Just International

ICC Rejects Israel’s Request to Cancel Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant

By Quds News Network

The Hague (Quds News Network)- The International Criminal Court (ICC) has rejected Israel’s attempt to cancel arrest warrants issued against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. The decision was announced on tod by Pre-Trial Chamber I.

Israel had asked the ICC to withdraw or invalidate the warrants. It also called on the Court to suspend its investigation into crimes committed in Palestine. A senior Israeli legal team submitted the request on May 9, 2025.

But the ICC judges ruled that the arrest warrants remain valid. The judges said the Court had the legal authority to issue them. They rejected Israel’s claim that the warrants violated the suspects’ human rights or international law.

“The warrants include valid jurisdictional findings,” the judges stated. They also said that reversing a procedural ruling earlier this year did not affect the legal foundation of the warrants.

The ruling also clarified another key point. Israel wanted the ICC to pause its investigation until a final decision is made on jurisdiction. The Court refused.

Under Article 19(7) of the Rome Statute, an investigation can be suspended if a state challenges the admissibility of a case. But Israel only challenged the Court’s jurisdiction, not the admissibility. Therefore, the ICC said the investigation will go on.

The Chamber noted that only admissibility challenges can halt investigations. Jurisdictional challenges, it ruled, do not carry the same effect.

Palestine had asked to submit its own observations on Israel’s request. But the Court said it already had enough information and declined to hear additional arguments from the Palestinian side at this stage.

The decision marks a major step in the ICC’s ongoing investigation into Israeli war crimes in the occupied Palestinian territories. The Court began the investigation in 2021 and issued the arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant in November 2024.

Israel does not recognize the Court’s jurisdiction. However, the ICC has ruled that it has legal authority over the territories occupied by Israel since 1967; Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem.

The ICC’s investigation focuses on crimes committed since June 13, 2014.

Despite mounting political pressure, the Court reaffirmed its position. The investigation will move forward, and the arrest warrants remain active.

17 July 2025

Source: countercurrents.org

“By Way of Deception”: Mossad’s Duplicity and Washington’s Complicity

By Rima Najjar

How Mossad’s spyware, America’s silence, and the weaponization of loyalty expose a crisis in alliance, narrative, and justice

Despite billions in military aid, cutting-edge technological support, and unflinching diplomatic shielding, the United States is routinely surveilled by the very ally it sustains. Through Mossad, Israel reciprocates not with loyalty but with layered espionage — described by former CIA operative Andrew Bustamante as gifts laced with spyware and collaboration steeped in distrust. For many Americans, this moral asymmetry cuts against the intuitive link between generosity and allegiance.

In a now-viral segment of Julian Dorey’s Podcast #224, Bustamante recounts how Mossad would offer the CIA “presents” — usually tech or intelligence tools — routinely embedded with spyware. The anecdote isn’t exceptional; it’s emblematic. Mossad’s ethos, shaped by a Zionist statecraft that privileges domination over accountability, is unapologetic: deception over transparency, survival over solidarity, interests over alliances. Its guiding credo, “By way of deception, thou shalt do war,” isn’t rhetorical flourish. It’s a tactical doctrine where manipulation is sacred, ethical boundaries expendable, and strategic betrayal, even of benefactors, fully normalized.

While the CIA navigates diplomatic constraint and executive oversight, Mossad operates with doctrinal autonomy. The asymmetry is both operational and philosophical, and it reverberates negatively against Palestinians through policymaking, intelligence norms, and the moral language of alliance.

The asymmetry at the heart of the U.S.–Israel alliance — where unconditional aid meets strategic betrayal — is not a diplomatic fluke. It’s structural. Mossad’s ethos of deception, embedded in Zionist doctrine, offers a blueprint for unaccountable power: surveillance recast as partnership, aggression disguised as preemption. And U.S. policy doesn’t just tolerate this calculus — it amplifies it.

Take the 2021 Iron Dome funding debate. Despite evidence that the system shielded bombing campaigns in Gaza, lawmakers across the aisle framed it as a humanitarian imperative, divorced from on-the-ground realities. U.S.–Israel intelligence collaboration, including joint surveillance tools and biometric databases, has empowered Shin Bet’s predictive policing — marking Palestinian youth as preemptive threats based on algorithmic suspicion.

Mossad’s operations targeting U.S. diplomats or breaching counterintelligence norms are met with silence — not for lack of evidence, but because the alliance is sacrosanct. Within this schema, deception is valorized as strategic brilliance. The result: policy frameworks that privilege impunity over principle, alliance over accountability, and erasure over evidence.

Zionist statecraft doesn’t limit deception to espionage. It encodes it into the very architecture of governance. In Gaza, Israel’s doctrine of “mowing the lawn” — a euphemism for routine mass bombardment — reframes civilian annihilation as counterterrorism. The 2024 ICJ ruling that Israel’s occupation of Gaza, East Jerusalem, and the West Bank is illegal was met with escalated settlement expansion and settler militia violence, especially in Area C. These militias, often armed and protected, displace Palestinian shepherds and Bedouin communities under the guise of “security zones.” Western diplomatic cover transforms ethnic cleansing into a strategic imperative.

Such logic has precedent. The Balfour Declaration of 1917 and the Ha’avara Agreement with Nazi Germany exemplify how Zionist institutions have historically leveraged imperial power to entrench colonial dominance. Today, the pattern persists — this time through the U.S., enabling Israel’s impunity via normalized apartheid. Land seizures, movement restrictions, and denial of citizenship are branded as defensive maneuvers against a population rendered suspect by design. In this matrix, security is no longer protection — it is pretext. Realpolitik is not pragmatism — it’s the ideological lubricant for a project of erasure.

Israel’s impunity is insulated not just by military superiority or diplomatic muscle, but also by narrative armor. It re-codes transgression as necessity, dominance as defense. This ideological scaffolding leans heavily on Holocaust memory, existential anxiety, and the language of perpetual threat. Israel, as it professes to the world, does not merely defend itself — it defends “civilization” against barbarism. In this schema, preemptive strikes, indefinite detentions, and siege warfare are rebranded as moral imperatives.

Consider Mossad’s extrajudicial assassinations — across sovereign states from Lebanon to Malaysia. Rarely condemned, they’re framed as tactical genius, immortalized in Hollywood, and repackaged as heroic innovation. The logic: Israeli violence is uniquely legible, rooted in historical trauma and the burden of Jewish survival. Meanwhile, Palestinian resistance — regardless of its alignment with international anti-colonial norms — is treated as structurally illegitimate.

