Just International

War and Oil: Connecting the dots

By Mazin B. Qumsiyeh

(and why everyone should boycott Chevron) [footnotes below]

The U.S. and Israel have had a special arrangement since 1979 under which the United States would supply oil to Israel if Israel could not secure enough oil on its own due to shortage or supply disruption [1]. This pact is unique: No other country receives a similar guaranteed emergency oil supply from the U.S. and the agreement has been extended routinely with the last extension for ten years! [2]. The US sent refined fuel to Israel to bomb Gaza in 2008/2009 even when gas prices at the pump got higher for US citizens [3]. In 2023, 60% of the crude oil imported by Israel (totals imports $3.23 billion) came from Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan to Turkish ports through the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (in which Chevron has the largest stakeholder- Chevron is also to be the main beneficiary of the attack on Venezuela). The percentage rose to 70% of crude supply through that pipeline between late 2023 and late 2025 [4]. Refined imports of $1.35 billion worth came mostly from Russia, Egypt, Turkey, and Romania. The U.S. is the sole documented supplier of military-grade jet fuel (JP-8) under aid programs during the war [4] of course paid for by US taxpayers to decimate Gaza and dramatically increase greenhouse gases.

In 2020 Chevron completed a major acquisition of U.S.–based Noble Energy, which had been the lead developer of Israel’s largest offshore natural gas fields. This deal brought Chevron’s operations directly into Israel’s energy sector [5]. Chevron integrated into its global portfolio the “Tamar and Leviathan” offshore gas fields (Most portions of these belong to Palestine based on UN partition lines) and at least part of the ownership of the current Gaza strip [6]. In 2025, Egypt signed a deal to import $35 billion in gas from the Chevron operated gas fields (and a new “Nitzana” pipeline) off the coast of Gaza benefitting the apartheid state and the rich Chevron. Hence the ethnic cleansing and genocide on Gaza continues to empty it and allow for money to continue flowing. Here are the biggest institutional shareholders of Chevron (and people should write to them to divest): The Vanguard Group, Inc.; State Street Corporation; Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.; BlackRock Inc. And ofcourse boycott Chevron stations [See 7].

Venezuelan people and most of the world are fully aware that 1) Trump consulted with his partners in crime (Chevron CEO and Netanyahu) but not Congress when he decided to bomb for oil (and rare minerals), 2) The market bumbed up Chevron stock price upon hearing the news [8], 3) They are merely a stepping stone for taking over other countries (Panama, Canada, Greenland, Cuba)… But the imperial power WILL fail. I leave that to another analysis. But in the meantime do continue to act and we all need to work harder to stop the lunatics pushing us to WWIII.

[1] https://www.energy.senate.gov/services/files/894BE546-C7E6-4BC4-A3F0-9E352549109B
[2] https://www.israelnationalnews.com/flashes/323545
[3] https://wespac.org/2009/01/16/us-taxpayers-spending-over-one-billion/
[4] https://oilchange.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Israel-Gaza-Fuel-Data-v2.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
[5] https://israel.chevron.com/en/about
[6] https://www.timesofisrael.com/chevron-seals-acquisition-of-noble-energy-which-operates-in-israel-gas-fields/
[7] https://bdsmovement.net/chevron https://afsc.org/BoycottChevron
[8] https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/05/market-sees-chevron-the-big-venezuela-winner-but-oil-majors-face-a-long-road.html

Mazin Butros Qumsiyeh is a Palestinian scientist and author, founder and director of the Palestine Museum of Natural History and the Palestine Institute for Biodiversity and Sustainability at Bethlehem University where he teaches.

7 January 2026

Ex-CIA Chief David Petraeus Briefs Officials in Israel Overseeing “New Gaza”

By Jonathan Whittall

Former CIA Director David Petraeus—one of the godfathers of the modern doctrine of counterinsurgency warfare—last week visited the U.S.-military run coordination center established in southern Israel to oversee the so-called ceasefire in Gaza, multiple sources from the diplomatic community told Drop Site News.

In his remarks at the Civil-Military Coordination Center (CMCC) in Kiryat Gat, Petraeus praised Israel’s shift to clearing, holding, and rebuilding—a change from his previous criticism that Israeli forces were not implementing lessons from the U.S. counter-insurgency operations in Iraq, in particular the creation of “gated communities.”

One week prior to Petraeus’s visit, the U.S. Army presented the CMCC with plans for a “Gaza First Planned Community” in Rafah, as first reported by Drop Site. The residential compound would house up to 25,000 Palestinians in an area under full Israeli military control and would include biometric entry, identity checks, reeducation programs, and controls over aid and housing.

According to two sources with knowledge of the daily workings of the CMCC, the “Gaza First Planned Community” is intended to function as a pilot project—the first known step in the overall reconstruction plan of a “New Gaza.” The compound will be funded by the UAE, according to The Guardian.

Petraeus’s January 21 appearance at the CMCC coincided with President Donald Trump’s inauguration of the so-called Board of Peace the following day at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. At the ceremony, Trump said he was “committed to ensuring Gaza is demilitarized, properly governed and beautifully rebuilt,” adding: “I’m a real estate person at heart and it’s all about location. And I said, look at this location on the sea, look at this beautiful piece of property.” Trump was followed by his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who listed among the priorities for the coming 100 days a “Trump economic development plan to rebuild and energize Gaza.” There will also be a process to “synthesize the security and governance frameworks to attract and facilitate these investments,” Kushner said.

In his remarks to the CMCC, Petraeus compared the 2007 U.S. troop surge in Iraq to the military operation in Gaza. Petraeus, who presided over a massive escalation of U.S. troops during the occupation of Iraq and the arming of local militias in what became a brutal sectarian civil war, is the former commander of U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM). He also dramatically expanded night raids and CIA and Special Operations missions inside Afghanistan. He was a key player in the expansion of U.S. covert warfare in Yemen and elsewhere in the Middle East and Africa before President Barack Obama installed him as CIA director.

Apart from promoting the implementation of gated communities based on his history in Iraq and Afghanistan, Petraeus is likely taking a special interest in Gaza because of the business opportunities Trump appears to be selling. Soon after his resignation from the CIA in 2012, Petraeus began work for Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR), a powerful U.S. private-equity and investment company. Petraeus is currently a partner at KKR, chairman of the KKR Global Institute, and chairman of KKR Middle East, which has offices in the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia.

Petraeus also used his CMCC address to highlight the field manual for counterinsurgency that he developed at the end of 2006. That manual (which is available here) “establishes doctrine (fundamental principles) for military operations in a counterinsurgency (COIN) environment.” In it, Petraeus writes “Not all Islamic insurgents or terrorists are fighting for a global revolution. Some are pursuing regional goals, such as establishing a Sunni Arab-dominated Iraq or replacing Israel with an Arab Palestinian state.”

Petraeus also took time to praise the CMCC’s efforts in coordinating humanitarian aid into Gaza since a ceasefire deal went into effect in October, despite the fact that Israel has completely blocked essential items, such as caravans and other shelter items, and banned 37 aid organizations from operating in Gaza. A number of European countries even stopped sending personnel to the CMCC last month saying it has failed to increase aid flows, according to Reuters.

The CMCC was created by CENTCOM one week after the October 2025 ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas went into effect. It includes representatives from more than 50 countries and international organizations, and is tasked with coordinating aid, monitoring the ceasefire, and planning reconstruction. The CMCC is headed by Lieutenant General Patrick Frank, who served under Petraeus in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Petraeus has long argued that lessons from the U.S. troop surge in Iraq could guide Israeli operations. Writing in Foreign Affairs in June 2024, he argued that Israel was repeating U.S. mistakes—but could also replicate U.S. “successes,” particularly the counterinsurgency strategy adopted in Iraq after 2007 that he oversaw. Central to Petraeus’s argument is the creation of gated communities with biometric entry points, identity cards, and constant patrols. In an interview with Al Majalla in October he said: “You clear every building, floor, room, cellar, and plug every tunnel entrance. … As long as you’ve found all the tunnel entrances and have a good entry control point. Then you have biometric ID cards that allow people who live in that area to return and access better shelters near their homes, which are largely damaged or destroyed.”

Speaking on the sidelines of the Institute for National Security Studies conference in Tel Aviv in March 2024, Petraeus told the Times of Israel that Israel should pivot to a counterinsurgency approach: “The foundational concepts of counterinsurgency are that you clear an area, you hold it, and you hold it in a very significant manner…You wall it off. You create gated communities, as we call it, 12 or 13 of them in Fallujah alone. You use biometric ID cards because you’re trying to separate the enemy, the extremists, from the people. That’s the fundamental idea.”

Like Petraeus’s gated-community model, the “Gaza First Planned Community” envisions implementing biometric screening to regulate entry. The CMCC presentation on the housing compound described systems that cross-reference applicants against security databases as a condition for access to housing and services. The advancement of technological capacity in counter-insurgency operations is something that Petraeus recently referred to as “Software-Defined Warfare.”

Petraeus resigned as CIA director in November 2012, amid a public scandal over an extramarital affair with his biographer, during which he shared classified materials with her. He later pled guilty to a federal misdemeanor charge that he mishandled classified information.

Soon after his resignation, Petraeus began work for KKR whose portfolio includes companies that have technology and defense interests in Gaza. In 2017, KKR acquired a majority stake in Optiv, which maintains strategic partnerships with the Israeli cyber-security industry. In May 2022, KKR led a $200 million funding round for Sempris, an identity driven cyber security company founded by former Israeli intelligence officials. In 2023, KKR acquired Circor, which is a supplier to the aerospace and defense markets. KKR has also invested in Global Technical Realty, a secure underground data centre in Petah Tikvah, Israel.

