nuclear War! Peace on the Planet

Drago Bosnic and Michel Chossudovsky

English

SAY NO TO NUCLEAR WAR

Avec  sous-titres en français 

Dites Non à la Guerre Nucléaire!

MICHEL CHOSSUDOVSKY – DRAGO BOSNIĆ – DITES NON À LA GUERRE NUCLÉAIRE

sub-titulos en español

Di No a la Guerra  Nuclear!

MICHEL CHOSSUDOVSKY – DRAGO BOSNIĆ – DI NO A LA GUERRA NUCLEAR

Субтитры на русском языке

Скажи “нет” ядерной войне!

МИШЕЛЬ ШОСУДОВСКИЙ – ДРАГО БОСНИЧ – СКАЖИ НЕТ ЯДЕРНОЙ ВОЙНЕ

1 December 2024

Source: globalresearch.ca

How FIFA murdered soul of football by sportswashing Israel’s genocide in Gaza

By Nima Tavallaey Roodsari

As Israel’s US-backed genocidal war on Gaza rages on, the death toll of Palestinian footballers has surpassed 320 even as the international governing body of football continues to engage in blatant sportswashing.

On February 24, 2022, FIFAUEFA, and the IOC issued separate statements condemning Russia just hours after it launched its military operation in Ukraine.

Four days later, the FIFA Council and UEFA Executive Committee banned all Russian teams from participating in international football tournaments.

The IOC Executive Board made similar recommendations on the same day.

Fast forward two years to July 10, 2024, when the US medical journal The Lancet published a report estimating that “up to 186,000 or even more deaths could be attributable to the current conflict (war) in Gaza,” affecting a population where 47 percent are under 18 years old.

The official death toll from the Israeli genocidal war against Palestinians in Gaza is nearly 42,400 now, including more than 17,000 children. However, thousands more remain trapped under the rubble and unaccounted for.

Six months before the Lancet issued its report, on January 26, The International Court of Justice issued an interim ruling in a case originally filed by South Africa declaring that there was a “plausible” case against Israel for committing genocide in Gaza.

This is without even mentioning the horrific images of mutilated and slaughtered Palestinian men, women, and children that have circulated on social media daily since October 7, 2023.

What has been FIFA’s response? Under the leadership of Gianni Infantino—who, during the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, expressed a wide range of global identities—the world football’s governing body has engaged in one of the largest and most obscene acts of political gaslighting and sportswashing in human history.

On October 3 of this year, FIFA announced that its Disciplinary Committee would “initiate an investigation into the alleged offense of discrimination raised by the Palestine Football Association.”

It further stated that the FIFA Governance, Audit, and Compliance Committee “will be entrusted with the mission to investigate – and subsequently advise the FIFA Council on – the participation in Israeli competitions of Israeli football teams allegedly based in the territory of Palestine.”

This ludicrous language came after the decision to take action against Israel had been postponed at least three times.

Infantino stated, “The ongoing violence in the region confirms that, above all considerations, and as stated at the 74th FIFA Congress, we need peace.”

“As we remain extremely shocked by what is happening, our thoughts are with those who are suffering. We urge all parties to restore peace to the region immediately.”

It is evident that Infantino, who once famously claimed to feel “African, Qatari, disabled, woman,” etc does not extend this sentiment to Palestinians.

Consider the case of Muhammed Bhar, a 24-year-old Palestinian man with Down syndrome and autism, who was killed when Israeli soldiers unleashed a military dog on him.

As the dog attacked, Muhammed tried to comfort it to stop its aggression.

Personally, I doubt Infantino is capable of feeling much at all, except perhaps the sensation of bending over on command, like an obedient Zionist lapdog—after lining his own pockets, of course.

Mark Twain is famously quoted as saying, “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.”

Over the past year, amid unrelenting West-backed Israeli aggression in Gaza and now Lebanon, we have witnessed three levels of hypocrisy: hypocrisy, damned hypocrisy, and FIFA hypocrisy.

By doing so, FIFA has paved the way for European football clubs to sportswash Israel’s genocide in Gaza and Lebanon even as innocents continue to die every moment.

A particularly egregious example is that of German football club Borussia Dortmund.