More insidiously, Zionist exceptionalism weaponizes the language of liberal democracy to obscure apartheid. Israel brands itself “the only democracy in the Middle East” while imposing dual legal regimes: one for Jewish settlers, another for Palestinians under occupation. Anti-Semitism discourse is instrumentalized to collapse critique of Israeli policy into hatred of Jewish people. This isn’t accidental — it’s tactical. It recasts settler colonialism as a civilizational crusade, where indigenous erasure becomes a sacred necessity.

In intelligence, this logic mirrors Mossad’s playbook: deceive, distort, dominate — not in defiance of moral codes, but in their name. Spyware-laced “gifts,” institutional infiltration, and normalization of double agency are strategic affirmations of a sacred mission. Subversion is sanctified — deception, a birthright.

The U.S. response to Mossad’s tactics isn’t shaped by ignorance. Americans working in tech are aware that Israeli industrial actors not only conduct corporate espionage frequently, but when suspected and reported, US agencies routinely refuse to investigate and prosecute flagrant incidents happening right under their noses, even when they acknowledge them. Israel’s supposed tech innovations in surveillance, monitoring, and data processing are almost never of Israeli origin.

This is because American foreign policy reflects ideological alignment with Israel guided by beliefs that frame power as virtue. Through exceptionalism, the U.S. views itself as morally superior and selectively applies standards of accountability. Liberal hegemony drives efforts to remake the world in its image, promoting democracy and markets through military and diplomatic dominance. Coupled with a commitment to military primacy, these ideologies filter which actions are condemned, and which are excused. This framework makes criticism of allies like Israel politically off-limits.

These US ideological blinders find a parallel in Zionist exceptionalism, a belief system that frames Israel as uniquely entitled to moral and political legitimacy regardless of its actions. Zionist exceptionalism positions Israeli identity as singularly virtuous or historically burdened, allowing its violence to be rationalized while Palestinian resistance is pathologized. Through this lens, institutions — from media to academia — internalize and reproduce a hierarchy of legitimacy that shields Israeli conduct from scrutiny and casts Palestinian survival as suspect:

· Media Framing

Western news outlets routinely sanitize Israeli violence. Airstrikes on Gaza become “clashes,” settler pogroms morph into “tensions,” and apartheid infrastructure is relabeled as “security measures.” Palestinian death tolls are framed as collateral, not structural. When Pegasus spyware infiltrates journalists’ devices, the story is tech anomaly — not political scandal. This reframing immunizes Israel from the condemnation reserved for other regimes.

· Academic Gatekeeping

In elite institutions, Palestine is cordoned into conflict studies or security modules, where strategy is foregrounded and ethics obscured. Pro-Israel funding shapes hiring, grants, and symposia — curbing inquiry. Palestinian scholars face visa barriers, censorship, and academic isolation. Epistemic sovereignty itself becomes suspect. The unspoken rule: only certain voices may speak on occupation.

· Diplomatic Shielding

Despite mounting documentation — UN reports, ICC investigations, human rights testimonies — Israel evades accountability. U.S. vetoes act as firewall. Joint intelligence agreements elevate Mossad as a strategic partner, even amid exposed deception. The irony is brutal: the very tools of international law and diplomacy are weaponized to preserve Zionist impunity.

The network of global complicity described above doesn’t just excuse asymmetry — it operationalizes it. Mossad’s espionage becomes cleverness; Israeli apartheid is cast as pragmatism; Palestinian survival is treated as threat.

Challenging U.S. indulgence is not an editorial choice — it is a geopolitical imperative. To confront Zionist impunity, we must dismantle the narratives that sustain it. That means building systems where Palestinian testimony, memory, and resistance are treated not as exceptional — but as authoritative. It means decoupling legitimacy from militarized alliances, and redefining security not as domination, but as dignity.

This is a moral reckoning. It demands stripping espionage of glamour, exposing diplomacy’s complicity, and confronting the ideological machinery that enables betrayal. In doing so, we don’t merely name the asymmetry — we reject it. We counter it with frameworks of accountability, transparency, and liberation — rewriting the script that has too long cast domination as Palestine’s destiny. That script is over.

Rima Najjar is a Palestinian whose father’s side of the family comes from the forcibly depopulated village of Lifta on the western outskirts of Jerusalem and whose mother’s side of the family is from Ijzim, south of Haifa.

16 July 2025

Source: countercurrents.org

At Hague Group Emergency Summit, 30+ Nations Seek to ‘Halt the Genocide in Gaza’

By Brett Wilkins

Ministerial delegates from more than 30 nations gathered in the Colombian capital Bogotá Tuesday for an emergency summit focused on “concrete measures” to end Israel’s U.S.-backed genocide in Gaza and other crimes against occupied Palestine.

The two-day Hague Group summit ultimately aims to “halt the genocide in Gaza” and sois led by co-chairs Colombia—which last year severed diplomatic relations with Israel—and South Africa, which filed the ongoing genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) joined by around two dozen countries. Progressive International first convened the Hague Group in January in the eponymous Dutch city, which is home to both the ICJ and International Criminal Court (ICC), whose rulings the coalition is dedicated to upholding.

“This summit marks a turning point in the global response to the erosion and violation of international law,” South African Minister of International Relations and Cooperation Ronald Lamola said ahead of the gathering. “No country is above the law, and no crime will go unanswered.”

Colombian Deputy Foreign Minister Mauricio Jaramillo Jassir said before the summit: “The Palestinian genocide threatens the entire international system. Colombia cannot remain indifferent in the face of apartheid and ethnic cleansing. The participating states will not only reaffirm their commitment to opposing genocide, but also formulate concrete steps to move from words to collective action.”

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfZXQK01t-Q]

That action includes enforcement of ICC arrest warrants issued last year for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant, his former defense minister, for alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza including murder and forced starvation in a war that has left more than 211,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing since October 2023, according to the Gaza Health Ministry.

Hague Group members Bolivia, Cuba, Honduras, Malaysia, Namibia, and Senegal will attend the summit. Algeria, Bangladesh, Botswana, Brazil, Chile, China, Djibouti, Indonesia, Iraq, Ireland, Lebanon, Libya, Mexico, Nicaragua, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Qatar, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Uruguay, and Venezuela will also take part.