KKR has further links with Israel through their ownership of Axel Springer, a German media and technology company which has been accused of profiting from West Bank settlements through the Israeli company Yad2, which it owns. In December 2024, Yad2 ran an advertisement in an Israeli financial newspaper, The Marker, with the slogan “From the river to the sea”, with dropped pins across the entirety of historic Palestine, indicating real estate opportunities. The ad read: “Yad2 helps you look ahead and build a future in your next home in Israel.”

Amjad Shawa, the head of the Palestinian NGO network, speaking to Drop Site from Gaza City, criticized the presentation Trump and his son-in-law Jared Kushner gave at Davos, saying it “was not consulted with any Palestinian, whether civil society, Palestinian Authority, or Palestinian private sector.” He added, “It is just a beautiful photo designed by AI that does not reflect reality. It doesn’t deal with the recent situation, it is just dealing with construction here and there. It is not talking about political horizons, social cohesion, about order, about different issues important to Palestinians. Who will own this? Will we the Palestinians own this? Or others will own it and we will serve it as Palestinians?”

In fact, Palestinian energy resources may be under consideration as the financial underpinning for Gaza’s reconstruction. Under this model, the undeveloped Gaza Marine field, estimated at one trillion cubic feet of natural gas, would be monetized to support reconstruction.

Both British prime minister Tony Blair—who is named on the executive board of the Board of Peace—and Petraeus have strong ties to the UAE that converge around energy interests. Abu Dhabi’s Mubadala, acquired a 22% stake in Israel’s Tamar offshore gas field in December 2021. Blair has been a paid advisor for Mubadala. KKR, together with Blackrock, held a $4 billion investment in the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) and has a minority stake in ADNOC Gas Pipeline Assets, which has the technical expertise required for offshore gas exploration and extraction, and to manage infrastructure, such as pipelines or LNG terminals, and handle commercial gas sales.

In Iraq, Petraus gained experience in financing smaller scale reconstruction projects with redirected state resources. An Iraq Development Fund was created to channel Iraqi resources to reconstruction. In 2007, as Petraeus was leading U.S. forces in Iraq, he reoriented captured Iraqi funds into a counterinsurgency tool through the Commanders Emergency Response Program (CERP). The approach has been outlined in a U.S. military manual called “Commanders Guide to Money as a Weapons System.”

The exploration of Gaza’s gas would fit into the economic and energy cooperation between Israel and the UAE under the Abraham Accords. In 2025, a formal UAE–Israel energy cooperation memorandum of understanding was signed, outlining gas sector cooperation. UAE involvement in Gaza gas would further position it as a regional energy hub linking the Gulf’s capital and infrastructure with Eastern Mediterranean resources and European markets.

Shawa contended that “investors are most welcome,” but they have to “accept the rules.” The rules are that Gaza must be rebuilt according to the Palestinian perspective, “not according to their perspective.”

Petraeus’s visit is part of what is sure to be a convergence of parties looking for involvement in Trump’s plans in Gaza, where Palestinians would remain relegated to the status of inmates or future labor, but not the drivers of their own destiny.

“Trump’s plan for Gaza follows the tried-and-tested model of North American genocide, in which survivors are confined to Indigenous reservations. In this model, Palestinians’ racialized bodies are viewed as only needing to be fed and watered, stripped of any subjective depth,” Dr. Ghassan Abu Sitta, a surgeon who has worked extensively in Gaza, is the chair in conflict medicine at the American University of Beirut and rector of the University of Glasgow, told Drop Site.

“The map of the proposed ‘New Gaza’ presented by Jared Kushner in Davos looks exactly like the internal architecture of a prison. Rather than Gaza functioning as an open-air prison, the plan would turn it into a closed prison, where the inmates—Palestinians—are micromanaged.”

Jonathan Whittall Political analyst and humanitarian worker with two decades of work in emergencies with MSF and the UN.

31 January 2026

Source: dropsitenews.com

The Kashmir Conflict and the Reality of Crimes Against Humanity

New York, New York

January 31, 2026

Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai

Crimes against humanity represent one of the most serious affronts to human dignity and collective conscience. They embody patterns of widespread or systematic violence directed against civilian populations — including murder, enforced disappearances, torture, persecution, sexual violence, deportation, and other inhumane acts that shock the moral order of humanity. The United Nations Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime against Humanity presents a historic opportunity to strengthen global resolve, reinforce legal frameworks, and advance cooperation among states to ensure accountability, justice, and meaningful prevention.

While the international legal architecture has evolved significantly since the aftermath of the Second World War, important normative and institutional gaps remain. The Genocide Convention of 1948 and the Geneva Conventions established foundational legal protections, and the creation of the International Criminal Court reinforced accountability mechanisms. Yet, unlike genocide and war crimes, there is still no stand-alone comprehensive convention dedicated exclusively to crimes against humanity. This structural omission has limited the capacity of states to adopt consistent domestic legislation, harmonize cooperation frameworks, and pursue perpetrators who move across borders. The Conference of Plenipotentiaries seeks to fill this critical void.

The Imperative of Prevention

Prevention must stand at the core of the international community’s approach. Too often, the world reacts to atrocities only after irreparable harm has been inflicted and communities have been devastated. A meaningful prevention framework requires early warning mechanisms, stronger monitoring capacities, transparent reporting, and a willingness by states and institutions to act before crises escalate. Education in human rights, inclusive governance, rule of law strengthening, and responsible security practices are equally essential elements of prevention.

Civil society organizations, academic institutions, moral leaders, and human rights defenders play a vital role in documenting abuses, amplifying the voices of victims, and urging action when warning signs emerge. Their protection and meaningful participation must therefore be an integral component of any preventive strategy. Without civic space, truth is silenced — and without truth, accountability becomes impossible.

Accountability and the Rule of Law

Accountability is not an act of punishment alone; it is an affirmation of universal human values. When perpetrators enjoy impunity, cycles of violence deepen, victims are re-traumatized, and the integrity of international law erodes. Strengthening judicial cooperation — including extradition, mutual legal assistance, and evidence-sharing — is essential to closing enforcement gaps. Equally important is the responsibility of states to incorporate crimes against humanity into domestic criminal law, ensuring that such crimes can be prosecuted fairly and independently at the national level.

Justice must also be survivor centered. Victims and affected communities deserve recognition, reparations, psychological support, and the assurance that their suffering has not been ignored. Truth-seeking mechanisms and memorialization efforts help restore dignity and foster long-term reconciliation.

The Role of Multilateralism

The Conference reinforces the indispensable role of multilateralism in confronting global challenges. Atrocities rarely occur in isolation; they are rooted in political exclusion, discrimination, securitization of societies, and structural inequalities. No state, however powerful, can confront these dynamics alone. Shared norms, coordinated diplomatic engagement, and principled international cooperation are vital to preventing abuses and responding when they occur.

Multilateral commitments must also be matched with political will. Declarations are meaningful only when accompanied by implementation, transparency, and accountability to both domestic and international publics.

Technology, Media, and Modern Challenges

Contemporary conflicts and crises unfold in an increasingly digital and interconnected world. Technology can illuminate truth — enabling documentation, verification, and preservation of evidence — but it can also be weaponized to spread hate, dehumanization, and incitement. Strengthening responsible digital governance, countering disinformation, and supporting credible documentation initiatives are essential tools for both prevention and accountability. Journalists, researchers, and human rights monitors must be protected from reprisals for their work.

Climate-related stress, demographic shifts, and political polarization further complicate the landscape in which vulnerabilities emerge. The Conference should therefore promote a holistic understanding of risk factors that may precipitate widespread or systematic violence.

A Universal Commitment — With Local Realities

While the principles guiding this Convention are universal, their application must be sensitive to local histories, languages, cultures, and institutional realities. Effective implementation depends on national ownership, capacity-building, judicial training, and inclusive policymaking that engages women, youth, minorities, and marginalized communities. The pursuit of justice must never be perceived as externally imposed, but rather as an expression of shared human values anchored within domestic legal systems.

The Kashmir Conflict and the Reality of Crimes Against Humanity

Crimes against humanity do not emerge overnight. They develop through sustained patterns of abuse, erosion of legal safeguards, and the normalization of repression. Jammu and Kashmir presents a contemporary case study of these dynamics.

Under international law, crimes against humanity encompass widespread or systematic attacks directed against a civilian population, including imprisonment, torture, persecution, enforced disappearance, and other inhumane acts. Evidence emerging from Kashmir—documented by UN experts, international NGOs, journalists, and scholars—demonstrates patterns that meet these legal criteria.

The invocation of “national security” has become the central mechanism through which extraordinary powers are exercised without effective judicial oversight. Draconian laws are routinely used to silence dissent, detain human rights defenders, restrict movement, and suppress independent media. This securitized governance has produced what many Kashmiris describe as the “peace of the graveyard”—an imposed silence rather than genuine peace.

Early-warning frameworks for mass atrocities are particularly instructive. Gregory Stanton identifies Kashmir as exhibiting multiple risk indicators, including classification and discrimination, denial of civil rights, militarization, and impunity. These indicators, if left unaddressed, historically precede mass atrocity crimes.

The systematic silencing of journalists, as warned by the Committee to Protect Journalists, and the targeting of academics and diaspora voices—such as the denial of entry to Dr. Nitasha Kaul and the cancellation of travel documents of elderly activists like Amrit Wilson—demonstrate repression extending beyond borders.

The joint statement by ten UN Special Rapporteurs (2025) regarding one of internationally known human rights defender – Khurram Parvez – underscores that these are not isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern involving arbitrary detention, torture, discriminatory treatment, and custodial deaths. Together, these acts form a systematic attack on a civilian population, triggering the international community’s responsibility to act.

This Conference offers a critical opportunity to reaffirm that sovereignty cannot be a shield for crimes against humanity. Kashmir illustrates the urgent need for:

· Preventive diplomacy grounded in early warning mechanisms.