The Bundesliga club faced severe backlash from its own fans when it announced that the German weapons manufacturer  Rheinmetall would be its main shirt sponsor.

On their website, they expressed their “historical responsibility towards Israel,” adding that they are “fully committed” to the Zionist apartheid regime’s “right to exist.”

On October 7, 2024, marking the first anniversary of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, Borussia Dortmund and several other Bundesliga clubs released similar statements.

They condemned the Palestinian resistance but remained silent about the nearly 43,000 Palestinians (official toll) killed in the past year, most of whom were women and children. Many of the victims included young football players, including Dortmund fans.

One day earlier, Gaza-based football journalist and Press TV correspondent Abubaker Abed, along with Spanish-Moroccan journalist Leyla Hamed, published a video from Deir El-Balah, a city in the northern Gaza Strip.

The video was recorded the day after Israeli warplanes bombed a mosque filled with people seeking refuge from the indiscriminate bombing campaign.

Beneath the rubble, a torn Borussia Dortmund shirt was discovered, emblazoned with Marco Reus’s name and number. Neither Borussia Dortmund nor Marco Reus has issued a statement addressing their devoted Palestinian fans, whether dead or alive.

I suppose the gesture of players from the German national team covering their mouths during the FIFA World Cup in 2022 was less a protest and more a confession of their complicity in what has transpired, what is happening now, and what is yet to come.

This brings us to the chaotic UEFA Nations League match where Italy hosted the Israeli team in Udine. Viral social media posts have documented the presence of snipers on the stadium roof before, during, and after the game.

This is all happening because FIFA, UEFA, and the IOC refuse to apply their own rules and principles to Israel, as they did with such urgency when punishing Russia and Belarus because of Western pressure.

None of this is news to anyone. The more pressing question is: Now that we have established that the “I” in FIFA stands for Israel, what should the civilized world do next regarding sport in general and football in particular?

Through its blood-drenched hypocrisy and sportswashing of Israel’s crimes, FIFA has compromised the soul of this beautiful game, at least in the short term.

While the image of 19-year-old Sha’ban Al-Dalou engulfed in flames haunts the conscience of the civilized world, I am left wondering if, as an unintended consequence, FIFA has permanently harmed itself as an international sports organization.

Nima Tavallaey Roodsari is a football journalist and podcast host based in Sweden. He tweets at @NimaTavRood

17 October 2024

Source: presstv.ir

Masar Badil: The Egyptian regime is a collaborator with the Zionist entity against our people in Gaza

Masar Badil: The Egyptian regime is a collaborator with the Zionist entity against our people in Gaza

The Masar Badil, the Palestinian Alternative Revolutionary Path Movement, emphasizes that the Egyptian regime is actively participating in war crimes against the Palestinian people and in the Zionist-U.S. siege imposed on the Gaza Strip for nearly two decades. The regime of General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi continues to close the Rafah crossing and prevents the entry of humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people, who have been facing a continuous genocide for the past 14 months.

Khaled Barakat, a member of the movement’s executive committee, said in a media interview with Yemen’s Al-Masirah channel: “The Egyptian people are well aware of the reality of the fascist and treacherous regime in Cairo. This illegitimate and authoritarian regime has become a primary partner in the genocide against our people in Gaza.” He called on the Egyptian and Palestinian masses to “rebel and resist the Camp David regime.”

We call for an international campaign and various forms of popular pressure on the Egyptian regime to open the Rafah crossing and allow the entry of medicine, food, and water for the Palestinian people, especially during the winter season, when people are being killed by bombs, starvation, and disease. Patients are also deprived of receiving treatment abroad, while the Israeli enemy systematically and daily destroys the health, food, education, and environmental systems in the besieged Gaza Strip.

Barakat added: “The generals’ regime in Egypt violates international law, fails to fulfill its obligations and responsibilities, and does not adhere to the recognized international conventions signed by the Egyptian state. It is complicit in war crimes and treats Gaza as a cash cow, exploiting our people’s needs and stealing large sums of money from Palestinians while suppressing the Egyptian people and preventing them from expressing solidarity with the Palestinian people.”