Notably, so will NATO members and U.S. allies Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, and Turkey. Like Israel, the United States denies there is a genocide in Gaza, despite growing international consensus among human rights defenders, jurists, and genocide experts including some of the leading Holocaust scholars in Israel and the United States.

A spokesperson for the U.S. State Department—which has sanctioned ICC judges and United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories Francesca Albanese for seeking accountability for Israeli crimes—told Jewish News Syndicate Monday that the United States “strongly opposes efforts by so-called ‘multilateral blocs’ to weaponize international law as a tool to advance radical anti-Western agendas.”

The spokesperson added that the Trump administration “will aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic warfare,” even as U.S. allies take part in the summit.

Undaunted by U.S. sanctions, Albanese is among several U.N. experts who spoke at the summit, which she hailed as “the most significant political development in the past 20 months.”

[https://twitter.com/ProgIntl/status/1945186308013359484]

In prepared remarks, Albanese—who earlier this month said that “Israel is responsible for one of the cruelest genocides in modern history”—told attendees that “for too long, international law has been treated as optional—applied selectively to those perceived as weak, ignored by those acting as the powerful.”

“This double standard has eroded the very foundations of the legal order,” she argued. “That era must end.”

According to Albanese:

The world will remember what we, states and individuals, did in this moment—whether we recoiled in fear or rose in defense of human dignity. Here in Bogotá, a growing number of states have the opportunity to break the silence and revert to a path of legality by finally saying: Enough. Enough impunity. Enough empty rhetoric. Enough exceptionalism. Enough complicity. The time has come to act in pursuit of justice and peace—grounded in rights and freedoms for all, and not mere privileges for some, at the expense of the annihilation of others.

The Israeli Mission to the United Nations told Jewish News Syndicate that “what the event organizers, and perhaps some of the countries attending, forget is what triggered this conflict—namely, the butchering of 1,200 innocent souls on October 7, and how 50 Israelis remain in brutal captivity to this day by Hamas in Gaza.”

“Attempting to exert pressure on Israel—and not Hamas, who initiated and are prolonging this conflict—is a moral travesty,” the mission added. “The war will not end while hostages remain in Gaza.”

In addition to the ICC warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant, the ICJ—whose ruling in the genocide case is not expected for years—has ordered Israel to prevent genocidal acts in Gaza, to stop blocking lifesaving humanitarian aid from entering the strip, and to halt its assault on Rafah. Israel has ignored all three orders.

“The choice before us is stark and unforgiving,” Colombian President Gustavo Petro wrote in The Guardian last week. “We can either stand firm in defense of the legal principles that seek to prevent war and conflict, or watch helplessly as the international system collapses under the weight of unchecked power politics.”

“While we may face threats of retaliation when we stand up for international law—as South Africa discovered when the United States retaliated for its case at the International Court of Justice—the consequences of abdicating our responsibilities will be dire,” Petro continued. “If we fail to act now, we not only betray the Palestinian people, we become complicit in the atrocities committed by Netanyahu’s government.”

“For the billions of people in the Global South who rely on international law for protection, the stakes could not be higher,” he added. “The Palestinian people deserve justice. The moment demands courage.”

Brett Wilkins is a staff writer for Common Dreams.

16 July 2025

Source: countercurrents.org

At Least 21 Starving Civilians Killed at US- and Israeli-Backed GHF Aid Sites in Gaza, What Happened?

By Quds News Network

Gaza (Quds News Network)- At least 21 starving Palestinians were killed Wednesday morning while seeking aid at a US- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) distribution site in southern Gaza, after chaos broke out when American mercenaries trapped the crowd and used pepper spray.

What Happened?

According to local sources, when the GHF aid distribution point in northern Rafah opened, starving civilians rushed from long distances and were funneled through a narrow corridor to reach the site.

When they reached, American mercenaries closed the gate and sprayed pepper spray, causing mass panic and suffocation due to the gas and overcrowding. So far, more than 20 people have been killed.

According to survivors, the American mercenaries deliberately closed the gate as aid seekers arrived, causing crushing overcrowding. The Americans then began spraying pepper spray and tear gas, which led to panic and chaos, resulting in people being trampled and killed.

One survivor said there were thousands of aid seekers, adding that these are “not aid sites” but “mass death traps” designed to lure starving people.

Another survivor, while bidding farewell to a relative, said, “The Americans killed him.”

According to medical sources, the majority of the victims were children and fathers who have been starved for months by Israel.

False Accusations

The controversial foundation confirmed the killings, saying “at least 19 of the victims were trampled and one was stabbed amid a chaotic and dangerous surge, driven by agitators in the crowd.”

However, the GHF claimed that “elements within the crowd – armed and affiliated with Hamas – deliberately fomented the unrest,” without providing any evidence.

GHF personnel identified multiple firearms in the crowd, the organisation alleged, adding that a US worker was threatened with a firearm by someone in the crowd.

The GHF didn’t mention that American mercenaries attacked the aid seekers, leading to chaos and deaths.

In response, Gaza’s Government Media Office slammed GHF’s “false and misleading statement”.

The Office explained what happened:

  • This morning, 21 people were killed — 15 from suffocation and 6 by direct gunfire, with dozens more injured.
  • GHF called on hundreds of thousands of civilians to receive aid at a center named ‘SDS3’ in southern Gaza. Once thousands of starving people were gathered inside the narrow iron corridors, deliberately designed to restrict movement, the gates were locked.
  • Staff of this “criminal organization”, along with Israeli soldiers, sprayed pepper gas and opened fire on the starving crowd, who had come seeking aid.
  • This resulted in mass suffocation, stampedes, and immediate deaths within an enclosed area with no exits, a setting clearly designed to cause killings.
  • Testimonies from 14 eyewitnesses consistently confirm what happened. The Government Media Office had earlier released verified video evidence showing members of this American-backed organization firing directly at civilians.
  • GHF’s attempt to shift blame onto innocent civilians or Palestinian factions is a transparent and unacceptable tactic aimed at evading legal, ethical, and humanitarian responsibility for a deliberate massacre.
  • This is not an isolated incident. To date, over 870 civilians have been killed near or at GHF aid sites, more than 5,700 injuried, and 46 others went missing, making it a “direct participant in the genocide and starvation campaign carried out by the Israeli occupation.”