· Independent investigations and universal jurisdiction where applicable.

· Stronger protections for journalists, scholars, and human rights defenders, including Irfan Mehraj, Abdul Aaala Fazili, Hilal Mir, Asif Sultan and others.

· Victim-centered justice and accountability frameworks for Mohammad Yasin Malik, Shabir Ahmed Shah, Masarat Aalam, Aasia Andrabi, Fehmeeda Sofi, Nahida Nasreen and others.

Recognizing Kashmir within the crimes-against-humanity discourse is not political—it is legal, moral, and preventive. Failure to act risks entrenching impunity and undermining the very purpose of international criminal law.

Conclusion

The United Nations Conference of Plenipotentiaries carries profound moral, legal, and historical significance. It represents not only a technical exercise in treaty development but a reaffirmation of humanity’s collective promise — that no people, anywhere, should face systematic cruelty without recourse to justice and protection. By advancing a comprehensive Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime against Humanity, the international community strengthens its resolve to stand with victims, confront impunity, and uphold the sanctity of human dignity.

The success of this effort will ultimately depend on our willingness to transform commitments into action, principles into practice, and aspiration into enduring protection for present and future generations.

Dr. Fai submitted this paper to the Organizers of the Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference of Plenipotentiaries on Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Humanity on behalf of PCSWHR which is headed by Dr. Ijaz Noori, an internationally known interfaith expert. The conference took place at the UN headquarters between January 19 – 30, 2026.

Dr. Fai is also the Secretary General
World Kashmir Awareness forum.
He can be reached at:
WhatsApp: 1-202-607-6435
gnfai2003@yahoo.com
www.kashmirawareness.org

The Unbreakable Nael Barghouti

By JEREMY SCAHILL AND JAWA AHMAD

“I never lost hope, and I never will,” said Nael Barghouti, a 68-year-old Palestinian from the occupied West Bank who spent more than four decades in Israeli captivity. It has been a year since Barghouti won his freedom through a prisoner exchange deal signed between Hamas and Israel in January 2025. As a condition of his release, Barghouti had to agree to go into exile and was deported to Egypt a month later. “I have been optimistic from the very first day I began my struggle,” he said. “In prison, I was optimistic that I would be free one day. And, even if I were to die in prison, I would remain content, because those who come after me will continue the path, because they are convinced that we are in the right.”

According to the most recent and reliable statistics, there are approximately 9,300 Palestinians currently held in Israeli captivity. Nearly half of these have not been charged or brought to trial. Additionally, there are an unknown number of Palestinians held in military camps run by the Israeli army. At least 87 Palestinians have been killed inside Israeli prisons since October 7, 2023, including several documented cases of death by torture, abuse, or intentional neglect. “Without any prior warning, a prisoner is detained with no charge—a 15 year old [boy], or a woman. Malicious arrest—arrest simply to send a lesson to entire generations. They are received with beatings, bone‑breaking, and the spread of infectious diseases,” Barghouti told Drop Site.

In a wide-ranging, in-person interview in Istanbul, Barghouti reflected on his time in Israeli captivity, the torture he endured alongside other Palestinian prisoners, and why he believes the Palestinian cause will ultimately triumph. “We are not seekers of blood or wars, but we will accept nothing other than defending ourselves and our rights,” Barghouti said. “Why is it forbidden for Palestinians to live like any other people—to leave when they wish, return when they wish, go to the sea when they wish? Personally, I have seen the sea only once, in a prison transport vehicle, and when I was released. The sea is thirty kilometers (18 miles) from my village—why? Why are olive trees hundreds of years old uprooted? Why do settlers go to villages to uproot trees, attack people, and kill their animals? Why does the occupation prevent the families of released prisoners from leaving to meet them?”

In the struggle for Palestinian liberation, political prisoners occupy a space of immense national pride and importance. They are widely seen as heroes of the cause, and they participate in the decision-making process for the factions to which they belong. “Palestinian prisoners in the occupation’s prisons are one of the most respected and esteemed groups among the Palestinian people—regardless of which faction the prisoner belongs to,” said Husam Badran, who spent 14 years in Israeli prisons and is currently Hamas’s head of national relations. He told Drop Site, “I believe there is hardly a Palestinian household that does not have a Palestinian prisoner. In some families, the father, mother, and children are sometimes all inside prison at the same time. We are talking about a long experience since [the Arab-Israeli war of] 1967; we are talking about a period of almost sixty years. We define ourselves as fighters for freedom—certainly not terrorists, as the occupation describes us.”

Badran, a former commander of Hamas’s armed wing Al Qassam Brigades in the West Bank, described how Hamas and other factions held democratic elections inside the prisons and remained intimately engaged in the broader decision making of their movements on the outside. “I wouldn’t trade the prison experience for all experiences in the world. It is bitter and difficult, true, but you gain a lot from it—on a human level, a personal level, and in understanding life. You cannot learn this anywhere else except in prison, despite how difficult it is. Your ability to innovate and invent [ways] to communicate surpasses imagination,” he said. “Yes, we studied, we learned, we went to university, we earned master’s degrees, because the Palestinian by nature has an extraordinary ability to confront hardship. The world is not capable of understanding that this is who the Palestinian is. This Palestinian today is part of the decision‑making body in the Palestinian cause. So how do you expect to break him? And how do you expect to impose international forces on him, take away his weapon, and bring [Tony] Blair to rule him? How could he accept that?,” Badran asked.

“The whole story is connected together. If you want to understand the current Palestinian situation by looking only at the last two years, you will not succeed in understanding the Palestinian cause—you will fail,” he added. “You must go back decades and study the Palestinian personalities and leaderships. So how do you expect to deal with this type of leadership—whether in Hamas or others—through submission, surrender, and raising the white flag?”

This week President Donald Trump pushed ahead with his Gaza Plan and announced the first round of appointments to his so-called Board of Peace. They include his son-in-law Jared Kushner, venture capitalists, ex-Prime Minister of the UK Tony Blair, and an assortment of non-Palestinian heads of state and political leaders, as well as business figures—some with close ties to Israel. “States want to sign agreements on behalf of the Palestinian people, but the Palestinian people did not authorize them and never will. Money will not tempt us, and airplanes will not frighten us. This resistance will continue until the Palestinian people return to their lands, and until American politicians regain their reason, along with everyone who supports this entity,” Barghouti said. He added, “Anyone who truly wants America to remain a state that upholds justice in the world must stand with the Palestinian people—not [submit] to the influence of a Zionist lobby that is damaging America more than it is damaging the rest of the world.”

“Our spirits and our will were not broken”

When he was freed last year, Barghouti was the longest-serving Palestinian prisoner held by Israel. He spent more than 45 years behind bars—nearly 34 of them consecutively. In 2009, the Guiness Book of World Records certified him as “the longest serving political prisoner ever.” The previous record was also held by a Palestinian, Said Alatabah, who served more than 31 years before being released in 2008.

As a ten year old boy, Barghouti witnessed Israeli forces invade his family’s West Bank village of Kobar, near Ramallah, during the 1967 Arab-Israeli war as Israel began its decades-long occupation. Barghouti began his anti-occupation actions by joining other youth in throwing stones and writing graffiti on walls. He came from a family with deep roots in Palestinian resistance. “My uncle was imprisoned during the British occupation and the beginning of the Zionist entity. My father was imprisoned twice during the occupation, as were my mother, brother, sister, wife, and many other family members,” Barghouti said. “We come from a family that rejects the occupation. We lived in a simple village, but it was one that hosted refugees from [the Nakba in] 1948. We knew that these refugees had land, homes, and property, and that overnight they became poor people waiting for the United Nations to grant them some aid,” he added. “What we witnessed of the crimes of the occupation and its soldiers, and the humiliations, instilled in us a refusal to accept this occupation. From a very young age, since 1967, I saw my father being humiliated by soldiers while I was still a child—him being beaten in front of me by patrols.”

In 1977, Barghouti was arrested for the first time and spent three months in jail. In April 1978, just as he was preparing to complete his high school final exams, Barghouti was again arrested, along with his brother Omar and cousin Fakhri, but this time he was accused of being involved with the killing of a former Israeli paratrooper working as a bus driver. They also detained his father. “I was tortured in front of my father, and my father was tortured in front of me. They threatened to arrest my mother, and later they did arrest her,” Barghouti recalled.

In the end, he was hit with a life sentence plus 18 years. “We entered prison unjustly, were sentenced unjustly, and were assaulted unjustly,” he said. “We will not submit, and we will not be ashamed that we resisted—we will not disown our actions. Those who must disown their crimes are the leaders of the Zionist occupation.”

When Barghouti entered prison, he originally affiliated himself with Fatah, the party of the late Palestine Liberation Organization chairman Yasser Arafat. In the 1990s, when Arafat signed the Oslo Accords and recognized Israel, Barghouti joined Hamas.

“The Palestinian people have been fighting for more than a hundred years. This is not tied to Hamas, Fatah, or any other organization. Every phase will have its own names and labels until the goals of the Palestinian people are achieved: return and self‑determination. This is a point that no Palestinian will ever abandon,” he said. “We entered prison and resisted the occupation, and we are not ashamed of that. It is the right of the Palestinian people—and of any people under occupation—to resist. The American people resisted British injustice. How did Ireland gain its freedom? Through the use of all forms of resistance.”

Inside the prison, Barghouti earned a reputation as a leader, organizer, and political thinker. He was a voracious reader of history books and studied foreign languages. As the years went by, he became known as the “Dean of the Palestinian Prisoners” and Abu Al-Noor, “Father of Light.” He often organized protests and strategized how to resist the prison authorities.