The Masar Badil Movement calls upon solidarity forces with the Palestinian people to participate in a broad popular and international campaign to be launched in the coming days, aimed at stopping the Israeli genocide and forcing the Egyptian regime to allow the entry of humanitarian aid to Palestinians in Gaza and to open the Rafah crossing without restrictions or conditions.”

To participate in the campaign, please contact the movement via the following email: info@masarbadil.org

1 December 2024

Source: masarbadil.org

Masar Badil: The Zionist enemy retreats in the face of the will of the Resistance and the steadfastness of its people in Lebanon

Masar Badil movement: The Zionist Enemy Retreats in the Face of the Will of the Resistance and the Steadfastness of its People in Lebanon

The Executive Committee of the Masar Badil, the Palestinian Alternative Revolutionary Path Movement, confirmed in its regular meeting today, Thursday, November 28, 2024, that the heroic Islamic Resistance in Lebanon, supported by its popular cradle and the resistance camp in the region, won the “Battle of the Mighty Ones” when it thwarted the goals of the Zionist-U.S. aggression and forced the enemy army to retreat in the face of the steadfastness and valor of the Mujahideen, and the dedication of the loyal and patient popular cradle that was determined to follow in the path of the martyrs, the wounded and its Secretary-General and leader, the martyr Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah. They remained, and remain, confident of achieving the promised victory, the steadfastness of the resistance, and the truth of its honorable compass that points to Jerusalem on the path of liberation and return, and towards a liberated Palestine from the river to the sea.

The Zionist enemy and its allies, which wanted to eliminate and crush the resistance and its leadership in Lebanon, and remove it from its path in order to ensure U.S., Western and Zionist hegemony over the region under the slogan of the “New Middle East,” and to uproot Hezbollah by force, destruction, assassinations and massacres, have not reaped anything but disappointment, defeat and failure, and a handful of dust and illusions,  after their criminal aggression. The reliance on these imperialist powers by some local and regional forces has also failed and their conspiracies have been shattered in the face of the facts on the ground and the steadfastness and strength of the resistance in all arenas of confrontation.

The Masar Badil movement reiterates its respect and highest appreciation for the sacrifices of the Lebanese people, the resistance and its leadership, which has gained the respect of the peoples when it once again presented a living and shining lesson to all liberation movements in the world, and a revolutionary model of the ability of the armed popular forces to seize historical achievements and defeat the forces of colonialism, occupation and fascism, despite all obstacles. It also emphasized the ability of the armed resistance to protect the people’s resources, capacities, dignity and sovereignty over their homeland.

The movement warns of the malicious conspiracies being hatched in secret and in public against the resistance in Palestine, Lebanon, Yemen, Iraq and Syria, especially the policies of lies and deception practiced by the war criminal Netanyahu and his criminal racist entity with U.S. cover, and with the complicity of the client regimes and reactionary forces affiliated with Washington inside and outside the Arab nation.

The Masar Badil calls for unity and solidarity of the Arab and Islamic resistance fronts and their popular forces everywhere in the region, and to continue confrontation of the Zionist occupation and the unceasing genocidal aggression of the Zionist enemy against our people in occupied Palestine, especially in the steadfast Gaza Strip. The Masar also calls upon our Arab and Islamic peoples and international solidarity movements to firmly support the Palestinian resistance, which has amazed friend and enemy alike with its steadfastness and creativity, and has protected the Palestinian people, their rights and the Palestinian cause itself from being erased and liquidated.

28 November 2024

Source: masarbadil.org

Myanmar activist finds ICC Prosecutor’s arrest request insufficient for Rohingya Muslims

Myanmar activist finds ICC Prosecutor’s arrest request insufficient for Rohingya Muslims

By Selman Aksünger

Myanmar human rights activist and genocide expert Maung Zarni said the ICC Prosecutor’s request for the arrest of the leader of the Myanmar military government was positive but insufficient for the return of Rohingya Muslims to their homeland.

Myanmar human rights activist and genocide expert Maung Zarni said the arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for Myanmar military leader Min Aung Hlaing was a positive step.

Zarni said the arrest warrant for a single general was not enough to ensure the safe return of more than one million Rohingya Muslims to their ancestral lands and the rebuilding of their society.