“Mass Death Traps”

Since the GHF started its operations on May 27 in Gaza, over 800 aid seekers have been killed by Israeli forces and American mercenaries and over 5,200 others injured, according to the Palestinian Health Ministry.

Additionally, 46 others have been reported missing after heading to the GHF sites to obtain food.

Israeli mass killings of aid seekers near GHF aid sites have become a grim daily reality amid chaotic scenes, as desperate Palestinians are given only a narrow window to rush for food and are targeted by Israeli forces.

Palestinians in Gaza and the UN described these sites as “mass death traps” and “slaughterhouses”.

On March 2, Israel announced the closure of Gaza’s main crossings, cutting off food, medical and humanitarian supplies, worsening a humanitarian crisis for 2.3 million Palestinians, according to reports by human rights organisations who have accused it of using starvation as a weapon of war against Palestinains.

An Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) report in May warned that almost a quarter of the civilian population would face catastrophic levels of food insecurity (IPC Phase Five) in the coming months.

After more than 80 days of total blockade, starvation, and growing international outrage, limited aid has allegedly been distributed by the GHF, a scandal-plagued organization backed by the US and Israel, created to bypass the UN’s established aid delivery infrastructure in the Gaza Strip.

Most humanitarian organisations, including the UN, have distanced themselves from GHF, arguing that the group violates humanitarian principles by restricting aid to south and central Gaza, requiring Palestinians to walk long distances to collect aid, and only providing limited aid, among other critiques. They have also said the model would increase forced displacement in Gaza.

The UN confirmed that Israel is still blocking food from reaching starving Palestinians with only a few trucks of aid having reached Gaza.

Doctors Without Borders (MSF) warned that “weaponizing aid in this manner may constitute crimes against humanity.”

“Every day Palestinians are met with carnage in their attempts to receive supplies from the insufficient amount of aid trickling into Gaza,” MSF said.

The commissioner-general of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA), Philippe Lazzarini, condemned the “lethal” US-Israel aid distribution mechanism in Gaza. In a post on X, Lazzarini indicated that Palestinian lives “have been so devalued”.

“It is now the routine to shoot & kill desperate & starving people while they try to collect little food from a company made of mercenaries,” he said.

“Inviting starving people to their death is a war crime. Those responsible of this system must be held accountable. This is a disgrace & a stain on our collective consciousness.”

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said that the US-backed aid distribution mechanism is “inherently unsafe” and “it is killing people.”

“Any operation that channels desperate civilians into militarized zones is inherently unsafe. It is killing people,” Guterres told reporters.

Guterres said UN-led humanitarian efforts are being “strangled,” aid workers themselves are starving and Israel, as the occupying power, is required to agree to and facilitate aid deliveries into and throughout the Palestinian enclave.

“People are being killed simply trying to feed themselves and their families. The search for food must never be a death sentence,” Guterres told reporters.

According to a Haaretz report, conversations with officers and soldiers reveal that commanders ordered forces to shoot at crowds waiting for food near or at the US-backed GHF aid sites to drive them away or disperse them, despite posing no threat.

“It’s a killing field,” one soldier said.

“Where I was stationed, between one and five people were killed every day. They’re treated like a hostile force – no crowd-control measures, no tear gas – just live fire with everything imaginable: heavy machine guns, grenade launchers, mortars. Then, once the center opens, the shooting stops, and they know they can approach. Our form of communication is gunfire.”

In a recent statement, the Israeli military admitted that its forces “harmed” Palestinian civilians at US-Israeli aid distribution centers in Gaza. The army claimed new field instructions were issued based on “lessons learned.”

A new Associated Press report with leaked footage also detailed how American contractors at GHF aid sites used live ammunition, stun grenades and pepper spray against starving Palestinians seeking food.

16 July 2025

Source: countercurrents.org

From the Red River to the Sea: The Struggle to Remain Whole

By Sony Thang

I’m Vietnamese.

In 1954, Western powers decided to split Vietnam in two. Not because we asked for it. Not because it was just. But because it served their imperial interests. The South was handed to a US-backed regime we never chose, and this foreign-imposed division was packaged as a “solution.” We were told to accept it, and there would be peace. That half a country was better than none.

But we refused.

Vietnam is not a bargaining chip. We are not a piece of land to be divided and labeled “free” by strangers. When we stood against partition, they called us unreasonable. They called us terrorists. They said we were the problem.

Sound familiar?

Just a few years earlier, in 1947, the same powers had pushed a partition plan for Palestine. Not because the Palestinians agreed, but because foreign powers demanded it. More than 77 years later, the same script is still being used.

Palestinians are told to accept foreign-imposed divisions. To settle for “solutions” written by others. To be grateful for the fragments of their homeland they’re allowed to keep. They’re expected to forget the villages destroyed, the graves of their ancestors, the keys to their stolen homes, and the olive trees they once nurtured.

Vietnam was told to settle for half. We refused. So did Palestine.

They were told to accept UN Resolution 181, just as we were told to accept the Geneva Accords. But we knew that real peace cannot be forced. And it certainly isn’t peace if it begins with erasure. There’s no justice in a deal that demands surrender.

We fought not because we hated peace, but because peace without freedom is a lie. Half a land means half a people. And we proved them wrong. Today, Vietnam is whole. Not North. Not South. But united.

Palestinians understood this too. That’s why they rejected partition. That’s why they continue to resist. 

People often claim that Palestine was never a state. But neither were many other colonized nations. Algeria. Kenya. Ireland. Apartheid-era South Africa. None had internationally recognized statehood, yet no one suggests they should have accepted colonial rule for that reason alone.

Colonialism doesn’t ask whether you had embassies or a parliament. It only asks whether it can get away with taking your land.

Palestinians had land. They had memory. They lived lives rooted in soil long before anyone came to redraw their borders. Denying them statehood simply holds them to a standard no colonized people could ever meet.

Vietnam prevailed because we remembered who we were.

Palestinians remember too.

And that memory threatens those whose power depends on historical amnesia.

In 1973, Lê Đức Thọ became the only person in history to refuse the Nobel Peace Prize. He did not reject it out of pride, but because he understood there could be no peace while US bombs were still falling. Peace cannot be awarded by the same hands that drop napalm. By walking away from global applause, he kept his dignity and reminded the world that peace without justice is nothing but theater.

Today, Palestinians are once again being told to accept less, to surrender more, and to thank their occupiers for whatever remains.

But like Vietnam, they refuse.