“We Palestinian prisoners entered prison at a time when the torture was the same as the torture that exists today. We carried out multiple [hunger] strikes with the support of our people. Sometimes the occupation wanted calm from us so that the Palestinian people would not rise up, so through our strikes, we achieved certain gains: the pen, the paper, the notebook, the book, and bedding—the blanket,” he said. “Everything inside the prisons was achieved through our [hunger] strikes. Our organization was disciplined because we are political prisoners: we do not accept living the life of a criminal prisoner.”

Over the decades, Barghouti was imprisoned with other high-profile Palestinians, including Yahya Sinwar, who would go on to become the leader of Hamas in Gaza and was one of the main architects of the October 7 attacks. Sinwar was killed in October 2024 in battle in Gaza. “If we wanted to speak about the martyred brother Yahya, I knew him and lived with him. He was among the most humane people I have ever known,” Barghouti said. He recalled how they both studied Hebrew, and that Sinwar had translated the memoirs of various Israeli intelligence chiefs from Hebrew to Arabic and encouraged other prisoners to study Israel’s history and tactics.

“We learned about Zionist life in prison through the Hebrew language—yes. We came to know them, and we came to know the extent of their criminality,” he said. “It should not be surprising that in prison we understood them, studied them, and came to know their criminality through their own books and through what they wrote in their press,” he added. “Sinwar and his brothers and comrades learned and understood that this enemy cannot coexist with this region as long as it carries a racist Zionist ideology. This is the truth.”

Sinwar and Barghouti were both released in 2011 as part of an exchange deal for Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, who had been taken captive by Hamas fighters in 2006. More than 1,000 Palestinians were freed in the deal. Sinwar, who was held more than 20 years in Israeli captivity, played a central role in negotiating the deal from inside prison.

Upon his release, Sinwar returned to Gaza and went on to become the political leader of Hamas. “He understood more deeply how to influence the occupation. And so, after leaving prison, it was in his mind that we must do something that makes this occupation reckon with its continued presence,” said Badran, who lived in the same cell with Sinwar for years. “He chose to set an example for all Palestinian leadership that the true leader is one who lives among his people—exposed to harm as they are, fights as they fight, is martyred as they are martyred, and goes hungry as they go hungry.”

As Sinwar rose to the leadership of Hamas in Gaza following his release from prison, Barghouti returned to his village of Kobar on October 18, 2011. After nearly 34 years in captivity, he tried to build a life in a world he had not inhabited for more than three decades. A month after winning his freedom, he married Iman Nafi, who had also served 10 years in prison, from 1987-1997. “Nael is a Palestinian hero. I have known of his heroism, his steadfastness and leadership in prison for many years. He is a special person. He belongs to a revolutionary school that is true and authentic and comes from the land itself. I have known so many details about his life, from what I have read and heard,” Nafi wrote in an essay published in the 2019 book, These Chains Will Be Broken: Palestinian Stories of Struggle and Defiance in Israeli Prisons. “When he came asking for my hand, I told my family that I agree without any hesitation.”

Like Barghouti, Nafi was arrested when she was still in high school. “As a freed prisoner, I consider my marriage to another freed prisoner a victory against prison, a challenge to those who deprived us of our freedom, and a triumph of the spirit of faith and hope,” Barghouti said on his wedding day. “The idea that Nael would be released from prison and he and I would be together gives the Palestinian people hope that we could all be free and happy,” Nafi said. Barghouti enrolled at Al Quds Open University and farmed his land along with his brother Omar, who was also released in the Shalit deal. “The world has changed and developed so much since I was gone. But the longer the occupation lasts, the worse things are,” Barghouti said soon after his release. “I am being welcomed not as a person, but as an idea, a symbol for Palestinians.”

On June 12, 2014, three Israeli settlers were abducted near an illegal settlement outside of Hebron. Israel accused Hamas of being responsible and launched a sweeping military action throughout the occupied West Bank, codenamed Operation Brother’s Keeper, and took more than 350 Palestinians prisoner. Among these were some 70 Palestinians released in the 2011 Shalit deal. On June 18, Israeli forces descended on Kobar and snatched Barghouti—claiming he had violated the terms of his release after he delivered a speech at Birzeit University and citing rumors that he was considering accepting a ministerial post in a possible unity government between Fatah and Hamas. Barghouti dismissed their justifications and charged he was snatched as another act of collective punishment.

Prosecutors, claiming to have secret evidence, sought to have his life sentence reinstated. A year later, a military court in Ofer Prison ruled the charges baseless that Barghouti had “committed a crime under the security laws,” but the court nonetheless sentenced him to 30 months in prison, claiming secret intelligence showed he was involved with “terrorist financing.” Barghouti was not permitted to see the alleged evidence. In 2017, again citing secret files, the military court reversed its decision and reimposed Barghouti’s original life sentence. He remained in captivity until Hamas and Israel signed a ceasefire deal in January 2025. He was freed from prison on the condition that he live in exile.

Barghouti, whose freedom was achieved through negotiations in the aftermath of Operation Al Aqsa Flood, recalls hearing the news of the Hamas-led attacks in Israel on October 7, 2023. “Honestly, I felt the same feeling that the Israelis felt in 1967—how within six hours the Arab air force was destroyed and Arab land was occupied. [The Israelis] felt happiness and arrogance. I did not feel arrogance. Despite our limited and simple capabilities and [living] under siege—we don’t have F‑16s, we don’t have Patriot missiles—this arrogant army, which goes to Yemen and bombs Yemen, bombs Iraq, bombs Iran, was confronted by simple people coming out of the siege saying, ‘Enough,’” Barghouti remembered. “Yes, we took pride in it—yes. Even though we wish that this Flood had never had to happen—that we had already been free and had no need for such battles. But, tomorrow, there will be another flood, and another, until this occupation and this injustice come to an end.”

Barghouti also said that, soon after the October 7 attacks, the Israeli guards inside the prison began to intensify their abuse and torture of Palestinian prisoners. “Israeli policy against prisoners used every method of repression: beatings, humiliation, dogs, tear gas, stun grenades, and starvation. I personally lost 22 kilograms (48 pounds) in weight. I was deliberately poisoned more than three times—myself and those living with me in the same section,” he said. “It was intentional poisoning—some of the guards put substances in the food, and everyone who ate it suffered from diarrhea, and we received no medication. Those who contracted contagious diseases like scabies were taken to rooms with healthy prisoners so the disease would spread, and it spread intentionally and systematically. This demonstrates a fascist mindset.”

“Our hands, legs, and ribs were broken, but our spirits and our will were not broken,” Barghouti added. “Dogs fitted with iron collars were used against me more than once: they were given orders. My shoulders were broken. My blood covered my back—from iron shackles, from plastic restraints. Hunger. Cold—for two full months I walked barefoot in the cold. Barefoot,” he recalled. “The clothes I was wearing—the guards all called me ‘homeless.’ I believe there are photographs they took—they boasted about it. The food—they would kick it with their feet, spit on it, spit into the food. These are things that happened.”

Solidarity With Other Palestinian Prisoners

Since his release in February 2025, Barghouti has used his time advocating for the freedom of other prisoners, demanding that families of those forced into exile be allowed to reunite, and promoting the cause of Palestinian liberation. When he was freed, Israel denied his wife exit papers to join him in Egypt. According to the Palestinian Prisoners Society, Israel routinely blocks families from being reunited with their loved ones once they are freed and forced into exile, with the organization calling the Israeli practice “collective revenge.”

“Why, at this moment, are the families of Palestinian prisoners who were released under an agreement prevented from meeting their children? Why is this happening? Why are the wives, sons, and daughters of detainees prevented from joining their children in visits? Why?” Barghouti asked. “All prisoners who have been [exiled]—their families are punished by being forbidden to meet them.”

Since 1967, Israel has also maintained a practice of holding the bodies of Palestinians who die in prison and refusing to allow their families to bury them. Conservative estimates indicate there are more than 700 bodies held in numbered graves or refrigerators, though these estimates do not include many of the Palestinians killed in Gaza whose bodies were taken back to Israel since October 7. In one case, Israel has continued to hold the body of a Palestinian who died on hunger strike in prison in 1980. “There are dozens, even hundreds, of Palestinian victims to this day in numbered graves and in secret prisons, and the Red Cross is not allowed to see them. They trade in bodies, and this goes against everything that is human,” Barghouti said.

Barghouti’s thoughts are never far from his comrades still in captivity, including high-profile political prisoners like Marwan Barghouti, the single most popular Palestinian leader. “These prisoners, and dozens like them, are heroes of the Palestinian people,” he said. “But if these prisoners were to be tried under a fair legal system, they would not—and could not—have received the sentences they were given. I challenge international law: if it truly wants to resolve the issue of Palestinian detainees, it must review all their cases.”

Hanan Barghouti, Nael’s 60-year-old sister, has been “administratively detained” by Israeli forces three times without charge or trial in the past two years. A prominent organizer of mobilizations in support of Palestinian prisoners, Hanan was first detained in September 2023 and released in November 2023 as part of the “Flood of the Free” prisoner exchange during the temporary truce between Hamas and Israel. After her 2023 release, Hanan recalled how an Israeli officer threatened her against appearing in the media or allowing celebrations for her freedom, reminding her that four of her sons were also under administrative detention. She told Al-Araby’s Al-Jadeed that she confronted him as a “sadistic oppressor.” Reflecting on the cost of resistance, she said: “The price is heavy and painful, and there is a sea of blood, but this blood will water the land, and the land will bloom in all colors.”

She was then taken again by Israeli forces in March 2024 and held for nine months—an Israeli violation of the terms of the November 2023 exchange deal. On September 30, 2025, she was detained for a third time under a new administrative order and is being subjected to repression, abuse, and starvation in Israel’s Damon Prison, according to the Prisoners’ Media Office. Barghouti told Drop Site that Hanan was taken shortly after he spoke with her by phone.