Three basic conditions of true justice

Zarni, who stated that he does not think that real justice for the Rohingya Muslims will be achieved with just an arrest request, said, “If we are looking for real justice for the victims of genocide, it is not enough to try one, two or even half a dozen military leaders who have command responsibilities. Justice for the Rohingya Muslims is not just about imprisoning a few high-ranking commanders who carried out the genocide.”

Zarni listed three basic conditions for justice for the Rohingya Muslims, saying, “First, the safe return to their ancestral lands in Northern Arakan, then the opportunity to reclaim their lands and then rebuild their communities, lives, schools, hospitals, businesses and mosques in safety. These three basic elements will enable them to rebuild their economies, societies and other cultural and intellectual institutions.”

Zarni, who drew attention to the fact that genocide was carried out by the state, said, “Crimes against humanity and genocides are usually committed by political states and regimes using the army, paramilitary groups, militia groups, law enforcement forces and even the legal system. The situation of the Rohingya Muslims is a situation that could be a textbook example of genocide.”

Zarni assessed the role of the leader of the Myanmar military government, General Min Aung Hlaing, whose arrest request was made by the ICC, saying, “He is the Milosevic of Myanmar, the Netanyahu of Myanmar. In 2017, in the midst of all the killings, mass rapes, massacres and destructions of his army in Rakhine State, he famously addressed the military and the people in his speech saying that the existence of the Rohingya Muslims, their lives and their presence on Myanmar soil was ‘unfinished business’ from World War II. Thus, he clearly gave the signal to finish this unfinished business. The genocide was the means to do this. General Min should be seen as evil, racist, violent and genocidal as Netanyahu.”

“The genocide has been going on since the 1970s”

Drawing attention to the institutional dimension of the genocide rather than the individual accountability of those with command responsibility, Zarni noted the following:

“The mass deportation of one million Rohingya Muslims in six months to two years is a mass crime, but the institutional oppression of Rohingya Muslims dates back to the 1970s. That’s why we call it ‘gradual genocide.’ What the ICC prosecutor did is positive and I sincerely support it, but we should not confuse law with justice.”

Zarni said that genocide crimes are usually committed by states with the support of racist societies, adding, “The Nazi regime’s genocide against Jews and other minorities was carried out with the support of the German people. Myanmar Buddhist society has also entered the realm of genocidal racism. I have not seen any sincere change, even from the so-called democratic revolutionaries, that they are ready to accept Rohingya Muslims as people of Myanmar.”

Zarni, who also criticized the ICC’s approach, said: “It is worrying that the court waited 5 years to request the arrest of a single Myanmar general. It is positive that an arrest warrant was issued for Netanyahu and Gallant 6 days ago. I commend the court and prosecutors for this bold step. I support them trying the Myanmar general as well, but justice for the Rohingya Muslims must go beyond what the court can provide.”

“Social prejudices continue”

Zarni explained the two main obstacles to Rohingya Muslims’ return:

“The first obstacle is Myanmar society. Different ethnic groups, different religions, mainstream Buddhists and even some Myanmar Muslims have been led to believe that Rohingya Muslims do not belong there. They were propagandized that they came as seasonal agricultural workers during the British period and stayed in the country after the British left. This propaganda, produced by the Myanmar military, was accepted by political parties and leaders, including Aung San Suu Kyi, priests and other ethnic minorities.”

Zarni said that some groups that want democracy, federal autonomy and human rights are not ready to accept that Rohingya Muslims are subject to the same rights. He added, “In order for this internal obstacle to change, all Myanmar opinion leaders, journalists, educators and revolutionary leaders need to come together and say, ‘We accept Rohingya Muslims back, they are part of our society, they are our brothers.’ But this is not happening.”

Zarni said that the second obstacle to the Rohingya Muslims returning to their homeland is the lack of an active role by the international community, adding, “Since 2016-2017, one million Rohingya Muslims who were forcibly removed from their country have not been provided with the necessary protection in neighboring countries, including Bangladesh. Bangladesh describes them as ‘forcibly displaced persons from Myanmar’. No, they are victims of genocide and Rohingya refugees under the refugee convention.”