They refuse to disappear quietly.

And they will not trade their freedom for silence.

One day, like us, they too will be whole again.

Because the land remembers.

And so do the people.

___________________________________________

Sony Thang is a Vietnamese writer

15 July 2025

Source: countercurrents.org

Israel’s Demographic Project in Gaza – an Assault on the Palestinian Future

By Anthony Fulton

Twenty years ago, Israel unilaterally disengaged from Gaza after the post-1967 years of occupation and settlement. An overriding factor governing the decision to withdraw was the issue of demography. With a population of over two million Palestinians, Gaza has always represented a significant part of a broad demographic problem facing the self-declared ‘only democracy in the Middle East.’ Within Israel and the occupied territories (the area that has been under direct or indirect Israeli control for 58 years) there are over 14 million people. Approximately half are Israeli Jews, the other half, Palestinians. This underreported reality stands sharply at odds with the notion of a Jewish and democratic state, especially one which aspires to the land borders of a Greater Israel.

Twenty-one months after Israel re-entered, Gaza stands in ruins – obliterated, to use the current Trumpian term. The State of Israel has unleashed terror upon the Strip on an unprecedented scale. The different elements of the collective punishment of Gaza have become familiar but still make for shocking reading: the indiscriminate bombing; the sniper and drone attacks; the withholding of aid; the domicide; the ongoing forced displacement; the restriction of access to water, food, healthcare; the targeting of civilians and razing of infrastructure.

That these things add up to genocide is hardly a matter for debate anymore. Instead, we need to ask where all this is headed. We can’t simply accept the hasbara narrative that Israel only wants the return of the hostages and the destruction of Hamas. The current state of the Strip cannot support this. There is no access to Gaza, but we can look at satellite photographs. We can look at the footage provided by Palestinians. We can also listen to Israelis in public, political and media spaces. More is going on here. This is a war that is going way beyond the oft-repeated objectives.

It seems perverse on the part of many Western commentators not to link the devastation of Gaza to current public discourse in Israel and to Zionist concerns about demography and Palestinian fertility. There are two aspects of this genocidal tragedy that suggest a renewed drive on Israel’s part to tackle a perceived ‘demographic timebomb.’ Firstly, Israel is manifestly engaged with the idea of the ethnic cleansing of the population and secondly, it is waging a war on the Palestinian future through the daily targeting of women and children.

The forced transfer of the Gazan population is now openly discussed, an entirely possible endgame legitimized by Trump’s plan. A new infrastructure of resettlement (with a nomenclature betraying a nostalgia for Gush Katif) is being prepared by the IDF’s D9 Caterpillar bulldozers. Palestinians have been uprooted and are continually being displaced within the Strip. The GHF aid ‘system’ is exacerbating this. Their homes have been destroyed and the areas that Palestinians can move in are now extremely limited, the conditions intolerable. It is in this context that we are presented with the current idea of a ‘humanitarian city.’ As Trump himself has put it, Gaza is a ‘hellhole.’ It might seem to some that the world will not stand by and let the ethnic cleansing of Gaza happen but, of course, it’s already happening. The uncomfortable optics of forced transfer won’t be an issue when conditions have become so bad that people beg to leave and their ejection from their own land can be spun as an act of mercy.

Bad enough, you may think. But what should be equally as outrageous to the outside world is Israel’s sustained assault on Palestinian children and women. At the point of writing, a figure of over 57,000 fatalities in Gaza includes 17,000 children and 9,000 women.

South Africa’s ongoing case at the ICJ includes the accusation that Israel, in contravention of the Genocide Convention, is imposing measures intended to prevent births within the Gazan population. A recent U.N. report by the Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory criticizes Israel for deliberately targeting health facilities in Gaza, destroying ‘in part the reproductive capacity of the Palestinians in Gaza as a group.’ The WHO has warned of a health system at breaking point. Cesarean sections are being performed without anesthetic in those few hospitals still operating and newborn children are dying due to a scarcity of incubators and medical staff. The weaponization of aid means that, according to UNICEF, 17,000 pregnant and breastfeeding women currently require treatment for acute malnutrition in Gaza. Doctors have described a critical shortage of baby formula as being a direct result of Israeli aid restrictions.

This onslaught on children and mothers is a key component of this genocide which can be linked to a long-held Zionist obsession with Palestinian birthrates. Mandate Palestine was not, of course, a land without a people, as pioneers of the state such as Israel’s first Prime Minister, Ben Gurion, knew. The country has always worried about the need to manufacture and maintain a Jewish majority. A chief architect of the 2005 withdrawal from Gaza, Arnon ‘the Arab Counter’ Soffer, long warned of the danger for the Jewish state of the Palestinian womb, Arafat’s ‘biological weapon.’

Evidence of the intent to target women and children can be seen in statements by Israeli public figures, collated in South Africa’s petition to the ICJ and freely available elsewhere. These senior figures include not just the usual suspects like Ben Gvir and Smotrich but also the President of Israel, Isaac Herzog who responded to Oct 7th with the declaration that there are no uninvolved civilians in Gaza, ‘an entire nation’ is responsible.’ This normalization of genocidal discourse, particularly in relation to women and children, is enabled by a national political consensus and an indifferent Israeli public. It seems that there is not one righteous man in Gaza, or indeed, woman or child. ‘The children… have brought this upon themselves’, as one opposition member of the Knesset put it.

Barring international intervention, it seems certain that at the end of this latest phase in Gaza there will be fewer Palestinians. The demographic facts will have changed; they have already changed. The numbers are appalling enough, with 57,000 fatalities likely being an underestimate. But there are also names. For those who care to seek them out.

Indiscriminate blanket bombing has killed thousands of civilians and rendered Gaza unlivable. This is a war of homicidal excess, not one that is being waged to recover hostages and eliminate a terrorist organization. It is difficult not to conclude that it is part of a longer-term project to change the ethnic balance between the river and the sea.

Such are the ongoing demands of Zionism and its insatiable hunger for land, that it is not enough to erase the Palestinian past and present. Ethnic cleansing can only be part of a wider strategy. The demographic threat of tomorrow must also be addressed.

The facts are available, as is the evidence of intention. If the hostage situation is resolved, if Hamas is somehow ‘defeated’, who seriously believes that the expansionist, frontier state of Israel will leave Gaza alone? Or the West Bank? If Zionism is to avoid a death spiral, the demographic timebomb must be defused. The project demands land, and it demands a Jewish majority on that land.