“Today, my sister—my own sister—is in prison. Why? Because she spoke with me on the phone,” Barghouti said. “Can you imagine? She is taken under an administrative law dating back to the period of British occupation. My sister is [imprisoned] simply because she spoke with her brother. What justice is this?”

Israeli politicians have recently intensified their threats to begin executing Palestinian prisoners, and the conditions inside of the prisons have dramatically worsened as torture and extrajudicial killings have intensified since October 7. In November, the Israeli Knesset moved forward a bill introducing the death penalty for those it deems terrorists, a measure expected to apply almost exclusively to Palestinians living under occupation. The bill grants immunity to the state, allows death sentences without a prosecutor’s request, and imposes total isolation on those condemned. Passed in its first reading by 39–16, the vote was celebrated by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who wore a noose-shaped pin and declared that “terrorists will only be released to hell.”

Barghouti argues that the escalating abuse and torture and threats to begin executions, will foreclose meaningful negotiations toward a broader peace, given the importance of the prisoners to the Palestinian struggle. “They have left the prisoners’ file as a fuse for future confrontations. Release them, and I believe the region could enjoy a long period of calm. [These prisoners] are an inseparable part of the Palestinian struggle. Keep them imprisoned, and you will drive many generations, and the children of future generations, to struggle for their liberation, and the cycle will continue unchanged,” he said. “Stupidity is one of God’s soldiers deployed upon the minds of these criminals—it will ultimately contribute to the end of this entity. Part of their stupidity, animosity, and criminality will contribute to their downfall in front of the people of the world, not only in the eyes of our people.”

In striking ways, Barghouti’s life is a metaphor for the entire Palestinian struggle. “We endured beatings and humiliation, but our spirit and our will were not broken, and will never be broken by any torture. We endured because we were people of conviction. Even when we were prevented from praying, and forbidden from practicing our religious rituals, we prayed in secret—just as Christians once prayed in secret under the Byzantine and Roman empires when they were persecuted,” he said. “We held onto hope, we remain hopeful, and we will continue to hope. The jailer will never defeat us, no matter what methods he uses, because we are people of a just cause,” Barghouti added. “We deserve a state under the sun—a state with scientists, poets, writers, and artists, no less than any other country in the world.”

19 January 2026

Source: dropsitenews.com

From Blair to Kushner: Meet Trump’s Gaza “Board of Peace” Members, Including an Israeli Businessman

By Quds News Network

US President Donald Trump has named former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio as members of his so-called “Board of Peace”, a body which he says will oversee the governance and reconstruction of Gaza after two years of Israeli genocide.

With Trump serving as chair, the Founding Executive Board will oversee the work of a committee of technocrats tasked with the temporary governance of Gaza and its reconstruction. It will also include US special envoy Steve Witkoff, World Bank President Ajay Banga, and the president’s son-in-law Jared Kushner.

There will also be a separate “Gaza Executive Board” – responsible for overseeing all on-the-ground work of yet another administrative group, the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG).

Meanwhile, the Board of Peace is expected to sit above these two executive bodies and comprise a number of world leaders.

Here is everything you need to know about Trump’s “Board of Peace” members:

Tony Blair

Blair is known for his role in the 2003 US-led invasion and occupation of Iraq.

After leaving office, Blair’s consultancy organisation, the Tony Blair Institute (TBI), has drawn widespread criticism for advising a raft of autocratic governments including Egypt, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia.

TBI has also received money from a financial fraudster linked with illegal Israeli settlements and an American Islamophobic network.

Blair also serves as an honorary patron of the UK branch of Israel’s Jewish National Fund (JNF), which has faced heavy criticism for its activities – including donating £1m ($1.3m) to what it described as “Israel’s largest militia” and erasing Palestine from its official maps.

TBI was more recently linked to a widely condemned plan which proposed the ethnic cleansing of Gaza, involving a sweeping postwar redevelopment of the besieged Strip.

The project includes turning the devastated enclave into a “Trump Riviera,” with infrastructure named after Gulf monarchs and was created by Israeli businessmen with support from Boston Consulting Group (BCG).

He described Trump’s plans for Gaza as the “best chance of ending two years of war, misery and suffering”.

Conceding that Blair’s inclusion on the executive board is controversial, Trump said in October: “I’ve always liked Tony, but I want to find out that he’s an acceptable choice to everybody.”

A map on TBI’s website includes the occupied West Bank, Gaza, and the Golan Heights as part of Israel, reinforcing concerns over the organization’s alignment.

He will serve on the Gaza Executive Board.

Jarad Kushner

Former Middle East advisor and Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner was one of the main architects of Trump’s Abraham Accords, and he formed an especially close friendship with Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

He floated a plan dubbed “The Deal of the Century”, which called for Israel to annex 30 percent of the West Bank and a Palestinian pseudo-state to be created with no military. The plan tried to entice the Palestinian Authority by offering $50bn in economic aid. It was rejected.

When Trump left the White House, Kushner launched Affinity Partners, a private equity fund that blended Kushner’s taste for exotic properties, adventure and geopolitics. Saudi Arabia is Affinity Partners’ main backer, with its sovereign wealth fund giving Kushner $2bn dollars.

With the Gulf money, Affinity Partners has invested in two Israeli companies: Phoenix Holdings, an insurance company, and the car leasing division of Shlomo Holdings, whose parent company, Shmeltzer Holdings, is part owner of Israel Shipyards, the only domestic shipbuilder for the Israeli navy.

When Kushner began his White House role, the little experience he had in the Middle East was based on religious Zionism through his synagogue. Kushner was raised in an Orthodox Jewish household, and Trump’s daughter Ivanka converted to Judaism after marrying him.

The 44-year-old hails from a family of Jewish New Jersey real estate developers known for their cut-throat ways. The Kushner family is especially close with ICC-wanted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. So close in fact that Netanyahu once slept in Jared Kushner’s bedroom at the family house in New Jersey decades ago when he was visiting the US, the New York Times reported previously.

When Trump called for the US to take over the Gaza Strip and turn it into a Middle East Riviera with the Palestinians forcibly displaced, many Arab officials in the region and analysts saw Kushner’s hand at work.

In February 2024, Kushner gave a talk at Harvard where he advocated for the forced displacement of Palestinians and highlighted the destroyed enclave’s real estate potential.

“Gaza’s waterfront property, it could be very valuable,” he said. “It’s a little bit of an unfortunate situation there, but I think from Israel’s perspective, I would do my best to move the people out and then clean it up.”

Steve Witkoff

Steve Witkoff, a New York real estate developer and investor, was a relatively unknown political newcomer in Trump’s team who emerged as a key figure in the Gaza ceasefire negotiations.

After the first deal was announced in January and later violated by Israel, Trump said Witkoff would continue “to work closely with Israel and our Allies to make sure Gaza NEVER again becomes a terrorist safe haven”.

Witkoff, who is Jewish himself, has been a friend of Trump for four decades. Now, he’s Trump’s Middle East envoy.

Witkoff has consistently blamed Palestinians for Israel’s assault on Gaza and claimed that humanitarian aid is reaching starving Palestinians despite Israel’s blockade. “There is hardship and shortage, but no starvation,” he once said, at a time when Israel was using starvation as a weapon of war against Palestinians.

Marco Rubio

As US Secretary of State, Marco Rubio is central to the Trump administration’s approach to foreign policy.

Before Trump’s return to office, Rubio had spoken out against a ceasefire in Gaza, saying that he wanted Israel “to destroy every element of Hamas they can get their hands on”.

In October, he said the Gaza security force must include nations Israel is “comfortable with” and that the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (Unrwa) can have no future in the running of Gaza.

Rubio has long been known as a strong opponent of the BDS movement and pro-Palestine activism, and for cracking down on anti-genocide, pro-Palestinian protests.

Ajay Banga

Ajay Banga, president of the World Bank, has advised a number of senior US politicians, including President Barack Obama, during his career.

Born in India in 1959, Banga became a US citizen in 2007, and later served as the CEO of Mastercard for more than a decade.

Former US President Joe Biden nominated him to lead the World Bank in 2023.

In 2024, he warned that a significant widening of Israel’s assault on Gaza could lead to major impacts on the global economy, calling the steep loss of civilian lives “unconscionable.”

Banga said war damage from Israeli strikes on Gaza was at that time probably in the $14-20 billion range, and destruction from Israel’s bombing of southern Lebanon added to that regional total.

Marc Rowan

Marc Rowan, an American billionaire investor and co-founder of Apollo Global Management, is among the most prominent financial figures on the board. He is currently serves as Apollo’s chief executive officer and is widely regarded as one of the firm’s principal strategists.

Apollo Global Management is one of the world’s largest alternative investment firms. Rowan’s personal wealth is estimated at approximately $8.2 billion, based on Forbes’ 2026 rankings. He has also been active in philanthropic initiatives and is known for supporting organizations focused on combating antisemitism.

Observers say Rowan is likely to play a central role in designing complex financial structures aimed at attracting private global capital to Gaza, shifting reconstruction from emergency relief toward long-term investment.

Yakir Gabay

Israeli businessman Yakir Gabay, who also holds Cypriot citizenship, is another key figure named to the board. Gabay is a major player in European real estate and is expected to focus on housing solutions and investment models for Gaza’s massive displacement crisis.

Gabay owns approximately 15 percent of Aroundtown, Europe’s largest commercial real estate company by assets under management. The firm’s portfolio is valued at around $30 billion and spans Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom, according to Forbes.

Gabay began his career at Israel’s Securities Authority before moving into the private sector, later serving as chief executive of the underwriting arm of Bank Leumi. He entered the real estate market in the early 2000s, capitalizing on depressed property prices in Berlin before expanding across major European cities.