“The Arakan Army is also racist”

Zarni, who explained that the state of Rakhine is under the control of the Arakan Army, one of the armed rebel groups fighting with the army in Myanmar, said, “The lands of the Rohingya Muslims are currently under the control of the armed militia called the ‘Arakan Army’. The Arakan Army has repeatedly shown that it is equally racist, genocidal and violent towards the Rohingya Muslims.”

Zarni stated that as a solution proposal, the Rohingya Muslims should be given refugee status and then an inter-state conference should be held where Turkey, China, India and other regional countries come together. He said, “The sole focus of the conference should be the voluntary return of the Rohingya Muslims to their homes. This should happen with the international protection force to be formed by Bangladesh, India, China, Thailand and other ASEAN countries.”

Stating that the military and administrative situation in Myanmar is suitable for international intervention, Zarni said, “The intervention of not all 198 UN member states but only a few neighboring countries that are important for the Myanmar army is sufficient. India, China, Thailand and Bangladesh in particular should come together. Bangladesh currently carries the biggest burden with one million Rohingya Muslim refugees on its soil.”

Selman is a PhD candidate at Maastricht University. His research concerns the impact of sea-level rise on a displaced nation’s sovereignty rights over natural resources.

29 November 2024

Take Your Symbolic International Solidarity Day and Give Us back Our Land and Our Rights

True Solidarity with Palestine Demands Concrete Actions

In 1977, the United Nations declared 29 November to be the International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People. In doing so, the UN conflated solidarity with Palestinians with the date of the adoption of the UN Partition Plan for Palestine, a colonial resolution that contributed to creating the very reasons why Palestine solidarity is needed in the first place.

The UN Partition Plan, adopted 29 November 1947, aimed to give 56 percent of Mandatory Palestine to Zionist colonizers for a Jewish state, although they made up around 32 percent of the population of Palestine—following decades of illegal migration and implantation facilitated by the British Mandate—and owned 7 percent of the land of Palestine. Thereby, the UN, led by western colonial states, not only endorsed Zionist colonial aspirations in Palestine, but lent “Israel” international legitimacy even prior to its creation in 1948. The Partition Plan disregarded Palestinian self-determination and blatantly demanded that the Palestinian people capitulate to and approve of their own colonization. During the 1948 Nakba, Zionist militias, with the support of colonial states, executed the Partition Plan and beyond, colonizing 78 percent of Mandatory Palestine and forcibly displacing 65 percent of the Palestinian people.

The UN’s actions effectively set the stage for the years of Israeli impunity, global inaction and western colonial complicity that would follow to this day. After the signing of the Oslo Accords, partition morphed into the so-called two-state solution and the accompanying state-building paradigm, which only served to further legitimize and entrench Israeli colonial domination. Furthermore, the failure to properly address the root causes (colonization, apartheid and forced displacement and transfer) has led to the latest manifestation of Israeli colonialism: the genocide of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. This genocide is not an aberration but the continuation of the ongoing Nakba. “Israel” is a colonial-apartheid regime that, by its very nature, requires the elimination of the Palestinian people to sustain itself, as well as ensuring that colonizers maintain privileges at the expense of the native population. The international community was passively and actively liable when Zionist militias carried out massacres and displaced over 750,000 Palestinians to create “Israel”, and remains complicit as “Israel” carries out its ongoing genocide, so far killing at least 43,391 and injuring more than 102,347 Palestinians.

Furthermore, as “Israel” passes two laws banning UNRWA—the only mandated and most capable organization providing aid and support in the Gaza Strip amid a genocide—the UN and states have only responded with weak statements of concern and condemnations. Colonial states, particularly the United States, have taken no steps to end their complicity or pressure “Israel” to stop its campaign against UNRWA. Instead, they persist in reaffirming their unconditional support for the Israeli colonial-apartheid regime. States’ failure to protect UNRWA not only contributes to “Israel’s” aim to liquidate the Palestinian refugee issue, but also violates their obligations to take every practical measure to protect the Agency, and ensure its ability to fulfill its mandate, as per UNGA Resolution 194, until Palestinian refugees return.