Anthony Fulton writes about Israel-Palestine. He has contributed to Dissident Voice, CounterPunch, Antiwar.com, The Times of Israel, Countercurrents, Mondoweiss and other media.

14 July 2025

Source: countercurrents.org

Beit Hanoun’s Fury: How Gaza’s Obliterated Northern Town Defies Israeli Victory

By Dr. Ramzy Baroud 

As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu geared up for what was intended as a triumphant visit to Washington, commencing on Monday, July 7, 2025, Hamas’ Al-Qassam Brigades in Beit Hanoun were meticulously preparing their own stark counter-narrative. On the very inaugural day of the Israeli leader’s high-stakes diplomatic trip, the battalion launched a devastating strike, inflicting significant casualties on Israeli soldiers. The Israeli army, notorious for obfuscating its military losses, begrudgingly acknowledged five soldiers killed and 14 wounded, some critically.

This audacious operation, coupled with numerous others across both northern and southern Gaza, offered an undeniable truth: Israel’s utter inability to secure any segment of the Strip. This failure undermines its proclaimed intent to establish control over the genocide-stricken territory, seemingly as a prelude to forcibly displacing the entire population, first to Rafah in the south, and ultimately, towards Egypt.

Netanyahu may possess a sharp political cunning, yet his acumen primarily serves his personal survival as a politician. It demonstrably fails to harness politics for the genuine good of his nation, let alone for global stability. He might project an image of eloquence, but this perceived mastery of words often flourishes only because he remains largely unchallenged within his customary political circles.

Consider, for instance, this pronouncement he uttered on July 6, 2025, just hours before his flight to Washington:

“Our joint involvement brought a great victory over our mutual enemy – Iran. Iran has dedicated itself, for years, to our destruction, and for years, we had apprehensions: What should we do about Iran? Would we be able to take on Iran? And now, our heroic pilots flew in the skies of Iran, and the IDF did wonders, along with the Mossad and all other security branches…”

Stripped of critical context, this self-congratulatory declaration implies an earth-shattering event poised to fundamentally alter “the face of the Middle East,” a favored refrain of Netanyahu’s. Yet, beyond the relentless and baseless claims of having decisively defeated Iran – a narrative utterly devoid of credibility among sober political analysts – mere hours later, Palestinians in Gaza, enduring over 639 days of a relentless and internationally recognized genocide, delivered an undeniable message: Israel cannot even subjugate Beit Hanoun.

What, then, is Beit Hanoun?

In essence, this small town, encompassing an approximate area of 12.5 square kilometers (4.8 square miles), persists merely as a geographic marker and a name. It has been almost entirely obliterated, its entire pre-war population, estimated at around 60,000 residents, wholly displaced.

Owing to its perilous proximity to the Israeli border, often as close as 1.5 kilometers (approximately 1 mile), Beit Hanoun has been a primary target in nearly all of Israel’s prior aggressions against Gaza. It bore a disproportionately heavier burden of destruction compared to other Palestinian areas, dating back as early as 2004, 2006, and 2014.

However, the latest war and genocide have left virtually no building intact; some structures have been bombed repeatedly, rendering the entire area a haunting tableau of charred devastation. Indeed, numerous charred remains of victims still lie in the streets of Beit Hanoun or entombed beneath its vast rubble to this day.

Adding profound insult to grievous injury, the city was literally branded with the Star of David. In January 2025, chilling satellite imagery starkly revealed a giant Star of David carved into what was once fertile farmland in Beit Hanoun. Historically, alongside Beit Lahia and other eastern regions, the town constituted a vital segment of Gaza’s food basket – a role that became acutely critical during the two decades of suffocating Israeli siege.

Though much of this crucial agricultural land had already been appropriated by the Israeli army as ‘military zones,’ it still managed to somewhat stave off outright famine. Thus, the deliberate destruction of Beit Hanoun fundamentally equates to a deliberate assault on Gaza’s very capacity for survival.

Yet, Beit Hanoun simply refuses to die. On the contrary, it persists as one of the most active and formidable fronts for the Palestinian Resistance, posing one of the most perplexing military quandaries for the Israeli army. This defiance occurs despite Israel’s state-of-the-art killing technology, overwhelming troop numbers, and a seemingly endless supply chain, courtesy of Uncle Sam’s boundless generosity.

When Israel initiated its full-scale ground offensive on Gaza on October 27, 2023, it commenced precisely in Beit Hanoun. Astonishingly, it took the Resistance merely three days – between October 27 and November 1 – to discern the tactics of the invading Israeli army and adapt accordingly.

On November 1, Al-Qassam declared it had decimated four Israeli Merkava tanks and armored vehicles using Yasin 105 anti-tank rocket-propelled grenades, followed by the precision targeting of an Israeli soldier gathering with a quadcopter drone. On November 11, the Israeli army itself reluctantly admitted to the killing of four soldiers and the wounding of others in a booby-trapped tunnel in Beit Hanoun. The Resistance further asserted it had detonated an anti-personnel improvised explosive device (IED) targeting Israeli forces occupying a civilian home in the area.

Numerous other operations followed, each as lethal and sophisticated as its predecessors. It became terrifyingly evident that the more destruction the Israeli army wrought upon Beit Hanoun, the more fiercely and resiliently its resistance emerged. Desperate for a conclusive victory, the Israeli army brazenly declared on December 18, 2023, that it had “dismantled” the Al-Qassam battalions in the town. Consequently, its war tactics in the area supposedly shifted from a full-scale invasion to “holding operations,” predicated on the false premise that the Israeli army was now in “full control.”

That, too, proved to be another pipedream. The Israeli army was repeatedly forced to withdraw from Beit Hanoun as Palestinian fighters, expertly utilizing previously excavated tunnels – and possibly newly dug ones – infiltrated back into their ravaged town. They ingeniously leveraged the very mass destruction inflicted by the Israeli army to their strategic advantage, turning the urban wasteland into a complex battlefield.

The deadly July 7 attack on Israeli forces marked the 639th day since the war’s inception on October 7, 2023. This operation unequivocally signaled Israel’s failure, not only to occupy the town definitively, but also to truly conquer any part of Gaza. Beit Hanoun is, in essence, a microcosm of Gaza’s undefeated, and arguably undefeatable, nature.