Gabay also comes from a family with deep institutional ties in Israel. His father, Meir Gabay, served as director-general of Israel’s Ministry of Justice and as civil service commissioner. His mother, Yemima Gabay, held a senior position in the public prosecution and headed the pardons department at Israel’s Ministry of Justice.

Robert Gabriel

Robert Gabriel, a US national security adviser, will be the final member of the “founding executive board”.

Gabriel has worked with Trump since his 2016 presidential campaign, shortly after which, according to PBS, he became a special assistant to Stephen Miller, another of Trump’s key current advisers.

Nickolay Mladenov

The 53-year-old former Bulgarian foreign minister and defence minister is the most critical figure in the newly launched phase two of the ceasefire.

While not on the Executive Board, Mladenov has been confirmed as the director-general of the United States-proposed “Board of Peace”. His mandate is to oversee the transition to a new technocratic administration.

For five years from 2015-2020, Mladenov served as the United Nations’ top envoy to the region.

Now, he is tasked with supervising the new “technocratic committee”, which will manage daily life for two million war-battered Palestinians who have lost homes and now displaced after two years of Israeli genocide and ongoing violations of ceasefire.

The “Board of Peace” signals a new governance architecture for post-genocide Gaza, one that shifts management from local frameworks to an internationally led structure with clear political, security, and economic mandates.

19 January 2026

Source: countercurrents.org

One Year Later – Reckoning the Trump Wreck in America

By Phil Pasquini

In acknowledging the unwarranted and chaotic realignment of the federal government in the aftermath of Donald Trump’s inauguration on January 20, 2025, a rally and protest took place at Farragut Square to “honor and acknowledge the freedoms, principles, public services and essential national values trashed by the Trump Regime since it took power a year ago.”

Fittingly, the action began at Farragut Square named for US Navy Admiral David Farragut, famous for his quote “Damn the torpedoes” who in defiance of overwhelming odds ordered his fleet to charge into the heavily mined Mobile Bay in a successful bid to defeat the enemy during the Civil War battle.

In that same spirit of prevailing, in this case against the “fascist Trump regime,” protesters began a day-long series of actions to show that “we are not going away,” by charging ahead to bring about change in realigning America presently from what is clearly “not normal” during their “One Year Later: A March of Reckoning.”

Susan, one of the organizers, addressed the crowd recalling how Trump had begun his first day in office by issuing a flurry of executive orders “designed to systematically erode our government, and the very democratic ideals this nation has stood for since 1776. In just one year, the extensive corruption, grift, lies and cruelty have touched every segment of our country.” As a result, she proclaimed that “We no longer enjoy the protections that once made us the envy of the world.”

She went on to say that “We have lost the confidence of our allies, trust in our leadership has eroded and the very freedom laid out in our Constitution, which we once took for granted, are now slipping away. We will not stand idly by as our nation falters. We reject the dismantling of democratic ideals, and we say emphatically NO to the corruption, the lies, and the total incompetence of this regime. Together we are here to remember and together we will resist!”

Before they began their march to, around the White House, and beyond after having been warned not to engage with counter protesters or those who may express their dislike for the protest, the first such person appeared and began admonishing the press for covering the event which the gentleman found offensive as the march inhibited his ability to walk to work.

He was soon followed by a second irritated citizen at the White House who repeatedly accused the participants of being professional activists, asking repeatedly how much they were being paid. The answer to his very vociferous and antagonistic inquiry was met by the participants responding in unison with “We hate Donald Trump for free.”

After marching around the expansive White House campus, the protest ended at the recently unveiled WWI Memorial at Pershing Park, where two other rallies and protests intersected, organized by Free DC, and the Women’s March.

The DC residents protest portion heard from speakers who are “…sick of this administration’s attacks on DC” and “for a Free DC.” Among their concerns are the deployment of National Guard troops in the streets, home rule, taxation without representation, and for long overdue statehood. “… our fight is more urgent than ever: ICE is kidnapping our neighbors, MPD is cooperating with federal agents, Congress has introduced bill after bill to overturn our local laws, and local elections on the horizon will require us to actively ensure their fairness and integrity.”

The nationwide “Walk out on Fascism” action also being held at the park with an overflowing crowd filling the memorial. This event was also taking place in cities and towns across the country, in Puerto Rico and Frankfurt, Germany. Many in attendance had walked out of their schools, left their place of work, withheld their services, or forewent any commerce. Participants collectively promised to support both national and local reforms by echoing the theme of “turning your back to fight against fascism.”

During the rally, several speakers affirmed their commitment of resisting the Trump regime’s reforming of our government into his autocratic view of America.

On speaker, Jackie Johnson, related how “This administration is openly using the tools of government as weapons of retaliation and control. Congress itself is being used as a weapon against the people of the District of Columbia.”  She illustrated her point by saying that more than fifty bills relating to DC being able to govern itself were thwarted by Congress through a “concerted effort” to place local control in the hands of the executive branch in weakening local democracy and nationally to “silence communities across the country that stand in the way of an authoritarian agenda. The people who live in the district deserve the right to govern our own community.”

“Military forces should not be occupying the capital city or any city in the United States,” she continued. “Ignoring this occupation is dangerous. The National Guard deployed in DC until the end of this year…does not make DC any safer. Get the National Guard out of the nation’s capital.”

In addressing Congress, she said that “…rather than being manipulated, it needs to stand up and do its job.” She charged that both the House and the Senate to use the power of the purse and the Constitution to execute “real and true oversight of this increasingly lawless White House.”

She accused the White House of “using the nation’s capital as a testing ground, punishing critics, criminalizing poverty, and reshaping public safety according to political wind. The American people want Congress to show us they have some backbone. Nothing about government is working as it should, especially since January 20th of 2025.”

Organizers and participants expressed their continuing disgust for “more of our tax dollars [going] to endless wars abroad and more militarization here at home,” including, as reported by Politico, a compromise budget bill to be voted on this week for the fiscal year ending in September to fund Homeland Security at a cost of $10 billion.

While the protest was taking place, President Trump was conducting a rambling two-hour press conference at the White House before departing for Davos where he will attempt to coerce the EU into supporting his taking of Greenland, at the peril of his adding additional tariffs against any holdouts.

Report and photos by Phil Pasquini

21 January 2026

Source: countercurrents.org

ICC-Wanted Netanyahu Joins Trump’s Gaza “Board of Peace”

By Quds News Network

Occupied Palestine (QNN)- Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes in Gaza, has accepted an invitation from US President Donald Trump to join the so-called “Board of Peace” under Trump’s 20-point Gaza ceasefire plan, raising serious concerns about the board’s objectivity after two years of genocide.

Netanyahu’s Office announced on social media on Wednesday that Netanyahu is to join the initiative, despite the fact that it was unveiled as part of phase two of the ceasefire agreement with Hamas to end Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza.

[https://twitter.com/jeremyscahill/status/2013879902152347768]

Trump officially announced on Saturday the architecture of the “Board of Peace”, which is expected to “fulfill” Trump’s 20-point plan for Gaza, days after US envoy Steve Witkoff launched “phase two” of the US-brokered plan to end Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

The White House detailed a three-tiered power structure, with a US-led “Board of Peace” composed of billionaires and figures close to Israel at the top.

Bulgarian diplomat Nickolay Mladenov, who has been named the “High Representative for the Board of Peace”, will oversee the transition of rule in Gaza to a Palestinian administration of technocrats. 

The White House also announced the formation of a “Gaza Executive Board”, which will work with the Office of the High Representative and the Palestinian technocratic administration named the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG).

While Washington frames this as a roadmap for “reconstruction and prosperity”, the exclusion of Palestinians from the top decision-making body suggests they will have little say in deciding the future governance structure. At the bottom of the hierarchy lies the only Palestinian component: NCAG.

On Sunday, Netanyahu objected to the board and said the formation of this executive committee “was not coordinated with Israel”.

National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir called for a return to “full war” and “voluntary migration” rather than handing Gaza to a board involving Turkey, and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich called for building settlements in Gaza and returning to the genocide.

Numerous world leaders have been invited to join the body, including Russia, Qatar, Turkey, Canada, France, UAE, Argentina, 

Despite the US-led nature of the plan, the inclusion of representatives from Turkey and Qatar has faced opposition from Israel.

Bloomberg News reported on Sunday that the Trump administration has asked countries to contribute at least $1bn to become permanent members. A non-permanent membership would remain free.

So far, the UAR, Morocco, Vietnam, Kazakhstan, Hungary, Argentina and Belarus have agreed to take part.

21 January 2026

Source: countercurrents.org

Israel’s demolition of UNRWA facilities undermines UN, imposes de facto annexation in East Jerusalem

By Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor

Palestinian Territory – The demolition by Israeli authorities of the facilities of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) in East Jerusalem constitutes a serious violation of Israel’s obligations as an occupying power. It reflects a deliberate policy to undermine the United Nations, reduce its presence and role in the city, and impose new on-the-ground and administrative realities that entrench Israeli control and further restrict the rights of Palestinian residents.

Earlier today, Israeli forces, accompanied by bulldozers, raided the UNRWA headquarters in Sheikh Jarrah, Jerusalem, and began demolishing structures inside the compound, in the presence and under the supervision of Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir.

In an explicit expression of political support for the destruction and undermining of a UN organisation, Itamar Ben-Gvir described the events as “a historic day, a day of celebration, and a day of great importance for governing Jerusalem for many years to come.” He added, “These supporters of terrorism were here, and today they are being expelled from here along with everything they built. This is what will happen to anyone who supports terrorism.”

The demolition and accompanying statements constitute a deliberate attempt to recast UNRWA from a UN agency protected by international immunity into an ‘enemy’ stripped of legitimacy through accusations of terrorism. This paves the way for normalising attacks against the agency and any independent international presence, while testing the limits of international deterrence and seeking to establish a precedent that UN immunity can be violated without consequence.