77 years since the signing of the Plan, our demands extend beyond a symbolic day of solidarity. Real solidarity requires addressing the root causes, supporting Palestinian resistance and liberation, and ensuring the right to return and to self-determination, in order to achieve the ultimate dismantlement of the Israeli colonial-apartheid regime.

Therefore, we call on the international community—states, international organizations, including the UN, as well as non-profits and the private sector—to take decisive, concrete actions to impose a ceasefire in Gaza and Lebanon, protect UNRWA and Palestinian refugee rights, and until the decolonization of Palestine. This includes recognizing “Israel” as a colonial-apartheid regime, providing support to the Palestinian liberation movement, and implementing the full spectrum of sanctions against “Israel”, i.e., economic, political, and military. Any other “solution” is insufficient and insulting to the Palestinian people and principles of justice.

28 November 2024

Source: badil.org

Pakistan: A Revolution That’s Not Being Televised

By Junaid S Ahmad

November 24th was designated as the global day of protest for the release of former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, who has been imprisoned by the Pakistani military and political elites since August of 2023. It was a day of solidarity with the brutalized, tortured, and imprisoned tens of thousands of Pakistanis associated with Khan’s Movement for Justice (PTI) and those who opposed the current military-with-a-civilian-facade regime. Despite a complete lockdown, with roadblocks being ubiquitous, as well as trigger-happy militarized security forces, there have been massive demonstrations against the regime across Pakistan, culminating in marching towards the capital, Islamabad. Rallies and protests of Pakistanis and human rights activists are taking place in Washington, New York, London, Paris, Barcelona, Istanbul, and many other cities across the world.

The demands of the Movement for Justice are the following:
1) Immediate release of Imran Khan and the end of farcical and politically-motivated charges and cases.
2) Immediate release of the tens of thousands of PTI activists imprisoned.
3) A recognition of the election results of February of this year, wherein Khan’s PTI handily won the most seats in Parliament – so that PTI would get its rightful place of governing the country.
4) The end of interference from the military establishment in the political life of the country

Over the past twenty-four hours, there is a lot to be said and celebrated. Despite severe repression, Pakistanis have exploded in revolt throughout the country. From all corners of the nation, people are all marching towards here in Islamabad. The capital has been converted into an outright fortress with the regime having imported thousands upon thousands of containers and buses to be used as roadblocks. The courage of ordinary Pakistanis in confronting a fascist state with trigger-happy militarized security forces is simply awe-inspiring. We are seeing the only real enemy our pathetic military establishment is willing to confront: its own people.

There is much more to say. But for now, three things:

1) Whether one likes former Prime Minister Imran Khan or not, it’s difficult to think of a contemporary political leader who could mobilize such massive demonstrations in literally every corner of the world. From Tokyo to Kuala Lumpur to Johannesburg to Istanbul to Athens to Barcelona to Manchester to Dublin to New York to Atlanta to Chicago to Houston and to roughly sixty-five other cities in the world (the latest count) – this has really been surreal. When thinking of individual political leaders who would be able to attract such unrelenting global protests of solidarity and support, one thinks of Mandela, Castro, Nasser. Perhaps I’m missing something because of getting caught up in the sheer magnitude of the worldwide scale these protests have assumed.

2) What happened in Pakistan in April of 2022 will go down as one of the most reckless and ill-conceived regime change operations in history. As I’ve stated before in interviews and writings below, it’s probably not a good idea to target the most popular and beloved – for at least the past three decades – national icon. The Biden Administration and the generals in Islamabad have made a martyr out of Khan, have miraculously transformed him from arguably just a moderate reformer to a full-blown revolutionary in the eyes of the people!

3) Can we imagine what the response would be if these were both nationwide and worldwide demonstrations, on this scale, against totalitarian repression of political prisoners and dissidents in Iran, Russia, China, Cuba, Venezuela, etc.? We would be seeing 24-7 coverage on ALL of the major media outlets, probably not even taking a pause to cover an inauguration of a new US President. Here we have the beginnings of a revolution in a country with the fifth largest population in the world, fifth largest military, nuclear-armed, and virtual silence. It can barely elicit a paragraph in Reuters or the AP. If ever there was an example of the skewed – to put it mildly – imperial ideology of the media and the intelligentsia, this is it. Just as with the Zionist genocide in Gaza, they are also complicit in enabling now over two years of one of the most fascistic totalitarian phases in Pakistan’s history.