And like every sacred piece of land in Gaza and throughout Palestine, the history of Beit Hanoun predates the very existence of Israel by millennia. Beit Hanoun, an ancient settlement, is believed to have been founded by a pagan king named Hanoun. Archaeological findings in the area testify to both ancient constructions and uninterrupted habitation across countless epochs.

It was there, just west of Beit Hanoun, that the Ayyubids famously vanquished the Crusaders at the Battle of Umm al-Nasser hill in 1239. To commemorate that pivotal victory, a mosque was consecrated bearing the battle’s name. Tragically, this very mosque, the revered Umm al-Naser Mosque, was obliterated by Israel in November 2023, with news of its destruction confirmed in January the following year.

If the human spirit were merely quantifiable by stones and concrete, Beit Hanoun would have been meticulously erased from both existence and memory long ago. The human spirit, however, can only be truly measured by the unyielding steadfastness of a people’s collective will. As clever as he may perceive himself to be, neither Netanyahu nor his formidable, US-backed army will ever manage to defeat this ancient Palestinian town, nor Gaza, nor the indomitable Palestinian people themselves. If history has bequeathed us any certain lesson, it is precisely this.

Dr. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle.

13 July 2025

Source: countercurrents.org

Fedayeen Terrain: Hamas’s Shift from Symbolic Rocket Fire to Tactical Attrition

By Rima Najjar

Proximity as power: “From zero distance” “من مسافة صفر” has become both a tactical descriptor and a rhetorical device used to assert that resistance is not abstract or remote, but visceral, embodied, and unflinching.

An unyielding fedayeen ethos — where resistance is not merely tactical, but sacrificial, rooted in the unwavering willingness to give one’s life for a just cause — has not only kept the movement alive, but made its endurance a testament.

Hamas’s innovative and courageous approach to guerrilla warfare has — against immense odds — held firm under the combined military might of Israel and the United States. Through tactical evolution, close-range ambushes, locally manufactured weaponry, and an unyielding fedayeen ethos, the resistance has not only survived but maintained control over key terrain, shaped ceasefire negotiations, and frustrated Israel’s strategic goals.

This battlefield endurance marked a strategic inflection point in October 2023, when Hamas recalibrated its tactics toward a more decentralized, guerrilla-based resistance. Its ability to regenerate forces, adapt rapidly to battlefield conditions, and impose costs on elite IDF units demonstrates a level of operational resilience that few anticipated. What was expected to be a swift eradication has instead become a prolonged confrontation — one where Hamas’s battlefield endurance now reverberates as political leverage.

Early in its military evolution, Hamas relied on symbolic resistance — rocket attacks and statements that signaled defiance more than battlefield effectiveness, especially during conflicts like “Operation Cast Lead” and “Protective Edge.” These gestures were about enduring, asserting presence, and maintaining political legitimacy under siege.

But since the October 2023 offensive, that paradigm has shifted. Hamas has embraced tactical attrition, deploying advanced IEDs, close-range anti-tank strikes, and adaptive guerrilla maneuvers to inflict measurable damage and contest territory. Their strategy now aims not just to survive, but to frustrate Israeli operations and achieve concrete military objectives — even at extraordinary cost.

Hamas’s arsenal — locally produced rockets like the Qassam and Sejjil, Yassin-105 anti-tank missiles, mortars, small arms, and IEDs — reflects tactical ingenuity forged under siege. Hidden workshops across Gaza continue to churn out weapons despite relentless Israeli airstrikes on manufacturing sites. Designs adapt quickly to battlefield needs, a resilience that has become central to the resistance’s strategy.

Short-range, high-mobility munitions now dominate Hamas’s tactical playbook. In Gaza’s dense urban terrain, these allow for ambushes and quick strikes against armored vehicles and infantry. IEDs have evolved with shaped charges to pierce Israeli armor, while battlefield reports suggest techniques borrowed from Hezbollah, like time-delayed secondary blasts targeting rescue teams.

The shift from symbolic defiance to tactical attrition has profoundly reshaped the ceasefire landscape. Hamas is no longer negotiating from a position of desperation or mere survival — it’s leveraging battlefield resilience as political capital.

Despite catastrophic losses, Hamas has demonstrated sustained operational capacity: ambushing Israeli forces, reoccupying “cleared” zones, and maintaining weapons production under siege. This has forced Israel to revise its war aims. While Prime Minister Netanyahu initially vowed to “eliminate Hamas,” recent statements prioritize hostage recovery and hint at diplomatic flexibility.

The contrast in combat range between Israel and Hamas/allied factions is stark. Hamas’s weapons are effective only up close — fighters must crawl through ruins, approach tanks, and manually affix explosives, often under direct fire. These acts are not just tactical gambits; they are embodiments of courage, of a resistance willing to risk everything for each meter of home ground.

In contrast, Israeli forces remain largely aerial. Jets, drones, and artillery shell from a distance, insulated from the terrain. Where Hamas confronts power face-to-face, Israel enacts domination from above. The fedayeen fight not only through physical presence, but through the convictions etched into their bodies — their endurance, memory, and refusal to yield become weapons in themselves in a war of asymmetric annihilation.

In May 2025 Israel shifted toward static, artillery-heavy operations under a campaign it calls Gideon’s Chariots, ultimately bogging its forces down in Gaza’s rubble. But Hamas’s proximity-based tactics continue to exact losses, leveraging embodied resistance (their bodies are their chariots) to turn courage and terrain into strategic assets. So, the fight evolved into a test of political endurance — where Hamas’s mere survival became its strongest bargaining chip.

Hamas’s astonishing battlefield endurance has enabled ceasefire negotiations — but also complicated them. By surviving, and in some respects outmaneuvering a vastly militarily superior adversary, Hamas enters talks not as a defeated actor but as one with leverage. This inversion fuels a paradox: the group’s resilience, once a rationale for its containment, now demands political concessions. Hence, current ceasefire proposals encompass phased Israeli withdrawals, hostage exchanges, and even frameworks for post-war governance.

Hamas’s shift toward tactical attrition has transformed its role in ceasefire negotiations and broader political calculations. Having survived months of intense warfare and demonstrated operational resilience, it now negotiates from a position of strength — demanding full Israeli withdrawal, rejecting disarmament, and asserting itself as a legitimate stakeholder.