In Jerusalem, the act carries an explicit assertion of sovereignty aimed at entrenching de facto annexation by eliminating any UN presence that reminds the world of the city’s status as occupied territory and of the refugee issue and their rights. At the same time, phrases such as “historic day” and “this is what will happen to anyone who supports terrorism” serve as messages of intimidation to international and human rights organisations that might document violations or challenge this trajectory, while also mobilising domestic support to entrench hostility towards the United Nations, its agencies, and all international organisations under explicit political cover.

The demolition of the UNRWA headquarters is inseparable from the purpose it serves, representing an initial step to clear the site for a large-scale settlement project as part of a systematic policy to depopulate East Jerusalem of Palestinians and forcibly impose a new demographic reality. These practices fall within patterns of forcible transfer and demographic change prohibited under international humanitarian law, particularly in light of Israeli plans to construct 1,440 settlement units on the site of the UN facility, near the Giv’at HaMatos settlement.

Labelling UNRWA staff and facilities as terrorist entities constitutes hate speech intended to strip humanitarian work of its legitimacy and condition public opinion to justify further grave violations, as part of a broader campaign of incitement and deliberate criminalisation of international organisations operating in the occupied Palestinian territory, including Jerusalem.

The act forms part of a gradual and sustained escalation in recent days against UNRWA facilities in East Jerusalem. Days earlier, Israeli forces raided a UNRWA health centre and ordered its closure for 30 days. This sequence reflects a deliberate effort to constrict the work of a UN agency and eliminate its field presence, in direct defiance of the occupying power’s obligations under international law and the legal status of the United Nations and its agencies.

The escalation included the Knesset’s passage in October 2024 of two laws banning UNRWA operations and prohibiting official contact with it, as well as the Israeli government’s decision in December 2025 to cut off water and electricity to all its premises and declare its activities illegal.

This occurs at a time when UNRWA is largely unable to carry out its mandate in the occupied Palestinian territory due to new Israeli laws and measures, particularly those restricting humanitarian aid, education, healthcare, and other essential services that constitute a lifeline for millions of Palestinian refugees, half of whom are children. This systematic obstruction deprives them of their basic rights and undermines the conditions necessary for their survival, especially in the Gaza Strip, where millions of Palestinians, most of them refugees, face an imminent threat to their lives due to policies of starvation, denial of medical care, and obstruction of life-saving materials, alongside ongoing killing, injury, targeting, and severe suffering.

Israel’s insistence on legalising its successive measures against UNRWA over recent years amounts to a declaration of war on the refugee community, one of the most vulnerable groups in Palestinian society. This comes as Israel continues to prevent refugees from returning to their homes and lands from which they were forcibly displaced, while their living conditions have deteriorated dramatically across all aspects due to the ongoing Israeli genocide in the Gaza Strip for more than two years, and its military operations and comprehensive restrictions in the West Bank.

Israeli forces have killed multiple UNRWA staff and destroyed or bombarded hundreds of the agency’s facilities and schools in the Gaza Strip, exposing a grave failure of the global order, led by the United Nations, which has been unable to safeguard even its own agencies, sites, or resolutions.

Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor stresses that these measures constitute a flagrant violation of Israel’s obligations as an occupying power and reveal an integrated policy aimed at preventing UNRWA from fulfilling its mandate and forcibly pushing it out of the Palestinian territories, including East Jerusalem, as a prelude to reengineering the demographic and institutional reality of the occupied city.

The destruction of UNRWA’s headquarters in occupied East Jerusalem constitutes a clear violation of international law and the UN Charter. The application of Israeli law in this context also breaches Israel’s obligations as an occupying power, as affirmed by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in its most recent advisory opinion on the illegality of Israel’s presence in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem.

Euro-Med Monitor asserts that the demolition of UNRWA facilities, the raid on its headquarters, and the closure of its facilities in East Jerusalem directly contradict the ICJ advisory opinion issued on 22 October 2025. The Court confirmed that Israel, as an occupying power and UN member state, is obligated to cooperate in good faith with the United Nations, ensure full respect for its privileges, immunities, property, and staff, and facilitate the work of UN agencies, including UNRWA, rather than obstruct, prevent, or undermine it.

Accordingly, the demolition, closures, and political supervision imposed on UNRWA constitute direct obstruction of a UN mandate and an infringement of the protection of international property, in clear contradiction of the duty to facilitate operations in the occupied territory, including East Jerusalem.

Israeli actions directly violate the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, particularly Article 2, which affirms that the UN and its property enjoy complete immunity from legal process and that its premises are inviolable, with any search, seizure, confiscation, expropriation, or other coercive measure strictly prohibited.

The International Court of Justice clearly affirmed that any executive, administrative, or legislative measure targeting UN property and assets is legally prohibited, and that the application of Israeli law in East Jerusalem is unlawful, reiterating in October 2025 Israel’s obligation to facilitate UNRWA’s work and ensure its humanitarian access.

Euro-Med Monitor recalls statements by the UNRWA Commissioner-General that the agency has been subjected to months of organised Israeli harassment, including deliberate arson attacks in 2024, systematic media incitement, hostile legislation, a raid on the same headquarters around a month ago, and the lowering of the UN flag and raising the Israeli flag instead. These practices reflect a hostile environment aimed at forcibly breaching UN immunity.

The international community, particularly the United Nations, must take immediate institutional measures to protect its premises and staff in the occupied Palestinian territory. This includes adopting clear and binding security protocols, strengthening UN field monitoring at targeted sites, ensuring immediate official documentation of any attack or coercive interference with UN facilities, and urgently briefing relevant UN bodies to take practical steps to prevent recurrence and ensure respect for the inviolability of UN premises and immunities.

International silence legitimises the forcible violation of UN humanitarian work. Euro-Med Monitor calls for the activation of international accountability mechanisms rather than reliance on verbal condemnations, and for an end to the policy of impunity that enables Israel to continue its violations without deterrence.

Euro-Med Monitor urges the international community to compel Israel to fully implement the International Court of Justice advisory opinion issued on 22 October 2025, including reopening closed facilities, restoring water and electricity, halting the confiscation or demolition of UN property, ensuring the uninterrupted functioning of UNRWA, ending measures that obstruct supplies, staff movement, or access to facilities, and securing safe corridors for UN teams.

The targeting of UN facilities and staff must be addressed in the ongoing investigation by the International Criminal Court, with responsibility established at the political and military leadership levels and along the chain of command, and all those who ordered, facilitated, participated in, or failed to prevent these attacks prosecuted.

Israel must provide full reparations and remedies, including the reconstruction of destroyed UN facilities and effective, comprehensive compensation for affected staff, victims, and their families.

Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor is a Geneva-based independent organization with regional offices across the MENA region and Europe

21 January 2026

Source: countercurrents.org

The Monstrosity as a System: The War on Palestine and the Moment the World Lost Its Moral Gravity

By Laala Bechetoula

“Today more than ever, Arabs and Muslims must become aware of the terrible maneuvers and plots being hatched against them by lighting the fires of discord and sedition among the members of the Ummah, between Sunnis and Shiites, Arabs and Kurds, Arabs and Berbers, and Muslims and Christians. Proof of this is the turpitudes suffered by the central cause of the Arabs and Muslims, that of plundered Palestine. I highly recommend reading Amir Nour’s book because of the judicious choice of carefully documented writings by authoritative authors and studies, the sagacity of the analysis, and the clairvoyance of the foresight.” — Ahmed Taleb-Ibrahimi, former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Algeria (1982–1988)

There are endorsements that adorn a book, and there are endorsements that place it inside history. The words of Ahmed Taleb-Ibrahimi do not merely recommend “The Monstrosity of Our Century: The War on Palestine and the Last Western Man”; they situate it within a long tradition of intellectual vigilance against division, manipulation, and moral corrosion. They also state—without euphemism—what many governments, institutions, and editorial boards prefer to dilute: Palestine is not merely a political cause; it is a truth test.

Amir Nour’s new book does not approach Palestine as a “conflict,” a “cycle,” or a “file.” It approaches it as a historical rupture—the point at which the contemporary international system ceased to reconcile power with principle, law with alliance, and narrative with reality. One year after the full return of Trumpism to the center of global machtpolitik—might politics—this book no longer reads as a polemical incursion. Rather, it reads as a forensic document.

Indeed, the question is no longer whether Nour went too far in his analysis of contemporary geopolitics and their lasting implications. The real overarching question is whether reality itself has already gone further than his words.

Gaza Is Not the Event—It Is the Mirror

Right from its opening pages, Nour’s book dismantles the most comforting illusion of modern diplomacy: that Palestine in general, and Gaza in particular, represents an aberration in an otherwise functional international order. He writes—without rhetorical excess and with devastating precision: “What is unfolding in Gaza is not a tragic deviation from the international order; it is the moment when that order reveals its true hierarchy of lives.”

This sentence is not a metaphor. It is a diagnostic instrument. Gaza, in Nour’s analysis, is not the breakdown of the so-called “rules-based order;” it is the place where those rules finally stop pretending to be universal. The book’s title itself draws from the formulation of Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, who described Gaza as “the monstrosity of our century.” Nour adopts this phrase because it names a condition, not an emotion: a world capable of witnessing mass destruction in real time while simultaneously organizing its justification.

That is why Richard Forer, in the foreword, states unambiguously, “For logistical reasons, Israel could not act alone. It needed the blessing and the military assistance of the United States, Britain, and Germany.”

This is not an accusation from the margins. It is an observation grounded in arms transfers, sustained funding, diplomatic cover, and repeated vetoes. Gaza exposes not only violence but also complicity structured as policy.