Below are useful links to some of the scenes over the past 24 hours, to recent (Western media) interviews (on Breakthrough News, Useful Idiots, Flashpoints, etc.), some of my recent articles (for context), and images of the uprising. I’m indebted to my students who are also bravely participating in, and covering, this popular revolt. I had also sent something briefly below to give some context to Nov. 24th being global Khan/Movement for Justice mobilization and solidarity day.

[https://twitter.com/DropSiteNews/status/1860764956993503283]

[https://twitter.com/PTIOfficialUSA/status/1860791219774722429]

[https://twitter.com/TRTWorldNow/status/1860918840580006140]

[https://twitter.com/Ali_Mustafa/status/1860759746568962414]

[https://twitter.com/PTIOfficialUSA/status/1860730315276214543]

[https://twitter.com/HarmeetSinghPk/status/1832411101990158722]

Video:

Pakistan’s Power Struggle, w/ Junaid Ahmad

Pakistan’s Protests for Gaza Are Reigniting Its Fight Against US-Backed Military Rule

Shock in Pakistan: US-Backed Military Losing Grip

Exposed: US Backed regime change in Pakistan

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/watch-former-pakistan-pm-imran-khans-supporters-protest-in-over-60-locations-worldwide/amp_articleshow/115643984.cms
https://apnews.com/article/pakistan-imran-khan-rally-cellphone suspension-415227ef93b710798dedbc6c9f8ac2a5
https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2022/11/08/assassination-imran-khan-pakistan-us-coup/
https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2023/03/15/pakistan-coup-regime-arrest-imran-khan/
https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2023/05/22/arrest-imran-khan-pakistan-regime/
https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/pakistan-imran-khan-shooting-tipping-point-reached
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20240202-bidens-generals-in-pakistan/
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20240213-khan-v-the-generals/
https://countercurrents.org/2024/09/unworthy-victims-pakistani-women-confronting-state-terror/
https://countercurrents.org/2024/11/antagonistic-and-irreconcilable-contradictions-and-the-future-of-imran-khans-movement-for-justice/
https://muslimviews.co.za/antagonistic-and-irreconcilable-contradictions-within-imran-khans-movement-for-justice/

Junaid S Ahmad, Professor of Law, Religion, and Global Politics. Director, Center for the Study of Islam and Decolonization (CSID), Islamabad, Pakistan

25 November 2024

Source: countercurrents.org

Peru’s Choices Between a New Deep-Water Port and Used Metro Cars

By Vijay Prashad

Between November 15 and 16, 2024, the government of Peru hosted the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum. This 21-country gathering that first started in 1989 brings together the major countries in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) with the major countries that ring the Pacific Ocean, including the United States and China. There was nothing dramatic at the APEC forum itself, whose Machu Picchu Declaration could have been written at any of the previous forums. There is one sentence in the Declaration that was of interest: “Unprecedented and rapid changes continue to shape the world today.” However, the governments could not elaborate on that sentence given their different views on those changes. Even though the meeting itself did not articulate the “rapid changes,” events outside the meeting in Lima made the nature of these changes very clear.

Used Metro Cars

The U. S. President Joe Biden came to APEC with a rather odd selection of offerings. Standing beside Peru’s President Dina Boluarte, Biden announced that the United States is pleased to donate 150 passenger cars and locomotives to the Lima Metro system. This would ordinarily have been a very welcome announcement. However, there was something in that announcement that did not sit well: the cars and locomotives were not new but were used in the Caltrain system. The U.S. government had previously thought of selling them to Peru but then hastened to make this a donation instead.

New goods did come to Peru, but these were not for civilian use. The United States provided Peru with nine Black Hawk helicopters (about $65 million paid to Sikorsky Aircraft by the U.S. taxpayers). These helicopters are to be used against drug traffickers, but there is no guarantee that the Peruvian government will not use them against its citizens. Along the grain of these military helicopters, the U.S. military provided security for the APEC summit, despite the fact that the Peruvian military has shown itself quite capable of managing a summit of this scale.