This leverage directly challenges the Palestinian Authority’s claim to sole governance, with Hamas’s battlefield credibility outpacing the PA’s diplomatic relevance in Gaza. International mediators are increasingly forced to reckon with Hamas’s influence, and proposals for hybrid governance models or technocratic oversight suggest it may seek indirect political control while retaining its military posture.

Regionally, this endurance has unsettled Israeli and U.S. plans for a post-Hamas Gaza, while strengthening Hamas’s standing among segments of the Palestinian population and sympathetic Arab publics.

Mediators are increasingly forced to reckon with Hamas’s influence because the group remains a central actor in both battlefield dynamics and negotiation outcomes. Here’s specific evidence:

• Direct Engagement by Mediators: Hamas has submitted a “positive response” to ceasefire proposals from Qatar and Egypt, signaling its readiness to negotiate terms including IDF withdrawal and humanitarian guarantees. Mediators have acknowledged Hamas’s role by continuing proximity talks in Doha, with Israel sending a delegation despite publicly rejecting Hamas’s proposed amendments.

• U.S. Recognition of Hamas’s Role: President Trump stated that “Hamas wants to have that ceasefire” and emphasized that the deal would not improve if Hamas rejected it. The U.S. has also reportedly offered guarantees to Hamas via Qatari mediators that the war would not resume after a 60-day truce — a tacit acknowledgment of Hamas’s negotiating power.

• Hostage Leverage: Hamas’s continued control over hostages has forced Israel and international actors to engage with it directly. The group has used staggered hostage release proposals to shape ceasefire terms, including demands for prisoner swaps and territorial withdrawal.

• Territorial Control: Despite prolonged Israeli operations, Hamas retains control over central Gaza, including strategic areas like Nuseirat and Deir el-Balah. This control allows it to reassert tactical dominance and influence aid distribution, further entrenching its role in negotiations.

Hamas’s evolution from symbolic resistance to tactical attrition has upended traditional power dynamics. By forcing Israel into a protracted conflict with no clear exit, the group has secured a role in shaping Gaza’s future — whether its adversaries acknowledge it or not. The question now is not if Hamas will be part of post-war negotiations, but on what terms.

Ultimately, Hamas’s evolution confronts not just military paradigms, but political certainties. Its place in Gaza’s future is no longer hypothetical; it’s embedded in the rubble, the resistance, and the negotiations that follow.

14 July 2025

Source: countercurrents.org

Israel Kills 1,588 Health Workers in Gaza

By Quds News Network

Gaza (Quds News Network)- Israel has killed 1,588 health workers in Gaza since October 7, 2023, the Gaza Health Ministry announced Sunday.

Dr. Muneer Al-Boursh, the ministry’s secretary-general, said Israel struck Dr. Ahmed Qandeel, a general surgery consultant and a pillar of Gaza’s medical community. “His death is not an exception,” Al-Barsh said. “It is part of a systematic campaign of extermination.”

Al-Boursh added that doctors, nurses, and paramedics face danger every day. “We documented 1,588 health professionals killed while performing their humanitarian duty,” he said.

Hospitals in Gaza have become military targets. Ambulances now serve as moving coffins, Al-Boursh warned. “This violates all international laws and norms,” he said.

“Why kill doctors?” he asked. “Because their presence means life. Their resilience disrupts the machine of death. The occupier fears healers as much as it fears fighters.”

Over the past 21 months, Israel’s genocide has crushed Gaza’s health system. The army destroyed 34 of 38 hospitals, both public and private. Only four hospitals still function, and then only at limited capacity.

Israeli restrictions have blocked international medical teams from entering Gaza. This ban deepened staff shortages and pushed the system to the brink of collapse.

Gaza now faces a dire shortage of medicines and equipment. Health workers struggle to treat the wounded and the sick under constant bombardment and crippling blockade.

Dr. Al-Boursh urged urgent global action to protect health workers and restore medical services in Gaza before the system fails entirely.

14 July 2025

Source: countercurrents.org

ICC Rejects Requests to Withdraw Arrest Warrants for Israeli PM, Former War Minister

TEHRAN (Tasnim) – Despite overwhelming pressers from Tel Aviv and Washington, the International Criminal Court (ICC) dismissed requests concerning the arrest warrants for the Israeli prime minister and former defense minister.

The ICC’s judges on Wednesday ruled that the tribunal’s arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant for war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Gaza Strip would stand.

The orders were issued due to the duo’s actions either leading to, prolonging or reinforcing the regime’s October 2023-present war of genocide on Gaza that has so far claimed the lives of more than 58,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children.

The judges said the warrants would remain active while the court continued to review the regime’s so-called objections to its jurisdiction in the case.

They also rejected a parallel Israeli plea to freeze the broader investigation into crimes committed in the occupied Palestinian territories, underscoring the tribunal’s refusal to yield to diplomatic pressure.

The regime, which has long denied the court’s jurisdiction, insists the warfare is a legitimate response to a historic resistance operation on October 7, 2023 that took place after decades of US-backed Israeli bloodshed and destruction targeting Palestinians. 

In their ruling, the judges said the regime’s argument that a separate April decision by an ICC appeals chamber invalidated the arrest warrants was “incorrect.”

They clarified that while Tel Aviv’s jurisdictional challenge was still under review, it had no bearing on the current validity of the arrest warrants.

The warrants remain in force, the court stated, until a specific ruling on jurisdiction was made — a timeline that remains undefined.

The ICC’s determination to proceed with the Gaza war crimes case has unfolded against a backdrop of mounting threats, political interference, and retaliation targeting its senior officials.

On May 1, 2024, Nicholas Kaufman, a British-Israeli lawyer closely tied to Israeli regime, warned ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan during a private meeting in The Hague that both he and the court would be “destroyed” if he refused to withdraw the arrest warrants.

Kaufman, who claimed to be relaying an offer from Netanyahu’s legal advisor, urged Khan to reclassify the case files as confidential, suggesting it would allow Tel Aviv to respond privately and help Khan discreetly exit the case.

The lawyer, however, later denied acting on official instruction and claimed he had spoken on his own initiative.

The threats against Khan followed months of escalating US hostility towards the court over the Gaza investigation.

In February 2025, Washington revoked Khan’s visa, froze his assets, and barred his family from entering the US.

By June, the administration of former US President Joe Biden had imposed sanctions on four ICC judges involved in the issuance of the arrest warrants, two of whom participated in the Wednesday ruling that upheld them.

17 July 2025

Source: tasnimnews.com