Double Standards as an Operating System

One of the book’s most meticulously documented sections is devoted to what Nour identifies as the institutionalization of double standards. This is not moral indignation; it is comparative analysis. While Ukraine is framed as a sacred cause of sovereignty, legality, and civilian protection, Palestine is consistently stitched up as “complex,” “contextual,” and indefinitely postponed. Forer writes, “In its unrestrained codependency with Israel, hypocrisy plays a major role,” adding, “Confusion and dissembling occur when a nation acts contrary to its publicly stated values.”

These lines matter because they identify hypocrisy not as a lapse but as a governing logic and behavior. International law has not disappeared; it has become selective. And selectivity, Nour shows, is no longer a flaw—it is the design.

This diagnosis is reinforced by Chas W. Freeman Jr., former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense, who writes that Amir Nour “eloquently and unflinchingly shows how the course of events in Palestine has discredited the moral authority of the West and devalued international law, while changing the world order and isolating Israel, making its survival increasingly doubtful.”

When such words come from within the Western strategic establishment, they are not radical. They set alarm bells ringing.

When Justice Becomes a Target

Perhaps the most chilling section of the book concerns international justice. Nour does not romanticize the ICJ or the ICC; he treats them as fault lines where the system’s contradictions surface. Forer notes how Western officials responded to the ICJ’s finding of a “plausible genocide”: “Criticism is answered with ‘Israel’s right to defend itself,’ without explaining how killing children by the thousands makes Israel more secure.” And Nour’s conclusion leaves no ambiguity: “Even in the midst of a ‘textbook case of genocide,’ the West continues to shield and thus bolster the actions of Israel.”

This is not rhetoric. It is a description of procedural reality. When international justice approaches protected actors, it ceases to be celebrated as law and begins to be treated as a threat.

The book documents the intimidation of the ICC prosecutor and the explicit warning: “Target Israel, and we will target you.” What Nour analyzed as pressure has since hardened into policy through sanctions and institutional retaliation. The system does not merely ignore justice; it disciplines it. Hence, as the foreword states bluntly, “The West has abandoned its responsibility to the world order and made a mockery of its alleged respect for international law.”

Trumpism: The End of Moral Pretense

Nour’s treatment of Trumpism is among the book’s most intellectually disciplined sections. He does not reduce it to personality or spectacle. He treats it as a revelation. Trumpism did not invent brutality; it removed its embarrassment.

This logic runs from the recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, through the so-called “Deal of the Century,” to what Palestinian ambassador Husam Zomlot described as the vulgar liquidation of Palestinian sovereignty. Nour places these moments on a single trajectory: the replacement of law with transaction.

In the book’s conclusion, the line becomes unmistakable: “Up until its final days, the departing U.S. administration supported the Israeli slaughter with all means possible.” What follows is even starker: “This was another step toward establishing a ‘Greater Israel,’ paid for with rivers of blood.”

These are not metaphors. They are supported by figures, arms transfers, legislative initiatives, and official statements that Nour documents exhaustively. Trumpism, in this sense, is not an anomaly. It is the moment when power stops pretending to be moral. This reading is starkly reinforced by Donald Trump’s own words. In a recent interview[1], Trump openly dismissed the constraining role of international law, suggesting that only his personal judgment and morality ultimately limited American power. Whether intended as provocation or conviction, the statement crystallizes precisely the logic Nour dissects: power stripped of moral pretense, accountable only to itself.

That is why Hassan Janabi, former Iraqi minister and ambassador, writes, “Amir Nour has made his bold and insightful book a prominent document exposing the Zionist settlement project, for which Palestinians and Arabs have paid a heavy price. Yet, the signs of the project’s failure are becoming clear, just as its racist foundations and intentions have been revealed over the past seventy years, as exemplified in the ongoing genocidal war on Palestine.”

Criminalizing Compassion and Solidarity

One of the book’s most unsettling contributions lies in its analysis of repression without censorship. Nour shows how solidarity with Palestine is increasingly reclassified—from political position to ideological threat.

The mechanism is subtle: universities discipline, mainstream media reframe, and institutions warn. Empathy itself becomes suspicious.

As Ramzy Baroud writes in his endorsement, Nour’s work helps free historical understanding from the short-sighted frameworks that sustain binary “us versus them” narratives and restore a global, rather than ethnocentric, reading of history.

Palestine, Nour demonstrates, has become the litmus test of permissible compassion. The question is no longer whether freedom of expression exists, but for whom it is allowed to exist.

The End of Empathy and the “Last Western Man”

The book’s final chapter is titled “The End of Empathy, Genocide, and the Last Western Man.” This is not a flourish. It is the core thesis. Nour writes, “Gaza is almost completely destroyed, and its population is undergoing an unprecedented genocide.” He then adds, with devastating restraint, in the eyes of Donald Trump, “Collective punishment wasn’t severe enough. As if Palestinians could possibly be brutalized more than the ‘crime of crimes’ they’ve been subjected to for over a year.”

For Nour, the “Last Western Man” is not a people, a culture, or a race. It is a figure: the modern subject who sees everything, knows everything, and remains functionally unmoved. Not ignorant—anesthetized.

It is this dimension that my own endorsement sought to capture: “Neither to accuse the West nor to defend the East, Amir Nour’s book brings the human back to the center, revealing truth as what the powers that be can no longer conceal.”

A World That Is Leaving

Nour does not predict a new world order out of wishful thinking. He tracks it through behavior. The Global South is not revolting; it is withdrawing belief: BRICS expansion, alternative financial rails, and diplomatic hedging. These are not ideological gestures; they are responses to disillusionment. And Palestine accelerates this shift by exposing the gap between proclaimed universality and practiced selectivity, double standards, and variable geometry.

Why This Book Must Be Read—Now

The Monstrosity of Our Century is not comfortable. It does not offer solutions, slogans, or diplomatic exits. It offers something far more dangerous: clarity. This is not a book about Palestine alone. It is about what we have become by witnessing Gaza.

To read Amir Nour is not to agree with every line. It is to lose the luxury of not knowing.

And in a world governed by managed outrage, selective law, and anesthetized empathy, that loss no longer signals excess—it signals responsibility.

Laala Bechetoula is an Algerian journalist and writer, author of “The Book of Gaza Hashem: A Testament Written in Olive Wood and Ash”.

21  January 2026

Source: countercurrents.org

European Security Planning Should Include Friendly Relations with Russia

By Bharat Dogra

If a single policy change is to be identified which can resolve many problems and risks of Europe while also helping the cause of world peace, then this must preeminently be a strong recommendation for Europe to fundamentally reconsider its relations with Russia and to start moving towards seeking a future of friendship with Russia, in place of the existing policy of relentless and non-rational hostility which goes against basic geography and common sense.

While better, improved relationship of all of Europe with Russia would be beneficial for all, in particular the improved relationship of Germany, France and UK with Russia would be very welcome.

Such improved relationship can help immediately in ending the Ukraine-Russia war on a note of durable peace and goodwill (such as can still be salvaged) but the beneficial impacts of such improved relationship, which must extend ultimately to eastern Europe and all of Europe, will go beyond this and contribute to better development prospects of all concerned, eliminating huge dangers of bigger wars and advancing overall prospects of world peace.

This must be understood in the post-cold war framework. After the disintegration of communist Soviet Union, Russia was in the middle of extreme economic difficulties and tried to find a way out of very adverse situations. In such a condition Russia would have been extremely grateful for sincere efforts of European countries to help the troubled country. This would have established enormous goodwill and helped the Europeans to enter into longer-term energy and other agreements on favorable terms to them but also helpful for the recovery of Russia.

This was not to be and instead Europe gradually drifted towards increasingly hostile relationship with Russia, even as Russia found its own strengths to recover considerably from the traumatic situation following the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the resulting economic crisis.

The hostilities worsened in the course of the Ukraine war and are at their extreme level in this late stage of the war. As a result on several occasions risks and possibilities of a direct confrontation have arisen. Such a possibility in turn can have very destructive consequences as three of the involved countries—Russia, UK and France—have nuclear weapons.

Now that, relatively speaking in comparison to Biden’s times, President Trump also appears more inclined to favor an early end of war, there is everything to be gained by Europe cooperating in any efforts that can be actually effective in ending the war, instead of sticking to proposals which may look good on paper but given the realities of the situation cannot effectively help to end the war and bring peace.

Beyond this, however, Europe should very seriously consider changing its perceptions and policies towards Russia in more fundamental ways.

The wider objective of this policy shift should be to improve short-term as well as long-term peace prospects in the region, in particular to reduce the risks of a big and very destructive war involving nuclear weapon countries, as well as to improve prospects of peace, stability and development. It is only by improving peace prospects and reducing war possibility, that the prospects of sustainable development can improve and it is only in such peaceful conditions that the cooperation as well as the commitment for very important tasks of environment protection including an adequate and satisfactory climate response at the regional level can emerge.

Geography and resource distribution are also on the side of mutual cooperation of Europe with Russia that can be very beneficial to both sides.

One cannot plan for the best possible future options on the basis of real and imaginary past grievances or highly unrealistic fears for the future which are not based on evidence.

Europe has some of the highest levels of education and top level scholarship to support its policy making. Hence it has been surprising and shocking that several of its policy choices in recent times have not been based on hard evidence or even common sense and rationality. Much needed capacity to correct mistakes and take corrective actions has been missing. It is not clear what is behind the tendency to demonize Russia, its present leadership and almost all of its recent actions without making any effort at all to try to understand things also from the perspective of Russia, its leaders and people. The views and pleas of several highly reputed western scholars who have argued in well-reasoned, evidence-based ways for a better understanding of Russia have also been ignored.

Europe with its high levels of education and scholarship is supposed to be a world leader for peace, and it can make a significant contribution to this on its home front by seeking a future of friendship, not unending hostility, with Russia.

Bharat Dogra is Honorary Convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include Protecting Earth for Children, Planet in Peril and A Day in 2071.

24 January 2026

Source: countercurrents.org