A Port for South America

Two hours north of Lima, along the wonderful coastline of Peru, sits Chancay, a coastal town famous for being a staging point in the War of the Pacific (1879-1884) between Chile and Peru. What used to be a quiet town is now a major port. In a joint venture, the Peruvian company Volcan Compañí Minera S.A.A. owns 40 percent of the port, while COSCO Shipping Ports of China holds the remaining 60 percent. COSCO is a state-owned enterprise that already owns a part of one port on the Pacific Ocean’s American coastline, in Seattle, Washington.

The Chinese invested $3.6 billion in the Peruvian project, which began in 2021 and is near completion. The deepest part of the port will be 17.8 meters, which will allow it to berth the very large cargo ships that have a capacity of 18,000 TEUs (Twenty-foot Equivalent Units, the standard measurement for the capacity of cargo ships); the largest cargo ship is the MSC Irina, built in China, with a capacity of 24,346 TEUs. During the APEC summit, Presidents Xi Jinping of China and Boluarte of Peru inaugurated the port.

The Chancay port will be complemented by a train line that the Chinese will build that runs from the port into Brazil’s state of Amazonas to the Free Economic Zone within the city of Manaus. Trade between South America and China will be direct and will not need to be transshipped through Central or North America. Shipping time will be drastically reduced, making trade more profitable at both ends. Initially, the port will be a boon for agricultural products (avocados, blueberries, coffee, and cacao). Eventually, though, the Peruvian government hopes to build industrial zones in the hinterland of the port to process these products, including timber, and ensure that value-added gains remain in Peru. One example, the Ancon Industrial Park, is already on the books and will be developed next year. A study of the project by Peruvian scholars expects to see gains for Peru and the rest of South America within a few years.

Investment or Insecurity

The United States tried to shut down Chinese investment in Peru. In 2020, the United States was able to shut out Chinese investment from La Unión port in El Salvador. No such pressure was possible on the Peruvian government, despite its military links to the United States. Last year, retired U.S. General Laura J. Richardson, then head of Southern Command, expressed her views about the Chinese investments to the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington: “I’d like to say what the PRC is doing—the People’s Republic of China—looks to be investment, but really I call it extraction, at the end of the day. And I say that it’s in the red zone, just to use… an analogy there. They’re on the 20-yard line to our homeland. Or, we could say that they’re on the first and second island chain to our homeland. And the proximity in terms of this region and the importance of the region, I think that we have to truly appreciate what this region brings, and the security challenges that these countries face.”

The United States tried to make the investment about security, but for Latin American countries, this was an investment. When asked about the port, Peru’s former finance minister Alex Contreras told the Financial Times that “any investment is welcome in a region which has an enormous investment deficit. If you have to choose between no investment and Chinese investment, you will always prefer investment.”

At the G20 meeting in Brazil after the APEC summit, Xi Jinping returned to the theme of the Belt and Road Initiative. China, he said, “will always be a member of the Global South, a reliable long-term partner of fellow developing countries.” From the standpoint of Peru, the port it built did not look like a security threat. It looked instead like development.

Vijay Prashad is an Indian historian, editor, and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Globetrotter.

26 November 2024

Source: countercurrents.org

Palestinian Surgeon Brutalized before Being Killed in Israeli Prison, Says Eyewitness

By Sky News/Middle East Eye

15 Nov 2024

“He had clearly been assaulted with injuries around his body. He was naked in the lower part of his body. The prison guard threw him in the middle of the yard and left him there.”

Sky News has reported new details about the events leading up to the death of Palestinian surgeon Dr Adnan al-Bursh, based on testimony from an inmate at the Israeli prison where he died. During the Israeli military’s siege of al-Shifa Hospital, Bursh was detained and eventually taken to Ofer Prison, where he was reportedly beaten and tortured to the extent that he could not go to the bathroom unaided. His death was quietly announced, with the Israeli military denying any responsibility. In a statement, the Israel Prison Service also denied any involvement in the doctor’s death.

Video:

Palestinian surgeon ‘assaulted’ before death in Israeli prison, says eyewitness

New testimony claims to reveal the moments that led to death of Gaza doctor

25 November 2024

Source: transcend.org